feat: mapping documents by eddie-knight · Pull Request #527 · ossf/security-baseline

eddie-knight · 2026-07-07T14:07:12Z

This splits out the in-line mappings to standalone documents correspondings to Gemara v1.2.0+

This will be propagated to the website upon the next release.

Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <knight@linux.com>

…ence IDs with catalog usage Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <knight@linux.com>

Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <knight@linux.com>

…framework crosswalks Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <knight@linux.com>

…ingDocument artifacts Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <knight@linux.com>

…d from mapping documents Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <knight@linux.com>

…orkflow Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <knight@linux.com>

Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <knight@linux.com>

…OpenCRE crosswalks All nine ids were inherited from the original inline data and verified against the authoritative frameworks: - CSF 2.0: PR.A-02/PR.A-05 -> PR.AA-02/PR.AA-05 (no PR.A category exists; Identity Management, Authentication, and Access Control is PR.AA), and ID.AM.01 -> ID.AM-01 (subcategory ordinals are hyphen-delimited). - SSDF v1.1: P0.3.1/P0.4.2 -> PO.3.1/PO.4.2 (digit zero for letter O), and 'RV 2.2' -> RV.2.2 (malformed separator). - OpenCRE: 483-813 -> 486-813, 357-352 -> 347-352, 263-284 -> 263-184 (transposition typos; originals return 404 from the OpenCRE API, corrected ids resolve and match usage elsewhere in the document). Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <knight@linux.com>

… in 800-161, Scorecard, SAMM, and SLSA crosswalks All defects were inherited from the original inline data: - 800-161: drop targets 1.2e and 1.2f from M-OSPS-AC-01; they are EU CRA Annex I identifiers, not SP 800-161 controls (the CRA crosswalk already carries them for OSPS-AC-01). - Scorecard: reassign Binary-Artifacts from OSPS-QA-04 (multi-repo security requirements) to OSPS-QA-05, which owns the 'no binary artifacts in the repository' requirement. - SAMM 2.0: repair entry ids that skipped or mis-split hierarchy levels (Requirements-driven Testing under Verification; Software Dependencies under Secure Build; Create and Promote under Strategy & Metrics) and normalize spacing so each SAMM stream is identified by exactly one string. - SLSA 1.0: use one canonical spelling for the Isolated isolation requirement (previously five variants), split the malformed 'Provenance generation- Exists, Authentic' into its two real sub-requirements, fix 'Distribute provenance - Exists' (no such sub-level exists on the producer requirement), and align the 'Choose an appropriate build platform' spelling across mappings. All 14 documents still pass cue vet against #OSPSMapping and the repo validate command. Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <knight@linux.com>

evankanderson

I went through NIST-800-161 by hand, but then realized that I was gonna screw things up, so I wrote a pair of yq scripts:

Generate `control>>spec::section` mappings on repo head:

yq '.controls[] | {"id": .id} * .guidelines[] | {"id": .id, "ref": .reference-id} * .entries[] | .id + ">>" + .ref + "::" + .reference-id' baseline/OSPS-*.yaml | sort > tmp-original-maps

Generate `control>>spec::section` mappings on Eddie's branch:

yq '{"ref": .target-reference.reference-id} * .mappings[] | {"id": .source, "ref": .ref} * .targets[] | .id + ">>" + .ref + "::" + .entry-id' baseline/mappings/*.yaml | sort  > tmp-new-maps

Diff the two:

diff -u tmp-original-maps tmp-new-maps

Results:

