Layer JVM backend without cycles#26237
Draft
SolalPirelli wants to merge 29 commits into
Draft
Conversation
…ff out of OptimizerUtils because I forgot to do this earlier.
…into AnalysisUtils
Member
|
Benchmarks started. Workflow run. |
Member
|
Benchmarks completed. Overview. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Depends on #26236
Part of #25218
This should be the last PR before I can refactor the structure to enable parallelism.
This PR:
ClassBTypes" and "tracking INDY lambdas" into their own classesCodeGena littleHow much have you relied on LLM-based tools in this contribution?
Not at all
How was the solution tested?
Covered by existing tests (this is a refactoring)