spec: INTENT-4 — absent-key = empty list, context-only session scoping, cold-start re-emission#113
spec: INTENT-4 — absent-key = empty list, context-only session scoping, cold-start re-emission#113JarbasAl wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…context-only session scoping, cold-start recovery - Absent list-valued keys equal empty lists; all-four-keys shape requirement dropped (§5.2, §6.1). - Unknown payload fields ignored and preserved, never malformed (§5.3, §6.3) — the carrier for companion-spec fields. - Manifest is observability-only for registration processing; read-only consultation by other specs permitted (§2). - Deregistration session scoping reads exclusively from context.session.session_id; payload session_id removed (§8.4, §11). - Enable/disable of unregistered intents is a no-op; reload-state survival out of scope (§8.5). - Cold-start recovery: skills SHOULD re-emit registrations on the deployment readiness announcement; idempotent per §8.1 (§10). - describe responses keyed on method, ordering RECOMMENDED (§10.2). - Orchestrator passivity qualified by the §3.2 reserved-name exclusion; citations corrected; timeless out-of-scope wording. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 52 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Internal-purity refinement of OVOS-INTENT-4.
Changes
requires_context/excludes_context) ride on registration payloads.session_idfor deregistration — includingovos.skill.deregister— is read exclusively fromcontext.session.session_id, never fromMessage.data; the payload-levelsession_idfield is removed. One rule for every message in the spec.enabledfield is authoritative).method; consumers MUST key on it, withkeyword-then-templateordering RECOMMENDED rather than a MUST enabling positional access.ovos.intent.register.template,.deregister,.enable,.disable,ovos.intent.list) — none are dispatch topics, so none take the reserved colon shape (MSG-1 §2.1.1).CHANGELOG entry appended under the spec's current class. Version field unchanged: per VERSIONING.md it is a V1/V2 compatibility class, and these refinements do not change class.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code