skillspector 2.5.1 (new formula)

[bevanjkay]

---

• Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
• Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
• Have you built your formula locally with HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>?
• Is your test running fine brew test <formula>?
• Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

---

• I did not use AI/LLM to create this PR, or I disclosed the tool/model below and reviewed its output; I did not attribute commits to AI and will answer maintainer questions and review comments myself without AI/LLM.

---

Claude Code with Opus 5 was used to help develop the Formula file.
I tested the produced formula and wrote the test block myself.

[SMillerDev]

That seems to pull in a lot of stuff we don't want.

       *** scikit-build-core 1.0.3 using CMake 4.4.0 (metadata_wheel)
        Preparing metadata (pyproject.toml): finished with status 'done'
      Collecting ninja>=1.8.2
        Using cached ninja-1.13.0-py3-none-linux_aarch64.whl
      Building wheels for collected packages: patchelf

[daeho-ro]

I think we could update this formula after this PR is merged

• build: make langgraph-cli[inmem] an optional dependency NVIDIA/SkillSpector#354

[bevanjkay]

@daeho-ro yes, I have been waiting for it to merge to update the PR.