-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
Get Repository Name #131
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Get Repository Name #131
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fa0da5b
Enable getting the name of an existing repository
aj-foster d868108
Modify return type of hex_registry:unpack_names/3
aj-foster ad92c46
Return all attributes from version and package files
aj-foster 85e5964
Change decode functions to return all fields
aj-foster 4335822
Merge branch 'main' into aj/feat/get-repo-name
wojtekmach File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm, actually should we just go with this?
as long as it's safe, i.e. decode_msg doesn't return an error tuple or something?
in hindsight, it was a big mistake to initially return just the subset of the protobuf, just the packages field. With this change we're in sync with the protobuf which means if we ever add another field, we'll immediately start returning it here.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Went ahead and made this change in 85e5964 — easy to revert if necessary. I also made the similar change to
decode_versions/2anddecode_package/3.Edit: there was a choice to make for the "verified" function clause, which could use review. I have it verifying the same fields for now.