[Do Not Review] Storage add-ons integration on Remove background SEO page on Adobe.com with help of embed-sdk

[edwardsangami]

Epic link: [WXP-5102]

Description:
This PR enable the integration of Storage add-ons (like Google Drive, Dropbox, Google photos etc) on remove-background SEO page on Adobe.com

Additional Info:

• branch: sangamm/your-action
• branch url: https://github.com/adobecom/da-express-milo
• path: Desktop/a.com/da-express-milo/express/code/blocks/frictionless-quick-action
• running url: http://localhost:3000/express/feature/image/remove-background or http://localhost:3000/express/feature/image/remove-background?baseQA=https%3A%2F%2Flocalhost.adobe.com%3A8080&hzenv=stage
• install aem cli: npm install -g @adobe/aem-cli
• build and start: aem up
• DOCS shared by Sh****a: https://adobe-my.sharepoint.com/:w:/r/personal/shiksha_adobe_com/_layouts/15/Doc.aspx?sourcedoc=%7B93D6FD09-C28F-4F98-86D8-4A02CC39CAA5%7D&file=A.com%20coding%20kickstart.docx&wdLOR=c4EB6059F-56D6-BF4F-922E-0E30C74A31DC&fromShare=true&action=default&mobileredirect=true

Demo video:
https://adobe-my.sharepoint.com/:v:/p/sangamm/IQCvSsbXDVXmRbIr08iqiLGwAcjApeg7NY9n71Tbh32SLOs?nav=eyJyZWZlcnJhbEluZm8iOnsicmVmZXJyYWxBcHAiOiJPbmVEcml2ZUZvckJ1c2luZXNzIiwicmVmZXJyYWxBcHBQbGF0Zm9ybSI6IldlYiIsInJlZmVycmFsTW9kZSI6InZpZXciLCJyZWZlcnJhbFZpZXciOiJNeUZpbGVzTGlua0NvcHkifX0&e=2OCZeA

Summary

Briefly describe the features or fixes introduced in this PR.

---

Jira Ticket

Resolves: MWPW-NUMBER

---

Test URLs

Env	URL
Before	https://main--da-express-milo--adobecom.aem.page/express/
After	https://--da-express-milo--adobecom.aem.page/express/?martech=off

---

Verification Steps

• Steps to reproduce the issue or view the new feature.
• What to expect before and after the change.

---

Potential Regressions

• https://--da-express-milo--adobecom.aem.live/express/?martech=off

---

Additional Notes

(If applicable) Add context, related PRs, or known issues here.

[nateyolles]

@edwardsangami what's going on here with the [Do Not Review] status? Should this be a draft PR at this point?

[edwardsangami]

@edwardsangami what's going on here with the [Do Not Review] status? Should this be a draft PR at this point?

Hi @nateyolles, this PR was intended to be created as a draft. I’ve updated it and converted it to draft now.