Adapt rate limits after disabling in-block staking rate limit#2720
Conversation
🛡️ AI Review — Skeptic (security review)VERDICT: SAFE Baseline scrutiny: evgeny-s has write permission, a long-lived account with substantial contribution history, no Gittensor allowlist hit found; branch Static review only. The PR changes a single pallet file, does not touch FindingsNo findings. ConclusionNo malicious behavior or security vulnerability found in this diff. The remaining change is narrow cleanup around rate-limit removal and does not introduce a new unchecked user-controlled path, panic source, or supply-chain risk. 🔍 AI Review — Auditor (domain review)VERDICT: 👍 Gittensor UNKNOWN; author has repo write permission, a long-lived GitHub account, and substantial prior subtensor activity, so review focused on correctness and duplicate-work risk. The Auditor proposed a replacement PR description, but the current body is non-trivial; not overwriting. Maintainers: ask the Auditor to regenerate if you want it. No actionable domain findings. Duplicate-work check: PR #2720 is the better candidate for this narrow rate-limit adaptation. Recommend closing #2719 because it carries the same functional Verification: FindingsNo findings. ConclusionThe implementation is a small, consistent follow-up to the removed staking operation limiter: it drops now-obsolete rate-limit calls while preserving subnet existence, subtoken, hotkey, balance, lock, slippage, and stake-availability checks. I do not see a correctness blocker in the changed code. |
|
🔄 AI review updated — Skeptic: SAFE Auditor: 👍 |
Description
Follow-up PR to adapt rate limits after merging:
Related Issue(s)
Type of Change
Breaking Change
If this PR introduces a breaking change, please provide a detailed description of the impact and the migration path for existing applications.
Checklist
./scripts/fix_rust.shto ensure my code is formatted and linted correctlyScreenshots (if applicable)
Please include any relevant screenshots or GIFs that demonstrate the changes made.
Additional Notes
Please provide any additional information or context that may be helpful for reviewers.