Add seed script for local development

[Hinton]

🎟️ Tracking

📔 Objective

Introduces a repeatable, declarative way to seed a local dev environment via the existing SeederUtility.

• dev/seed.ps1 — new script that reads dev/seeds.json (and optional, gitignored dev/seeds.local.json for per-developer overrides), converts each entry's args from camelCase to kebab-case CLI flags,
  and invokes dotnet run --project util/SeederUtility once per seed. Supports -DryRun to preview the commands without executing. Fails fast on non-zero exit codes.
• dev/seeds.json — default seed set (two individual users + the qa.enterprise-basic preset) so new contributors get a consistent baseline dataset.
• dev/.gitignore — ignores seeds.local.json so per-developer overrides don't leak into the repo.
• IndividualUserOptions / IndividualArgs / RecipeOrchestrator — adds an optional --email flag to the individual command, falling back to the existing firstName.lastName@individual.example
  pattern when omitted. This lets seeds.json pin deterministic emails (e.g. jane@bitwarden.pw) instead of relying on the generated default.

📸 Screenshots

[github-actions]

Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details – 2807b73b-6ae9-41a6-aad2-41cfb07a8b69

---

New Issues (1)

Checkmarx found the following issues in this Pull Request

#	Severity	Issue	Source File / Package	Checkmarx Insight
1		CSRF	src/Api/Auth/Controllers/AccountsController.cs: 452	details Method at line 452 of /src/Api/Auth/Controllers/AccountsController.cs gets a parameter from a user request from model. This parameter value flow... Attack Vector

[theMickster]

The domain name in the seeds.json is the only thing that I think must be fixed.

[theMickster]

@Hinton Will you please take a peek at the workflow failures?
#7490

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.10%. Comparing base (94f2bc3) to head (3ab916a).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7490       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   14.39%   59.10%   +44.71%     
===========================================
  Files        1278     2078      +800     
  Lines       55352    91705    +36353     
  Branches     4270     8152     +3882     
===========================================
+ Hits         7966    54201    +46235     
+ Misses      47246    35572    -11674     
- Partials      140     1932     +1792     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.