-OSPS-AC-01>>800-161::1.2e
-OSPS-AC-01>>800-161::1.2f
 OSPS-AC-01>>800-161::AC-17
 OSPS-AC-01>>800-161::AC-4(21)
 OSPS-AC-01>>800-161::CM-5
@@ -1076,8 +991,8 @@
 OSPS-AC-01>>CRA::1.2d
 OSPS-AC-01>>CRA::1.2e
 OSPS-AC-01>>CRA::1.2f
-OSPS-AC-01>>CSF::PR.A-02
-OSPS-AC-01>>CSF::PR.A-05
+OSPS-AC-01>>CSF::PR.AA-02
+OSPS-AC-01>>CSF::PR.AA-05
 OSPS-AC-01>>OpenCRE::124-564
 OSPS-AC-01>>OpenCRE::152-725
 OSPS-AC-01>>OpenCRE::201-246
@@ -1133,8 +1048,8 @@
 OSPS-AC-03>>BSI-TR-03185-2::GV.02
 OSPS-AC-03>>BSI-TR-03185-2::QA.06
 OSPS-AC-03>>CRA::1.2f
-OSPS-AC-03>>CSF::PR.A-02
-OSPS-AC-03>>CSF::PR.A-05
+OSPS-AC-03>>CSF::PR.AA-02
+OSPS-AC-03>>CSF::PR.AA-05
 OSPS-AC-03>>OpenCRE::124-564
 OSPS-AC-03>>OpenCRE::152-725
 OSPS-AC-03>>OpenCRE::486-813
@@ -1164,7 +1079,7 @@
 OSPS-AC-04>>CSF::PR.AA-05
 OSPS-AC-04>>OpenCRE::123-124
 OSPS-AC-04>>OpenCRE::124-564
-OSPS-AC-04>>OpenCRE::263-284
+OSPS-AC-04>>OpenCRE::263-184
 OSPS-AC-04>>OpenCRE::347-507
 OSPS-AC-04>>OpenCRE::486-813
 OSPS-AC-04>>PCIDSS::2.2.1
@@ -1172,7 +1087,7 @@
 OSPS-AC-04>>PSSCRM::P3.2
 OSPS-AC-04>>SAMM::Operations -Environment Management -Configuration Hardening Lvl1
 OSPS-AC-04>>SLSA::Build platform - Isolation strength - Isolated
-OSPS-AC-04>>SLSA::Producer - Choose an appropriate build platform
+OSPS-AC-04>>SLSA::Choose an appropriate build platform
 OSPS-AC-04>>SSDF::PO.2
 OSPS-AC-04>>SSDF::PO.3.2
 OSPS-AC-04>>SSDF::PS.1
@@ -1189,7 +1104,7 @@
 OSPS-BR-01>>CRA::1.2f
 OSPS-BR-01>>CSF::PR.AA-02
 OSPS-BR-01>>OpenCRE::124-564
-OSPS-BR-01>>OpenCRE::357-352
+OSPS-BR-01>>OpenCRE::347-352
 OSPS-BR-01>>OpenCRE::486-813
 OSPS-BR-01>>PCIDSS::2.2.1
 OSPS-BR-01>>PCIDSS::6.4.1
@@ -1223,8 +1138,9 @@
 OSPS-BR-02>>PSSCRM::E2.1
 OSPS-BR-02>>PSSCRM::E2.6
 OSPS-BR-02>>PSSCRM::G1.4
+OSPS-BR-02>>SLSA::Build platform - Provenance generation - Authentic
+OSPS-BR-02>>SLSA::Build platform - Provenance generation - Exists
 OSPS-BR-02>>SLSA::Follow a consistent build process
-OSPS-BR-02>>SLSA::Provenance generation- Exists, Authentic
 OSPS-BR-02>>SSDF::PO.3.2
 OSPS-BR-02>>SSDF::PS.1
 OSPS-BR-02>>SSDF::PS.2
@@ -1244,7 +1160,7 @@
 OSPS-BR-03>>CRA::1.2k
 OSPS-BR-03>>OpenCRE::124-564
 OSPS-BR-03>>OpenCRE::263-184
-OSPS-BR-03>>OpenCRE::483-813
+OSPS-BR-03>>OpenCRE::486-813
 OSPS-BR-03>>PCIDSS::2.2.1
 OSPS-BR-03>>PCIDSS::2.2.7
 OSPS-BR-03>>PCIDSS::4.2.1
@@ -1287,7 +1203,7 @@
 OSPS-BR-04>>OpenCRE::208-355
 OSPS-BR-04>>OpenCRE::263-184
 OSPS-BR-04>>OpenCRE::347-352
-OSPS-BR-04>>OpenCRE::483-813
+OSPS-BR-04>>OpenCRE::486-813
 OSPS-BR-04>>OpenCRE::732-148
 OSPS-BR-04>>OpenCRE::745-356
 OSPS-BR-04>>OpenCRE::757-271
@@ -1302,7 +1218,7 @@
 OSPS-BR-04>>PSSCRM::E3.1
 OSPS-BR-04>>PSSCRM::E3.6
 OSPS-BR-04>>PSSCRM::G1.4
-OSPS-BR-04>>SLSA::Build platform - Isolation strength - isolated
+OSPS-BR-04>>SLSA::Build platform - Isolation strength - Isolated
 OSPS-BR-04>>SLSA::Choose an appropriate build platform
 OSPS-BR-04>>SLSA::Follow a consistent build process
 OSPS-BR-04>>SSDF::PS.1
@@ -1340,7 +1256,7 @@
 OSPS-BR-05>>PSSCRM::P3.1
 OSPS-BR-05>>PSSCRM::P3.5
 OSPS-BR-05>>SAMM::Implementation -Secure Build -Build Process Lvl2
-OSPS-BR-05>>SLSA::Isolation strength - isolated
+OSPS-BR-05>>SLSA::Build platform - Isolation strength - Isolated
 OSPS-BR-05>>SSDF::PO.3.2
 OSPS-BR-05>>SSDF::PS.1
 OSPS-BR-05>>SSDF::PS.2
@@ -1366,7 +1282,7 @@
 OSPS-BR-06>>PSSCRM::P3.2
 OSPS-BR-06>>PSSCRM::P3.3
 OSPS-BR-06>>SAMM::Implementation -Secure Deployment -Deployment Process Lvl3
-OSPS-BR-06>>SLSA::Distribute provenance - Exists
+OSPS-BR-06>>SLSA::Distribute provenance
 OSPS-BR-06>>SSDF::PO.5.2
 OSPS-BR-06>>SSDF::PS.2
 OSPS-BR-06>>SSDF::PS.2.1
@@ -1375,9 +1291,9 @@
 OSPS-BR-06>>UKSSCOP::Claim 1.2.2
 OSPS-BR-06>>UKSSCOP::Claim 3.1.1
 OSPS-BR-07>>BPB::S-B-5
-OSPS-BR-07>>SSDF::P0.3.1
-OSPS-BR-07>>SSDF::P0.4.2
 OSPS-BR-07>>SSDF::PO.1.1
+OSPS-BR-07>>SSDF::PO.3.1
+OSPS-BR-07>>SSDF::PO.4.2
 OSPS-BR-07>>SSDF::PO.5.1
 OSPS-BR-07>>SSDF::PW.1.2
 OSPS-BR-07>>SSDF::PW.1.3
@@ -1571,7 +1487,6 @@
 OSPS-DO-06>>UKSSCOP::3.3
 OSPS-DO-06>>UKSSCOP::Claim 1.2.1
 OSPS-DO-06>>UKSSCOP::Claim 1.2.2
-OSPS-DO-07>>::
 OSPS-GV-01>>800-161::AC-2
 OSPS-GV-01>>800-161::AC-3
 OSPS-GV-01>>800-161::IA-2
@@ -1724,7 +1639,7 @@
 OSPS-QA-01>>PSSCRM::E2.2
 OSPS-QA-01>>PSSCRM::P3.5
 OSPS-QA-01>>SAMM::Implementation -Secure Build -Build Process Lvl1
-OSPS-QA-01>>SLSA::Build platform - isolation strength - Isolated
+OSPS-QA-01>>SLSA::Build platform - Isolation strength - Isolated
 OSPS-QA-01>>SSDF::PS.1
 OSPS-QA-01>>SSDF::PS.2
 OSPS-QA-01>>SSDF::PS.3
@@ -1747,8 +1662,8 @@
 OSPS-QA-02>>CRA::2.1
 OSPS-QA-02>>CRA::2.2
 OSPS-QA-02>>CRA::2.3
+OSPS-QA-02>>CSF::ID.AM-01
 OSPS-QA-02>>CSF::ID.AM-02
-OSPS-QA-02>>CSF::ID.AM.01
 OSPS-QA-02>>ISO-18974::4.1.5
 OSPS-QA-02>>ISO-18974::4.3.1
 OSPS-QA-02>>OpenCRE::124-564
@@ -1802,9 +1717,9 @@
 OSPS-QA-03>>PSSCRM::P4.2
 OSPS-QA-03>>SAMM::Implementation -Secure Build -Build Process Lvl3
 OSPS-QA-03>>SAMM::Implementation -Secure Build -Software Dependencies Lvl3
-OSPS-QA-03>>SAMM::Verification -Requirements Testing -Control Verification Lvl1
-OSPS-QA-03>>SAMM::Verification -Requirements Testing -Control Verification Lvl2
-OSPS-QA-03>>SAMM::Verification -Requirements Testing -Control Verification Lvl3
+OSPS-QA-03>>SAMM::Verification -Requirements-driven Testing -Control Verification Lvl1
+OSPS-QA-03>>SAMM::Verification -Requirements-driven Testing -Control Verification Lvl2
+OSPS-QA-03>>SAMM::Verification -Requirements-driven Testing -Control Verification Lvl3
 OSPS-QA-03>>SSDF::PO.4.1
 OSPS-QA-03>>SSDF::PS.1
 OSPS-QA-03>>SSDF::PS.2
@@ -1820,13 +1735,12 @@
 OSPS-QA-04>>PCIDSS::6.4.2
 OSPS-QA-04>>PSSCRM::G2.2
 OSPS-QA-04>>PSSCRM::G5.4
-OSPS-QA-04>>SLSA::Build platform - isolation strength - Isolated
+OSPS-QA-04>>SLSA::Build platform - Isolation strength - Isolated
 OSPS-QA-04>>SSDF::PO.3.2
 OSPS-QA-04>>SSDF::PO.4.1
 OSPS-QA-04>>SSDF::PS.1
 OSPS-QA-04>>SSDF::PS.2
 OSPS-QA-04>>SSDF::RV.1.2
-OSPS-QA-04>>Scorecard::Binary-Artifacts
 OSPS-QA-05>>800-161::PL-8
 OSPS-QA-05>>800-161::SA-15
 OSPS-QA-05>>800-161::SR-3
@@ -1837,6 +1751,7 @@
 OSPS-QA-05>>PCIDSS::6.4.3
 OSPS-QA-05>>SSDF::PS.1
 OSPS-QA-05>>SSDF::PS.2
+OSPS-QA-05>>Scorecard::Binary-Artifacts
 OSPS-QA-06>>800-161::SA-11
 OSPS-QA-06>>800-161::SA-15
 OSPS-QA-06>>800-161::SR-3
@@ -1862,10 +1777,10 @@
 OSPS-QA-06>>PSSCRM::P4.2
 OSPS-QA-06>>PSSCRM::P4.3
 OSPS-QA-06>>PSSCRM::P4.4
+OSPS-QA-06>>SAMM::Verification -Requirements-driven Testing -Control Verification Lvl1
+OSPS-QA-06>>SAMM::Verification -Requirements-driven Testing -Control Verification Lvl2
+OSPS-QA-06>>SAMM::Verification -Requirements-driven Testing -Control Verification Lvl3
 OSPS-QA-06>>SAMM::Verification -Security Testing -Scalable Baseline Lvl3
-OSPS-QA-06>>SAMM::Verification-Requirements -Testing -Control Verification Lvl1
-OSPS-QA-06>>SAMM::Verification-Requirements -Testing -Control Verification Lvl2
-OSPS-QA-06>>SAMM::Verification-Requirements -Testing -Control Verification Lvl3
 OSPS-QA-06>>SSDF::PW.8.2
 OSPS-QA-06>>Scorecard::CI-Tests
 OSPS-QA-07>>800-161::AC-5
@@ -1990,7 +1905,7 @@
 OSPS-SA-03>>PSSCRM::P2.1
 OSPS-SA-03>>SAMM::Design -Threat Assessment -Application Risk Profile Lvl1
 OSPS-SA-03>>SAMM::Design -Threat Assessment -Threat Modeling Lvl1
