docs: align licence claims with the LICENSE file - #1
Open
cristianxruvalcaba-coder wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
docs: align licence claims with the LICENSE file#1cristianxruvalcaba-coder wants to merge 1 commit into
cristianxruvalcaba-coder wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
The 2026-08-18 relicense to FSL-1.1-Apache updated LICENSE but not the README or package metadata, leaving these repos publicly advertising a licence they no longer carry. FSL 1.1 is source-available with a competing-use restriction that converts to Apache 2.0 two years after each release, so the wording states both halves rather than either alone. package.json uses "SEE LICENSE IN LICENSE" because FSL is not an SPDX identifier and npm warns on invalid expressions. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SXZExtYaFJjKwrBuE1YTXK
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The relicense to FSL-1.1-Apache on 2026-08-18 changed
LICENSEbut not the README or package metadata. This repo has since been publicly advertising a licence it does not carry.What changed: every README licence claim now matches the
LICENSEfile, stated asFSL-1.1-Apache (converts to Apache 2.0 after two years)so neither half is misleading on its own. Where apackage.jsondeclaredApache-2.0, it now declaresSEE LICENSE IN LICENSE, because FSL is not an SPDX identifier and npm warns on invalid expressions.No licence is being changed here. This only makes the documentation agree with the grant that is already in force.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01SXZExtYaFJjKwrBuE1YTXK