Skip to content

chore: fix some function names in comment - #555

Open
cuoguojida wants to merge 1 commit into
JackalLabs:masterfrom
cuoguojida:master
Open

chore: fix some function names in comment#555
cuoguojida wants to merge 1 commit into
JackalLabs:masterfrom
cuoguojida:master

Conversation

@cuoguojida

@cuoguojida cuoguojida commented May 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

fix some function names in comment

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated internal documentation comments to accurately reflect method naming conventions.

Note: This is a maintenance release with no functional changes or user-visible impact.

Review Change Stack

Signed-off-by: cuoguojida <cuoguojida@outlook.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR corrects documentation comment labels for two legacy active-deals accessor methods in x/storage/keeper/active_deals.go. The doc comment for SetLegacyActiveDeals is updated from "SetActiveDeals" to "SetLegacyActiveDeals", and the doc comment for GetAllLegacyActiveDeals is updated from "GetAllActiveDeals" to "GetAllLegacyActiveDeals". No function signatures, storage keys, marshalling logic, or runtime behavior are modified.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • JackalLabs/canine-chain#522: Both PRs adjust doc comments in x/storage/keeper/active_deals.go to match legacy active-deals method names.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the changeset, which updates comment text to correct function names from generic to specific legacy variants.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@x/storage/keeper/active_deals.go`:
- Line 10: Update the godoc comment for the function SetLegacyActiveDeals to use
correct grammar and Go doc conventions: change "SetLegacyActiveDeals set a
specific activeDeals in the store from its index" to present-tense third-person
and fix the article (e.g., "SetLegacyActiveDeals sets a specific activeDeals in
the store from its index" or better "SetLegacyActiveDeals sets a specific
activeDeals entry in the store using its index"). Ensure the comment starts with
the function name "SetLegacyActiveDeals" and reflects the function purpose
concisely.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 0b85ff53-25b0-4324-a369-40a10a4c2eca

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1c58e22 and 61bce23.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • x/storage/keeper/active_deals.go

)

// SetActiveDeals set a specific activeDeals in the store from its index
// SetLegacyActiveDeals set a specific activeDeals in the store from its index

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick win

Consider improving godoc grammar while editing this line.

Since you're already updating this comment, consider these optional improvements to align with Go documentation conventions:

  • Change "set" to "sets" (godoc convention uses present tense, third person)
  • Change "a activeDeals" to "an activeDeals" (grammatical correctness)
✍️ Proposed documentation improvement
-// SetLegacyActiveDeals set a specific activeDeals in the store from its index
+// SetLegacyActiveDeals sets a specific activeDeals in the store from its index
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
// SetLegacyActiveDeals set a specific activeDeals in the store from its index
// SetLegacyActiveDeals sets a specific activeDeals in the store from its index
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@x/storage/keeper/active_deals.go` at line 10, Update the godoc comment for
the function SetLegacyActiveDeals to use correct grammar and Go doc conventions:
change "SetLegacyActiveDeals set a specific activeDeals in the store from its
index" to present-tense third-person and fix the article (e.g.,
"SetLegacyActiveDeals sets a specific activeDeals in the store from its index"
or better "SetLegacyActiveDeals sets a specific activeDeals entry in the store
using its index"). Ensure the comment starts with the function name
"SetLegacyActiveDeals" and reflects the function purpose concisely.

@cuoguojida

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@TheMarstonConnell Hi, Could you please review this PR at your convenience? Thank you very much.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant