Skip to content

docs: fix shape of expected array in LOO docstring#96

Merged
sethaxen merged 1 commit intoarviz-devs:mainfrom
penelopeysm:main
Apr 21, 2026
Merged

docs: fix shape of expected array in LOO docstring#96
sethaxen merged 1 commit intoarviz-devs:mainfrom
penelopeysm:main

Conversation

@penelopeysm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The docstring has the dimensions in the wrong way round. (PSIS is correct :) https://julia.arviz.org/PSIS/stable/api/#PSIS.psis)

Given that this is just a docs change I'm not sure if you'd like a patch bump, happy to do so if desired.

@devmotion
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Just came across this yesterday as well 🙂

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@sethaxen sethaxen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch, thanks! Yes, I would say this warrants a patch release.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.32%. Comparing base (bc72f89) to head (3ba0291).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #96   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.32%   97.32%           
=======================================
  Files          16       16           
  Lines         936      936           
=======================================
  Hits          911      911           
  Misses         25       25           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@sethaxen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Actually, I'll get it in the same patch release as #95, so no need to bump it here.

@sethaxen sethaxen merged commit 2ba8c6e into arviz-devs:main Apr 21, 2026
9 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants