Repository navigation
docs: disclose frozen OpticStudio Student integration limitation - #4
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: eea0d771b9
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| ## Evaluated integration — OpticStudio Student (not in catalog) | ||
|
|
||
| In a 2026 R1 Ansys Student environment, OpticStudio 26.1 was discovered and its normal process-start canary passed. The official optiSLang batch runtime created the OpticStudio integration node and a headless project, but model loading stopped when the current Student license rejected the node's required ZOS-API access. No OpticStudio optical calculation or physics validation was executed. Optics is not one of the implemented 11 domains or 134 catalog cases. This exploration is frozen: the project does not claim a runnable OpticStudio Student automation integration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This paragraph publishes concrete execution outcomes—successful discovery and canary, project creation, and a license rejection—but a repo-wide search for OpticStudio, ZOS-API, and optiSLang finds no manifest or result artifact supporting them; this paragraph is the only relevant record. Because the integration is deliberately excluded from the catalog, the existing static gates still pass and readers cannot verify this frozen blocked outcome from the repository's sources of truth. Add a sanitized, project-relative result record or remove the run-specific claims before publication.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L3-L3
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Summary
Provenance
Validation