Skip to content

Wip: ADR 35 - #2810

Open
v0d1ch wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
deposit-and-decommit-changes
Open

Wip: ADR 35#2810
v0d1ch wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
deposit-and-decommit-changes

Conversation

@v0d1ch

@v0d1ch v0d1ch commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

  • CHANGELOG updated or not needed
  • Documentation updated or not needed
  • Haddocks updated or not needed
  • No new TODOs introduced or explained herafter

@v0d1ch v0d1ch self-assigned this Aug 5, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Transaction cost differences

No cost or size differences found

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

End-to-end benchmark differences

Comparing this PR (new) against master (old). Numbers come from cloud VMs, so changes under 5% are shown as and are likely run-to-run noise rather than a real regression or improvement. 🟢 = improvement, 🔴 = regression; uncolored rows are neutral measures reported for context.

Sustained load (3 nodes, 3x5000 txs)

Metric master PR Δ
End-to-end TPS (tx/s) 495.57 494.55 ≈ -1.02 (-0.2%)
Sustained TPS (tx/s) 1,035.18 897.35 🔴 -137.83 (-13.3%)
Backlog drain time (s) 29.60 29.50 ≈ -0.10 (-0.3%)
Snapshots per second (/s) 0.56 0.53 -0.03 (-5.4%)
Avg txs per snapshot 882.40 937.50 +55.10 (+6.2%)
Avg. Confirmation Time (s) 24.571 24.243 ≈ -0.328 (-1.3%)
P50 confirmation (s) 26.072 25.466 ≈ -0.606 (-2.3%)
P95 confirmation (s) 29.679 29.517 ≈ -0.163 (-0.5%)
P99 confirmation (s) 29.910 29.681 ≈ -0.229 (-0.8%)
Tx validation time p50 (s) 8.606 8.488 ≈ -0.118 (-1.4%)
Peak node RSS (MB) 413.90 451.10 +37.20 (+9.0%)
Invalid txs 0.00 0.00 ≈ +0.00 (n/a%)

Plateau 1000 UTxO (1 node, 4000 txs)

Metric master PR Δ
End-to-end TPS (tx/s) 227.71 231.12 ≈ +3.41 (+1.5%)
Backlog drain time (s) 17.50 17.20 ≈ -0.30 (-1.7%)
Snapshots per second (/s) 0.46 0.40 -0.06 (-13.0%)
Avg txs per snapshot 500.00 571.40 +71.40 (+14.3%)
Avg. Confirmation Time (s) 10.958 10.936 ≈ -0.021 (-0.2%)
P50 confirmation (s) 13.388 11.773 🟢 -1.614 (-12.1%)
P95 confirmation (s) 16.951 17.193 ≈ +0.242 (+1.4%)
P99 confirmation (s) 17.459 17.202 ≈ -0.258 (-1.5%)
Tx validation time p50 (s) 5.358 4.734 🟢 -0.624 (-11.6%)
Peak node RSS (MB) 393.30 388.10 ≈ -5.20 (-1.3%)
Invalid txs 0.00 0.00 ≈ +0.00 (n/a%)

Round-trip latency (3 nodes, closed-loop, 3x250 txs)

Metric master PR Δ
End-to-end TPS (tx/s) 94.25 105.24 🟢 +10.99 (+11.7%)
Sustained TPS (tx/s) 94.52 105.32 🟢 +10.80 (+11.4%)
Backlog drain time (s) 0.00 0.00 ≈ +0.00 (n/a%)
Snapshots per second (/s) 63.71 71.00 +7.29 (+11.4%)
Avg txs per snapshot 1.50 1.50 ≈ +0.00 (+0.0%)
Avg. Confirmation Time (s) 0.032 0.028 🟢 -0.003 (-10.2%)
P50 confirmation (s) 0.031 0.028 🟢 -0.003 (-10.7%)
P95 confirmation (s) 0.041 0.036 🟢 -0.004 (-10.6%)
P99 confirmation (s) 0.047 0.042 🟢 -0.005 (-10.4%)
Tx validation time p50 (s) 0.009 0.007 🟢 -0.001 (-12.9%)
Peak node RSS (MB) 149.10 149.00 ≈ -0.10 (-0.1%)
Invalid txs 0.00 0.00 ≈ +0.00 (n/a%)

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Transaction costs

Transaction costs

Sizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using arbitrary values and results are not fully deterministic and comparable to previous runs.

Metadata
Generated at 2026-08-25 10:51:58.796124106 UTC
Max. memory units 14000000
Max. CPU units 10000000000
Max. tx size (kB) 16384

Script summary

Name Hash Size (Bytes)
νHead 1d511733200df551c8cd8cddb3160ed39087af815638be37a1b80ffd 12962
μHead 603f261bc5a01f5f4ed988cc07a40a130b94e6820c28e9affde82d9e* 4971
νDeposit eafae2c32f99ab347c7bb15961e0e84c74305f9088c1a7b8abf88e7f 2117
νCRS 09db7ee6cf7a4b358dd5c8a2f19d2c048336ffc5a01ef35a47ca7072 2736
  • The minting policy hash is only usable for comparison. As the script is parameterized, the actual script is unique per head.

Init transaction costs

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 5473 9.65 3.18 0.50
2 5572 9.80 3.21 0.50
3 5667 10.20 3.34 0.51
5 5858 11.68 3.83 0.54
10 6340 14.18 4.63 0.58
50 10182 35.19 11.18 0.97
100 14983 62.10 19.59 1.46
114 16327 69.98 22.07 1.60

Cost of Increment Transaction

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 2827 21.40 7.67 0.70
2 2958 22.37 8.64 0.72
3 3085 23.54 9.68 0.75
5 3348 25.27 11.56 0.78
10 4002 29.67 16.28 0.88
50 9244 72.59 56.38 1.75
75 12524 98.53 81.15 2.28

Cost of Decrement Transaction

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 642 18.52 6.70 0.58
2 772 19.46 7.66 0.60
3 904 20.41 8.63 0.62
5 1168 22.37 10.59 0.66
10 1822 27.11 15.43 0.76
50 7063 67.57 54.75 1.60
75 10342 93.30 79.44 2.13

Close transaction costs

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 669 17.76 11.66 0.61
2 800 18.71 12.63 0.63
3 928 19.71 13.62 0.65
5 1195 21.61 15.56 0.69
10 1850 26.52 20.46 0.79
50 7090 67.84 60.11 1.64
75 10361 93.23 84.77 2.17

Contest transaction costs

Parties Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 701 21.49 14.90 0.66
2 832 22.65 15.94 0.68
3 964 23.80 16.97 0.71
5 1226 26.09 19.03 0.75
10 1876 31.71 24.14 0.86
50 7122 79.56 65.74 1.78
66 9217 98.71 82.38 2.15

FanOut transaction costs

Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTXO for better comparability.
Rows first grow the UTxO set at a fixed 10 parties, then show the largest set that still fits per number of parties (burning more participation tokens leaves less room for outputs).

Parties UTxO UTxO (bytes) Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
10 0 0 5644 23.70 43.00 1.14
10 1 57 5678 26.05 45.51 1.18
10 5 285 5814 36.28 55.83 1.34
10 10 568 5983 50.26 69.12 1.56
10 20 1139 6324 82.76 97.10 2.04
1 20 1134 6039 76.54 95.13 1.96
5 20 1139 6168 79.31 96.01 2.00
10 20 1139 6323 82.76 97.10 2.04
20 20 1138 6633 90.08 99.38 2.13
50 15 854 7395 95.05 92.01 2.15

PartialFanOut transaction costs

Largest chunk of ada-only outputs that can be distributed in one partial fanout step, computed dynamically. The last row is the maximum total UTxO count where at least one output can still be distributed.

Total UTxO Distributed UTxO (bytes) Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
11 10 570 987 35.29 66.46 1.20
25 23 1311 1430 68.58 99.53 1.73
30 23 1310 1429 68.58 99.53 1.73
40 23 1308 1427 68.58 99.53 1.73
50 23 1311 1430 68.58 99.53 1.73
100 23 1309 1424 68.58 99.53 1.73
150 23 1308 1427 68.58 99.53 1.73
200 23 1308 1427 68.58 99.53 1.73
200 23 1310 1429 68.58 99.53 1.73

PartialFanOut transaction costs (with native tokens)

Largest chunk of native-token outputs that can be distributed in one partial fanout step, computed dynamically. The last row is the maximum total UTxO count where at least one output can still be distributed.

Total UTxO Distributed UTxO (bytes) Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
11 10 1140 1631 42.27 68.98 1.30
25 21 2331 2588 76.71 99.30 1.84
30 21 2331 2588 76.71 99.30 1.84
40 21 2016 2258 76.71 99.20 1.83
50 21 2016 2259 76.71 99.20 1.83
100 21 2520 2783 76.71 99.35 1.85
150 21 2079 2325 76.69 99.20 1.83
200 21 1995 2237 76.71 99.20 1.82
200 21 2394 2655 76.69 99.30 1.84

FinalPartialFanOut transaction costs (with native tokens)

Terminal partial fanout step (FanoutProgress → Final) with outputs carrying a native token. Burns all head tokens and proves accumulator exhaustion via BLS proof.

Distributed UTxO (bytes) Tx size % max Mem % max CPU Min fee ₳
1 114 5533 22.51 44.44 1.14
5 555 5891 36.06 55.96 1.34
10 1110 6341 54.18 70.75 1.62
10 1150 6381 54.18 70.75 1.62
End-to-end benchmark results

End-to-end benchmark results

This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master code.

Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.

Generated at 2026-08-25 10:53:25.44755878 UTC

Baseline Scenario

Number of nodes 1
Number of txs 300
Load mode open-loop
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 184.4
P99 187.6ms
P95 187.2ms
P50 184.7ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 128.9
End-to-end TPS 1595.93 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.2
Snapshots observed 2
Snapshots per second 10.64 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 150.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 143.5
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 2

Three local nodes

Number of nodes 3
Number of txs 900
Load mode open-loop
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 951.1
P99 985.3ms
P95 984.5ms
P50 947.6ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 494.0
End-to-end TPS 911.92 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.9
Snapshots observed 2
Snapshots per second 2.03 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 450.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 145.9
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 4
Scenario benchmark results

Scenario benchmark results

This page collects results from the scenario matrix: every combination of cluster size, UTxO shape, and incremental-ops mode is exercised by CI from the latest master code and reported below.

Numbers are approximate. They come from cloud VMs rather than controlled hardware, so the useful signal is the relative change between cells and between commits, not the absolute throughput.

Generated at 2026-08-25 11:06:25.342455452 UTC

Summary across cells

TPS columns are rates (transactions per second); Wall clock (s) is the measured elapsed time from the first tx submission to the last confirmation. Times are rounded to one decimal.

Scenario Txs Wall clock (s) End-to-end TPS (tx/s) Sustained TPS (tx/s) Avg conf (ms) P95 conf (ms)
Nodes=1, Constant, fire and forget 30 0.0 1158.38 n/a 25.1 25.6
Nodes=1, Constant, wait for tx valid 30 0.1 204.09 203.13 4.8 6.3
Nodes=1, Growing, fire and forget 30 0.0 1025.49 n/a 28.4 29.0
Nodes=1, Growing, wait for tx valid 30 0.2 173.89 174.20 5.7 6.7
Nodes=1, Mixed, fire and forget 30 0.0 981.02 n/a 29.8 30.3
Nodes=1, Mixed, wait for tx valid 30 0.2 180.46 180.21 5.5 6.9
Nodes=2, Constant, fire and forget 60 0.1 1124.71 n/a 51.6 52.2
Nodes=2, Constant, wait for tx valid 60 0.4 136.77 133.15 14.4 19.0
Nodes=2, Growing, fire and forget 60 0.1 824.12 n/a 71.0 71.9
Nodes=2, Growing, wait for tx valid 60 0.6 92.92 92.81 21.2 26.7
Nodes=2, Mixed, fire and forget 60 0.1 893.30 n/a 64.6 66.0
Nodes=2, Mixed, wait for tx valid 60 0.6 95.15 90.50 20.8 29.2
Nodes=3, Constant, fire and forget 90 0.1 782.45 n/a 111.7 114.0
Nodes=3, Constant, wait for tx valid 90 0.9 99.61 99.05 29.9 39.3
Nodes=3, Growing, fire and forget 90 0.2 562.28 n/a 155.9 158.1
Nodes=3, Growing, wait for tx valid 90 1.1 78.39 79.35 37.5 46.5
Nodes=3, Mixed, fire and forget 90 0.1 613.76 n/a 143.9 146.3
Nodes=3, Mixed, wait for tx valid 90 1.0 86.95 83.39 34.2 43.6

Nodes=1, Constant, fire and forget

Number of nodes 1
Number of txs 30
Load mode open-loop
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 25.1
P99 25.7ms
P95 25.6ms
P50 25.2ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 10.0
End-to-end TPS 1158.38 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.0
Snapshots observed 2
Snapshots per second 77.23 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 15.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 143.0
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 2

Nodes=1, Constant, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes 1
Number of txs 30
Load mode closed-loop
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 4.8
P99 7.8ms
P95 6.3ms
P50 4.7ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 1.7
End-to-end TPS 204.09 tx/s
Sustained TPS 203.13 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.0
Snapshots observed 30
Snapshots per second 204.09 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 1.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 143.9
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 2

Nodes=1, Growing, fire and forget

Number of nodes 1
Number of txs 30
Load mode open-loop
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 28.4
P99 29.0ms
P95 29.0ms
P50 28.6ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 10.9
End-to-end TPS 1025.49 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.0
Snapshots observed 2
Snapshots per second 68.37 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 15.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 143.3
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 31

Nodes=1, Growing, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes 1
Number of txs 30
Load mode closed-loop
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 5.7
P99 6.7ms
P95 6.7ms
P50 5.7ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 1.6
End-to-end TPS 173.89 tx/s
Sustained TPS 174.20 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.0
Snapshots observed 30
Snapshots per second 173.89 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 1.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 143.4
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 31

Nodes=1, Mixed, fire and forget

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes 1
Number of txs 30
Load mode open-loop
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 29.8
P99 30.4ms
P95 30.3ms
P50 29.9ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 18.8
End-to-end TPS 981.02 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.0
Snapshots observed 2
Snapshots per second 65.40 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 15.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 143.1
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 2

Nodes=1, Mixed, wait for tx valid

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes 1
Number of txs 30
Load mode closed-loop
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 5.5
P99 7.8ms
P95 6.9ms
P50 5.3ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 1.7
End-to-end TPS 180.46 tx/s
Sustained TPS 180.21 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.0
Snapshots observed 30
Snapshots per second 180.46 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 1.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 143.0
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 2

Nodes=2, Constant, fire and forget

Number of nodes 2
Number of txs 60
Load mode open-loop
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 51.6
P99 52.7ms
P95 52.2ms
P50 51.9ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 25.6
End-to-end TPS 1124.71 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.1
Snapshots observed 2
Snapshots per second 37.49 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 30.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 144.7
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 3

Nodes=2, Constant, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes 2
Number of txs 60
Load mode closed-loop
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 14.4
P99 21.5ms
P95 19.0ms
P50 13.9ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 4.2
End-to-end TPS 136.77 tx/s
Sustained TPS 133.15 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.0
Snapshots observed 60
Snapshots per second 136.77 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 1.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 144.9
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 3

Nodes=2, Growing, fire and forget

Number of nodes 2
Number of txs 60
Load mode open-loop
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 71.0
P99 72.3ms
P95 71.9ms
P50 71.3ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 29.3
End-to-end TPS 824.12 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.1
Snapshots observed 2
Snapshots per second 27.47 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 30.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 144.0
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 62

Nodes=2, Growing, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes 2
Number of txs 60
Load mode closed-loop
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 21.2
P99 28.0ms
P95 26.7ms
P50 20.9ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 6.3
End-to-end TPS 92.92 tx/s
Sustained TPS 92.81 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.0
Snapshots observed 60
Snapshots per second 92.92 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 1.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 145.6
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 62

Nodes=2, Mixed, fire and forget

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes 2
Number of txs 60
Load mode open-loop
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 64.6
P99 66.5ms
P95 66.0ms
P50 65.3ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 23.2
End-to-end TPS 893.30 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.1
Snapshots observed 2
Snapshots per second 29.78 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 30.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 144.9
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 3

Nodes=2, Mixed, wait for tx valid

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes 2
Number of txs 60
Load mode closed-loop
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 20.8
P99 29.5ms
P95 29.2ms
P50 20.3ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 5.9
End-to-end TPS 95.15 tx/s
Sustained TPS 90.50 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.0
Snapshots observed 60
Snapshots per second 95.15 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 1.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 146.2
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 3

Nodes=3, Constant, fire and forget

Number of nodes 3
Number of txs 90
Load mode open-loop
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 111.7
P99 114.1ms
P95 114.0ms
P50 112.6ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 58.2
End-to-end TPS 782.45 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.1
Snapshots observed 2
Snapshots per second 17.39 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 45.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 144.8
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 4

Nodes=3, Constant, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes 3
Number of txs 90
Load mode closed-loop
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 29.9
P99 41.8ms
P95 39.3ms
P50 29.8ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 8.5
End-to-end TPS 99.61 tx/s
Sustained TPS 99.05 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.0
Snapshots observed 61
Snapshots per second 67.52 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 1.5
Peak node RSS (MB) 145.2
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 4

Nodes=3, Growing, fire and forget

Number of nodes 3
Number of txs 90
Load mode open-loop
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 155.9
P99 158.3ms
P95 158.1ms
P50 157.2ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 48.6
End-to-end TPS 562.28 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.2
Snapshots observed 2
Snapshots per second 12.50 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 45.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 145.4
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 0

Nodes=3, Growing, wait for tx valid

Number of nodes 3
Number of txs 90
Load mode closed-loop
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 37.5
P99 55.9ms
P95 46.5ms
P50 37.5ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 11.0
End-to-end TPS 78.39 tx/s
Sustained TPS 79.35 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.0
Snapshots observed 61
Snapshots per second 53.13 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 1.5
Peak node RSS (MB) 145.9
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 0

Nodes=3, Mixed, fire and forget

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes 3
Number of txs 90
Load mode open-loop
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 143.9
P99 146.4ms
P95 146.3ms
P50 144.6ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 51.3
End-to-end TPS 613.76 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.1
Snapshots observed 2
Snapshots per second 13.64 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 45.0
Peak node RSS (MB) 145.1
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 4

Nodes=3, Mixed, wait for tx valid

Each client first grows its UTxO set (1-in to 2-out) for half of its tx budget, then contracts it back (2-in to 1-out) for the remainder.

Number of nodes 3
Number of txs 90
Load mode closed-loop
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) 34.2
P99 47.9ms
P95 43.6ms
P50 33.7ms
Tx validation time p50 (ms) 10.6
End-to-end TPS 86.95 tx/s
Sustained TPS 83.39 tx/s
Backlog drain time (s) 0.0
Snapshots observed 61
Snapshots per second 58.93 /s
Avg txs per snapshot 1.5
Peak node RSS (MB) 145.6
Number of Invalid txs 0
Fanout outputs 4

Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <sasha.bogicevic@iohk.io>
@v0d1ch
v0d1ch force-pushed the deposit-and-decommit-changes branch from b34fb4b to 6d929f7 Compare August 5, 2026 13:18
@v0d1ch v0d1ch changed the title ADR 35 Wip: ADR 35 Aug 6, 2026
@v0d1ch
v0d1ch force-pushed the deposit-and-decommit-changes branch from 0ec3c4d to f046187 Compare August 6, 2026 15:38
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <sasha.bogicevic@iohk.io>
@v0d1ch
v0d1ch force-pushed the deposit-and-decommit-changes branch from f046187 to 56a0f5c Compare August 6, 2026 15:40
v0d1ch added 2 commits August 11, 2026 11:50
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <sasha.bogicevic@iohk.io>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <sasha.bogicevic@iohk.io>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Bogicevic <sasha.bogicevic@iohk.io>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Separate chain-following logic from hydra-node

2 participants