initial attempt at 2 ToFs - #39
Open
PaulaScharf wants to merge 3 commits into
Open
Conversation
Member
Author
Member
Author
|
I tried to compare implementing the 2 ToFs solution both on the feather s3 and the sensebox s2. I did some speed tests with just the ToFs connected and nothing else. i got the following times: feather s3:
sensebox s2:
In general the s3 takes 42ms for a single inference while the s2 takes 64ms |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

I disconnected the already installed ToF from the sensor chain and connected it together with another ToF to a senseBox multiplexer-board.
I am not sure if its possible to know beforehand which ToF has which address on the multiplexer. I think it is independent of the connectors on the board.
Will investigate that a bit more, but otherwise we would need a hack for identifying which address is which ToF...
edit:
nvm, I guess I was confused. The address on the multiplexer does in fact depend on the connector