Conversation
Contributor
|
Sorry but, what is the motivation ? The change are not so big but you add lemmas that are not used (for the moment). So it look like just adding more complexity. |
Member
Author
|
The motivation is #1170, in order to prove that the empty condition is sufficient to guarantee safety. |
And prove that well-typed applications of opN always succeed (lemma sem_opN_typed_ok).
bgregoir
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
And prove that well-typed applications of opN always succeed (lemma sem_opN_typed_ok).
The
curryoperation is certainly beautiful, but it is hard to reason about it.