-OSPS-SA-03>>SAMM::Governance -Create and Promote Lvl1
+OSPS-SA-03>>SAMM::Governance -Strategy & Metrics -Create and Promote Lvl1
 OSPS-SA-03>>SAMM::Verification -Architecture Assessment -Architecture Mitigation Lvl2
 OSPS-SA-03>>SSDF::PO.5.1
 OSPS-SA-03>>SSDF::PW.1.1
@@ -2038,8 +1953,8 @@
 OSPS-VM-01>>PSSCRM::D1.2
 OSPS-VM-01>>PSSCRM::D1.3
 OSPS-VM-01>>PSSCRM::D1.5
-OSPS-VM-01>>SAMM::Governance -Create and Promote Lvl2
 OSPS-VM-01>>SAMM::Governance -Policy & Compliance -Policy & Standards Lvl1
+OSPS-VM-01>>SAMM::Governance -Strategy & Metrics -Create and Promote Lvl2
 OSPS-VM-01>>SAMM::Implementation -Defect Management -Defect Tracking Lvl1
 OSPS-VM-01>>SAMM::Implementation -Defect Management -Defect Tracking Lvl2
 OSPS-VM-01>>SAMM::Implementation -Defect Management -Defect Tracking Lvl3
@@ -2069,7 +1984,7 @@
 OSPS-VM-02>>PCIDSS::12.1.1
 OSPS-VM-02>>PCIDSS::12.10.2
 OSPS-VM-02>>PCIDSS::6.3.3
-OSPS-VM-02>>SAMM::Governance -Policy&Compliance -Policy&Standards Lvl2
+OSPS-VM-02>>SAMM::Governance -Policy & Compliance -Policy & Standards Lvl2
 OSPS-VM-02>>SSDF::RV.1.3
 OSPS-VM-02>>Scorecard::Security-Policy
 OSPS-VM-02>>UKSSCOP::3.2
@@ -2162,8 +2077,8 @@
 OSPS-VM-05>>PSSCRM::P4.3
 OSPS-VM-05>>PSSCRM::P4.4
 OSPS-VM-05>>PSSCRM::P4.5
-OSPS-VM-05>>SAMM::Implementation -Secure Build-Build Process Lvl3
-OSPS-VM-05>>SAMM::Implementation -Software Dependencies Lvl3
+OSPS-VM-05>>SAMM::Implementation -Secure Build -Build Process Lvl3
+OSPS-VM-05>>SAMM::Implementation -Secure Build -Software Dependencies Lvl3
 OSPS-VM-05>>SAMM::Verification -Security Testing -Scalable Baseline Lvl1
 OSPS-VM-05>>SAMM::Verification -Security Testing -Scalable Baseline Lvl3
 OSPS-VM-05>>SSDF::PO.4
@@ -2229,17 +2144,17 @@
 OSPS-VM-06>>PSSCRM::P4.3
 OSPS-VM-06>>PSSCRM::P4.4
 OSPS-VM-06>>PSSCRM::P4.5
-OSPS-VM-06>>SAMM::Implementation -Secure Build-Build Process Lvl3
-OSPS-VM-06>>SAMM::Implementation -Software Dependencies Lvl3
+OSPS-VM-06>>SAMM::Implementation -Secure Build -Build Process Lvl3
+OSPS-VM-06>>SAMM::Implementation -Secure Build -Software Dependencies Lvl3
 OSPS-VM-06>>SAMM::Verification -Security Testing -Scalable Baseline Lvl1
 OSPS-VM-06>>SAMM::Verification -Security Testing -Scalable Baseline Lvl3
 OSPS-VM-06>>SSDF::PO.4
 OSPS-VM-06>>SSDF::PW.1.2
 OSPS-VM-06>>SSDF::PW.8.1
-OSPS-VM-06>>SSDF::RV 2.2
 OSPS-VM-06>>SSDF::RV.1.2
 OSPS-VM-06>>SSDF::RV.1.3
 OSPS-VM-06>>SSDF::RV.2.1
+OSPS-VM-06>>SSDF::RV.2.2

