[michal-niedzwiedzki]

Initial checklist

• I read the support docs
• I read the contributing guide
• I agree to follow the code of conduct
• I searched issues and discussions and couldn’t find anything or linked relevant results below
• I made sure the docs are up to date
• I included tests (or that’s not needed)

Description of changes

Adds remark-lint-visimark to the list of plugins in doc/plugins.md. It is a unified plugin with a default export, the remark-plugin keyword in package.json, and the remark-plugin topic on its repo. (The npm package is remark-lint-visimark; it lives in the packages/remark-visimark folder of the monorepo.)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (1146b3a) to head (4acbf22).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #1504   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            6         6           
  Lines          138       138           
=========================================
  Hits           138       138           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[remcohaszing]

This points to a 404 page. Is the project private?

[michal-niedzwiedzki]

Thanks for catching this. The link was wrong: I'd used tree/main/..., but the default branch is master, so it 404'd. The repo is public. The entry now links to https://github.com/michal-niedzwiedzki/visimark/tree/master/packages/remark-visimark, which resolves. (The folder is remark-visimark; the npm package is remark-lint-visimark.)

I've also updated the PR description to follow the template. Could you take another look?