-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
Harden flaky merge-architectures generative test #289
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hardening 👌
Just thinking out loud, non-blocking on this PR. This comment got me to checking out
equal-except-architecture?,unique-variants, and the oldvariant-keys.the domain concept here is "two builds are the same image except for CPU architecture." This equivalence relation is what
merge-architecturesbuilds on. But we seem to apply this concept ad hoc, and in two different ways:equal-except-architecture?->someselect-keysand now withdissocThey give the same count but they're not the same definition. Saying they 'mirror' each other isn't quite true.
Might be worth a follow up... a single source of truth for "same image except arch".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great call — followed it up in 70d4abe.
There were genuinely two definitions of "same image except architecture": production's
equal-except-architecture?(compare-based equality on the variant minus:architecture) and the test (dissoc :architecture+set). Same count, different definitions, as you noted.Both now collapse onto
docker/full-tagas the single source of truth — it already encodes JDK, distro, and build tool but never the architecture, so it's the natural identity for "same image."equal-except-architecture?is now just(and (not= arch) (= full-tag full-tag)), and the test counts distinctfull-tags. Dropped the now-unusedequal?helper too.