{ai}[foss/2023b] PyTorch v2.2.1

[Flamefire]

(created using eb --new-pr)

Requires:

• {tools}[GCCcore/10.3.0 - 14.2.0] unittest-xml-reporting v3.1.0, lxml v5.3.0, libxslt v1.1.42 #22205

[github-actions]

Diff of new easyconfig(s) against existing ones is too long for a GitHub comment. Use --review-pr (and --review-pr-filter / --review-pr-max) locally.

[boegel]

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 3633"

[boegelbot]

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=22361 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 3633" EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_22361 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 5791

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

Details

- notification for comment with ID 2684269442 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3633
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.21
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/3673dab5f88a9a9ce509c5a8d105627a for a full test report.

[Flamefire]

We have 2.3.0 for 2023b. Shall we abandon this?