Archive completed stop-gate review threads

[bogdan0dzuba]

Summary

• archive persisted stop-gate review threads after a recognized ALLOW: or BLOCK: result is durably stored
• classify stop-gate jobs separately so --resume-last continues the latest user rescue task
• preserve failed, interrupted, empty, and unrecognized review threads for inspection
• retry archive operations directly when a shared broker endpoint is stale or busy

Root cause

The stop hook launched reviews as persistent app-server task threads and saved their results, but never called thread/archive. Successful internal review tasks therefore accumulated in the Codex task list.

Validation

• npm run build
• npm run check-version
• node --test tests/runtime.test.mjs - 66 passed
• remaining unit suites - 30 passed
• installed-plugin smoke test confirmed that the stop-gate thread is archived while the user rescue thread remains resumable

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: daba6afb93

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Avoid classifying user prompts by marker text

When a normal /codex:rescue prompt happens to quote Run a stop-gate review of the previous Claude turn.—for example, while editing or discussing the gate prompt—it is now stored with jobClass: "stop-review". Both findLatestResumableTaskJob and the active-task check only consider jobClass === "task", so --resume-last and task-resume-candidate silently omit that user's rescue thread. Pass an explicit internal stop-review flag from the hook instead of deriving resumability from user-controlled prompt content.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.