Skip to content

Add structured test-gap audit entries across regression, CLI, Docker, release, and reproducibility#8

Draft
Copilot wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/audit-test-gaps
Draft

Add structured test-gap audit entries across regression, CLI, Docker, release, and reproducibility#8
Copilot wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/audit-test-gaps

Conversation

Copilot AI commented Mar 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This issue asked for a coverage-gap audit that is actionable across testing priorities (regression, integration, CLI E2E, Docker, release/package, benchmark reproducibility, failure paths, and save/load image validation).
This PR adds a single consolidated audit section that defines each gap in a trackable issue format.

  • What changed

    • Added ## Audit: Test Coverage Gap Issues to docs/PRODUCT_AUDIT.md.
    • Added 8 explicit gap entries, one per requested focus area.
  • Issue format applied to every entry

    • Title
    • Missing test coverage area
    • Risk if not covered
    • Suggested test strategy
    • Acceptance criteria
    • Labels
  • Why this is useful

    • Converts broad audit intent into implementation-ready backlog items with clear done criteria.
    • Standardizes triage metadata (labels) for prioritization and workflow routing.

Example of the added structure:

### 4) Docker workflow runtime validation
- **Missing test coverage area:** Docker assets exist, but tests do not validate container build/run workflows for application and benchmark images.
- **Risk if not covered:** Published images may build but fail at runtime due to dependency, entrypoint, or path-mapping issues.
- **Suggested test strategy:** Add CI job(s) to build both Dockerfiles and run smoke commands (`auralock --help`, benchmark preflight) in containers.
- **Acceptance criteria:** CI verifies image build + smoke execution for `Dockerfile` and `Dockerfile.benchmark`.
- **Labels:** `testing`, `docker`, `ci`
Original prompt

This section details on the original issue you should resolve

<issue_title>audit test gaps</issue_title>
<issue_description>
Focus on:

  • regression gaps
  • integration gaps
  • CLI end-to-end coverage
  • Docker workflow validation
  • release/package verification
  • benchmark reproducibility
  • failure-path coverage
  • image output validation after save/load

For each issue, include:

  • Title
  • Missing test coverage area
  • Risk if not covered
  • Suggested test strategy
  • Acceptance criteria
  • Labels
    </issue_description>

Comments on the Issue (you are @copilot in this section)


📱 Kick off Copilot coding agent tasks wherever you are with GitHub Mobile, available on iOS and Android.

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Add tests to cover identified audit gaps Add structured test-gap audit entries across regression, CLI, Docker, release, and reproducibility Mar 21, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from VoDaiLocz March 21, 2026 06:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

audit test gaps

2 participants