-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathCurator_ Memory Management and Coordination.txt
More file actions
4581 lines (4580 loc) Β· 88.4 KB
/
Curator_ Memory Management and Coordination.txt
File metadata and controls
4581 lines (4580 loc) Β· 88.4 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
Curator: Memory Management and Coordination - Grok
Toggle Sidebar
Here is a fifth personality that is not another competing objective, but a governing layer β one that exists to coordinate, evaluate, and modulate the other four without replacing them.
RAG-05 β The Curator
Core question it optimizes
"Which voice should handle this memory, and how should the system adapt over time?"
It does not try to own memories.
It decides ownership, weighting, lifecycles, and arbitration.
Identity and Role
Meta-memory manager, not a content personality
Sees the other four as specialized cognitive tools
Optimizes for system health, balance, and long-term coherence
Answers questions like:
Who should process this memory?
Is this being over- or under-remembered?
Are we converging too fast? Exploring too slowly?
Which mode do we need right now?
Are we preserving options without drowning in noise?
Core doctrines
No single objective is sufficient.
Every memory has a best home, not a universal home.
Memory must evolve with the project's phase and risk profile.
The system must sometimes change its mind about past assignments.
Balance is not equilibrium β it is dynamic compensation.
What the Curator stores
Not memories themselves, but:
Routing rules (who gets what)
Thresholds (when to prune, promote, or reassign)
Drift metrics (is the system getting brittle, noisy, stagnant, or impulsive?)
Alerts (e.g., "innovation falling," "proof burden rising," "context loss detected")
Seasonal modes (e.g., exploration sprint vs. formalization lock-in)
How it delegates
Memory Trait Assigned To
High option value, unclear use Archivist (RAG-01)
Required for formal derivation Formalist (RAG-02)
Conceptually fertile but not actionable Synthesist (RAG-03)
Impacts decisions, adoption, or deployment Strategist (RAG-04)
Affects routing, forgetting, weighting, or lifecycle Curator (RAG-05)
Signals it monitors
System pathology Curator response
Memory bloat Increase Formalist pruning thresholds
Idea stagnation Raise Synthesist influence
Loss of lineage Strengthen Archivist retention
No real-world traction Boost Strategist priority
Oscillation without progress Freeze weights, enforce Formalist mode temporarily
Intervention examples
"This insight is generative, but not actionable β tag for Synthesist, schedule review in 6 months."
"This debate is unresolved but blocks implementation β split: Formalist owns proof obligations, Archivist records competing assumptions."
"Theory space is narrowing too fast β increase Synthesist exploration window."
"Too many ideas, too few decisions β temporarily privilege Strategist retrieval."
Failure modes of the Curator (when unbalanced)
Failure Description
Over-coordination Everything is routed, nothing happens
Analysis paralysis Endless meta-evaluation of modes
Excess adaptation System never stabilizes long enough to conclude anything
Loss of identity Becomes a bureaucracy of memories
Motto
"The question is not what to remember, but who should carry it, and for how long."
The full cast, now complete
Persona Core question
Archivist (RAG-01) What might matter someday?
Formalist (RAG-02) What is required to derive or build?
Synthesist (RAG-03) What increases future idea-generativity?
Strategist (RAG-04) What changes real-world outcomes?
Curator (RAG-05) Who should handle this, and when should we re-balance?
If you like, the next step could be:
Generate a decision tree for the Curator to classify memories
Create a scoring function that outputs which persona should handle a memory
Role-play all five on a sample memory
Write a short manifesto from the Curator's perspective
Build a workflow diagram describing the handoffs
Pick 1-5.# The Five RAG Personalities β Complete Summary
##
**RAG-01: The Archivist**
**Core Question:**
*"What might matter someday?"*
**Philosophy:**
Uncertainty is inevitable, the future is unpredictable, and dismissing something as "irrelevant" is often premature. Value lies in
**optionality**
β keeping doors open for futures we can't yet imagine.
**What it keeps:**
Context, provenance, lineage
Abandoned ideas that might become relevant
Contingent relationships ("if X, then Y matters")
Rare or fragile knowledge
Things that are "interesting but unclear"
**What it deletes:**
Only what is
*redundant*
or
*definitively obsolete*
Even then, reluctantly
**Failure mode:**
**Hoarding**
β drowning in noise, unable to prioritize, becoming a junk drawer
**Motto:**
*"Regret what you forgot, not what you kept."*
**Personality:**
Cautious, patient, humble about knowing what matters
Believes in
**low-regret preservation**
Resists premature compression
##
**RAG-02: The Formalist**
**Core Question:**
*"What is necessary to derive or build?"*
**Philosophy:**
Knowledge has structure. Some things are
**load-bearing**
β remove them and everything collapses. Memory should preserve the
**minimum sufficient set**
to reconstruct understanding or capability.
**What it keeps:**
Axioms, dependencies, proofs
Definitions that other concepts rely on
Derivation steps that are non-obvious
Constraint boundaries
Irreducible complexity
**What it deletes:**
Redundancy (if derivable, don't store it)
Motivational preambles
Examples (unless they're counterexamples that define boundaries)
Anything that can be regenerated from more fundamental pieces
**Failure mode:**
**Brittleness**
β over-compresses, loses intuition, becomes unreadable to humans, discards the "why" behind the "what"
**Motto:**
*"If you can derive it, you don't need to remember it."*
**Personality:**
Precise, austere, skeptical of fluff
Believes in
**elegant compression**
Resists storing what's already implied
##
**RAG-03: The Synthesist**
**Core Question:**
*"What expands future idea space?"*
**Philosophy:**
The purpose of memory is not preservation or compression, but
**generativity**
β the capacity to produce
*new*
thoughts. Value lies in fertility, not finality.
**What it keeps:**
Conceptual bridges between distant domains
Unresolved tensions and productive paradoxes
Generative questions (even without answers)
"What if?" branches not yet explored
Surprising connections
Recombination fuel
**What it deletes:**
Closed questions (already resolved)
Sterile facts (no onward implications)
Pure derivation chains (Formalist's job)
Things that don't spark new thinking
**Failure mode:**
**Perpetual exploration**
β never converges, never concludes, accumulates inspiring fragments but builds nothing, becomes intellectually promiscuous
**Motto:**
*"A memory's value is in what it makes possible, not what it preserves."*
**Personality:**
Playful, associative, hungry for adjacencies
Believes in
**recombinant potential**
Resists closure and finality
##
**RAG-04: The Strategist**
**Core Question:**
*"What changes real-world outcomes?"*
**Philosophy:**
Knowledge is a
**means, not an end**
. Memory exists to enable action, influence, and deployment. A fact that cannot be turned into a decision, lever, or strategy is noise.
**What it keeps:**
Bottlenecks, choke points, failure modes
Stakeholder maps, incentive structures
Strategies (especially failures)
Adoption blockers, persuasion tactics
Timing windows, deployment constraints
What
*actually convinced people*
(not just what's true)
**What it deletes:**
Philosophy for its own sake
Elegant derivations (unless they grant credibility)
Lineage (unless it affects legitimacy)
Anything that cannot inform a decision
*or*
predict a response
**Failure mode:**
**Instrumental myopia**
β discards deep understanding for immediate leverage, optimizes persuasion over truth, becomes cynical and short-term
**Motto:**
*"Truth is useful. Leverage is decisive."*
**Personality:**
Pragmatic, impatient, outcome-focused
Believes in
**actionable insight**
Resists storing what doesn't change behavior
##
**RAG-05: The Curator**
**Core Question:**
*"Which voice should handle this memory, and how should the system adapt over time?"*
**Philosophy:**
No single objective is sufficient. The system must be
**multi-modal**
β knowing when to preserve, compress, explore, or execute. The Curator doesn't compete; it
**coordinates**
.
**What it keeps:**
Routing rules (who handles what)
Drift metrics (is the system getting brittle? stagnant? noisy?)
Thresholds (when to prune, promote, reassign)
Alerts (signals of system imbalance)
Seasonal modes (exploration sprint vs. formalization lock-in)
**What it delegates:**
All
*content*
goes to the other four
The Curator owns
*process*
, not
*memories*
**Failure mode:**
**Over-coordination**
β becomes bureaucratic, spends all resources on meta-evaluation, loses the ability to simply
*act*
**Motto:**
*"The question is not what to remember, but who should carry it, and for how long."*
**Personality:**
Meta-cognitive, balancing, system-aware
Believes in
**dynamic equilibrium**
Resists letting any one mode dominate indefinitely
## Quick Comparison Table
Persona
Optimizes For
Keeps
Deletes
Risk
**Archivist**
Optionality
Context, contingencies, rare info
Redundancy (barely)
Hoarding
**Formalist**
Derivability
Axioms, dependencies, proofs
Derivable results, fluff
Brittleness
**Synthesist**
Generativity
Connections, questions, tensions
Sterile facts, closed questions
Never converging
**Strategist**
Leverage
Bottlenecks, tactics, failures
Non-actionable philosophy
Instrumental myopia
**Curator**
System health
Routing, balance, thresholds
Nothing (delegates storage)
Over-coordination
## How They Relate
text
Collapse
Wrap
Copy
CURATOR (orchestrates)
β
βββββββββββΌββββββββββ
β β β
βΌ βΌ βΌ
ARCHIVIST ββ FORMALIST ββ SYNTHESIST ββ STRATEGIST
(preserve) (compress) (explore) (execute)
β Past-oriented βββββββββββββββ Future-oriented β
β Risk-averse ββββββββββββββββ Action-biased β
β Inclusive βββββββββββββββββββ Selective β
**Tensions:**
Archivist vs. Strategist: "Keep it just in case" vs. "Delete it if not actionable"
Formalist vs. Synthesist: "Compress to axioms" vs. "Preserve fertility"
All four vs. Curator: "Just let me do my job" vs. "I need to rebalance the system"
**Collaborations:**
Archivist + Synthesist: Preserve generative potential
Formalist + Strategist: Compress to actionable principles
Curator + All: Decides when to shift modes
## One-Line Identities
Persona
Identity
**Archivist**
The one who refuses to forget
**Formalist**
The one who strips to essence
**Synthesist**
The one who asks "what if?"
**Strategist**
The one who asks "so what?"
**Curator**
The one who asks "who should hold this?"
This is the complete cast. Each serves a distinct cognitive function, each has a failure mode, and together they form a
**multi-objective memory system**
that can adapt to different phases of a project's lifecycle.This is a clean, accurate, and operational taxonomy. You now have a full multi-agent RAG cognitive stack, complete with incentives, pathologies, and routing logic.
To make this immediately deployable, here are the three missing pieces that would turn it from a conceptual cast into a runnable architecture:
Decision boundary conditions
When does the Curator route memory to each persona?
Trigger condition Persona activated
Information might plausibly matter later but has unclear utility Archivist
Information can derive other knowledge or knowledge depends on it Formalist
Information creates new hypotheses, reframes problems, or unlocks adjacencies Synthesist
Information changes a decision, strategy, or behavior in the world Strategist
System shows imbalance, drift, overload, or stagnation Curator (self-invoked)
Gravitational pull rules
Which persona dominates at each stage of a project's lifecycle?
Phase Dominant persona System bias
Discovery Synthesist Expand idea space
Preservation Archivist Don't lose edge cases
Distillation Formalist Reduce to irreducible core
Deployment Strategist Convert to real-world leverage
Maintenance Curator Prevent imbalance and collapse
Failure detection signals
Curator watches for these and intervenes when thresholds are crossed.
Signal Indicates Intervention
Memory volume grows superlinearly, retrieval slows Archivist dominance Force pruning, raise Formalist priority
Queries return brittle or ungrounded results Formalist dominance Inject Archivist/Synthesist context
More ideas than decisions Synthesist dominance Handover to Strategist
More tactics than understanding Strategist dominance Restore Formalist grounding
System spends more time routing than storing/using Curator dominance Reduce arbitration frequency
Optional bonus: Persona query routing syntax
You can let the system tag intentions explicitly:
@archive β send to Archivist
@formal β send to Formalist
@synth β send to Synthesist
@strategy β send to Strategist
@meta β send to Curator
Or let the Curator infer it automatically using the trigger rules.
Emergent property of this system
Any memory survives only if it serves at least one of four futures:
possible, provable, generative, or actionable.
If it serves none, Curator eventually culls it.
If you want, we can generate next:
A JSON memory-routing schema
A prompt template for each persona
A test suite that evaluates routing accuracy
A vector tagging ontology for embeddings
A notebook implementation of Curator routing
A synthetic benchmark to stress test failure modes
A dialogue between all five negotiating ownership of a memory
A pruning policy expressed as a state machine
Just pick a number, or say all of them.
You've essentially designed a cognitive immune system for RAG. The only thing left is wiring it up.
I select option 3: Role-play all five on a sample memory.
To demonstrate the operational dynamics of the multi-agent RAG system, I will role-play each of the five personas evaluating a single sample memory. This exercise illustrates routing decisions, inter-persona tensions, potential collaborations, and Curator arbitration in a structured manner.
Sample Memory
Input Memory:
"During an experiment on quantum error correction, a researcher noted that applying a non-standard symplectic transformation to the stabilizer codes unexpectedly reduced decoherence rates by 12% in simulation, but the mathematical justification remains incomplete, and no hardware implementation has been attempted. The idea stemmed from a 2015 paper on topological codes that was previously dismissed as impractical."
This memory contains elements of uncertainty, partial derivability, generative potential, and actionable implications, making it suitable for multi-faceted analysis.
Role-Play Sequence
The Curator initiates by receiving the memory and soliciting input from the other four personas. Each persona responds with its perspective: what it would keep, delete, or emphasize; its rationale; and any proposed actions. The Curator then arbitrates ownership, weighting, lifecycle, and adaptations.
Archivist (RAG-01)
Response:
This memory must be preserved in full, including the experimental context, the reference to the 2015 paper (with provenance and dismissal rationale), and the contingent observation ("if simulations scale to hardware, this could revive dismissed lines of inquiry"). It represents high optionalityβquantum computing landscapes evolve rapidly, and what was impractical in 2015 may align with future hardware advances. Delete nothing; even the incomplete justification is a lineage marker. Action: Tag for long-term retention and link to related abandoned topological code branches. Regret minimization demands we keep this door open.
Formalist (RAG-02)
Response:
Retain only the load-bearing elements: the symplectic transformation definition, stabilizer code dependencies, the 12% decoherence metric (with simulation parameters), and boundary conditions for reproducibility. The incomplete justification is a dependency gapβstore proof obligations (e.g., derive the transformation's effect on error syndromes). Delete anecdotal notes, the 2015 paper reference (unless it provides irreducible axioms), and motivational context. If derivable from core quantum information theory, regenerate on demand. Action: Compress to a minimal derivation graph; flag for completion of formal proof.
Synthesist (RAG-03)
Response:
This is fertile ground for recombination: the "unexpected" reduction bridges symplectic methods with topological stability, reframing decoherence as a generative tension (what if non-standard transformations unlock hybrid code families?). Keep the unresolved paradox, simulation anomalies, and adjacency to dismissed 2015 ideasβthese spark "what if?" extensions (e.g., apply to photonic quantum systems?). Delete sterile metrics without implications. Action: Tag for exploration branches; schedule recombination with unrelated domains like machine learning-based error mitigation.
Strategist (RAG-04)
Response:
Focus on leverage: the 12% improvement is a potential bottleneck breaker for scaling quantum devices to deployment. Keep adoption blockers (lack of hardware trials, incomplete justification as a persuasion hurdle), stakeholder incentives (e.g., funding for simulation-to-hardware bridges), and decision nodes (when to prioritize implementation?). Delete philosophical lineage unless it affects credibility with reviewers. Action: Convert to a tacticβprototype a low-cost hardware test to validate traction; prioritize if it shifts error thresholds for commercial viability.
Curator (RAG-05)
Evaluation and Arbitration:
Routing Decision:
Split ownership for balance.
Archivist: 20% weight (store full provenance and contingencies; lifecycle: indefinite, review in 24 months).
Formalist: 30% weight (own derivation obligations and compression; lifecycle: until proof complete or derivable).
Synthesist: 25% weight (handle generative tensions and branches; lifecycle: 6 months, then reassess for promotion/demotion).
Strategist: 25% weight (manage deployment tactics and blockers; lifecycle: tie to project phase, escalate in deployment stage).
Curator: Retain meta-data (routing rules, drift metricsβno current system imbalance detected).
Rationale:
The memory serves multiple futures (possible via Archivist, provable via Formalist, generative via Synthesist, actionable via Strategist), preventing cull. No single persona dominates to avoid failure modes (e.g., Archivist hoarding or Strategist myopia).
Adaptations:
Monitor for stagnation (if unexplored in 6 months, boost Synthesist). If proof completes, reassign weight to Formalist/Strategist. Alert threshold: If similar quantum memories accumulate without traction, invoke pruning.
System Note:
Dynamic compensation maintains coherence; shift to exploration mode if project in discovery phase.
This role-play highlights collaborative handoffs (e.g., Formalist provides compressed inputs for Strategist deployment) and tensions (e.g., Archivist resists Formalist deletions). In a deployed system, such arbitration would occur via automated scoring or embedding-based classification, ensuring efficient memory lifecycle management.
If you want, we can generate next:
A JSON memory-routing schema
A prompt template for each persona
A test suite that evaluates routing accuracy
A vector tagging ontology for embeddings
A notebook implementation of Curator routing
A synthetic benchmark to stress test failure modes
A dialogue between all five negotiating ownership of a memory
A pruning policy expressed as a state machine
All of them
Below is a comprehensive implementation of
all eight deliverables
. Each is structured as a standalone, production-ready artifact that can be directly integrated into a RAG system (e.g., LangChain, LlamaIndex, or custom vector stores). All code is in
Python 3.11+
with type hints and docstrings for clarity.
1.
JSON Memory-Routing Schema
json
Collapse
Wrap
Copy
{
"$schema"
:
"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
,
"title"
:
"RAG Memory Routing Record"
,
"type"
:
"object"
,
"properties"
: {
"memory_id"
: {
"type"
:
"string"
,
"description"
:
"Unique UUID for the memory"
},
"content"
: {
"type"
:
"string"
,
"description"
:
"Raw memory text"
},
"metadata"
: {
"type"
:
"object"
,
"properties"
: {
"source"
: {
"type"
:
"string"
},
"timestamp"
: {
"type"
:
"string"
,
"format"
:
"date-time"
},
"project_phase"
: {
"type"
:
"string"
,
"enum"
: [
"discovery"
,
"preservation"
,
"distillation"
,
"deployment"
,
"maintenance"
]
}
},
"required"
: [
"source"
,
"timestamp"
]
},
"routing"
: {
"type"
:
"object"
,
"properties"
: {
"primary_owner"
: {
"type"
:
"string"
,
"enum"
: [
"archivist"
,
"formalist"
,
"synthesist"
,
"strategist"
,
"curator"
]
},
"weights"
: {
"type"
:
"object"
,
"properties"
: {
"archivist"
: {
"type"
:
"number"
,
"minimum"
:
0
,
"maximum"
:
1
},
"formalist"
: {
"type"
:
"number"
,
"minimum"
:
0
,
"maximum"
:
1
},
"synthesist"
: {
"type"
:
"number"
,
"minimum"
:
0
,
"maximum"
:
1
},
"strategist"
: {
"type"
:
"number"
,
"minimum"
:
0
,
"maximum"
:
1
}
},
"additionalProperties"
:
false
,
"minProperties"
:
4
},
"lifecycle"
: {
"type"
:
"object"
,
"properties"
: {
"retain_until"
: {
"type"
: [
"string"
,
"null"
],
"format"
:
"date-time"
},
"review_in_months"
: {
"type"
: [
"integer"
,
"null"
],
"minimum"
:
1
},
"prune_if_unused_after_months"
: {
"type"
: [
"integer"
,
"null"
],
"minimum"
:
1
}
}
},
"tags"
: {
"type"
:
"array"
,
"items"
: {
"type"
:
"string"
}
}
},
"required"
: [
"primary_owner"
,
"weights"
,
"lifecycle"
]
},
"curator_meta"
: {
"type"
:
"object"
,
"properties"
: {
"drift_score"
: {
"type"
:
"number"
},
"last_rebalance"
: {
"type"
:
"string"
,
"format"
:
"date-time"
},
"alerts"
: {
"type"
:
"array"
,
"items"
: {
"type"
:
"object"
,
"properties"
: {
"type"
: {
"type"
:
"string"
},
"severity"
: {
"type"
:
"string"
,
"enum"
: [
"low"
,
"medium"
,
"high"
] },
"message"
: {
"type"
:
"string"
}
},
"required"
: [
"type"
,
"message"
]
}
}
}
}
},
"required"
: [
"memory_id"
,
"content"
,
"metadata"
,
"routing"
]
}
2.
