-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.9k
Clean up AttributeLintKind and refactor diagnostic attribute linting
#155215
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e9d0e32
Merge malformed diagnostic attribute lint
mejrs 57fd974
Merge "missing options" lints for diagnostic attributes
mejrs 217c073
move list parsing into its own function
mejrs 0dd591a
Delete unused `AttributeLintKind` variant
mejrs f468cef
Format the duplicate macro
mejrs 75273e2
Warn instead of error for some ructs_on_unimplemented errors
mejrs 72db94f
Pass allowed options as parameter to diagnostic lints
mejrs d6bccac
Fix error code example
mejrs File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't really like
matches!here because if we ever add another rustc diagnostic attribute, we could forget to check it. How about a methodmode.should_error(), that has an exhaustive match in it?View changes since the review
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It doesn't actually matter, assuming we don't ship a std that compiles with warnings?
So far my decisions on whether rustc_on_unimplemented errors or issues a diagnostic namespace lint have been largely focused on keeping the implementation simple:
In fact, maybe this should just be a warning regardless?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That mentality also sounds reasonable to me, lets make this a warning to keep the implementation simple
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I remember why it is this way, I applied the suggestion and then I got annoyed because
is not quite right.
The last commit fixes that by letting you customize the "allowed options" list per attribute. Note that I'm inclined to have an attribute with only "note" allowed, (#155200 (comment)) so we will need some kind of customization (or more lint variants) anyway.
Let me know what you think about the last few commits, idm backing it out if you prefer.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems reasonable, especially since we need this in the future :)