Skip to content

Add pull_request_bot configuration file#764

Merged
albertmink merged 1 commit intomainfrom
albertmink-patch-2
Apr 20, 2026
Merged

Add pull_request_bot configuration file#764
albertmink merged 1 commit intomainfrom
albertmink-patch-2

Conversation

@albertmink
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@albertmink albertmink commented Apr 17, 2026

Tool as configured adds a comment (on every pr) with checkboxes for Summary, Review and Delete all bot comments.
According to spec it understands CLAUDE.md and others.

@albertmink
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

FYI: @larshp I just want to let you now that we are trying to add some automatism to the repository. Our team knows about the bot and it's settings from internal repositories and workflows. However, I'm not sure how accessible this hyperspace bot is to the public (Hyperlinks are pointing to SAP-internal pages I think).

@hyperspace-insights
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Control Panel

Hi, I'm an AI-powered Review Bot that helps you with summarizing and reviewing pull requests.
To interact with me, just use the following actions:

  • 📝 Summarize PR
  • 🔍 Review
  • 🗑️ Delete all bot comments and reviews

💌 Have ideas or want to contribute? Create an issue and share your thoughts with us!
📑 Check out the documentation for more information.
📬 Subscribe to the Hyperspace PR Bot DL to get the latest announcements and pilot features!

Made with ❤️ by Hyperspace.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@hyperspace-insights hyperspace-insights Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR adds a single configuration file .hyperspace/pull_request_bot.json that configures an SAP-internal "Hyperspace" PR bot. The file is a straightforward JSON configuration. There are no code logic issues, bugs, or security concerns in the file itself.

The key concern worth noting is already raised in the existing comment by a reviewer (about internal accessibility to the public/open-source community). No new substantive issues to flag in the file content itself — the JSON is syntactically valid, references a schema URL, and the settings are intentionally conservative (auto_generate_review: false, auto_insert_summary: false).

This PR is minimal and low-risk. The only substantive concern — whether an SAP-internal bot tool is appropriate for a public open-source repository — has already been raised in an existing review comment and should be addressed by the author.

PR Bot Information

Version: 1.20.16 | 📖 Documentation | 🚨 Create Incident | 💬 Feedback

  • LLM: anthropic--claude-4.6-sonnet
  • Correlation ID: 35a3dbae-fb21-4b5e-950b-bbe0f20a5aef
  • Agent Instructions:
  • File Content Strategy: Full file content
  • Event Trigger: issue_comment.edited

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wurzka wurzka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm interested in how good the reviews are for file formats 🕵️‍♀️

@albertmink albertmink merged commit 8b19bcf into main Apr 20, 2026
9 checks passed
@albertmink albertmink deleted the albertmink-patch-2 branch April 20, 2026 10:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants