Clippy backport#114938
Merged
Merged
Conversation
[`useless_conversion`]: only lint on paths to fn items and fix FP in macro Fixes rust-lang#11065 (which is actually two issues: an ICE and a false positive) It now makes sure that the function call path points to a function-like item (and not e.g. a `const` like in the linked issue), so that calling `TyCtxt::fn_sig` later in the lint does not ICE (fixes rust-lang/rust-clippy#11065 (comment)). It *also* makes sure that the expression is not part of a macro call (fixes rust-lang/rust-clippy#11065 (comment)). ~~I'm not sure if there's a better way to check this other than to walk the parent expr chain and see if any of them are expansions.~~ (edit: it doesn't do this anymore) changelog: [`useless_conversion`]: fix ICE when call receiver is a non-fn item changelog: [`useless_conversion`]: don't lint if argument is a macro argument (fixes a FP) r? `@llogiq` (reviewed rust-lang#10814, which introduced these issues)
…_block, r=Centri3 Correctly handle async blocks for NEEDLESS_PASS_BY_REF_MUT Fixes rust-lang/rust-clippy#11299. The problem was that the `async block`s are popping a closure which we didn't go into, making it miss the mutable access to the variables. cc `@Centri3` changelog: none
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Collaborator
|
Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy cc @rust-lang/clippy |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2023
…k-Simulacrum [beta] Clippy backports for ICE fixes This backports PRs to beta, that fix ICEs, some lint grouping and FP fixes. Namely: - rust-lang/rust-clippy#11191 - rust-lang/rust-clippy#11172 - rust-lang/rust-clippy#11130 - rust-lang/rust-clippy#11106 - rust-lang/rust-clippy#11104 - rust-lang/rust-clippy#11077 - rust-lang/rust-clippy#11070 (This PR is not synced to the Rust repo yet, but I will open a separate PR to get it into `master`, before beta is branched: rust-lang#114938) - rust-lang/rust-clippy#11069 Kind of a big backport, but most of it is tests. r? `@Mark-Simulacrum` cc `@Manishearth`
Member
|
@bors r+ p=1 |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Collaborator
|
Finished benchmarking commit (fe3eae3): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 633.445s -> 633.189s (-0.04%) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
r? @Manishearth
This is the accompanying PR to #114937. This needs to be merged before tomorrow, so that it gets into master, before beta is branched.
The second commit is pretty much an out-of cycle sync, so that we don't get backport-debt for next release cycle right away.
cc @Mark-Simulacrum also mentioning you here, to make sure this is included in the beta branching.