-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
sync: add closed method to broadcast::WeakSender
#7900
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
mladedav
wants to merge
1
commit into
tokio-rs:master
Choose a base branch
from
mladedav:dm/broadcast-weak-sender-closed
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was initially going to say this changes behavior of the existing function, but I guess it doesn't because if you can call this method then there is a sender, so the closed for receivers condition does not matter here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, the closed boolean was a bit overloaded - if there were no receivers, senders could observe that there are no receivers; if there were no senders, receivers could observe that there are no senders.
I'll just add that
has_receiversis now the same asrx_cnt != 0andhas_sendersis the same asnum_tx.load(Ordering::Relaxed) != 0. The first one can be safely deleted because they are both in a lockedTail. I'm not entirely sure about the other one sincenum_txis inSharedand not inTailso it's not behind the same lock as the boolean currently is. I'm just mentioning this if you'd want me to deletehas_receiversso that it cannot diverge and if I should look closer into deletinghas_sendersif it's safe.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you can delete the fields entirely, then that's great. But don't do it if it's too complex.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I've deleted just
has_receivers. I'm pretty sure that's safe. I'm not so sure about the other one so I'll leave it alone.