Skip to content

Editorial: fix error in String.prototype.endsWith note#3812

Merged
ljharb merged 1 commit intomainfrom
string-endsWith-note
Apr 9, 2026
Merged

Editorial: fix error in String.prototype.endsWith note#3812
ljharb merged 1 commit intomainfrom
string-endsWith-note

Conversation

@michaelficarra
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Apr 8, 2026

The rendered spec preview for this PR is available as a single page at https://tc39.es/ecma262/pr/3812 and as multiple pages at https://tc39.es/ecma262/pr/3812/multipage .

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@linusg linusg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this note is very useful, FWIW.

@michaelficarra
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@linusg I agree. Let's remove it in a separate PR.

@michaelficarra michaelficarra added the ready to merge Editors believe this PR needs no further reviews, and is ready to land. label Apr 9, 2026
@ljharb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

ljharb commented Apr 9, 2026

why fix it if it'll just be removed?

@michaelficarra
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@ljharb For historical reasons. If you look back at the thing that was removed (or want to revert the removal), it won't have an error in it.

@ljharb ljharb force-pushed the string-endsWith-note branch from 66862b5 to 477ed18 Compare April 9, 2026 21:10
@ljharb ljharb merged commit 477ed18 into main Apr 9, 2026
10 checks passed
@ljharb ljharb deleted the string-endsWith-note branch April 9, 2026 21:19
@michaelficarra
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Follow-up: #3831

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

editorial change ready to merge Editors believe this PR needs no further reviews, and is ready to land.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants