-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
add ci script to ckeck for git unresolved conflicts #23961
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
cedric-anne
merged 1 commit into
glpi-project:11.0/bugfixes
from
SebSept:ci-unresolved-conflicts-10
Apr 29, 2026
+16
−0
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
=======should be detected too.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have suite of
=signs in the code:Those should be changed to apply suggestion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
does this
===have a special meaning inglpi_notificationtemplatetranslationstable ? @stonebuzz @trasher ? or can I just remove them ? (a quick search in code tells me there is nothing special with this=)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Theoretically, the chevrons alone are enough, but if you want, I'll add this @cedric-anne
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Manual conflict resolution can result in having only the
=======line remaining, so if we want a complete detection, it is better to add it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, I agree it should be detected.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like it's just a kind of "visual separator"; I guess it can be replaced.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is part of the template text, isn't it? Not saying this template doesn't deserve to be changed, but it is completely unrelated to the scope of this PR.
My opinion is that the goal of this PR is to spot forgotten conflicts, which it does very well.
Spending time handling all possible cases where someone miss-edited a conflict is out of scope and probably not worth it (there are a lot more possibilities than just some "===" left over).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Almost everytime I have a conflict to handle, I do it manually. So there are the same risk to forgot a
========line than to forgot a<<<<<<<<line.Anyway, this can be done later.