-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 699
Add sent-path-count leaf #1463
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add sent-path-count leaf #1463
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -30,13 +30,19 @@ submodule openconfig-bgp-neighbor { | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| "This sub-module contains groupings that are specific to the | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| neighbor context of the OpenConfig BGP module."; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| oc-ext:openconfig-version "9.9.1"; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| oc-ext:openconfig-version "9.10.0"; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| revision "2026-03-31" { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| description | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| "Add prefix sent path count."; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| reference "9.10.0"; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| } | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| revision "2025-04-18" { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| description | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| "Clarification to usage of link-bandwidth-ext-community | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| container under BGP use-multiple-paths`."; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| reference "9.9.1"; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| reference "9.9.1"; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| } | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| revision "2025-03-30" { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
@@ -688,6 +694,15 @@ submodule openconfig-bgp-neighbor { | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Adj-RIB-Out for the neighbor"; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| } | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| leaf sent-path-count { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| type uint32; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| description | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| "The number of add-paths advertised to a neighbor after | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| the post-policy Adj-RIB-Out. This value reflects the total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| number of paths present in the post-policy Adj-RIB-Out for | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| the neighbor once add-path configuration is applied."; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| } | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment on lines
+697
to
+704
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The leaf name
Suggested change
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @romeyod, @earies, @jgcumming -please can you let me know if you implement a similar leaf and agree that we should add this into the core OC YANG model (rather than as a Cisco specific augmentation).
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @romeyod is on leave so I'm replying on behalf of him. EOS implements a similar leaf and we agree that it would be good to expose the leaf so that it can be used in the relevant use cases. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| leaf installed { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| type uint32; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| description | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not too particularly keen on the naming, could you consider
sent-add-paths? Mainly droppingcountto make it consistent with the other sibling leaves.