Skip to content

Update gef-extras.sh#1217

Closed
exil-security wants to merge 1 commit intohugsy:mainfrom
exil-security:main
Closed

Update gef-extras.sh#1217
exil-security wants to merge 1 commit intohugsy:mainfrom
exil-security:main

Conversation

@exil-security
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Description

The version of gef and gef-extra are not marching, which causing issue while downloading from scripts/gef-extras.sh

Changing the isntall script to fetch the tag from gef-extras github repository .

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Coverage update for 4770fa0 🟢

Old New
Commit 0c95800 4770fa0
Score 71.0775% 71.0775% (0)

@hugsy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

hugsy commented Mar 15, 2026

This is the intended logic: branch of gef-extras should work at parity with gef. gef is considered the source of truth always, not gef-extras.

When you say "The version of gef and gef-extra are not marching", what problem are having exactly?

@exil-security
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

gef latest version is 2026.01 while gef-extra latest version 2025.01. When fetching gef version the git clone will fail since the version 2026.01 doesn't exist in gef-extra.

@hugsy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

hugsy commented Mar 18, 2026

gef latest version is 2026.01 while gef-extra latest version 2025.01. When fetching gef version the git clone will fail since the version 2026.01 doesn't exist in gef-extra.

Good catch, I will publish a new release of gef-extras to match

@hugsy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

hugsy commented Mar 18, 2026

Done

@hugsy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

hugsy commented Apr 26, 2026

This issue was fixed by re-aligning gef-extras with gef as it should have been (see https://github.com/hugsy/gef-extras/releases/tag/2026.01)

Thanks for reporting the issue.

Closing.

@hugsy hugsy closed this Apr 26, 2026
@hugsy hugsy added this to the 2026.06 milestone Apr 26, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants