-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 207
Add GitLab as Known Instance and draft Paired Onboarding Sprint pattern #926
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
rrrutledge
wants to merge
7
commits into
InnerSourceCommons:main
Choose a base branch
from
rrrutledge:add-gitlab-known-instance
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1386d21
Add GitLab as Known Instance across two patterns
rrrutledge 4ae4a44
Draft new pattern: Paired Onboarding Sprint
rrrutledge b5355ae
Drop GitLab GDK from Internal Developer Platform Known Instances
rrrutledge 0adaa7a
List Paired Onboarding Sprint pattern in README
rrrutledge 514e185
Note GDK containerization as related context in Paired Onboarding Sprint
rrrutledge 63316d6
Skip O'Reilly webinar link in the PR link checker
rrrutledge ba11e28
Credit Raimund Hook as author of Paired Onboarding Sprint
rrrutledge File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does "new-contributor environment setup" refer to the local development environment on a laptop?
And is this pattern referring to local development environments, or rather remote infrastructure that a software package is deployed to (like a DEV/STAGING/PROD environment)?
Or is the difference insignificant?
Aside: If this is the repo of the GDK, we could add a link to this: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-development-kit
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good question — and you're right, this doesn't belong here. The GDK is a local development environment a contributor runs on their own laptop (via GDK-in-a-box, a containerized GitLab instance), not the centralized, deployed self-service platform this pattern describes. I've dropped it from this pattern's Known Instances rather than trying to make it fit — pushed in b5355ae.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll have to work on the Claude skill to make this better 🤔