deno: fix CVE-2023-28446

[06kellyjac]

Description of changes

Fix GHSA-vq67-rp93-65qf on unstable with a patch for now until #221462 lands

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 23.05 Release Notes (or backporting 22.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[06kellyjac]

cve details:

// Expected Prompt
┌ ⚠️  Deno requests run access to "cat"
├ Requested by `Deno.Command().output()` API
├ Run again with --allow-run to bypass this prompt.
└ Allow? [y/n/A] (y = yes, allow; n = no, deny; A = allow all run permissions) >

// Actual Prompt
┌ ⚠️  Deno requests run access to "echo"
├ Requested by `Deno.Command().output()` API
├ Run again with --allow-run to bypass this prompt.
└ Allow? [y/n/A] (y = yes, allow; n = no, deny; A = allow all run permissions) >

---

this build's output:

λ ./result/bin/deno run --unstable cve-2023-28446-poc.ts
┌ ⚠️  Deno requests run access to "cat".
├ Requested by `┌ ⚠️  Deno requests run access to "echo"├ Requested by `Deno.Command().output()` API
├ Run again with --allow-run to bypass this prompt.
└ Allow? [y/n/A] (y = yes, allow; n = no, deny; A = allow all run permissions) >

Correctly lists cat for the first line. The Requested by section does still show the cheeky string that's trying to modify that first line which could cause some confusion but still good IMO. Will be an improvement from the current build & tide us over until #221462

[ocfox]

LGTM