Return NODE_NAME_NON_EXISTENT instead of ERROR. - #44
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: evshary <evshary@gmail.com>
Collaborator
|
I agree — see also ros2/rmw#182, ros2/rmw_opensplice#281 and ros2/rmw_fastrtps#311. |
Member
|
I would expect you to need separate branches for this. The |
Collaborator
|
Oops. Thanks for warning me, @dirk-thomas. Clearly I'm not quite used to tracking moving targets yet — which is quite strange for someone who once worked for a radar company. Methinks #45 should solve it. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There are some return value errors in CI test of rcl and rclaction, like this.
I think we should have the return value
RMW_RET_NODE_NAME_NON_EXISTENTif we can't get the node.Signed-off-by: evshary evshary@gmail.com