-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.3k
8377727: Ghost caret and focus appear in non‑editable text fields #30758
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it be enough to change the alpha component of the caret only?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That might be simpler.
It occurred that the code above could cause an IAE since the Color constructor requires values to be in range.
If the caret is white and the bg is say rgb(2, 2,2) then you'll pass 256 and get an exception.
It needs to be clamped.
There are also methods on java.awt.Color
Color.darker()
and
Color.brighter()
which could be used, but you'd first need to examine the caret color and probably the background too, to know which one is appropriate.
ie for a light bg with a dark caret, you'll want to use brighter() to reduce the contrast.
And vice versa.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, i will not. The white is rgb(255, 255, 255) and bg is rgb(2, 2, 2) then i will pass rgb ((2 + 255) / 2, (2 + 255) / 2, (2 + 255) /2) which is rgb(128, 128, 128) which is gray - perfectly fits the purpose of the fix.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure it will work good on all color combinations so i did both added alpha value of 50% and brought color half way to the background.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're right. I mis-read the parens.