Proofreading chapter 2 - #4487
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Michael Greaves <michael.greaves@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Greaves <michael.greaves@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Greaves <michael.greaves@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Greaves <michael.greaves@nokia.com>
✅ Deploy Preview for kptdocs ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR proofreads and rephrases Chapter 2 (“Concepts”) of the kpt book, aiming to improve clarity and readability of the documentation content.
Changes:
- Reworded multiple sections for improved grammar and readability.
- Restructured several paragraphs into bullet/numbered lists and expanded some explanations.
- Updated wording and formatting across the “Packages”, “Workflows”, and “Functions” sections.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Signed-off-by: Michael Greaves <michael.greaves@nokia.com> Assisted-by: Copilot Code Review: not-known Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Signed-off-by: Michael Greaves <michael.greaves@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Greaves <michael.greaves@nokia.com> Assisted-by: Copilot Code Review: not-known Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
|
Hey @mpgreaves, just a heads-up for future commits to please follow contributing.md. It helps keep the logs structured and clean. Thanks for the contribution! |
Signed-off-by: Michael Greaves <michael.greaves@nokia.com> Assisted-by: Copilot Code Review:not-known Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Catalin-Stratulat-Ericsson
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
looks good just a few minor things maybe to patch in before merging
Signed-off-by: Gergely Csatari <gergely.csatari@nokia.com> Co-authored-by: Catalin Stratulat <159934629+Catalin-Stratulat-Ericsson@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Gergely Csatari <gergely.csatari@nokia.com>
a102120
Signed-off-by: Gergely Csatari <gergely.csatari@nokia.com>
|
Signed-off-by: Gergely Csatari <gergely.csatari@nokia.com>
|
|
||
| <<<<<<< HEAD | ||
| Details of how to work with packages are set out in [Chapter 3](../03-packages). | ||
| ======= |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Merge conflict need to be resolved.
| - The functions are hermetic. For correctness, security and speed, it is desirable to be able to run functions hermetically without any privileges, thereby preventing out-of-band access to the host filesystem and networking. | ||
|
|
||
| We will discuss the KRM Functions Specification Standard in detail in | ||
| <<<<<<< HEAD |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Merge conflict need to be resolved.
| - `kpt fn render`: This command executes the pipeline of functions declared in the package and its subpackages. This is a declarative way to run the functions. | ||
| - `kpt fn eval`: This command executes a given function on the package. The image to run and the `functionConfig` are specified as a CLI argument. This is an imperative way to run functions. Since the function is provided explicitly by the user, an imperative invocation can be more privileged and low-level than a declarative invocation. For example, it can have access to the host system. | ||
|
|
||
| <<<<<<< HEAD |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Merge conflict need to be resolved.



No description provided.