Repository navigation
Conversation
0d14fa6 to
3571659
Compare
turion
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great that you want to add it! (And thanks for your work on it btw.) If possible, let's simplify it to a oneliner.
|
Please run |
3571659 to
94f16cc
Compare
|
The |
|
I ran |
|
I think I can't override the CI failure when trying to merge. Maybe it makes sense to merge into |
Assisted-by: Claude Code (claude-opus-5-5)
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
94f16cc to
d69c4ac
Compare
|
I re-added the overrides. I'm happy to remove them when they're no longer necessary. I'd prefer to avoid waiting for some big refactor of Haskell packages though. |
|
This solution is strictly worse since using |
|
@turion I thought commiters can ignore the check. Maybe you need to dismiss your old review first. |
|
I'm happy to include the overrides or leave them out. I really don't care. It's a bit annoying to go back and forth like this.
I am not a Nix person, but Claude tested Very possible that I'm missing something or misunderstood though. |
I'm the author of Cabal Gild. This PR adds me as a maintainer alongside @turion (from #299962) and adds
cabal-gildas a top-level attribute.Assisted-by: Claude Code (Claude Opus 5.5) was used to research how Haskell packages are exposed in nixpkgs and draft the commits. I reviewed all changes and built cabal-gild locally on aarch64-darwin.
Things done
./result/bin/.nixpkgs-reviewon this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage.passthru.tests.