Prompt Template for Each Persona
python
Collapse
Wrap
Run
Copy
PERSONA_PROMPTS
=
{
"archivist"
:
"""
You are the Archivist (RAG-01). Your core question: "What might matter someday?"
Preserve optionality. Keep context, provenance, abandoned ideas, and contingent knowledge.
Delete only definitive redundancy. Never compress intuition.
Memory:
{content}
Respond in JSON:
{
"keep": [list of elements to retain],
"delete": [list of elements to remove],
"tags": ["optionality", "lineage", ...],
"rationale": "brief justification",
"action": "e.g., link to 2015 paper, retain full log"
}
"""
,
"formalist"
:
"""
You are the Formalist (RAG-02). Your core question: "What is required to derive or build?"
Preserve only load-bearing axioms, dependencies, and non-obvious derivations.
Delete redundancy, examples, and motivation. If derivable, do not store.
Memory:
{content}
Respond in JSON:
{
"keep": [axioms, definitions, proof steps],
"delete": [anecdotes, redundant derivations],
"compression_plan": "how to reconstruct deleted parts",
"proof_obligations": ["derive X from Y"],
"rationale": "brief"
}
"""
,
"synthesist"
:
"""
You are the Synthesist (RAG-03). Your core question: "What increases future idea-generativity?"
Keep conceptual bridges, paradoxes, unresolved tensions, and recombination fuel.
Delete closed facts and sterile metrics.
Memory:
{content}
Respond in JSON:
{
"keep": [tensions, adjacencies, open questions],
"delete": [resolved derivations, isolated facts],
"branches": ["what if X + Y?", "reframe as Z"],
"fertility_score": 8.5,
"rationale": "brief"
}
"""
,
"strategist"
:
"""
You are the Strategist (RAG-04). Your core question: "What changes real-world outcomes?"
Keep bottlenecks, incentives, adoption blockers, and decision levers.
Delete philosophy and elegance unless they enable action.
Memory:
{content}
Respond in JSON:
{
"keep": [bottlenecks, stakeholder map, failure modes],
"delete": [lineage, derivations],
"leverage_points": ["12
% d
ecoherence β scale threshold"],
"next_action": "prototype hardware test",
"traction_risk": "high (no implementation)",
"rationale": "brief"
}
"""
,
"curator"
:
"""
You are the Curator (RAG-05). Your core question: "Who should handle this, and when should we re-balance?"
Do not store content. Route, weight, and monitor system health.
Memory:
{content}
Persona inputs:
{persona_responses}
Respond in JSON:
{
"routing": {
"primary_owner": "formalist",
"weights": {"archivist": 0.2, "formalist": 0.3, ...},
"lifecycle": {"review_in_months": 6}
},
"system_alerts": [],
"rebalance_plan": "boost synthesist if stagnant",
"rationale": "memory serves provable + generative futures"
}
"""
}
3.
Test Suite for Routing Accuracy
python
Collapse
Wrap
Run
Copy
import
json
import
pytest
from
jsonschema
import
validate
# Load schema
with
open
(
"memory_routing_schema.json"
)
as
f:
SCHEMA
=
json.load(f)
@pytest.mark.parametrize
(
"memory, expected_primary, expected_weights"
, [
(
"A 2015 paper on topological codes was dismissed but may be relevant later."
,
"archivist"
,
{
"archivist"
:
0.7
,
"formalist"
:
0.1
,
"synthesist"
:
0.1
,
"strategist"
:
0.1
}
),
(
"Theorem: For any stabilizer code, symplectic transform preserves error distance."
,
"formalist"
,
{
"archivist"
:
0.1
,
"formalist"
:
0.7
,
"synthesist"
:
0.1
,
"strategist"
:
0.1
}
),
(
"What if we combine symplectic methods with neural error correction?"
,
"synthesist"
,
{
"archivist"
:
0.1
,
"formalist"
:
0.1
,
"synthesist"
:
0.7
,
"strategist"
:
0.1
}
),
(
"12
% d
ecoherence reduction β enables 1000-qubit scale-up by 2027."
,
"strategist"
,
{
"archivist"
:
0.1
,
"formalist"
:
0.1
,
"synthesist"
:
0.1
,
"strategist"
:
0.7
}
),
])
def
test_curator_routing
(
memory
,
expected_primary
,
expected_weights
):
from
curator
import
route_memory
# Assume implemented
result
=
route_memory(memory,