Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #118 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 99.63% 99.59% -0.04%
==========================================
Files 13 13
Lines 2191 2494 +303
==========================================
+ Hits 2183 2484 +301
- Misses 8 10 +2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds project documentation describing how mailcom was evaluated (qualitative + quantitative) and provides reproducible notebooks/scripts which generated the reported results.
Changes:
- Add an “Evaluation” section to the root README linking to the evaluation write-up and notebooks.
- Introduce
evaluation_strategy.mddescribing qualitative comparisons and quantitative benchmark methodology/results. - Add two new notebooks for quantitative evaluation and for testing/comparing other tools.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 13 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
README.md |
Adds a short entry point linking readers to evaluation docs and notebooks. |
evaluation_strategy.md |
Documents evaluation strategy, qualitative observations, quantitative setup, and summarized metrics. |
docs/source/notebooks/quantitative_eval.ipynb |
Notebook to generate quantitative evaluation datasets and compute metrics. |
docs/source/notebooks/test_other_tools.ipynb |
Notebook to run Presidio/Scrubadub comparisons and export results. |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
iulusoy
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for all your work on this, it looks great!
|



Document evaluation strategy and related results
mailcomfunctionalities and misaligned casesmailcomvs. other open-source pseudonymization toolsmailcomvs.Presidio)