Summary:

Removed two 800-161 refs that look like a different format
Renamed CSF PR.A-* to PR.AA-*, ID.AM.01 to ID.AM-01
OpenCRE 263-284 -> 263-184 and 357-352 -> 347-352, 483-813 -> 486-813
Renamed a bunch of SLSA and SAMM references
Renamed SSDF P0.* to PO.* and RV 2.2 to RV.2.2
Removed an empty mapping for DO-07?
Moved Scorecard's Binary-Artifacts check from QA-04 to QA-05

At least a few of these appear to be correct, but I haven't done the legwork to actually check either way.

We're also (consistently) doing something weird with hyphens where we spell things as " -" (space before but not after hyphen).

evankanderson · 2026-07-10T18:16:10Z

+      - entry-id: CM-5
+      - entry-id: CM-6
+      - entry-id: IA-2
+      - entry-id: IA-5


OSPS-AC also included references to 1.2e and 1.2f, which aren't here.

The SAMM crosswalk inherited an inconsistent " -" (space before, no space after) separator between business-function / practice / stream levels in its entry-ids. These are OSPS-authored concatenations, not verbatim external identifiers, and the SLSA crosswalk already uses the " - " convention throughout. Normalize all 44 SAMM targets to " - " so the mappings corpus uses a single separator style. Intra-word hyphens (Requirements-driven) are untouched. cue vet against #OSPSMapping still passes and the compiled render is unchanged apart from the separator spacing. Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <knight@linux.com>

evankanderson · 2026-08-04T00:39:15Z

Summary:

Removed two 800-161 refs that look like a different format

Renamed CSF PR.A-* to PR.AA-*, ID.AM.01 to ID.AM-01

OpenCRE 263-284 -> 263-184 and 357-352 -> 347-352, 483-813 -> 486-813

Renamed a bunch of SLSA and SAMM references

Renamed SSDF P0.* to PO.* and RV 2.2 to RV.2.2

Removed an empty mapping for DO-07?

Moved Scorecard's Binary-Artifacts check from QA-04 to QA-05

Checking that these renames and moves (particularly the OpenCRE and Scorecard changes) are intentional, then I'm happy to approve.

eddie-knight added 10 commits July 7, 2026 09:08

chore(schema): bump Gemara dependency to v1.2.0

380563a

Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <knight@linux.com>

chore(baseline): bump gemara-version to 1.2.0 and align mapping-refer…

c3d396d

…ence IDs with catalog usage Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <knight@linux.com>

feat(schema): add #OSPSMapping definition for OSPS mapping documents

2e14237

Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <knight@linux.com>

feat(baseline): add Gemara MappingDocument artifacts for 14 external …

b301724

…framework crosswalks Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <knight@linux.com>

refactor(cmd): load and render external framework relations from Mapp…

0685341

…ingDocument artifacts Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <knight@linux.com>

refactor(baseline): remove inline guidelines from controls now source…

1852f73

…d from mapping documents Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <knight@linux.com>

ci: validate mapping documents against #OSPSMapping in cue-validate w…

fbc4ec5

…orkflow Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <knight@linux.com>

ci: set author to openssf

53ade4e

Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <knight@linux.com>

eddie-knight force-pushed the feat/mapping-documents branch from a26eb21 to a258c05 Compare July 7, 2026 14:11

evankanderson mentioned this pull request Jul 7, 2026

[feedback] Improve maintainer experience in achieving OSPS and Best Practices Badging #256

Open

evankanderson reviewed Jul 10, 2026

View reviewed changes

funnelfiasco previously approved these changes Jul 17, 2026

View reviewed changes

eddie-knight dismissed funnelfiasco’s stale review via c8d3d6c July 18, 2026 14:54

funnelfiasco approved these changes Aug 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

Navigation Menu

Uh oh!

feat: mapping documents - #527

feat: mapping documents#527
eddie-knight wants to merge 11 commits into
ossf:mainfrom
eddie-knight:feat/mapping-documents

eddie-knight commented Jul 7, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

evankanderson left a comment

Uh oh!

evankanderson Jul 10, 2026

Uh oh!

evankanderson commented Aug 4, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

eddie-knight commented Jul 7, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

evankanderson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Generate control>>spec::section mappings on repo head:

Generate control>>spec::section mappings on Eddie's branch:

Uh oh!

evankanderson Jul 10, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

evankanderson commented Aug 4, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

eddie-knight commented Jul 7, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Generate `control>>spec::section` mappings on repo head:

Generate `control>>spec::section` mappings on Eddie's branch: