-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 130
Add a mini interview step to end of ITP #1951
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
LonMcGregor
wants to merge
10
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
lm-itp-interview-practice
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cbe937f
first draft of mini-interview wshop
6df4a6e
link back to original tasks
b77a73a
Rewrite task spec
1b5f08c
Merge branch 'main' into lm-itp-interview-practice
LonMcGregor 2afd944
Update common-content/en/blocks/your-first-interview/index.md
LonMcGregor 03f6167
Update common-content/en/blocks/your-first-interview/index.md
LonMcGregor 1454962
incorporate feedback, rework for non-saturday workshop
c366439
remove from dayplan
dfd36d7
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin' into lm-itp-interview-practice
f00eff9
move to workshop page
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ | ||
| +++ | ||
| title="Your First Interview" | ||
| time=10 | ||
| objectives = [ | ||
| "Introduce yourself to a prospective employer", | ||
| "Answer technical questions about code", | ||
| "Convince an interviewer that you fully understand a project", | ||
| "Experience a professional interview" | ||
| ] | ||
| [build] | ||
| render = 'never' | ||
| list = 'local' | ||
| publishResources = false | ||
| +++ | ||
|
|
||
| Throughout ITP you have had experience building projects, giving demos, and now it's time to put it all together. | ||
| Now you are at the end of ITP you will take part in a very short interview. | ||
| This will let you practice answering technical questions about the TV Shows project you built. | ||
|
|
||
| Interviews can be stressful, especially if you have not done one before. | ||
| That's why we're doing one now! | ||
| There is no pass or fail here, and you can share your experiences with the rest of the class. | ||
|
|
||
| Being able to answer questions in an interview setting is a vital skill for employability, you won't get a job without this! | ||
| This builds on the earlier "Answering demo questions" workshop, and improve your ability to communicate about code with colleagues. | ||
| This is also practice before the Checkpoint stage, as completing an interview is a mandatory step before going on to the SDC. | ||
|
|
||
| In interviews it is important to convince the interviewer that you fully understand the code in a project. | ||
| You need to be able to explain _any_ of the code in your project, even if someone else wrote it. | ||
| We want to practice with a decent sized group project, so you will use your TV Shows project. | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ## What trainees will do | ||
| Here's how the interview will go, it should last no longer than 10 minutes: | ||
| * The interviewer will ask you to introduce yourself in 30 seconds, like you have been practising during the "Introduce Yourself!" energisers at the start of classes | ||
| * As part of your backlog, earlier in the week you shared the project to talk about in a slack thread and organised an interview time | ||
| * For up to 5 minutes, answer questions the interviewer has about the project you shared | ||
| * You should check the sections below to get an idea for the kind of things we are looking for, and what to avoid | ||
| * At the end, the interviewer will give you some feedback on how things went | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ## Instructions for the facilitator | ||
| The goal is to give all trainees experience with a short one on one interview. | ||
| Trainees will share their projects and book meeting times throughout the week. | ||
|
|
||
| Follow this script so all the interviews are consistent: | ||
| 1. (30 seconds) Ask the trainee to introduce themselves | ||
| 2. (up to 5 minutes) Pick one piece of functionality (e.g. "searching for an episode"), and ask the trainee to show the code and explain how it works. | ||
| 3. (up to 5 minutes) Share feedback to the trainee as a basis for a short discussion on how to improve their interviewing | ||
|
|
||
| Here are some tips: | ||
| * Check out the [TV Show project](https://github.com/CodeYourFuture/Project-TV-Show) beforehand, to familiarise yourself with what they have implemented | ||
| * Ask the trainee to present the code on their machine, and discuss it there | ||
| * We don't want to give trainees undue stress, so keep to the time limits suggested | ||
| * When asking questions, try to focus on more complex, non-trivial, or interesting parts of code | ||
| * See the pointers below for the main thngs we are looking for from trainees | ||
|
|
||
| After you've completed your interviews, share any particularly good outcomes or repeated issues from your interviews back to the education team so we can address them. | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ## Evidence of good understanding | ||
| Things for the interviewer to praise and look for. | ||
| Trainees should aim to show they can: | ||
| * Give a high level overview of a function after a quick read through | ||
| * Navigate through a codebase, knowing where everything is | ||
| * Explain the theory or usage behind JavaScript APIs like DOM, listeners, regexps, fetch | ||
| * Offer explanations of code at different levels, e.g. user-facing considerations, developer-facing considerations | ||
| * Explain choices / alternative approaches / trade-offs | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ## Evidence of poor understanding | ||
| If interviewers spot these, it could be a sign a trainee doesn't understand code. | ||
| Trainees should practice and avoid: | ||
| * Being unsure where different parts of code are, or having difficulty navigating a project | ||
| * Just reading what the code does, without being able to explain _why_ and _how_ it works | ||
| * Using JavaScript APIs while being unable to explain how they work | ||
| * Knowing jargon and buzzwords but unable to explain code with simple language | ||
| * Confusion over complex syntax like ternary, boolean, destructuring expressions, higher order functions | ||
| * Can't answer questions about code written by a teammate in a group project | ||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.