Skip to content

agentplane: clarify sampler content and migration ownership - #16219

Open
agentydragon wants to merge 1 commit into
codex/agentplane-app-server-batch4from
codex/agentplane-sampler-leaves-batch4
Open

agentydragon wants to merge 1 commit into
codex/agentplane-app-server-batch4from
codex/agentplane-sampler-leaves-batch4

Conversation

@agentydragon

@agentydragon agentydragon commented Nov 13, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The sampler’s pure content values currently live under internal/storage, while SQL migration ownership is mixed into the root service package. Move the content contract to internal/content and the unchanged embedded SQL plus Up entry point to central_sampler/migrations. Update every importer, test, BUILD, command and specification reference together.

The content leaf has no Store dependency. The Goose history table, advisory lock ID, SQL filenames and both SQL byte hashes are unchanged; History’s export integration fixture gets narrowly scoped Bazel access to the migration package. Store/Executor/Runtime transaction boundaries and authentication policy are left for the documented ownership design.

Validation: mandatory commit hooks and the sampler command RBE build passed. Content and History export tests passed in the focused invocation. That invocation failed one existing one-second runtime/backoff case; the unchanged whole sampler target passed on the integrated head in this invocation. No assertion or timeout was changed. Full PR CI remains authoritative for the published head.

Proposed final leaf group above App server PR #16217 in native stack #16208. Review the incremental diff against that parent.

@agentydragon agentydragon added the proposed Concrete implementation proposed for review; not approved for automatic merge label Nov 13, 2026

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

proposed Concrete implementation proposed for review; not approved for automatic merge

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant