Skip to content

CI: strengthen downstream tensor checks - #94

Closed
Krastanov-agent wants to merge 2 commits into
qojulia:mainfrom
Krastanov-agent:codex/downstream-regression-ci
Closed

CI: strengthen downstream tensor checks#94
Krastanov-agent wants to merge 2 commits into
qojulia:mainfrom
Krastanov-agent:codex/downstream-regression-ci

Conversation

@Krastanov-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • add Gabs and SecondQuantizedAlgebra to active reverse-dependency testing
  • test downstream packages from a temporary outer environment that develops both checkouts
  • add a filtered ecosystem smoke test for shared tensor bindings, unsupported zero arity, and tensor ambiguities

This is a CI-only follow-up to the QuantumInterface 0.4.4 downstream migration and should land after the downstream releases.

Validation

  • Julia syntax parsing for both workflow helper scripts
  • git diff --check

Changelog

Skip-Changelog

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 34.22%. Comparing base (4d9df4e) to head (c1cee8e).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #94      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   34.00%   34.22%   +0.22%     
==========================================
  Files          15       15              
  Lines         450      450              
==========================================
+ Hits          153      154       +1     
+ Misses        297      296       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Krastanov-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Maintainer note: this is a CI-only PR and should carry the Skip-Changelog label. The contributor token cannot add labels. The current changelog check failure is therefore expected until a maintainer applies it.

@Krastanov Krastanov closed this Sep 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants