Skip to content

Port 18 MCP tools to Lite (Tier-2 Lite<->Darling MCP parity)#1518

Merged
erikdarlingdata merged 3 commits into
devfrom
feature/lite-mcp-tool-ports
Jul 14, 2026
Merged

Port 18 MCP tools to Lite (Tier-2 Lite<->Darling MCP parity)#1518
erikdarlingdata merged 3 commits into
devfrom
feature/lite-mcp-tool-ports

Conversation

@erikdarlingdata

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Ports the 18 MCP tools Lite lacked vs Darling — mechanical [McpServerTool] wrappers over readers Lite already has (latch/spinlock, plan-cache-bloat, cpu-scheduler-pressure, resource-semaphore, default-trace, daily-summary, the three config-change histories, and the eight get_health_parser_* tools). io_issues/cpu_tasks got thin reader adds off the shared Common.SystemHealthParser (parse reused, not reinvented); the one new reader is GetResourceSemaphoreSnapshotAsync.

KnownLiteMissingMcpTools is drained to empty (the CI inventory-pin ratchet). The get_blocked_process_reports -> get_blocking rename is deliberately NOT done here — breaking, held for explicit sign-off.

Lite-only. Build clean; MCP inventory pin green locally; full Lite.Tests run in CI.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

erikdarlingdata and others added 3 commits July 13, 2026 21:11
Wraps the 18 MCP tools Lite lacked vs Darling as [McpServerTool] wrappers over
readers Lite already has: get_latch_stats / get_spinlock_stats / get_plan_cache_bloat /
get_cpu_scheduler_pressure / get_resource_semaphore / get_default_trace_events /
get_daily_summary / get_server_config_changes / get_database_config_changes /
get_trace_flag_changes, and the 8 get_health_parser_* tools. io_issues/cpu_tasks got
thin reader adds off the shared Common.SystemHealthParser (parse reused, not reinvented).
KnownLiteMissingMcpTools drained to empty (the CI inventory-pin ratchet). The get_blocking
rename is deliberately NOT done here (breaking; held for explicit sign-off).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@erikdarlingdata erikdarlingdata merged commit cf34020 into dev Jul 14, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant