From 4a21304ba2b85a86cc566992b373059af0dcd893 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 11:01:32 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 001/105] Add auth service --- src/lib/auth-service.ts | 217 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 217 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/lib/auth-service.ts diff --git a/src/lib/auth-service.ts b/src/lib/auth-service.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000..2f0fec24 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/lib/auth-service.ts @@ -0,0 +1,217 @@ +import type { Readable } from "svelte/store" +import { get, writable } from "svelte/store" +import type { StateValueFrom } from "xstate" +import { loginMachine } from "./login.xstate" +import type { Email, ServerResponse, User, UserId } from "./simple-comment-types" + +type LoginMachineStateValue = StateValueFrom + +export type AuthSessionState = LoginMachineStateValue + +export type AuthRequestReason = + | "comment-submit" + | "reply-submit" + | "manual-login" + +export type AuthRequestState = + | { status: "idle" } + | { + status: "pending" + reason: AuthRequestReason + requestId: string + } + +export type AuthOutcomeState = + | { status: "none" } + | { + status: "localValidationError" + message: string + requestId: string + } + | { + status: "remoteError" + error: ServerResponse | string + requestId: string + } + | { + status: "success" + user: User + requestId: string + } + | { + status: "cancelled" + requestId: string + } + +type PendingAuthRequest = Extract +type ActiveAuthOutcome = Exclude + +export type LoginPayload = { + userId: UserId + password: string +} + +export type SignupPayload = { + userId: UserId + password: string + displayName: string + email: Email +} + +export type GuestLoginPayload = { + displayName: string + email: Email +} + +export type ReportLocalValidationErrorInput = { + message: string + requestId?: string +} + +export type CreateAuthServiceOptions = { + initialUser?: User +} + +export type AuthService = { + sessionState: Readable + currentUser: Readable + authRequest: Readable + authOutcome: Readable + init: () => Promise + requestAuth: (reason: AuthRequestReason) => { requestId: string } + clearAuthOutcome: (requestId?: string) => void + cancelAuthRequest: (requestId?: string) => void + reportLocalValidationError: ( + input: ReportLocalValidationErrorInput + ) => void + login: (payload: LoginPayload) => Promise + signup: (payload: SignupPayload) => Promise + loginGuest: (payload: GuestLoginPayload) => Promise + logout: () => Promise +} + +const notImplemented = async (methodName: string): Promise => { + throw new Error( + `auth-service scaffold method '${methodName}' is not implemented` + ) +} + +const matchesRequestId = ( + value: { requestId: string }, + requestId?: string +): boolean => requestId === undefined || value.requestId === requestId + +export const createAuthService = ( + options: CreateAuthServiceOptions = {} +): AuthService => { + const { initialUser } = options + + let requestSequence = 0 + + const sessionStateStore = writable(initialUser ? "loggedIn" : "idle") + const currentUserStore = writable(initialUser) + const authRequestStore = writable({ status: "idle" }) + const authOutcomeStore = writable({ status: "none" }) + + const getPendingRequest = (): PendingAuthRequest | undefined => { + const activeRequest = get(authRequestStore) + + if (activeRequest.status !== "pending") return undefined + return activeRequest + } + + const getActiveOutcome = (): ActiveAuthOutcome | undefined => { + const activeOutcome = get(authOutcomeStore) + + if (activeOutcome.status === "none") return undefined + return activeOutcome + } + + const requestAuth = (reason: AuthRequestReason): { requestId: string } => { + requestSequence += 1 + + const requestId = `auth-request-${requestSequence}` + + authOutcomeStore.set({ status: "none" }) + authRequestStore.set({ + status: "pending", + reason, + requestId, + }) + + return { requestId } + } + + const clearAuthOutcome = (requestId?: string): void => { + const activeOutcome = getActiveOutcome() + + if (activeOutcome && !matchesRequestId(activeOutcome, requestId)) return + authOutcomeStore.set({ status: "none" }) + } + + const cancelAuthRequest = (requestId?: string): void => { + const activeRequest = getPendingRequest() + + if (!activeRequest || !matchesRequestId(activeRequest, requestId)) return + + authRequestStore.set({ status: "idle" }) + authOutcomeStore.set({ + status: "cancelled", + requestId: activeRequest.requestId, + }) + } + + const reportLocalValidationError = ({ + message, + requestId, + }: ReportLocalValidationErrorInput): void => { + const activeRequest = getPendingRequest() + + if (!activeRequest || !matchesRequestId(activeRequest, requestId)) return + + authRequestStore.set({ status: "idle" }) + authOutcomeStore.set({ + status: "localValidationError", + message, + requestId: activeRequest.requestId, + }) + } + + return { + sessionState: { + subscribe: sessionStateStore.subscribe, + }, + currentUser: { + subscribe: currentUserStore.subscribe, + }, + authRequest: { + subscribe: authRequestStore.subscribe, + }, + authOutcome: { + subscribe: authOutcomeStore.subscribe, + }, + init: async () => { + sessionStateStore.set("verifying") + sessionStateStore.set(initialUser ? "loggedIn" : "loggedOut") + }, + requestAuth, + clearAuthOutcome, + cancelAuthRequest, + reportLocalValidationError, + login: async payload => { + void payload + return notImplemented("login") + }, + signup: async payload => { + void payload + return notImplemented("signup") + }, + loginGuest: async payload => { + void payload + return notImplemented("loginGuest") + }, + logout: async () => { + return notImplemented("logout") + }, + } +} From a9777403ced6e9ba817b61fd43de10cfec0c9647 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 18:31:21 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 002/105] Add documentation for widget-scoped auth service and establish implementation checklist --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md | 88 +++++++++++++++++++ src/lib/auth-service.ts | 23 +++++ 2 files changed, 111 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e0d924b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ +# Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 1 Checklist + +Status: planning + +Classification: proposed implementation checklist draft (not approved) + +Source plan: `docs/RepoHealthImprovementBacklog.md` (Priority 5: Frontend Architecture Decoupling) + +## Scope Lock (from Source Plan) + +In scope: + +- reduce component-bound behavior coupling where the repo already flags it as a concern +- clarify boundaries between view components, state machines, and auth/workflow logic + +Success signals to satisfy: + +- auth and identity flows are less dependent on component presence +- UI modules are easier to test at the right boundary +- login-related state, side effects, and rendering responsibilities are easier to explain as separate concerns + +Out of scope: + +- changing backend/API contracts +- introducing auth feature behavior changes beyond boundary ownership refactor +- request/outcome coordination for `CommentInput.svelte` and reply flows +- moving login form-local field state or field-level validation UI out of `Login.svelte` +- extracting auth API workflows in this slice + +## Slice Intent + +This slice establishes only the minimal contract for a widget-scoped `auth-service` that owns login-machine runtime lifecycle outside `Login.svelte`. + +Execution note: + +- maintainer preference requires three separate sessions for this slice: + - export scaffold + - fail-first tests + - implementation to green +- if implementation cannot reach green without changing the tests, stop and discuss rather than modifying tests in the implementation session + +## Atomic Checklist Items + +- [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Reduce `src/lib/auth-service.ts` to the minimal slice-1 export scaffold that defines `AuthSessionState` from `src/lib/login.xstate.ts`, exports `AuthService` with only `sessionState` and `destroy`, and exports `createAuthService` without request/outcome, current-user, or auth-command surfaces. + - Depends on: none. + - Trace: + - "clarify boundaries between view components, state machines, and auth/workflow logic" (Priority 5) + - "auth/session behavior is coupled to component presence and lifecycle rather than being owned by a smaller dedicated workflow/service boundary" (Priority 5) + +- [ ] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend tests for the slice-1 `auth-service` contract in `src/tests/frontend/auth-service.test.ts` that prove `createAuthService()` returns an object with readable `sessionState`, that `sessionState` uses the `loginMachine` session vocabulary, and that `destroy()` is part of the public lifecycle contract. + - Depends on: C01. + - Trace: + - "UI modules are easier to test at the right boundary" (Priority 5) + - "clarify boundaries between view components, state machines, and auth/workflow logic" (Priority 5) + +- [ ] C02 `[frontend]` Implement slice-1 runtime ownership in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `createAuthService()` owns a live interpreted instance of `src/lib/login.xstate.ts`, publishes session state from that runtime rather than manual string stores, and disposes the runtime through `destroy()`. + - Depends on: T01. + - Validated by: T01. + - Trace: + - "it drives the `loginMachine` state machine" (Priority 5) + - "auth/session behavior is coupled to component presence and lifecycle rather than being owned by a smaller dedicated workflow/service boundary" (Priority 5) + - success target: "auth and identity flows are less dependent on component presence" (Priority 5) + +## Behavior Slices + +### Slice 1A + +Goal: define the minimal public contract for auth-service runtime ownership without pre-committing later auth surfaces. + +Items: C01 + +Type: behavior + +### Slice 1B + +Goal: lock the slice-1 runtime contract in tests before runtime implementation begins. + +Items: T01 + +Type: behavior + +### Slice 1C + +Goal: move login-machine runtime lifecycle ownership into auth-service and expose it through the tested contract. + +Items: C02 + +Type: behavior diff --git a/src/lib/auth-service.ts b/src/lib/auth-service.ts index 2f0fec24..8f911bba 100644 --- a/src/lib/auth-service.ts +++ b/src/lib/auth-service.ts @@ -1,3 +1,26 @@ +/** + * Widget-scoped auth service for Simple Comment. + * + * This module owns the live auth machine/runtime instance and the auth API + * side effects for a single mounted widget. It exposes the auth session state, + * current user, auth request state, and auth request outcome as a single + * shared boundary for auth-aware components. + * + * `Login.svelte` uses this service to submit login, signup, guest-login, and + * logout commands while retaining ownership of form-local field state and + * field-level validation UI. `CommentInput.svelte` and reply flows use this + * service to request authentication and observe request-scoped outcomes + * without depending on `Login.svelte` mount timing or component-mediated side + * effects. `SelfDisplay.svelte` uses this service to read the authenticated + * user and trigger logout. + * + * The auth session lifecycle vocabulary comes from `login.xstate.ts`, which + * remains the source of truth for auth machine states and transitions. This + * service interprets that machine, publishes readable session state derived + * from it, and keeps request bookkeeping separate from machine lifecycle + * state so callers can distinguish auth session status from the outcome of a + * specific auth request. + */ import type { Readable } from "svelte/store" import { get, writable } from "svelte/store" import type { StateValueFrom } from "xstate" From 00d8fd41047c8b89c8ab2a82fb15856c35337e89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 18:41:28 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 003/105] Refine auth service slice-1 checklist and update auth service types and lifecycle contract --- .../plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md | 4 ++-- src/lib/auth-service.ts | 16 +++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md index e0d924b6..dbc6b6c4 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Execution note: ## Atomic Checklist Items -- [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Reduce `src/lib/auth-service.ts` to the minimal slice-1 export scaffold that defines `AuthSessionState` from `src/lib/login.xstate.ts`, exports `AuthService` with only `sessionState` and `destroy`, and exports `createAuthService` without request/outcome, current-user, or auth-command surfaces. +- [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Add the minimal slice-1 runtime scaffold to `src/lib/auth-service.ts` by defining `AuthSessionState` from `src/lib/login.xstate.ts`, adding `destroy` to the `AuthService` lifecycle contract, and preserving exploratory request/outcome, current-user, and auth-command surfaces unless they directly conflict with the slice-1 runtime contract. - Depends on: none. - Trace: - "clarify boundaries between view components, state machines, and auth/workflow logic" (Priority 5) @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ Execution note: ### Slice 1A -Goal: define the minimal public contract for auth-service runtime ownership without pre-committing later auth surfaces. +Goal: define the minimal public contract for auth-service runtime ownership while preserving non-conflicting exploratory auth-service surfaces for later slices. Items: C01 diff --git a/src/lib/auth-service.ts b/src/lib/auth-service.ts index 8f911bba..79aeae7f 100644 --- a/src/lib/auth-service.ts +++ b/src/lib/auth-service.ts @@ -27,9 +27,9 @@ import type { StateValueFrom } from "xstate" import { loginMachine } from "./login.xstate" import type { Email, ServerResponse, User, UserId } from "./simple-comment-types" -type LoginMachineStateValue = StateValueFrom +type LoginMachineState = StateValueFrom -export type AuthSessionState = LoginMachineStateValue +export type AuthSessionState = LoginMachineState export type AuthRequestReason = | "comment-submit" @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ export type AuthService = { signup: (payload: SignupPayload) => Promise loginGuest: (payload: GuestLoginPayload) => Promise logout: () => Promise + destroy: () => void } const notImplemented = async (methodName: string): Promise => { @@ -131,7 +132,15 @@ export const createAuthService = ( let requestSequence = 0 - const sessionStateStore = writable(initialUser ? "loggedIn" : "idle") + const initialLoginState = loginMachine.initialState.value + + if (typeof initialLoginState !== "string") { + throw new Error("Expected a flat login machine state") + } + + const sessionStateStore = writable( + initialUser ? "loggedIn" : (initialLoginState as AuthSessionState) + ) const currentUserStore = writable(initialUser) const authRequestStore = writable({ status: "idle" }) const authOutcomeStore = writable({ status: "none" }) @@ -236,5 +245,6 @@ export const createAuthService = ( logout: async () => { return notImplemented("logout") }, + destroy: () => { }, } } From 5e69084e1d8012f6464515fa67f4a23209797bc7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 18:44:41 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 004/105] Update checklist items for slice-1 auth service implementation and testing --- docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md index dbc6b6c4..d566edd4 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md @@ -41,13 +41,13 @@ Execution note: ## Atomic Checklist Items -- [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Add the minimal slice-1 runtime scaffold to `src/lib/auth-service.ts` by defining `AuthSessionState` from `src/lib/login.xstate.ts`, adding `destroy` to the `AuthService` lifecycle contract, and preserving exploratory request/outcome, current-user, and auth-command surfaces unless they directly conflict with the slice-1 runtime contract. +- [x] C01 `[frontend]` Add the minimal slice-1 runtime scaffold to `src/lib/auth-service.ts` by defining `AuthSessionState` from `src/lib/login.xstate.ts`, adding `destroy` to the `AuthService` lifecycle contract, and preserving exploratory request/outcome, current-user, and auth-command surfaces unless they directly conflict with the slice-1 runtime contract. - Depends on: none. - Trace: - "clarify boundaries between view components, state machines, and auth/workflow logic" (Priority 5) - "auth/session behavior is coupled to component presence and lifecycle rather than being owned by a smaller dedicated workflow/service boundary" (Priority 5) -- [ ] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend tests for the slice-1 `auth-service` contract in `src/tests/frontend/auth-service.test.ts` that prove `createAuthService()` returns an object with readable `sessionState`, that `sessionState` uses the `loginMachine` session vocabulary, and that `destroy()` is part of the public lifecycle contract. +- [ ] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend tests for `src/lib/auth-service.ts` in `src/tests/frontend/auth-service.test.ts` that prove `createAuthService()` creates and owns a live interpreted `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime, publishes `sessionState` from that runtime, and disposes the runtime when `destroy()` is called. - Depends on: C01. - Trace: - "UI modules are easier to test at the right boundary" (Priority 5) From 66a51ca558c6561b87c70dc9cfc768f9bf68a60a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 18:56:14 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 005/105] Add fail-first frontend tests for auth service functionality --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md | 2 +- src/tests/frontend/auth-service.test.ts | 72 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 src/tests/frontend/auth-service.test.ts diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md index d566edd4..c5bbb36e 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Execution note: - "clarify boundaries between view components, state machines, and auth/workflow logic" (Priority 5) - "auth/session behavior is coupled to component presence and lifecycle rather than being owned by a smaller dedicated workflow/service boundary" (Priority 5) -- [ ] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend tests for `src/lib/auth-service.ts` in `src/tests/frontend/auth-service.test.ts` that prove `createAuthService()` creates and owns a live interpreted `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime, publishes `sessionState` from that runtime, and disposes the runtime when `destroy()` is called. +- [x] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend tests for `src/lib/auth-service.ts` in `src/tests/frontend/auth-service.test.ts` that prove `createAuthService()` creates and owns a live interpreted `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime, publishes `sessionState` from that runtime, and disposes the runtime when `destroy()` is called. - Depends on: C01. - Trace: - "UI modules are easier to test at the right boundary" (Priority 5) diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/auth-service.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/auth-service.test.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000..4e76e280 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/tests/frontend/auth-service.test.ts @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ +import { beforeEach, describe, expect, jest, test } from "@jest/globals" +import { get } from "svelte/store" +import { loginMachine } from "../../lib/login.xstate" +import { createAuthService } from "../../lib/auth-service" + +type TransitionState = { value: string } + +const mockInterpret = jest.fn() + +jest.mock("xstate", () => { + const actual = jest.requireActual("xstate") + + return { + ...actual, + interpret: (...args: unknown[]) => mockInterpret(...args), + } +}) + +describe("auth-service", () => { + let transitionListener: ((state: TransitionState) => void) | undefined + let mockInterpreter: { + onTransition: jest.Mock + start: jest.Mock + stop: jest.Mock + } + + beforeEach(() => { + jest.clearAllMocks() + transitionListener = undefined + + mockInterpreter = { + onTransition: jest.fn(listener => { + transitionListener = listener as (state: TransitionState) => void + return mockInterpreter + }), + start: jest.fn(() => { + transitionListener?.({ value: "verifying" }) + return mockInterpreter + }), + stop: jest.fn(), + } + + mockInterpret.mockReturnValue(mockInterpreter) + }) + + test("creates and starts a live interpreted login runtime", () => { + createAuthService() + + expect(mockInterpret).toHaveBeenCalledWith(loginMachine) + expect(mockInterpreter.onTransition).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(mockInterpreter.start).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + }) + + test("publishes sessionState from runtime transitions", () => { + const authService = createAuthService() + + expect(get(authService.sessionState)).toBe("verifying") + + expect(transitionListener).toBeDefined() + transitionListener?.({ value: "loggedIn" }) + + expect(get(authService.sessionState)).toBe("loggedIn") + }) + + test("disposes the runtime when destroy is called", () => { + const authService = createAuthService() + + authService.destroy() + + expect(mockInterpreter.stop).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + }) +}) From f4aa5d2fc40efe723ffac86996a9b2315745c674 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 19:01:10 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 006/105] Integrate XState for login machine management in auth service --- src/lib/auth-service.ts | 19 +++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/lib/auth-service.ts b/src/lib/auth-service.ts index 79aeae7f..96aadc5a 100644 --- a/src/lib/auth-service.ts +++ b/src/lib/auth-service.ts @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ */ import type { Readable } from "svelte/store" import { get, writable } from "svelte/store" +import { interpret } from "xstate" import type { StateValueFrom } from "xstate" import { loginMachine } from "./login.xstate" import type { Email, ServerResponse, User, UserId } from "./simple-comment-types" @@ -131,12 +132,11 @@ export const createAuthService = ( const { initialUser } = options let requestSequence = 0 - + const authRuntime = interpret(loginMachine) const initialLoginState = loginMachine.initialState.value - if (typeof initialLoginState !== "string") { + if (typeof initialLoginState !== "string") throw new Error("Expected a flat login machine state") - } const sessionStateStore = writable( initialUser ? "loggedIn" : (initialLoginState as AuthSessionState) @@ -145,6 +145,15 @@ export const createAuthService = ( const authRequestStore = writable({ status: "idle" }) const authOutcomeStore = writable({ status: "none" }) + authRuntime.onTransition(state => { + if (typeof state.value !== "string") + throw new Error("Expected a flat login machine state") + + sessionStateStore.set(state.value as AuthSessionState) + }) + + authRuntime.start() + const getPendingRequest = (): PendingAuthRequest | undefined => { const activeRequest = get(authRequestStore) @@ -245,6 +254,8 @@ export const createAuthService = ( logout: async () => { return notImplemented("logout") }, - destroy: () => { }, + destroy: () => { + authRuntime.stop() + }, } } From 570066565cd3df7aae3c637c7cb827c3564db1e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 19:01:58 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 007/105] Archive Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 1 Checklist --- .../{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md (97%) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md similarity index 97% rename from docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md rename to docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md index c5bbb36e..bde55531 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md +++ b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 1 Checklist -Status: planning +Status: archived Classification: proposed implementation checklist draft (not approved) @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ Execution note: - "UI modules are easier to test at the right boundary" (Priority 5) - "clarify boundaries between view components, state machines, and auth/workflow logic" (Priority 5) -- [ ] C02 `[frontend]` Implement slice-1 runtime ownership in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `createAuthService()` owns a live interpreted instance of `src/lib/login.xstate.ts`, publishes session state from that runtime rather than manual string stores, and disposes the runtime through `destroy()`. +- [x] C02 `[frontend]` Implement slice-1 runtime ownership in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `createAuthService()` owns a live interpreted instance of `src/lib/login.xstate.ts`, publishes session state from that runtime rather than manual string stores, and disposes the runtime through `destroy()`. - Depends on: T01. - Validated by: T01. - Trace: From 42fb3aa543729b7b3a93ba085da01ebd68784b61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 11:14:27 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 008/105] Add Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 2 Checklist draft --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md | 90 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..29b37209 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ +# Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 2 Checklist + +Status: planning + +Classification: proposed implementation checklist draft (not approved) + +Source plan: `docs/RepoHealthImprovementBacklog.md` (Priority 5: Frontend Architecture Decoupling) + +## Scope Lock (from Source Plan) + +In scope: + +- reduce component-bound behavior coupling where the repo already flags it as a concern +- clarify boundaries between view components, state machines, and auth/workflow logic + +Success signals to satisfy: + +- auth and identity flows are less dependent on component presence +- UI modules are easier to test at the right boundary +- login-related state, side effects, and rendering responsibilities are easier to explain as separate concerns + +Out of scope: + +- changing backend/API contracts +- introducing auth feature behavior changes beyond boundary ownership refactor +- login, signup, guest-login, and logout command implementation +- request/outcome coordination for `CommentInput.svelte` and reply flows +- login-tab ownership and form-local field/validation UI concerns +- localStorage/session persistence extraction + +## Slice Intent + +This slice moves initial auth verification and authenticated-user publication into `auth-service` so session bootstrap no longer depends on `Login.svelte` side effects. + +Execution note: + +- maintainer preference requires three separate sessions for this slice: + - export scaffold + - fail-first tests + - implementation to green +- if implementation cannot reach green without changing the tests, stop and discuss rather than modifying tests in the implementation session + +## Atomic Checklist Items + +- [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Tighten the slice-2 public contract in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `currentUser`, `init`, and `CreateAuthServiceOptions.initialUser` are the explicit public surface for initial auth verification and authenticated-user publication, while preserving non-conflicting exploratory auth-service command and request/outcome surfaces unchanged. + - Depends on: none. + - Validated by: T01. + - Trace: + - "clarify boundaries between view components, state machines, and auth/workflow logic" (Priority 5) + - "auth/session behavior is coupled to component presence and lifecycle rather than being owned by a smaller dedicated workflow/service boundary" (Priority 5) + +- [ ] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend tests for slice-2 init behavior in `src/tests/frontend/auth-service.init.test.ts` that prove `init()` drives auth bootstrap through `auth-service` rather than `Login.svelte`, calls `verifySelf()` when no `initialUser` is provided, transitions `sessionState` to `loggedIn` and publishes `currentUser` on successful verification, leaves `currentUser` undefined and transitions to `loggedOut` on `401` verification failure, leaves `currentUser` undefined and transitions to `error` on non-`401` verification failure, and defines the `initialUser` contract by proving whether `init()` skips `verifySelf()` when `initialUser` is supplied or still verifies and replaces it. + - Depends on: C01. + - Trace: + - "UI modules are easier to test at the right boundary" (Priority 5) + - "auth and identity flows are less dependent on component presence" (Priority 5) + +- [ ] C02 `[frontend]` Implement slice-2 bootstrap behavior in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `init()` owns the `verifySelf` auth API side effect, maps verification outcomes onto the live interpreted `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime, and publishes `currentUser` from the service rather than from `Login.svelte`. + - Depends on: T01. + - Validated by: T01. + - Trace: + - "it performs auth-related API calls such as verify" (Priority 5) + - "it performs mount/unmount side effects that influence app-level auth behavior" (Priority 5) + - success target: "login-related state, side effects, and rendering responsibilities are easier to explain as separate concerns" (Priority 5) + +## Behavior Slices + +### Slice 2A + +Goal: make auth-service's public bootstrap contract explicit without expanding into login submission flows. + +Items: C01 + +Type: behavior + +### Slice 2B + +Goal: lock the init verification and current-user publication contract in fail-first tests. + +Items: T01 + +Type: behavior + +### Slice 2C + +Goal: move initial auth verification and current-user publication into auth-service runtime ownership. + +Items: C02 + +Type: behavior From 8862c4d1376399828f4fe689e512e2b02a946035 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 11:21:08 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 009/105] Mark checklist item C01 as complete for tightening the slice-2 public contract in auth service --- docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md index 29b37209..b1380d06 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Execution note: ## Atomic Checklist Items -- [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Tighten the slice-2 public contract in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `currentUser`, `init`, and `CreateAuthServiceOptions.initialUser` are the explicit public surface for initial auth verification and authenticated-user publication, while preserving non-conflicting exploratory auth-service command and request/outcome surfaces unchanged. +- [x] C01 `[frontend]` Tighten the slice-2 public contract in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `currentUser`, `init`, and `CreateAuthServiceOptions.initialUser` are the explicit public surface for initial auth verification and authenticated-user publication, while preserving non-conflicting exploratory auth-service command and request/outcome surfaces unchanged. - Depends on: none. - Validated by: T01. - Trace: From 77511cc3aabb8b6c79f375f7ad1bf014622d47b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 11:32:59 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 010/105] Add fail-first frontend tests for auth service initialization behavior --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md | 2 +- src/tests/frontend/auth-service.init.test.ts | 77 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 src/tests/frontend/auth-service.init.test.ts diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md index b1380d06..a1c82f17 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Execution note: - "clarify boundaries between view components, state machines, and auth/workflow logic" (Priority 5) - "auth/session behavior is coupled to component presence and lifecycle rather than being owned by a smaller dedicated workflow/service boundary" (Priority 5) -- [ ] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend tests for slice-2 init behavior in `src/tests/frontend/auth-service.init.test.ts` that prove `init()` drives auth bootstrap through `auth-service` rather than `Login.svelte`, calls `verifySelf()` when no `initialUser` is provided, transitions `sessionState` to `loggedIn` and publishes `currentUser` on successful verification, leaves `currentUser` undefined and transitions to `loggedOut` on `401` verification failure, leaves `currentUser` undefined and transitions to `error` on non-`401` verification failure, and defines the `initialUser` contract by proving whether `init()` skips `verifySelf()` when `initialUser` is supplied or still verifies and replaces it. +- [x] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend tests for slice-2 init behavior in `src/tests/frontend/auth-service.init.test.ts` that prove `init()` drives auth bootstrap through `auth-service` rather than `Login.svelte`, calls `verifySelf()` when no `initialUser` is provided, transitions `sessionState` to `loggedIn` and publishes `currentUser` on successful verification, leaves `currentUser` undefined and transitions to `loggedOut` on `401` verification failure, leaves `currentUser` undefined and transitions to `error` on non-`401` verification failure, and defines the `initialUser` contract by proving whether `init()` skips `verifySelf()` when `initialUser` is supplied or still verifies and replaces it. - Depends on: C01. - Trace: - "UI modules are easier to test at the right boundary" (Priority 5) diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/auth-service.init.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/auth-service.init.test.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a04db4e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/tests/frontend/auth-service.init.test.ts @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ +import { beforeEach, describe, expect, jest, test } from "@jest/globals" +import { get } from "svelte/store" +import { createAuthService } from "../../lib/auth-service" +import type { AdminSafeUser } from "../../lib/simple-comment-types" +import { verifySelf } from "../../apiClient" + +jest.mock("../../apiClient", () => ({ + verifySelf: jest.fn(), +})) + +const mockVerifySelf = jest.mocked(verifySelf) + +const verifiedUser: AdminSafeUser = { + id: "alice", + name: "Alice Example", + email: "alice@example.com", + isAdmin: false, + isVerified: true, + challenge: "challenge-token", +} + +describe("auth-service init", () => { + beforeEach(() => { + jest.clearAllMocks() + }) + + test("calls verifySelf when no initialUser is provided", async () => { + mockVerifySelf.mockResolvedValue(verifiedUser) + const authService = createAuthService() + + await authService.init() + + expect(mockVerifySelf).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + }) + + test("transitions to loggedIn and publishes currentUser on successful verification", async () => { + mockVerifySelf.mockResolvedValue(verifiedUser) + const authService = createAuthService() + + await authService.init() + + expect(get(authService.sessionState)).toBe("loggedIn") + expect(get(authService.currentUser)).toEqual(verifiedUser) + }) + + test("leaves currentUser undefined and transitions to loggedOut on 401 verification failure", async () => { + mockVerifySelf.mockRejectedValue({ status: 401 }) + const authService = createAuthService() + + await authService.init() + + expect(mockVerifySelf).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(get(authService.sessionState)).toBe("loggedOut") + expect(get(authService.currentUser)).toBeUndefined() + }) + + test("leaves currentUser undefined and transitions to error on non-401 verification failure", async () => { + mockVerifySelf.mockRejectedValue({ status: 500 }) + const authService = createAuthService() + + await authService.init() + + expect(mockVerifySelf).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(get(authService.sessionState)).toBe("error") + expect(get(authService.currentUser)).toBeUndefined() + }) + + test("skips verifySelf and preserves initialUser when initialUser is supplied", async () => { + const authService = createAuthService({ initialUser: verifiedUser }) + + await authService.init() + + expect(mockVerifySelf).not.toHaveBeenCalled() + expect(get(authService.sessionState)).toBe("loggedIn") + expect(get(authService.currentUser)).toEqual(verifiedUser) + }) +}) From a3bd1928764050c83447c631546bc4370810ef1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 11:48:04 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 011/105] Implement slice-2 bootstrap behavior in auth service to manage user verification and state handling --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md | 2 +- src/lib/auth-service.ts | 24 +++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md index a1c82f17..0836fc8d 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ Execution note: - "UI modules are easier to test at the right boundary" (Priority 5) - "auth and identity flows are less dependent on component presence" (Priority 5) -- [ ] C02 `[frontend]` Implement slice-2 bootstrap behavior in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `init()` owns the `verifySelf` auth API side effect, maps verification outcomes onto the live interpreted `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime, and publishes `currentUser` from the service rather than from `Login.svelte`. +- [x] C02 `[frontend]` Implement slice-2 bootstrap behavior in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `init()` owns the `verifySelf` auth API side effect, maps verification outcomes onto the live interpreted `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime, and publishes `currentUser` from the service rather than from `Login.svelte`. - Depends on: T01. - Validated by: T01. - Trace: diff --git a/src/lib/auth-service.ts b/src/lib/auth-service.ts index 96aadc5a..5affabed 100644 --- a/src/lib/auth-service.ts +++ b/src/lib/auth-service.ts @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ import type { Readable } from "svelte/store" import { get, writable } from "svelte/store" import { interpret } from "xstate" import type { StateValueFrom } from "xstate" +import { verifySelf } from "../apiClient" import { loginMachine } from "./login.xstate" import type { Email, ServerResponse, User, UserId } from "./simple-comment-types" @@ -232,8 +233,27 @@ export const createAuthService = ( subscribe: authOutcomeStore.subscribe, }, init: async () => { - sessionStateStore.set("verifying") - sessionStateStore.set(initialUser ? "loggedIn" : "loggedOut") + if (initialUser !== undefined) { + currentUserStore.set(initialUser) + authRuntime.send("SUCCESS") + return + } + + currentUserStore.set(undefined) + + try { + const verifiedUser = await verifySelf() + + currentUserStore.set(verifiedUser) + authRuntime.send("SUCCESS") + } catch (error) { + currentUserStore.set(undefined) + + const { status } = (error ?? {}) as { status?: number } + + if (status === 401) authRuntime.send("FIRST_VISIT") + else authRuntime.send({ type: "ERROR", error: error as ServerResponse | string }) + } }, requestAuth, clearAuthOutcome, From d593f5004f214cd98178e21c976035641952a399 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 14:13:12 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 012/105] Add Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 3 Checklist draft for planning and implementation --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md | 102 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..80b656b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ +# Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 3 Checklist + +Status: planning + +Classification: proposed implementation checklist draft (not approved) + +Source plan: `docs/RepoHealthImprovementBacklog.md` (Priority 5: Frontend Architecture Decoupling) + +## Scope Lock (from Source Plan) + +In scope: + +- reduce component-bound behavior coupling where the repo already flags it as a concern +- clarify boundaries between view components, state machines, and auth/workflow logic + +Success signals to satisfy: + +- auth and identity flows are less dependent on component presence +- UI modules are easier to test at the right boundary +- login-related state, side effects, and rendering responsibilities are easier to explain as separate concerns + +Out of scope: + +- changing backend/API contracts +- introducing auth feature behavior changes beyond boundary ownership refactor +- signup and guest-login command implementation +- request/outcome coordination for `CommentInput.svelte` and reply flows +- login-tab ownership and form-local field/validation UI concerns +- localStorage/session persistence extraction + +## Slice Intent + +This slice moves `login` and `logout` command ownership into `auth-service` so those auth API side effects no longer depend on `Login.svelte`. + +Execution note: + +- maintainer preference requires three separate sessions for this slice: + - export scaffold + - fail-first tests + - implementation to green +- if implementation cannot reach green without changing the tests, stop and discuss rather than modifying tests in the implementation session + +## Atomic Checklist Items + +- [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Tighten the slice-3 public contract in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `login` and `logout` are the explicit slice-owned command surfaces for authenticated-session command ownership, while preserving non-conflicting exploratory `signup`, `loginGuest`, and request/outcome surfaces unchanged. + - Depends on: none. + - Validated by: T01, T02. + - Trace: + - "clarify boundaries between view components, state machines, and auth/workflow logic" (Priority 5) + - "auth/session behavior is coupled to component presence and lifecycle rather than being owned by a smaller dedicated workflow/service boundary" (Priority 5) + +- [ ] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend tests for `login` command ownership in `src/tests/frontend/auth-service.login.test.ts` that prove `auth-service.login()` owns the `postAuth` side effect, drives the live `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime through the login success/error path rather than leaving the behavior in `Login.svelte`, publishes authenticated user state on successful login, and leaves `currentUser` undefined while transitioning to `error` on failed login. + - Depends on: C01. + - Trace: + - "it performs auth-related API calls such as ... login" (Priority 5) + - "UI modules are easier to test at the right boundary" (Priority 5) + +- [ ] C02 `[frontend]` Implement `login` command ownership in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `login()` owns the `postAuth` side effect, maps success/error onto the live interpreted `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime, and publishes authenticated user state from the service rather than from `Login.svelte`. + - Depends on: T01. + - Validated by: T01. + - Trace: + - "it performs auth-related API calls such as ... login" (Priority 5) + - success target: "login-related state, side effects, and rendering responsibilities are easier to explain as separate concerns" (Priority 5) + +- [ ] T02 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend tests for `logout` command ownership in `src/tests/frontend/auth-service.logout.test.ts` that prove `auth-service.logout()` owns the `deleteAuth` side effect, drives the live `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime through the logout success/error path rather than leaving the behavior in `Login.svelte`, clears `currentUser` on successful logout, and transitions to `error` on failed logout. + - Depends on: C01, C02. + - Trace: + - "it performs auth-related API calls such as ... logout" (Priority 5) + - "UI modules are easier to test at the right boundary" (Priority 5) + +- [ ] C03 `[frontend]` Implement `logout` command ownership in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `logout()` owns the `deleteAuth` side effect, maps success/error onto the live interpreted `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime, and clears authenticated user state from the service rather than from `Login.svelte`. + - Depends on: T02. + - Validated by: T02. + - Trace: + - "it performs auth-related API calls such as ... logout" (Priority 5) + - success target: "login-related state, side effects, and rendering responsibilities are easier to explain as separate concerns" (Priority 5) + +## Behavior Slices + +### Slice 3A + +Goal: make `login` and `logout` explicit auth-service command surfaces without expanding into signup, guest login, or consumer request/outcome seams. + +Items: C01 + +Type: behavior + +### Slice 3B + +Goal: lock `login` command ownership in fail-first tests and then move the `postAuth` side effect into auth-service. + +Items: T01, C02 + +Type: behavior + +### Slice 3C + +Goal: lock `logout` command ownership in fail-first tests and then move the `deleteAuth` side effect into auth-service. + +Items: T02, C03 + +Type: behavior From 65f91813f9f30022ec39eee1534022706b94b4ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 14:13:55 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 013/105] Mark checklist item C01 as complete for tightening the slice-3 public contract in auth service --- docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md index 80b656b5..edd3415a 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Execution note: ## Atomic Checklist Items -- [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Tighten the slice-3 public contract in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `login` and `logout` are the explicit slice-owned command surfaces for authenticated-session command ownership, while preserving non-conflicting exploratory `signup`, `loginGuest`, and request/outcome surfaces unchanged. +- [x] C01 `[frontend]` Tighten the slice-3 public contract in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `login` and `logout` are the explicit slice-owned command surfaces for authenticated-session command ownership, while preserving non-conflicting exploratory `signup`, `loginGuest`, and request/outcome surfaces unchanged. - Depends on: none. - Validated by: T01, T02. - Trace: From 25e692226a9862519758fce0553ce361e23e573a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 11:36:24 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 014/105] Archive and supersede Priority 5 Frontend Architecture Decoupling Checklist --- ...FrontendArchitectureDecouplingChecklist.md | 50 ++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) rename docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5FrontendArchitectureDecouplingChecklist.md (82%) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5FrontendArchitectureDecouplingChecklist.md b/docs/archive/Priority5FrontendArchitectureDecouplingChecklist.md similarity index 82% rename from docs/plans/Priority5FrontendArchitectureDecouplingChecklist.md rename to docs/archive/Priority5FrontendArchitectureDecouplingChecklist.md index d348299c..9307b9ec 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5FrontendArchitectureDecouplingChecklist.md +++ b/docs/archive/Priority5FrontendArchitectureDecouplingChecklist.md @@ -1,6 +1,54 @@ # Priority 5 Frontend Architecture Decoupling Checklist -Status: planning +Status: archived, superseded + +## Supersession Note + +This checklist is archived and superseded. Do not use it as an implementation +guide for Priority 5. + +This document was useful as an early exploration of the frontend auth/login +coupling problem, but it is now considered unsafe for execution because it +over-specifies a large architecture for a comparatively straightforward +extraction task: + +- extract auth/login side effects out of `Login.svelte` into shared + TypeScript; +- keep auth transport calls delegated to `src/apiClient.ts`; +- lift login/auth coordination out of `CommentInput.svelte` and related relay + store coupling. + +The checklist violates the repo's current planning and checklist standards in +practice because it turns a small, reversible extraction into a broad +architecture program. It prescribes multiple new modules and abstractions +(`auth-storage.ts`, `auth-workflows.ts`, `auth-controller.ts`, +`auth-stores.ts`, `AuthRuntime.svelte`, and split form components) before the +current `auth-service` seam is complete or proven insufficient. That creates +too much harness for the task, weakens atomicity, and increases the chance of +behavioral drift. + +The checklist also conflicts with the backlog constraint to prefer small +planning slices over broad modernization efforts. It mixes mechanical +extraction, runtime ownership, storage policy, component decomposition, shared +store migration, consumer rewiring, and validation into one dependency chain. +That shape contributed to previous Priority 5 churn and should not be +reintroduced. + +The safer superseding direction is the incremental `auth-service` path already +started by the slice checklists: + +- finish `auth-service.login()` and `auth-service.logout()` using + `src/apiClient.ts`; +- keep `Login.svelte` responsible for form-local UI state for now; +- remove auth side effects from `Login.svelte` only after service behavior is + covered by focused tests; +- then decouple `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` from + `dispatchableStore` / `loginStateStore` relay behavior in small, reviewable + slices. + +Future Priority 5 plans should cite this document only as superseded context +and should not revive its module graph, controller/runtime split, or form +component split without a fresh approved plan that justifies those choices. Classification: proposed implementation checklist draft (not approved) From 8f7e4728a413e0cff03249234f0058bc785c9958 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 11:50:16 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 015/105] Add .codex to .gitignore to exclude Codex files from version control --- .gitignore | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 023f5cd9..4ae075d8 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -23,3 +23,4 @@ debug.log !/dist/css/simple-comment-style.css !/cypress/**/*.js deno.lock +.codex From 9e72b47333476e7454f23c4a8535daa55402ce4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 11:50:27 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 016/105] Implement login command ownership and add tests for auth service login functionality --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md | 4 +- src/lib/auth-service.ts | 30 ++++++- src/tests/frontend/auth-service.login.test.ts | 82 +++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) create mode 100644 src/tests/frontend/auth-service.login.test.ts diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md index edd3415a..1aa3282a 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md @@ -49,13 +49,13 @@ Execution note: - "clarify boundaries between view components, state machines, and auth/workflow logic" (Priority 5) - "auth/session behavior is coupled to component presence and lifecycle rather than being owned by a smaller dedicated workflow/service boundary" (Priority 5) -- [ ] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend tests for `login` command ownership in `src/tests/frontend/auth-service.login.test.ts` that prove `auth-service.login()` owns the `postAuth` side effect, drives the live `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime through the login success/error path rather than leaving the behavior in `Login.svelte`, publishes authenticated user state on successful login, and leaves `currentUser` undefined while transitioning to `error` on failed login. +- [x] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend tests for `login` command ownership in `src/tests/frontend/auth-service.login.test.ts` that prove `auth-service.login()` owns the `postAuth` side effect, drives the live `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime through the login success/error path rather than leaving the behavior in `Login.svelte`, publishes authenticated user state on successful login, and leaves `currentUser` undefined while transitioning to `error` on failed login. - Depends on: C01. - Trace: - "it performs auth-related API calls such as ... login" (Priority 5) - "UI modules are easier to test at the right boundary" (Priority 5) -- [ ] C02 `[frontend]` Implement `login` command ownership in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `login()` owns the `postAuth` side effect, maps success/error onto the live interpreted `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime, and publishes authenticated user state from the service rather than from `Login.svelte`. +- [x] C02 `[frontend]` Implement `login` command ownership in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `login()` owns the `postAuth` side effect, maps success/error onto the live interpreted `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime, and publishes authenticated user state from the service rather than from `Login.svelte`. - Depends on: T01. - Validated by: T01. - Trace: diff --git a/src/lib/auth-service.ts b/src/lib/auth-service.ts index 5affabed..2aae7deb 100644 --- a/src/lib/auth-service.ts +++ b/src/lib/auth-service.ts @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ import type { Readable } from "svelte/store" import { get, writable } from "svelte/store" import { interpret } from "xstate" import type { StateValueFrom } from "xstate" -import { verifySelf } from "../apiClient" +import { postAuth, verifySelf } from "../apiClient" import { loginMachine } from "./login.xstate" import type { Email, ServerResponse, User, UserId } from "./simple-comment-types" @@ -259,9 +259,31 @@ export const createAuthService = ( clearAuthOutcome, cancelAuthRequest, reportLocalValidationError, - login: async payload => { - void payload - return notImplemented("login") + login: async ({ userId, password }) => { + currentUserStore.set(undefined) + authRuntime.send("LOGIN") + + try { + const authResponse = await postAuth(userId, password) + + if (!authResponse.ok) { + authRuntime.send({ type: "ERROR", error: authResponse }) + return + } + + authRuntime.send("SUCCESS") + + const verifiedUser = await verifySelf() + + currentUserStore.set(verifiedUser) + authRuntime.send("SUCCESS") + } catch (error) { + currentUserStore.set(undefined) + authRuntime.send({ + type: "ERROR", + error: error as ServerResponse | string, + }) + } }, signup: async payload => { void payload diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/auth-service.login.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/auth-service.login.test.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000..c6f9d2ad --- /dev/null +++ b/src/tests/frontend/auth-service.login.test.ts @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +import { beforeEach, describe, expect, jest, test } from "@jest/globals" +import { get } from "svelte/store" +import { createAuthService } from "../../lib/auth-service" +import type { AdminSafeUser, ServerResponse } from "../../lib/simple-comment-types" +import { postAuth, verifySelf } from "../../apiClient" + +jest.mock("../../apiClient", () => ({ + postAuth: jest.fn(), + verifySelf: jest.fn(), +})) + +const mockPostAuth = jest.mocked(postAuth) +const mockVerifySelf = jest.mocked(verifySelf) + +const verifiedUser: AdminSafeUser = { + id: "alice", + name: "Alice Example", + email: "alice@example.com", + isAdmin: false, + isVerified: true, + challenge: "challenge-token", +} + +const validLoginResponse: ServerResponse = { + status: 200, + ok: true, + statusText: "OK", + body: "auth-token", +} + +const bootstrapLoggedOut = async () => { + const authService = createAuthService() + + mockVerifySelf.mockRejectedValue({ status: 401 }) + await authService.init() + + expect(get(authService.sessionState)).toBe("loggedOut") + expect(get(authService.currentUser)).toBeUndefined() + + jest.clearAllMocks() + + return authService +} + +describe("auth-service login", () => { + beforeEach(() => { + jest.clearAllMocks() + }) + + test("owns the postAuth side effect with exact credentials and publishes authenticated user on success", async () => { + const authService = await bootstrapLoggedOut() + + mockPostAuth.mockResolvedValue(validLoginResponse) + mockVerifySelf.mockResolvedValue(verifiedUser) + + await authService.login({ userId: "alice", password: "password123" }) + + expect(mockPostAuth).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(mockPostAuth).toHaveBeenCalledWith("alice", "password123") + expect(mockVerifySelf).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(get(authService.sessionState)).toBe("loggedIn") + expect(get(authService.currentUser)).toEqual(verifiedUser) + }) + + test("leaves currentUser undefined and transitions to error on failed login", async () => { + const authService = await bootstrapLoggedOut() + + mockPostAuth.mockRejectedValue({ + status: 401, + ok: false, + statusText: "Unauthorized", + body: "Bad credentials", + }) + + await authService.login({ userId: "alice", password: "wrong-password" }) + + expect(mockPostAuth).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(mockPostAuth).toHaveBeenCalledWith("alice", "wrong-password") + expect(get(authService.sessionState)).toBe("error") + expect(get(authService.currentUser)).toBeUndefined() + }) +}) From 69851f903329c1dc4d649a1c5bcca1db7b67a80c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 12:06:38 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 017/105] Add tests for logout command ownership in auth service --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md | 2 +- .../frontend/auth-service.logout.test.ts | 77 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 src/tests/frontend/auth-service.logout.test.ts diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md index 1aa3282a..4a8151d6 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ Execution note: - "it performs auth-related API calls such as ... login" (Priority 5) - success target: "login-related state, side effects, and rendering responsibilities are easier to explain as separate concerns" (Priority 5) -- [ ] T02 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend tests for `logout` command ownership in `src/tests/frontend/auth-service.logout.test.ts` that prove `auth-service.logout()` owns the `deleteAuth` side effect, drives the live `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime through the logout success/error path rather than leaving the behavior in `Login.svelte`, clears `currentUser` on successful logout, and transitions to `error` on failed logout. +- [x] T02 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend tests for `logout` command ownership in `src/tests/frontend/auth-service.logout.test.ts` that prove `auth-service.logout()` owns the `deleteAuth` side effect, drives the live `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime through the logout success/error path rather than leaving the behavior in `Login.svelte`, clears `currentUser` on successful logout, and transitions to `error` on failed logout. - Depends on: C01, C02. - Trace: - "it performs auth-related API calls such as ... logout" (Priority 5) diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/auth-service.logout.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/auth-service.logout.test.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000..dc67e95a --- /dev/null +++ b/src/tests/frontend/auth-service.logout.test.ts @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ +import { beforeEach, describe, expect, jest, test } from "@jest/globals" +import { get } from "svelte/store" +import { createAuthService } from "../../lib/auth-service" +import type { AdminSafeUser, ServerResponse } from "../../lib/simple-comment-types" +import { deleteAuth } from "../../apiClient" + +jest.mock("../../apiClient", () => ({ + deleteAuth: jest.fn(), + postAuth: jest.fn(), + verifySelf: jest.fn(), +})) + +const mockDeleteAuth = jest.mocked(deleteAuth) + +const verifiedUser: AdminSafeUser = { + id: "alice", + name: "Alice Example", + email: "alice@example.com", + isAdmin: false, + isVerified: true, + challenge: "challenge-token", +} + +const validLogoutResponse: ServerResponse = { + status: 200, + ok: true, + statusText: "OK", + body: "logged out", +} + +const bootstrapLoggedIn = async () => { + const authService = createAuthService({ initialUser: verifiedUser }) + + await authService.init() + + expect(get(authService.sessionState)).toBe("loggedIn") + expect(get(authService.currentUser)).toEqual(verifiedUser) + + jest.clearAllMocks() + + return authService +} + +describe("auth-service logout", () => { + beforeEach(() => { + jest.clearAllMocks() + }) + + test("owns the deleteAuth side effect and clears authenticated user on success", async () => { + const authService = await bootstrapLoggedIn() + + mockDeleteAuth.mockResolvedValue(validLogoutResponse) + + await authService.logout() + + expect(mockDeleteAuth).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(get(authService.sessionState)).toBe("loggedOut") + expect(get(authService.currentUser)).toBeUndefined() + }) + + test("transitions to error and preserves currentUser on failed logout", async () => { + const authService = await bootstrapLoggedIn() + + mockDeleteAuth.mockRejectedValue({ + status: 500, + ok: false, + statusText: "Internal Server Error", + body: "Logout failed", + }) + + await authService.logout() + + expect(mockDeleteAuth).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(get(authService.sessionState)).toBe("error") + expect(get(authService.currentUser)).toEqual(verifiedUser) + }) +}) From ea86166a83d1ee7c73d2b283da458792b3bf88e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 12:28:00 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 018/105] Implement logout command ownership in auth service and handle user state clearing --- src/lib/auth-service.ts | 21 +++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/lib/auth-service.ts b/src/lib/auth-service.ts index 2aae7deb..685be183 100644 --- a/src/lib/auth-service.ts +++ b/src/lib/auth-service.ts @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ import type { Readable } from "svelte/store" import { get, writable } from "svelte/store" import { interpret } from "xstate" import type { StateValueFrom } from "xstate" -import { postAuth, verifySelf } from "../apiClient" +import { deleteAuth, postAuth, verifySelf } from "../apiClient" import { loginMachine } from "./login.xstate" import type { Email, ServerResponse, User, UserId } from "./simple-comment-types" @@ -294,7 +294,24 @@ export const createAuthService = ( return notImplemented("loginGuest") }, logout: async () => { - return notImplemented("logout") + authRuntime.send("LOGOUT") + + try { + const logoutResponse = await deleteAuth() + + if (!logoutResponse.ok) { + authRuntime.send({ type: "ERROR", error: logoutResponse }) + return + } + + currentUserStore.set(undefined) + authRuntime.send("SUCCESS") + } catch (error) { + authRuntime.send({ + type: "ERROR", + error: error as ServerResponse | string, + }) + } }, destroy: () => { authRuntime.stop() From a868165028c5b3c3312f3a21ec2e87fac7787477 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 12:28:16 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 019/105] Add Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 3 Checklist to document completed tasks and implementation details --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md (96%) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md similarity index 96% rename from docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md rename to docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md index 4a8151d6..f52ac56e 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md +++ b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md @@ -1,6 +1,9 @@ # Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 3 Checklist -Status: planning +Status: archived, completed + +Archived after all slice-3 checklist items were completed and focused +auth-service validation passed. Classification: proposed implementation checklist draft (not approved) @@ -68,7 +71,7 @@ Execution note: - "it performs auth-related API calls such as ... logout" (Priority 5) - "UI modules are easier to test at the right boundary" (Priority 5) -- [ ] C03 `[frontend]` Implement `logout` command ownership in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `logout()` owns the `deleteAuth` side effect, maps success/error onto the live interpreted `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime, and clears authenticated user state from the service rather than from `Login.svelte`. +- [x] C03 `[frontend]` Implement `logout` command ownership in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `logout()` owns the `deleteAuth` side effect, maps success/error onto the live interpreted `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime, and clears authenticated user state from the service rather than from `Login.svelte`. - Depends on: T02. - Validated by: T02. - Trace: From 2ec8b0249eda223bbd220e3b7ec8b4d3e960d229 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 13:04:11 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 020/105] Archive Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 2 Checklist --- docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) rename docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md (99%) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md similarity index 99% rename from docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md rename to docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md index 0836fc8d..514dbad0 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md +++ b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 2 Checklist -Status: planning +Status: archived Classification: proposed implementation checklist draft (not approved) From e6444430f622b166007a5115ed8a50e8a8d93e7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 13:07:17 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 021/105] Add Priority 5 Completion Items documentation for auth-service ownership and future tasks --- docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..6d51d76b --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +# Priority 5 Completion Items + +- 1. [x] Confirm completed baseline: `auth-service` owns login-machine runtime, initial verification, `login()`, and `logout()` behavior. + + Findings: + + - Confirmed for the `auth-service` service boundary: `src/lib/auth-service.ts` now creates and owns the live interpreted `loginMachine` runtime via `interpret(loginMachine)`. + - Confirmed initial verification ownership: `authService.init()` calls `verifySelf()`, maps success / `401` / non-`401` outcomes onto the live login machine, and publishes `currentUser` from the service. + - Confirmed `login()` command ownership: `authService.login()` calls `postAuth()`, verifies the resulting session with `verifySelf()`, maps success/error onto the live login machine, and publishes authenticated `currentUser` from the service. + - Confirmed `logout()` command ownership: `authService.logout()` calls `deleteAuth()`, maps success/error onto the live login machine, clears `currentUser` on successful logout, and preserves `currentUser` on logout failure. + - Validation evidence: `yarn test:frontend --runInBand src/tests/frontend/auth-service.test.ts src/tests/frontend/auth-service.init.test.ts src/tests/frontend/auth-service.login.test.ts src/tests/frontend/auth-service.logout.test.ts` passed with 4 suites and 12 tests passing. + - Scope caveat: this confirms the service baseline only. `Login.svelte` still contains legacy direct auth side-effect handlers and has not yet been rewired to use `auth-service`; that remains future completion work. + +- 2. [ ] Archive or mark completed any finished auth-service slice docs so active planning only shows unfinished work. + +- 3. [ ] Identify remaining direct auth side effects in `Login.svelte`, limited to signup, guest login, guest profile update, session/localStorage handling, and shared-store publication. + +- 4. [ ] Draft a slice for `signup()` command ownership in `auth-service`, with fail-first tests first and implementation in a separate pass. + +- 5. [ ] Draft a slice for `loginGuest()` command ownership in `auth-service`, including existing guest-token, verify, create guest, and update-if-changed behavior. + +- 6. [ ] Draft a slice for moving session/localStorage persistence out of `Login.svelte` only if it blocks service ownership or component decoupling. + +- 7. [ ] Draft a slice for wiring `Login.svelte` to call `auth-service` commands while keeping form-local state and field validation in `Login.svelte`. + +- 8. [ ] Draft a slice for replacing `Login.svelte` shared-store publication with auth-service state subscriptions. + +- 9. [ ] Draft a slice for removing `dispatchableStore` / `loginStateStore` login relay behavior from `CommentInput.svelte`. + +- 10. [ ] Draft a slice for removing `dispatchableStore` / `loginStateStore` logout relay behavior from `SelfDisplay.svelte`. + +- 11. [ ] Decide whether auth state should be passed directly through component props or exposed through a thin auth-service-backed store. + +- 12. [ ] Prefer direct `auth-service` API or a thin service-backed store; avoid introducing another ad-hoc event bus. + +- 13. [ ] Add validation expectations per slice: fail-first tests in one pass, production implementation in a later pass, no test edits during implementation unless the implementation session stops and explains why the test is wrong. + +- 14. [ ] Keep explicitly out of scope: splitting `Login.svelte` into form components, adding `auth-controller.ts`, adding `AuthRuntime.svelte`, creating broad auth workflow modules, or redesigning frontend state architecture. From 7a3d6ad2887c68e3c5a3ec79b5af8c5bf5790fea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 13:09:42 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 022/105] Update archive status for Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 1 and 2 checklists to 'completed' and document completion findings in the planning file --- docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md | 4 +++- docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md | 4 +++- docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md | 11 ++++++++++- 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md index bde55531..0438d0c2 100644 --- a/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md +++ b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ # Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 1 Checklist -Status: archived +Status: archived, completed + +Archived after all slice-1 checklist items were completed. Classification: proposed implementation checklist draft (not approved) diff --git a/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md index 514dbad0..24a836f0 100644 --- a/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md +++ b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ # Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 2 Checklist -Status: archived +Status: archived, completed + +Archived after all slice-2 checklist items were completed. Classification: proposed implementation checklist draft (not approved) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md index 6d51d76b..e55da726 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md @@ -11,7 +11,16 @@ - Validation evidence: `yarn test:frontend --runInBand src/tests/frontend/auth-service.test.ts src/tests/frontend/auth-service.init.test.ts src/tests/frontend/auth-service.login.test.ts src/tests/frontend/auth-service.logout.test.ts` passed with 4 suites and 12 tests passing. - Scope caveat: this confirms the service baseline only. `Login.svelte` still contains legacy direct auth side-effect handlers and has not yet been rewired to use `auth-service`; that remains future completion work. -- 2. [ ] Archive or mark completed any finished auth-service slice docs so active planning only shows unfinished work. +- 2. [x] Archive or mark completed any finished auth-service slice docs so active planning only shows unfinished work. + + Findings: + + - Confirmed no `Priority5AuthServiceSlice*Checklist.md` files remain under `docs/plans/`. + - Confirmed completed auth-service slice checklists are archived under `docs/archive/`: `Priority5AuthServiceSlice1Checklist.md`, `Priority5AuthServiceSlice2Checklist.md`, and `Priority5AuthServiceSlice3Checklist.md`. + - Confirmed all checklist items in slices 1, 2, and 3 are checked. + - Updated slice 1 and slice 2 archive headers from `Status: archived` to `Status: archived, completed` so they match the completed state already shown by their checked items. + - Slice 3 was already marked `Status: archived, completed`. + - Active planning surface is now clear for auth-service slices: future Priority 5 planning should start from this completion inventory rather than any stale active slice checklist. - 3. [ ] Identify remaining direct auth side effects in `Login.svelte`, limited to signup, guest login, guest profile update, session/localStorage handling, and shared-store publication. From 4d9261570679b2199661b48ed2a3b4551faffcce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 13:16:41 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 023/105] Update Priority 5 Completion Items: mark direct auth side effects in Login.svelte as identified and draft slice for signup() command ownership in auth-service --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md | 76 +++++++++++++++++++ docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md | 24 +++++- 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..887b7819 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ +# Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 4 Checklist + +Status: planning + +Classification: proposed implementation checklist draft (not approved) + +Source plan: `docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md` (Item 4: Draft a slice for `signup()` command ownership in `auth-service`) + +## Scope Lock + +In scope: + +- move `signup()` command ownership into `src/lib/auth-service.ts` +- make `auth-service.signup()` own the `createUser` auth/account side effect currently handled by `Login.svelte` +- compose existing `src/apiClient.ts` exports (`createUser`, and the existing service-owned login/session verification path through `postAuth` / `verifySelf`) rather than duplicating HTTP transport or request-body encoding logic +- preserve the existing post-signup behavior path: successful signup proceeds through the login/auth verification path and publishes authenticated `currentUser` +- validate the service boundary with fail-first tests before implementation + +Out of scope: + +- changing backend/API contracts +- implementing custom fetch, auth header, response-resolution, or user transport logic inside `auth-service` +- adding new auth/user API helpers outside `src/apiClient.ts` +- changing signup form-local field state or field-level validation UI in `Login.svelte` +- rewiring `Login.svelte` to call `auth-service.signup()` +- moving guest-login, guest-profile-update, localStorage, or shared-store behavior +- modifying `CommentInput.svelte`, `SelfDisplay.svelte`, or relay-store behavior +- editing tests during the implementation pass; if the fail-first tests cannot be made green through production-code changes only, stop and discuss + +## Slice Intent + +This slice moves signup command ownership into `auth-service` so user creation and the follow-on authenticated-session transition no longer depend on `Login.svelte` state handlers. + +The existing `Login.svelte` behavior creates the user, transitions the login machine through the signup success path, then continues into login/session verification. Slice 4 should preserve that behavior at the service boundary while keeping form-local validation and component rewiring out of scope. + +`src/apiClient.ts` already exposes the API primitives needed for this slice: +`createUser` for account creation, `postAuth` for login/authentication, and +`verifySelf` for publishing the authenticated user. `auth-service` should +compose those primitives. If implementation discovers a missing reusable user +or auth API primitive, stop and propose adding it to `src/apiClient.ts` rather +than creating a one-off client inside `auth-service`. + +## Atomic Checklist Items + +- [ ] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend tests for `signup` command ownership in `src/tests/frontend/auth-service.signup.test.ts` proving `auth-service.signup()` owns the `createUser` side effect via `src/apiClient.ts`, maps the service payload to the existing `createUser` input shape, drives the live `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime through the signup success path, performs the existing post-signup authentication/verification continuation through existing `apiClient.ts` primitives, publishes authenticated `currentUser` on successful signup, and leaves `currentUser` undefined while transitioning to `error` on signup failure. + - Depends on: none. + - Trace: + - "`Login.svelte` still contains legacy direct calls ... signup uses `createUser(userInfo)` from the `signingUp` state handler." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) + - "Draft a slice for `signup()` command ownership in `auth-service`, with fail-first tests first and implementation in a separate pass." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 4) + - "UI modules are easier to test at the right boundary" (`docs/RepoHealthImprovementBacklog.md`, Priority 5) + +- [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Implement `signup` command ownership in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `signup()` owns the `createUser` side effect by importing it from `src/apiClient.ts`, maps success/error onto the live interpreted `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime, reuses the existing service-owned login/session verification path after successful signup, and publishes authenticated user state from the service rather than from `Login.svelte`. + - Depends on: T01. + - Validated by: T01. + - Trace: + - "`Login.svelte` still contains legacy direct calls ... signup uses `createUser(userInfo)` from the `signingUp` state handler." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) + - "Draft a slice for `signup()` command ownership in `auth-service`, with fail-first tests first and implementation in a separate pass." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 4) + - "login-related state, side effects, and rendering responsibilities are easier to explain as separate concerns" (`docs/RepoHealthImprovementBacklog.md`, Priority 5) + +## Behavior Slices + +### Slice 4A + +Goal: lock the signup command ownership contract in fail-first tests before implementation. + +Items: T01 + +Type: behavior + +### Slice 4B + +Goal: move the `createUser` signup side effect and post-signup auth/session continuation into `auth-service`. + +Items: C01 + +Type: behavior diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md index e55da726..f614309f 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md @@ -22,9 +22,29 @@ - Slice 3 was already marked `Status: archived, completed`. - Active planning surface is now clear for auth-service slices: future Priority 5 planning should start from this completion inventory rather than any stale active slice checklist. -- 3. [ ] Identify remaining direct auth side effects in `Login.svelte`, limited to signup, guest login, guest profile update, session/localStorage handling, and shared-store publication. +- 3. [x] Identify remaining direct auth side effects in `Login.svelte`, limited to signup, guest login, guest profile update, session/localStorage handling, and shared-store publication. -- 4. [ ] Draft a slice for `signup()` command ownership in `auth-service`, with fail-first tests first and implementation in a separate pass. + Findings: + + - Important caveat: the item wording is too narrow if read literally. `Login.svelte` still contains legacy direct calls for behaviors now owned by `auth-service`: `verifySelf()`, `postAuth()`, and `deleteAuth()`. These should not be treated as new service-surface work, but they must be removed when `Login.svelte` is rewired to call `auth-service`. + - Already service-owned but still duplicated in `Login.svelte`: initial verification uses `verifySelf()` and writes `simple_comment_user`; user login uses `postAuth(userId, userPassword)`; logout uses `deleteAuth()`. + - Still not owned by `auth-service`: signup uses `createUser(userInfo)` from the `signingUp` state handler. This is the cleanest next command-ownership candidate because it is simpler than guest login and already maps onto the existing `SIGNUP -> signedUp -> loggingIn` machine path. + - Still not owned by `auth-service`: guest login flow reads stored guest credentials, attempts `postAuth(storedId, storedChallenge)`, calls `verifyUser()`, falls back to `getGuestToken()`, calls `verifyUser()` again, creates a guest with `createGuestUser(...)`, and sends success/error machine events. + - Still not owned by `auth-service`: guest profile update uses `updateUser({ id: storedId, name: displayName, email: userEmail })` when stored guest identity differs from the submitted guest form values. + - Session/localStorage handling remains in `Login.svelte`: login tab selection reads/writes `simple_comment_login_tab`; verified/current user state reads/writes `simple_comment_user`; guest login reads stored `simple_comment_user` to reuse guest credentials; mount logic hydrates form fields from stored user data. + - Shared-store publication remains in `Login.svelte`: `currentUserStore.set(self)` runs on destroy and reactively; `loginStateStore.set({ state, nextEvents })` publishes machine state; `loginStateStore.set({ select: selectedIndex })` publishes selected tab state. + - Relay coupling remains in `Login.svelte`: it subscribes to `dispatchableStore` and reacts to `loginIntent` / `logoutIntent` by driving its local machine. This is the component-side half of the later `CommentInput.svelte` / `SelfDisplay.svelte` decoupling work. + - Recommendation: do not plan all of these as one implementation phase. Keep the next slice to one command surface, preferably `signup()` first, then guest login/profile update, then rewiring/removal of legacy verify/login/logout handlers from `Login.svelte`. + +- 4. [x] Draft a slice for `signup()` command ownership in `auth-service`, with fail-first tests first and implementation in a separate pass. + + Findings: + + - Created `docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md` as the proposed slice-4 checklist draft. + - Kept the slice narrow: `signup()` command ownership in `auth-service` only. + - Preserved the test/code separation convention: T01 adds fail-first tests, C01 implements production code later, and the checklist explicitly says implementation must stop if tests cannot be made green without changing tests. + - Kept out of scope: `Login.svelte` UI rewiring, form-local signup validation, guest-login behavior, localStorage handling, shared-store publication, `CommentInput.svelte`, and `SelfDisplay.svelte`. + - The proposed slice preserves current behavior intent: successful signup should create the user and continue through the existing post-signup login/session verification path to publish authenticated `currentUser`. - 5. [ ] Draft a slice for `loginGuest()` command ownership in `auth-service`, including existing guest-token, verify, create guest, and update-if-changed behavior. From 6ee5e1d950eb0050ad5c795ef3f5b589fd7f7a7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 14:11:36 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 024/105] Add tests for signup command ownership in auth-service to validate createUser functionality and error handling --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md | 2 +- .../frontend/auth-service.signup.test.ts | 122 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 src/tests/frontend/auth-service.signup.test.ts diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md index 887b7819..e7b8d9e7 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ than creating a one-off client inside `auth-service`. ## Atomic Checklist Items -- [ ] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend tests for `signup` command ownership in `src/tests/frontend/auth-service.signup.test.ts` proving `auth-service.signup()` owns the `createUser` side effect via `src/apiClient.ts`, maps the service payload to the existing `createUser` input shape, drives the live `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime through the signup success path, performs the existing post-signup authentication/verification continuation through existing `apiClient.ts` primitives, publishes authenticated `currentUser` on successful signup, and leaves `currentUser` undefined while transitioning to `error` on signup failure. +- [x] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend tests for `signup` command ownership in `src/tests/frontend/auth-service.signup.test.ts` proving `auth-service.signup()` owns the `createUser` side effect via `src/apiClient.ts`, maps the service payload to the existing `createUser` input shape, drives the live `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime through the signup success path, performs the existing post-signup authentication/verification continuation through existing `apiClient.ts` primitives, publishes authenticated `currentUser` on successful signup, and leaves `currentUser` undefined while transitioning to `error` on signup failure. - Depends on: none. - Trace: - "`Login.svelte` still contains legacy direct calls ... signup uses `createUser(userInfo)` from the `signingUp` state handler." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/auth-service.signup.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/auth-service.signup.test.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000..4b75149d --- /dev/null +++ b/src/tests/frontend/auth-service.signup.test.ts @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ +import { beforeEach, describe, expect, jest, test } from "@jest/globals" +import { get } from "svelte/store" +import { createAuthService } from "../../lib/auth-service" +import type { AdminSafeUser, ServerResponse } from "../../lib/simple-comment-types" +import { createUser, postAuth, verifySelf } from "../../apiClient" + +jest.mock("../../apiClient", () => ({ + createUser: jest.fn(), + postAuth: jest.fn(), + verifySelf: jest.fn(), +})) + +const mockCreateUser = jest.mocked(createUser) +const mockPostAuth = jest.mocked(postAuth) +const mockVerifySelf = jest.mocked(verifySelf) + +const signupPayload = { + userId: "alice", + password: "password123", + displayName: "Alice Example", + email: "alice@example.com", +} + +const createdUser: AdminSafeUser = { + id: "alice", + name: "Alice Example", + email: "alice@example.com", + isAdmin: false, + isVerified: true, + challenge: "created-user-challenge", +} + +const verifiedUser: AdminSafeUser = { + id: "alice", + name: "Alice Example", + email: "alice@example.com", + isAdmin: false, + isVerified: true, + challenge: "verified-user-challenge", +} + +const validSignupResponse: ServerResponse = { + status: 201, + ok: true, + statusText: "Created", + body: createdUser, +} + +const validLoginResponse: ServerResponse = { + status: 200, + ok: true, + statusText: "OK", + body: "auth-token", +} + +const bootstrapLoggedOut = async () => { + const authService = createAuthService() + + mockVerifySelf.mockRejectedValue({ status: 401 }) + await authService.init() + + expect(get(authService.sessionState)).toBe("loggedOut") + expect(get(authService.currentUser)).toBeUndefined() + + jest.clearAllMocks() + + return authService +} + +describe("auth-service signup", () => { + beforeEach(() => { + jest.clearAllMocks() + }) + + test("owns createUser and publishes authenticated user after successful signup", async () => { + const authService = await bootstrapLoggedOut() + + mockCreateUser.mockResolvedValue(validSignupResponse) + mockPostAuth.mockResolvedValue(validLoginResponse) + mockVerifySelf.mockResolvedValue(verifiedUser) + + await authService.signup(signupPayload) + + expect(mockCreateUser).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(mockCreateUser).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ + id: "alice", + name: "Alice Example", + email: "alice@example.com", + password: "password123", + }) + expect(mockPostAuth).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(mockPostAuth).toHaveBeenCalledWith("alice", "password123") + expect(mockVerifySelf).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(get(authService.sessionState)).toBe("loggedIn") + expect(get(authService.currentUser)).toEqual(verifiedUser) + }) + + test("leaves currentUser undefined and transitions to error on failed signup", async () => { + const authService = await bootstrapLoggedOut() + + mockCreateUser.mockRejectedValue({ + status: 409, + ok: false, + statusText: "Conflict", + body: "User already exists", + }) + + await authService.signup(signupPayload) + + expect(mockCreateUser).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(mockCreateUser).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ + id: "alice", + name: "Alice Example", + email: "alice@example.com", + password: "password123", + }) + expect(mockPostAuth).not.toHaveBeenCalled() + expect(mockVerifySelf).not.toHaveBeenCalled() + expect(get(authService.sessionState)).toBe("error") + expect(get(authService.currentUser)).toBeUndefined() + }) +}) From 3f740b1bd4ce156be2dd9539a3dfe305aaa1596c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 14:20:09 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 025/105] Implement signup command ownership in auth-service to handle user registration and authentication flow --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md | 2 +- src/lib/auth-service.ts | 37 +++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md index e7b8d9e7..17f2e339 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ than creating a one-off client inside `auth-service`. - "Draft a slice for `signup()` command ownership in `auth-service`, with fail-first tests first and implementation in a separate pass." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 4) - "UI modules are easier to test at the right boundary" (`docs/RepoHealthImprovementBacklog.md`, Priority 5) -- [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Implement `signup` command ownership in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `signup()` owns the `createUser` side effect by importing it from `src/apiClient.ts`, maps success/error onto the live interpreted `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime, reuses the existing service-owned login/session verification path after successful signup, and publishes authenticated user state from the service rather than from `Login.svelte`. +- [x] C01 `[frontend]` Implement `signup` command ownership in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `signup()` owns the `createUser` side effect by importing it from `src/apiClient.ts`, maps success/error onto the live interpreted `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime, reuses the existing service-owned login/session verification path after successful signup, and publishes authenticated user state from the service rather than from `Login.svelte`. - Depends on: T01. - Validated by: T01. - Trace: diff --git a/src/lib/auth-service.ts b/src/lib/auth-service.ts index 685be183..7578caf7 100644 --- a/src/lib/auth-service.ts +++ b/src/lib/auth-service.ts @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ import type { Readable } from "svelte/store" import { get, writable } from "svelte/store" import { interpret } from "xstate" import type { StateValueFrom } from "xstate" -import { deleteAuth, postAuth, verifySelf } from "../apiClient" +import { createUser, deleteAuth, postAuth, verifySelf } from "../apiClient" import { loginMachine } from "./login.xstate" import type { Email, ServerResponse, User, UserId } from "./simple-comment-types" @@ -285,9 +285,38 @@ export const createAuthService = ( }) } }, - signup: async payload => { - void payload - return notImplemented("signup") + signup: async ({ userId, password, displayName, email }) => { + currentUserStore.set(undefined) + authRuntime.send("SIGNUP") + + try { + const signupResponse = await createUser({ + id: userId, + name: displayName, + email, + password, + }) + + if (!signupResponse.ok) { + authRuntime.send({ type: "ERROR", error: signupResponse }) + return + } + + authRuntime.send("SUCCESS") + await postAuth(userId, password) + authRuntime.send("SUCCESS") + + const verifiedUser = await verifySelf() + + currentUserStore.set(verifiedUser) + authRuntime.send("SUCCESS") + } catch (error) { + currentUserStore.set(undefined) + authRuntime.send({ + type: "ERROR", + error: error as ServerResponse | string, + }) + } }, loginGuest: async payload => { void payload From 263621a4421b84acacbd08296c636ad87fbe6621 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 14:20:47 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 026/105] Archive Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 4 Checklist as completed --- docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) rename docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md (99%) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md similarity index 99% rename from docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md rename to docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md index 17f2e339..4a4c3867 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md +++ b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice4Checklist.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 4 Checklist -Status: planning +Status: archived, completed Classification: proposed implementation checklist draft (not approved) From dd5dc107942aded0f372942cc15563725f2ad20e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 14:40:41 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 027/105] Init guest login slice --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md | 98 +++++++++++++++++++ docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md | 11 ++- 2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..5b6fc2b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ +# Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 5 Checklist + +Status: planning + +Classification: proposed implementation checklist draft (not approved) + +Source plan: `docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md` (Item 5: Draft a slice for `loginGuest()` command ownership in `auth-service`) + +## Scope Lock + +In scope: + +- move `loginGuest()` command ownership into `src/lib/auth-service.ts` +- make `auth-service.loginGuest()` own the guest-auth side effects currently handled by `Login.svelte` +- preserve the existing guest reuse flow: when a stored guest id/challenge is available, authenticate it with `postAuth`, verify it with `verifyUser`, and update the guest profile when display name or email changed +- preserve the existing new-guest flow: fetch a guest token with `getGuestToken`, verify it with `verifyUser`, create the guest user with `createGuestUser`, then publish authenticated `currentUser` +- compose existing `src/apiClient.ts` exports (`postAuth`, `verifyUser`, `getGuestToken`, `createGuestUser`, `updateUser`, and `verifySelf`) rather than duplicating HTTP transport or response-resolution logic +- validate the service boundary with fail-first tests before implementation + +Out of scope: + +- changing backend/API contracts +- implementing custom fetch, auth header, guest-token, response-resolution, or user transport logic inside `auth-service` +- adding new auth/user API helpers outside `src/apiClient.ts` +- changing guest form-local field state or field-level validation UI in `Login.svelte` +- rewiring `Login.svelte` to call `auth-service.loginGuest()` +- moving `localStorage` reads/writes into `auth-service` +- changing `simple_comment_user` persistence semantics +- modifying `CommentInput.svelte`, `SelfDisplay.svelte`, or relay-store behavior +- editing tests during the implementation pass; if the fail-first tests cannot be made green through production-code changes only, stop and discuss + +## Slice Intent + +This slice moves guest-login command ownership into `auth-service` so guest authentication, guest creation, and guest profile update side effects no longer depend on `Login.svelte` state handlers. + +The current `Login.svelte` flow reads stored guest identity from `localStorage`, then either reuses the stored guest credentials or creates a new guest. This slice should not silently move storage ownership into `auth-service`. Instead, the service contract should accept any reusable stored guest identity explicitly as command input/dependency, leaving storage extraction to a later slice if still needed. + +`src/apiClient.ts` already exposes the API primitives needed for this slice: +`postAuth`, `verifyUser`, `getGuestToken`, `createGuestUser`, `updateUser`, and +`verifySelf`. `auth-service` should compose those primitives. If implementation +discovers a missing reusable guest/user API primitive, stop and propose adding it +to `src/apiClient.ts` rather than creating a one-off client inside +`auth-service`. + +## Atomic Checklist Items + +- [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Tighten the `loginGuest` public contract in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `GuestLoginPayload` can carry the submitted guest display name/email plus optional reusable stored guest identity (`id`, `challenge`, stored `name`, stored `email`) without making `auth-service` read from `localStorage`. + - Depends on: none. + - Validated by: T01. + - Trace: + - "guest login flow reads stored guest credentials, attempts `postAuth(storedId, storedChallenge)`, calls `verifyUser()`, falls back to `getGuestToken()`, calls `verifyUser()` again, creates a guest with `createGuestUser(...)`, and sends success/error machine events." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) + - "guest profile update uses `updateUser({ id: storedId, name: displayName, email: userEmail })` when stored guest identity differs from the submitted guest form values." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) + - "Draft a slice for `loginGuest()` command ownership in `auth-service`, including existing guest-token, verify, create guest, and update-if-changed behavior." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 5) + +- [ ] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend tests for `loginGuest` command ownership in `src/tests/frontend/auth-service.login-guest.test.ts` proving `auth-service.loginGuest()` owns the stored-guest reuse path, fallback new-guest path, update-if-changed behavior, authenticated `currentUser` publication, and error handling. + - Depends on: C01. + - Required coverage: + - stored guest with valid `id`/`challenge` calls `postAuth(storedId, storedChallenge)` and `verifyUser()`, does not call `getGuestToken()` or `createGuestUser()`, and publishes authenticated `currentUser` + - stored guest with changed display name or email calls `updateUser({ id: storedId, name: displayName, email })` + - missing stored guest credentials, or failed stored guest authentication, falls back to `getGuestToken()`, `verifyUser()`, and `createGuestUser({ id, name: displayName, email })` + - guest-login failure leaves `currentUser` undefined and transitions to `error` + - Trace: + - "guest login flow reads stored guest credentials, attempts `postAuth(storedId, storedChallenge)`, calls `verifyUser()`, falls back to `getGuestToken()`, calls `verifyUser()` again, creates a guest with `createGuestUser(...)`, and sends success/error machine events." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) + - "UI modules are easier to test at the right boundary" (`docs/RepoHealthImprovementBacklog.md`, Priority 5) + +- [ ] C02 `[frontend]` Implement `loginGuest` command ownership in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `loginGuest()` composes existing `src/apiClient.ts` guest/auth/user primitives, maps success/error onto the live interpreted `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime, and publishes authenticated user state from the service rather than from `Login.svelte`. + - Depends on: T01. + - Validated by: T01. + - Trace: + - "guest login flow reads stored guest credentials, attempts `postAuth(storedId, storedChallenge)`, calls `verifyUser()`, falls back to `getGuestToken()`, calls `verifyUser()` again, creates a guest with `createGuestUser(...)`, and sends success/error machine events." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) + - "login-related state, side effects, and rendering responsibilities are easier to explain as separate concerns" (`docs/RepoHealthImprovementBacklog.md`, Priority 5) + +## Behavior Slices + +### Slice 5A + +Goal: define the guest-login command input contract without moving storage ownership into `auth-service`. + +Items: C01 + +Type: behavior + +### Slice 5B + +Goal: lock guest-login command ownership and fallback/update behavior in fail-first tests before implementation. + +Items: T01 + +Type: behavior + +### Slice 5C + +Goal: move stored-guest reuse, new-guest creation, and update-if-changed side effects into `auth-service`. + +Items: C02 + +Type: behavior + diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md index f614309f..6e4a8be4 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md @@ -46,7 +46,16 @@ - Kept out of scope: `Login.svelte` UI rewiring, form-local signup validation, guest-login behavior, localStorage handling, shared-store publication, `CommentInput.svelte`, and `SelfDisplay.svelte`. - The proposed slice preserves current behavior intent: successful signup should create the user and continue through the existing post-signup login/session verification path to publish authenticated `currentUser`. -- 5. [ ] Draft a slice for `loginGuest()` command ownership in `auth-service`, including existing guest-token, verify, create guest, and update-if-changed behavior. +- 5. [x] Draft a slice for `loginGuest()` command ownership in `auth-service`, including existing guest-token, verify, create guest, and update-if-changed behavior. + + Findings: + + - Created `docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md` as the proposed slice-5 checklist draft. + - Kept the slice narrow: `loginGuest()` command ownership in `auth-service` only. + - Captured the storage seam explicitly: preserving stored guest reuse requires stored guest `id`/`challenge`/profile data, but this slice should not move `localStorage` ownership into `auth-service`; the service contract should accept reusable stored guest identity as explicit command input/dependency. + - Required reuse of existing `src/apiClient.ts` primitives: `postAuth`, `verifyUser`, `getGuestToken`, `createGuestUser`, `updateUser`, and `verifySelf`. + - Preserved the test/code separation convention: C01 tightens the command contract, T01 adds fail-first tests, C02 implements production code later, and implementation must stop if tests cannot be made green without changing tests. + - Kept out of scope: `Login.svelte` UI rewiring, guest form-local validation, `localStorage` extraction, shared-store publication, `CommentInput.svelte`, and `SelfDisplay.svelte`. - 6. [ ] Draft a slice for moving session/localStorage persistence out of `Login.svelte` only if it blocks service ownership or component decoupling. From d40e5981b594b2b4b5e6b79761b242f876d57e41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 14:41:16 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 028/105] Tighten guest login public contract --- docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md | 3 +-- src/lib/auth-service.ts | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md index 5b6fc2b5..f37af044 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ to `src/apiClient.ts` rather than creating a one-off client inside ## Atomic Checklist Items -- [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Tighten the `loginGuest` public contract in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `GuestLoginPayload` can carry the submitted guest display name/email plus optional reusable stored guest identity (`id`, `challenge`, stored `name`, stored `email`) without making `auth-service` read from `localStorage`. +- [x] C01 `[frontend]` Tighten the `loginGuest` public contract in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `GuestLoginPayload` can carry the submitted guest display name/email plus optional reusable stored guest identity (`id`, `challenge`, stored `name`, stored `email`) without making `auth-service` read from `localStorage`. - Depends on: none. - Validated by: T01. - Trace: @@ -95,4 +95,3 @@ Goal: move stored-guest reuse, new-guest creation, and update-if-changed side ef Items: C02 Type: behavior - diff --git a/src/lib/auth-service.ts b/src/lib/auth-service.ts index 7578caf7..c7664acb 100644 --- a/src/lib/auth-service.ts +++ b/src/lib/auth-service.ts @@ -83,9 +83,17 @@ export type SignupPayload = { email: Email } +export type StoredGuestIdentity = { + id?: UserId + challenge?: string + name?: string + email?: Email +} + export type GuestLoginPayload = { displayName: string email: Email + storedGuest?: StoredGuestIdentity } export type ReportLocalValidationErrorInput = { From bd18d771fe4cfe83c7f34f3cb4e7d06eaea31ff7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 14:42:34 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 029/105] Add guest login ownership tests --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md | 2 +- .../frontend/auth-service.login-guest.test.ts | 241 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 242 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 src/tests/frontend/auth-service.login-guest.test.ts diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md index f37af044..ea701e54 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ to `src/apiClient.ts` rather than creating a one-off client inside - "guest profile update uses `updateUser({ id: storedId, name: displayName, email: userEmail })` when stored guest identity differs from the submitted guest form values." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) - "Draft a slice for `loginGuest()` command ownership in `auth-service`, including existing guest-token, verify, create guest, and update-if-changed behavior." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 5) -- [ ] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend tests for `loginGuest` command ownership in `src/tests/frontend/auth-service.login-guest.test.ts` proving `auth-service.loginGuest()` owns the stored-guest reuse path, fallback new-guest path, update-if-changed behavior, authenticated `currentUser` publication, and error handling. +- [x] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend tests for `loginGuest` command ownership in `src/tests/frontend/auth-service.login-guest.test.ts` proving `auth-service.loginGuest()` owns the stored-guest reuse path, fallback new-guest path, update-if-changed behavior, authenticated `currentUser` publication, and error handling. - Depends on: C01. - Required coverage: - stored guest with valid `id`/`challenge` calls `postAuth(storedId, storedChallenge)` and `verifyUser()`, does not call `getGuestToken()` or `createGuestUser()`, and publishes authenticated `currentUser` diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/auth-service.login-guest.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/auth-service.login-guest.test.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000..01249ad1 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/tests/frontend/auth-service.login-guest.test.ts @@ -0,0 +1,241 @@ +import { beforeEach, describe, expect, jest, test } from "@jest/globals" +import { get } from "svelte/store" +import { createAuthService } from "../../lib/auth-service" +import type { + AdminSafeUser, + AuthToken, + ServerResponse, + TokenClaim, +} from "../../lib/simple-comment-types" +import { + createGuestUser, + getGuestToken, + postAuth, + updateUser, + verifySelf, + verifyUser, +} from "../../apiClient" + +jest.mock("../../apiClient", () => ({ + createGuestUser: jest.fn(), + getGuestToken: jest.fn(), + postAuth: jest.fn(), + updateUser: jest.fn(), + verifySelf: jest.fn(), + verifyUser: jest.fn(), +})) + +const mockCreateGuestUser = jest.mocked(createGuestUser) +const mockGetGuestToken = jest.mocked(getGuestToken) +const mockPostAuth = jest.mocked(postAuth) +const mockUpdateUser = jest.mocked(updateUser) +const mockVerifySelf = jest.mocked(verifySelf) +const mockVerifyUser = jest.mocked(verifyUser) + +const guestUser: AdminSafeUser = { + id: "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000001", + name: "Guest Example", + email: "guest@example.com", + isAdmin: false, + isVerified: true, + challenge: "stored-guest-challenge", +} + +const updatedGuestUser: AdminSafeUser = { + ...guestUser, + name: "Updated Guest", + email: "updated@example.com", +} + +const validAuthResponse: ServerResponse = { + status: 200, + ok: true, + statusText: "OK", + body: "auth-token", +} + +const validGuestTokenResponse: ServerResponse = { + status: 200, + ok: true, + statusText: "OK", + body: "guest-token", +} + +const validTokenClaimResponse: ServerResponse = { + status: 200, + ok: true, + statusText: "OK", + body: { user: guestUser.id, exp: 9999999999 }, +} + +const validGuestCreateResponse: ServerResponse = { + status: 201, + ok: true, + statusText: "Created", + body: guestUser, +} + +const validGuestUpdateResponse: ServerResponse = { + status: 200, + ok: true, + statusText: "OK", + body: updatedGuestUser, +} + +const bootstrapLoggedOut = async () => { + const authService = createAuthService() + + mockVerifySelf.mockRejectedValue({ status: 401 }) + await authService.init() + + expect(get(authService.sessionState)).toBe("loggedOut") + expect(get(authService.currentUser)).toBeUndefined() + + jest.clearAllMocks() + + return authService +} + +describe("auth-service guest login", () => { + beforeEach(() => { + jest.clearAllMocks() + }) + + test("reuses stored guest credentials and publishes authenticated user", async () => { + const authService = await bootstrapLoggedOut() + + mockPostAuth.mockResolvedValue(validAuthResponse) + mockVerifyUser.mockResolvedValue(validTokenClaimResponse) + mockVerifySelf.mockResolvedValue(guestUser) + + await authService.loginGuest({ + displayName: "Guest Example", + email: "guest@example.com", + storedGuest: { + id: guestUser.id, + challenge: "stored-guest-challenge", + name: "Guest Example", + email: "guest@example.com", + }, + }) + + expect(mockPostAuth).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(mockPostAuth).toHaveBeenCalledWith( + guestUser.id, + "stored-guest-challenge" + ) + expect(mockVerifyUser).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(mockGetGuestToken).not.toHaveBeenCalled() + expect(mockCreateGuestUser).not.toHaveBeenCalled() + expect(mockUpdateUser).not.toHaveBeenCalled() + expect(mockVerifySelf).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(get(authService.sessionState)).toBe("loggedIn") + expect(get(authService.currentUser)).toEqual(guestUser) + }) + + test("updates reused guest profile when submitted identity changes", async () => { + const authService = await bootstrapLoggedOut() + + mockPostAuth.mockResolvedValue(validAuthResponse) + mockVerifyUser.mockResolvedValue(validTokenClaimResponse) + mockUpdateUser.mockResolvedValue(validGuestUpdateResponse) + mockVerifySelf.mockResolvedValue(updatedGuestUser) + + await authService.loginGuest({ + displayName: "Updated Guest", + email: "updated@example.com", + storedGuest: { + id: guestUser.id, + challenge: "stored-guest-challenge", + name: "Guest Example", + email: "guest@example.com", + }, + }) + + expect(mockUpdateUser).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(mockUpdateUser).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ + id: guestUser.id, + name: "Updated Guest", + email: "updated@example.com", + }) + expect(get(authService.sessionState)).toBe("loggedIn") + expect(get(authService.currentUser)).toEqual(updatedGuestUser) + }) + + test("creates a new guest when stored guest credentials are missing", async () => { + const authService = await bootstrapLoggedOut() + + mockGetGuestToken.mockResolvedValue(validGuestTokenResponse) + mockVerifyUser.mockResolvedValue(validTokenClaimResponse) + mockCreateGuestUser.mockResolvedValue(validGuestCreateResponse) + mockVerifySelf.mockResolvedValue(guestUser) + + await authService.loginGuest({ + displayName: "Guest Example", + email: "guest@example.com", + }) + + expect(mockPostAuth).not.toHaveBeenCalled() + expect(mockGetGuestToken).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(mockVerifyUser).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(mockCreateGuestUser).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(mockCreateGuestUser).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ + id: guestUser.id, + name: "Guest Example", + email: "guest@example.com", + }) + expect(get(authService.sessionState)).toBe("loggedIn") + expect(get(authService.currentUser)).toEqual(guestUser) + }) + + test("falls back to new guest creation when stored guest auth fails", async () => { + const authService = await bootstrapLoggedOut() + + mockPostAuth.mockRejectedValue({ + status: 401, + ok: false, + statusText: "Unauthorized", + body: "Bad credentials", + }) + mockGetGuestToken.mockResolvedValue(validGuestTokenResponse) + mockVerifyUser.mockResolvedValue(validTokenClaimResponse) + mockCreateGuestUser.mockResolvedValue(validGuestCreateResponse) + mockVerifySelf.mockResolvedValue(guestUser) + + await authService.loginGuest({ + displayName: "Guest Example", + email: "guest@example.com", + storedGuest: { + id: guestUser.id, + challenge: "stale-challenge", + }, + }) + + expect(mockPostAuth).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(mockGetGuestToken).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(mockCreateGuestUser).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(get(authService.sessionState)).toBe("loggedIn") + expect(get(authService.currentUser)).toEqual(guestUser) + }) + + test("leaves currentUser undefined and transitions to error on guest login failure", async () => { + const authService = await bootstrapLoggedOut() + + mockGetGuestToken.mockRejectedValue({ + status: 403, + ok: false, + statusText: "Forbidden", + body: "Guest login disabled", + }) + + await authService.loginGuest({ + displayName: "Guest Example", + email: "guest@example.com", + }) + + expect(mockGetGuestToken).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(mockCreateGuestUser).not.toHaveBeenCalled() + expect(get(authService.sessionState)).toBe("error") + expect(get(authService.currentUser)).toBeUndefined() + }) +}) From 1a47af33c11d4899bc491f6fc617657fddec959c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 14:45:10 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 030/105] Implement guest login command ownership --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md | 2 +- src/lib/auth-service.ts | 91 ++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md index ea701e54..2906b933 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ to `src/apiClient.ts` rather than creating a one-off client inside - "guest login flow reads stored guest credentials, attempts `postAuth(storedId, storedChallenge)`, calls `verifyUser()`, falls back to `getGuestToken()`, calls `verifyUser()` again, creates a guest with `createGuestUser(...)`, and sends success/error machine events." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) - "UI modules are easier to test at the right boundary" (`docs/RepoHealthImprovementBacklog.md`, Priority 5) -- [ ] C02 `[frontend]` Implement `loginGuest` command ownership in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `loginGuest()` composes existing `src/apiClient.ts` guest/auth/user primitives, maps success/error onto the live interpreted `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime, and publishes authenticated user state from the service rather than from `Login.svelte`. +- [x] C02 `[frontend]` Implement `loginGuest` command ownership in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` so `loginGuest()` composes existing `src/apiClient.ts` guest/auth/user primitives, maps success/error onto the live interpreted `src/lib/login.xstate.ts` runtime, and publishes authenticated user state from the service rather than from `Login.svelte`. - Depends on: T01. - Validated by: T01. - Trace: diff --git a/src/lib/auth-service.ts b/src/lib/auth-service.ts index c7664acb..53d0d8c7 100644 --- a/src/lib/auth-service.ts +++ b/src/lib/auth-service.ts @@ -25,7 +25,16 @@ import type { Readable } from "svelte/store" import { get, writable } from "svelte/store" import { interpret } from "xstate" import type { StateValueFrom } from "xstate" -import { createUser, deleteAuth, postAuth, verifySelf } from "../apiClient" +import { + createGuestUser, + createUser, + deleteAuth, + getGuestToken, + postAuth, + updateUser, + verifySelf, + verifyUser, +} from "../apiClient" import { loginMachine } from "./login.xstate" import type { Email, ServerResponse, User, UserId } from "./simple-comment-types" @@ -326,9 +335,83 @@ export const createAuthService = ( }) } }, - loginGuest: async payload => { - void payload - return notImplemented("loginGuest") + loginGuest: async ({ displayName, email, storedGuest }) => { + currentUserStore.set(undefined) + authRuntime.send({ type: "GUEST", guest: { name: displayName, email } }) + + const createNewGuest = async (): Promise => { + const guestTokenResponse = await getGuestToken() + + if (!guestTokenResponse.ok) throw guestTokenResponse + + const tokenClaimResponse = await verifyUser() + + if (!tokenClaimResponse.ok) throw tokenClaimResponse + + const createGuestResponse = await createGuestUser({ + id: tokenClaimResponse.body.user, + name: displayName, + email, + }) + + if (!createGuestResponse.ok) throw createGuestResponse + } + + const reuseStoredGuest = async (): Promise => { + const { id, challenge } = storedGuest ?? {} + + if (!id || !challenge) return false + + try { + const authResponse = await postAuth(id, challenge) + + if (!authResponse.ok) return false + + const verifyResponse = await verifyUser() + + if (!verifyResponse.ok) return false + + return true + } catch { + return false + } + } + + try { + const reusedStoredGuest = await reuseStoredGuest() + + if (!reusedStoredGuest) await createNewGuest() + + const { id, name: storedName, email: storedEmail } = storedGuest ?? {} + + const shouldUpdateStoredGuest = + reusedStoredGuest && + id && + (displayName !== storedName || email !== storedEmail) + + if (shouldUpdateStoredGuest) { + const updateResponse = await updateUser({ + id, + name: displayName, + email, + }) + + if (!updateResponse.ok) throw updateResponse + } + + authRuntime.send("SUCCESS") + + const verifiedUser = await verifySelf() + + currentUserStore.set(verifiedUser) + authRuntime.send("SUCCESS") + } catch (error) { + currentUserStore.set(undefined) + authRuntime.send({ + type: "ERROR", + error: error as ServerResponse | string, + }) + } }, logout: async () => { authRuntime.send("LOGOUT") From c79f414a05875a8b892621487c3b77299c9ccd16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 14:53:46 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 031/105] Archive Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 5 Checklist --- .../{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md (98%) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md similarity index 98% rename from docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md rename to docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md index 2906b933..256ff46d 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md +++ b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice5Checklist.md @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ # Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 5 Checklist -Status: planning +Status: archived, completed -Classification: proposed implementation checklist draft (not approved) +Classification: completed implementation checklist Source plan: `docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md` (Item 5: Draft a slice for `loginGuest()` command ownership in `auth-service`) From d47bcb94a92d61b3593c4d39f7afc4511abfb9d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 14:54:05 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 032/105] Remove obsolete auth-service scaffold helper --- src/lib/auth-service.ts | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/lib/auth-service.ts b/src/lib/auth-service.ts index 53d0d8c7..fdf636c1 100644 --- a/src/lib/auth-service.ts +++ b/src/lib/auth-service.ts @@ -133,12 +133,6 @@ export type AuthService = { destroy: () => void } -const notImplemented = async (methodName: string): Promise => { - throw new Error( - `auth-service scaffold method '${methodName}' is not implemented` - ) -} - const matchesRequestId = ( value: { requestId: string }, requestId?: string From f54cb23509ed88974a20fdf8d307be0e0b336891 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 15:00:21 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 033/105] Draft auth persistence slice --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice6Checklist.md | 121 ++++++++++++++++++ docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md | 11 +- 2 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice6Checklist.md diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice6Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice6Checklist.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..35850ba2 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice6Checklist.md @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ +# Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 6 Checklist + +Status: planning + +Classification: proposed implementation checklist draft (not approved) + +Source plan: `docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md` (Item 6: Draft a slice for moving session/localStorage persistence out of `Login.svelte`) + +## Scope Lock + +In scope: + +- move `simple_comment_user` session/guest persistence out of `Login.svelte` +- create a small auth persistence boundary, such as `src/lib/auth-persistence.ts`, for `simple_comment_user` reads/writes +- expose explicit persistence operations for stored auth user data: + - `loadStoredUser` + - `saveStoredUser` + - `clearStoredUser` + - `loadStoredGuestIdentity` +- make the persistence boundary tolerate missing storage, malformed JSON, and incomplete stored data without throwing during normal auth flows +- let `auth-service` use an injectable persistence dependency so tests and non-browser clients can provide their own storage behavior +- have `auth-service` save verified/authenticated users and clear stored session data on confirmed logout or unauthenticated initial verification +- have `auth-service.loginGuest()` use stored guest identity from the persistence dependency when the caller does not pass `storedGuest` explicitly +- replace `Login.svelte` direct `simple_comment_user` localStorage reads/writes with the shared persistence boundary while preserving existing form hydration and guest reuse behavior +- validate persistence behavior with fail-first tests before implementation + +Out of scope: + +- moving `simple_comment_login_tab` persistence out of `Login.svelte` +- changing login tab selection behavior or selected-tab UI persistence semantics +- treating `localStorage` as authoritative authentication state; server verification remains the source of truth for session validity +- adding a broad auth controller, runtime component, workflow module, or event bus +- changing backend/API contracts +- changing `src/apiClient.ts` HTTP transport behavior +- rewiring `Login.svelte` to call `auth-service` commands +- replacing `currentUserStore`, `loginStateStore`, or `dispatchableStore` +- modifying `CommentInput.svelte` or `SelfDisplay.svelte` +- editing tests during an implementation pass; if fail-first tests cannot be made green through production-code changes only, stop and discuss + +## Slice Intent + +This slice resolves the Item 6 conditional in favor of moving session and guest persistence out of `Login.svelte`. Auth/session continuity should not depend on the `Login.svelte` component being mounted, especially for future auth checks or guest reuse flows that may be initiated by `CommentInput.svelte`, `SelfDisplay.svelte`, or another auth-aware surface. + +The safe version is intentionally small: introduce a persistence adapter for `simple_comment_user`, then let `auth-service` depend on that adapter rather than reading browser storage directly. This keeps raw `localStorage` isolated, keeps auth-service testable, and avoids reintroducing the broad frontend architecture churn that Priority 5 has been trying to avoid. + +`simple_comment_login_tab` should stay in `Login.svelte` for this slice. It is a UI preference, not session/auth persistence, and moving it now would make the slice look cleaner while expanding its true responsibility. + +## Atomic Checklist Items + +- [ ] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend unit tests for the auth persistence boundary in `src/tests/frontend/auth-persistence.test.ts`. + - Depends on: none. + - Required coverage: + - missing `simple_comment_user` returns `undefined` + - malformed `simple_comment_user` returns `undefined` without throwing + - saved users round-trip through `saveStoredUser` and `loadStoredUser` + - `clearStoredUser` removes the stored user + - `loadStoredGuestIdentity` returns only the reusable guest identity fields needed by `auth-service.loginGuest()` + - Trace: + - "Session/localStorage handling remains in `Login.svelte`: ... verified/current user state reads/writes `simple_comment_user`; guest login reads stored `simple_comment_user` to reuse guest credentials; mount logic hydrates form fields from stored user data." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) + - "Draft a slice for moving session/localStorage persistence out of `Login.svelte` only if it blocks service ownership or component decoupling." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 6) + +- [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Implement `src/lib/auth-persistence.ts` as a small `simple_comment_user` persistence boundary with typed exports for `loadStoredUser`, `saveStoredUser`, `clearStoredUser`, and `loadStoredGuestIdentity`. + - Depends on: T01. + - Validated by: T01. + - Trace: + - "Session/localStorage handling remains in `Login.svelte`: ... verified/current user state reads/writes `simple_comment_user`; guest login reads stored `simple_comment_user` to reuse guest credentials; mount logic hydrates form fields from stored user data." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) + - "avoid introducing another ad-hoc event bus" (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 12) + +- [ ] T02 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend tests for `auth-service` persistence integration using an injected persistence dependency rather than browser `localStorage`. + - Depends on: C01. + - Required coverage: + - successful `init()`, `login()`, `signup()`, and `loginGuest()` save the verified authenticated user + - unauthenticated initial verification clears stored user data + - successful `logout()` clears stored user data + - failed auth commands do not save a new stored user + - `loginGuest()` uses persisted guest identity when `storedGuest` is omitted + - explicit `storedGuest` command input takes precedence over persisted guest identity + - Trace: + - "`authService.init()` calls `verifySelf()`, maps success / `401` / non-`401` outcomes onto the live login machine, and publishes `currentUser` from the service." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 1 findings) + - "`authService.login()` calls `postAuth()`, verifies the resulting session with `verifySelf()`, maps success/error onto the live login machine, and publishes authenticated `currentUser` from the service." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 1 findings) + - "guest login flow reads stored guest credentials..." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) + +- [ ] C02 `[frontend]` Integrate the auth persistence boundary into `src/lib/auth-service.ts` through an injectable persistence dependency, preserving server verification as the source of truth while saving, clearing, and reading stored guest identity through the adapter. + - Depends on: T02. + - Validated by: T02. + - Trace: + - "login-related state, side effects, and rendering responsibilities are easier to explain as separate concerns" (`docs/RepoHealthImprovementBacklog.md`, Priority 5) + - "Prefer direct `auth-service` API or a thin service-backed store; avoid introducing another ad-hoc event bus." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 12) + +- [ ] C03 `[frontend]` Replace direct `simple_comment_user` `localStorage` access in `src/components/Login.svelte` with the shared auth persistence boundary, while leaving `simple_comment_login_tab` persistence and all form-local validation/UI behavior in `Login.svelte`. + - Depends on: C01. + - Validated by: `yarn typecheck`. + - Trace: + - "Session/localStorage handling remains in `Login.svelte`: login tab selection reads/writes `simple_comment_login_tab`; verified/current user state reads/writes `simple_comment_user`; guest login reads stored `simple_comment_user` to reuse guest credentials; mount logic hydrates form fields from stored user data." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) + - "Keep explicitly out of scope: splitting `Login.svelte` into form components, adding `auth-controller.ts`, adding `AuthRuntime.svelte`, creating broad auth workflow modules, or redesigning frontend state architecture." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 14) + +## Behavior Slices + +### Slice 6A + +Goal: define and implement the small persistence adapter without touching auth command behavior. + +Items: T01, C01 + +Type: behavior + +### Slice 6B + +Goal: let `auth-service` own session persistence through an injected adapter while preserving server verification as the source of truth. + +Items: T02, C02 + +Type: behavior + +### Slice 6C + +Goal: remove direct `simple_comment_user` storage access from `Login.svelte` without moving UI preference persistence or rewiring auth commands. + +Items: C03 + +Type: mechanical diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md index 6e4a8be4..dc4a322c 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md @@ -57,7 +57,16 @@ - Preserved the test/code separation convention: C01 tightens the command contract, T01 adds fail-first tests, C02 implements production code later, and implementation must stop if tests cannot be made green without changing tests. - Kept out of scope: `Login.svelte` UI rewiring, guest form-local validation, `localStorage` extraction, shared-store publication, `CommentInput.svelte`, and `SelfDisplay.svelte`. -- 6. [ ] Draft a slice for moving session/localStorage persistence out of `Login.svelte` only if it blocks service ownership or component decoupling. +- 6. [x] Draft a slice for moving session/localStorage persistence out of `Login.svelte` only if it blocks service ownership or component decoupling. + + Findings: + + - Resolved the conditional in favor of moving session/guest persistence out of `Login.svelte`: auth/session continuity and guest reuse should not depend on the `Login.svelte` component being mounted. + - Created `docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice6Checklist.md` as the proposed slice-6 checklist draft. + - Kept the slice narrow: move only `simple_comment_user` session/guest persistence behind a small auth persistence boundary, then let `auth-service` consume that boundary through an injectable dependency. + - Explicitly kept `simple_comment_login_tab` persistence out of scope because it is UI preference state owned by `Login.svelte`, not auth/session persistence. + - Preserved server verification as the source of truth: persisted user data is cache/form/guest-reuse support, not authoritative authentication state. + - Avoided broad architecture churn: no auth controller, no runtime component, no workflow module, no new event bus, and no `CommentInput.svelte` / `SelfDisplay.svelte` rewiring in this slice. - 7. [ ] Draft a slice for wiring `Login.svelte` to call `auth-service` commands while keeping form-local state and field validation in `Login.svelte`. From 501e5a711867f3158e54d4b499856fbac19b2c04 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 09:57:40 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 034/105] Draft login auth-service wiring slice --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md | 111 ++++++++++++++++++ docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md | 10 +- 2 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..4dda1f63 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ +# Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 7 Checklist + +Status: planning + +Classification: proposed implementation checklist draft (not approved) + +Source plan: `docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md` (Item 7: Draft a slice for wiring `Login.svelte` to call `auth-service` commands) + +## Scope Lock + +In scope: + +- wire `Login.svelte` auth actions through `auth-service` command methods instead of direct `src/apiClient.ts` calls +- keep form-local field state, field validation, selected-tab UI, selected-tab persistence, and status-message formatting in `Login.svelte` +- create a widget-scoped `AuthService` instance at the current widget composition root and thread it explicitly down the current render path to `Login.svelte` +- replace `Login.svelte` local auth-machine runtime ownership with reads from the service-owned auth runtime +- expose the minimal service-owned auth state metadata needed for `Login.svelte` to preserve the existing `loginStateStore` publication shape during the transition +- keep `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` working through the existing relay stores for now +- validate command delegation with fail-first tests before implementation + +Out of scope: + +- moving `simple_comment_user` persistence out of `Login.svelte` +- replacing `loginStateStore`, `dispatchableStore`, or `currentUserStore` +- removing relay behavior from `CommentInput.svelte` or `SelfDisplay.svelte` +- deciding the final broader auth-state exposure strategy for the whole widget beyond this explicit prop-threaded seam +- introducing a singleton auth-service import, a new event bus, an auth controller, or a runtime wrapper component +- splitting `Login.svelte` into smaller components +- changing backend/API contracts +- editing tests during an implementation pass; if fail-first tests cannot be made green through production-code changes only, stop and discuss + +## Slice Intent + +This slice removes the remaining direct auth command side effects from `Login.svelte` without reopening the large architecture churn that earlier Priority 5 planning flirted with. `auth-service` already owns the live auth runtime and the auth commands. `Login.svelte` should become the place that validates fields, gathers form input, chooses which auth command to invoke, and renders the resulting auth state, not the place that talks to auth endpoints directly. + +The safe implementation path is to create a widget-scoped `AuthService` instance at the current composition root, thread it explicitly down the existing render path, and have `Login.svelte` delegate to it. That is narrower and safer than introducing a singleton or broad new store, and it does not decide the later direct-props versus thin-store question for every other auth-aware component. + +Because `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` still depend on `loginStateStore`, this slice should preserve that store shape for now. The key constraint is to avoid two authoritative auth runtimes: `Login.svelte` should observe the service-owned auth state rather than continue interpreting its own auth machine. + +## Atomic Checklist Items + +- [ ] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend component tests for `Login.svelte` auth-service delegation in `src/tests/frontend/Login.auth-service.test.ts`. + - Depends on: none. + - Required coverage: + - mount/init delegates the initial auth check through `authService.init()` + - valid login submission calls `authService.login({ userId, password })` + - valid signup submission calls `authService.signup({ userId, password, displayName, email })` + - valid guest submission calls `authService.loginGuest({ displayName, email })` when no explicit stored guest override is provided by the component + - local validation failures surface component-local errors and do not call auth-service command methods + - logout intent delegates through `authService.logout()` when logout is currently allowed + - Trace: + - "Draft a slice for wiring `Login.svelte` to call `auth-service` commands while keeping form-local state and field validation in `Login.svelte`." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 7) + - "Already service-owned but still duplicated in `Login.svelte`: initial verification uses `verifySelf()` ... user login uses `postAuth(userId, userPassword)`; logout uses `deleteAuth()`." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) + - "Still not owned by `auth-service`: signup uses `createUser(userInfo)` ..." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) + - "Still not owned by `auth-service`: guest login flow reads stored guest credentials..." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) + +- [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Create a widget-scoped `AuthService` instance with `createAuthService()` at the current composition root and thread it explicitly through `src/components/SimpleComment.svelte`, `src/components/DiscussionDisplay.svelte`, and `src/components/CommentInput.svelte` into `src/components/Login.svelte`. + - Depends on: T01. + - Validated by: `yarn typecheck`. + - Trace: + - "Prefer direct `auth-service` API or a thin service-backed store; avoid introducing another ad-hoc event bus." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 12) + - "Resolved the conditional in favor of moving session/guest persistence out of `Login.svelte`: auth/session continuity and guest reuse should not depend on the `Login.svelte` component being mounted." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 6 findings) + +- [ ] C02 `[frontend]` Extend `src/lib/auth-service.ts` with the minimal readable auth-runtime metadata needed for `Login.svelte` to mirror the service-owned machine into the existing `loginStateStore` shape without running a second interpreted auth machine inside the component. + - Depends on: T01. + - Validated by: T01. + - Trace: + - "Relay coupling remains in `Login.svelte`: it subscribes to `dispatchableStore` and reacts to `loginIntent` / `logoutIntent` by driving its local machine." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) + - "Draft a slice for replacing `Login.svelte` shared-store publication with auth-service state subscriptions." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 8) + +- [ ] C03 `[frontend]` Replace direct auth API calls and local auth-machine ownership in `src/components/Login.svelte` with `auth-service` command delegation and service-state subscriptions, while preserving component-local validation/UI behavior and the current `loginStateStore` publication contract for unreworked consumers. + - Depends on: C01, C02. + - Validated by: T01. + - Trace: + - "Draft a slice for wiring `Login.svelte` to call `auth-service` commands while keeping form-local state and field validation in `Login.svelte`." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 7) + - "Keep explicitly out of scope: ... creating broad auth workflow modules, or redesigning frontend state architecture." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 14) + - "login-related state, side effects, and rendering responsibilities are easier to explain as separate concerns" (`docs/RepoHealthImprovementBacklog.md`, Priority 5) + +## Behavior Slices + +### Slice 7A + +Goal: lock the `Login.svelte` command-delegation boundary in fail-first tests before implementation. + +Items: T01 + +Type: behavior + +### Slice 7B + +Goal: make a widget-scoped auth-service instance explicitly available to `Login.svelte` without introducing a new global auth mechanism. + +Items: C01 + +Type: mechanical + +### Slice 7C + +Goal: expose just enough service-owned runtime metadata to avoid a second authoritative auth machine inside `Login.svelte`. + +Items: C02 + +Type: behavior + +### Slice 7D + +Goal: make `Login.svelte` a command-delegating/view component for auth while preserving its current validation/UI responsibilities and legacy store publication. + +Items: C03 + +Type: behavior diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md index dc4a322c..3f2ceca7 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md @@ -68,7 +68,15 @@ - Preserved server verification as the source of truth: persisted user data is cache/form/guest-reuse support, not authoritative authentication state. - Avoided broad architecture churn: no auth controller, no runtime component, no workflow module, no new event bus, and no `CommentInput.svelte` / `SelfDisplay.svelte` rewiring in this slice. -- 7. [ ] Draft a slice for wiring `Login.svelte` to call `auth-service` commands while keeping form-local state and field validation in `Login.svelte`. +- 7. [x] Draft a slice for wiring `Login.svelte` to call `auth-service` commands while keeping form-local state and field validation in `Login.svelte`. + + Findings: + + - Created `docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md` as the proposed slice-7 checklist draft. + - Kept the slice narrow: `Login.svelte` should stop calling auth APIs directly and instead delegate auth commands to `auth-service` while retaining form-local state, field validation, selected-tab UI, selected-tab persistence, and status-message rendering. + - Chose the narrowest wiring seam: create a widget-scoped `AuthService` instance and thread it explicitly through the current component path rather than introducing a singleton import, new event bus, or broad store redesign. + - Called out a key constraint explicitly: `Login.svelte` should not keep a second authoritative auth runtime once it is delegating to `auth-service`; it should observe service-owned auth state and preserve the existing `loginStateStore` publication shape only as transitional compatibility for unreworked consumers. + - Kept item 8 and the relay-removal work out of scope: `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` still rely on `loginStateStore` / `dispatchableStore`, so slice 7 preserves those contracts rather than removing them prematurely. - 8. [ ] Draft a slice for replacing `Login.svelte` shared-store publication with auth-service state subscriptions. From 68497fa328c75e99737637939de3873ce48ab70c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:07:18 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 035/105] Draft slice 7 plan --- docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md | 174 +++++++++++++++++++ docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md | 2 + 2 files changed, 176 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..996edcab --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md @@ -0,0 +1,174 @@ +# Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 7 Plan + +Status: planning + +Source backlog: `docs/RepoHealthImprovementBacklog.md` (`Priority 5`) + +Parent plan: `docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md` (Item 7) + +Related artifacts: +- `docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md` (pre-plan draft checklist input; must be reconciled to this plan before implementation use) + +## Goal + +Wire `Login.svelte` to use the existing widget-scoped `auth-service` commands and auth runtime so the component stops performing direct auth API work while still owning form-local input, validation, and rendering behavior. + +## Intent + +This slice is about making `Login.svelte` simpler and less risky without turning the frontend inside out. + +Today, `Login.svelte` still does two jobs at once: + +- it behaves like a form component, +- and it also behaves like an auth controller that talks to the backend directly and runs its own auth state machine. + +For this slice, success means: + +- `Login.svelte` still owns its own fields, validation messages, selected tab, and UI rendering, +- but when the user tries to log in, sign up, continue as a guest, or log out, the component calls `auth-service` instead of calling auth APIs directly, +- and the component reads auth state from the service-owned runtime instead of running a second authoritative auth runtime locally. + +In plain terms: the login form should stay a form, and the auth service should stay the place that owns auth behavior. + +## Motivation + +Slice 7 exists because Priority 5 is not only about extracting auth commands into `auth-service`; it is also about removing the remaining hidden dependence on `Login.svelte` as the place where auth actually happens. + +The command extraction slices already moved `init()`, `login()`, `logout()`, `signup()`, and `loginGuest()` into `auth-service`. That work lowered risk at the service boundary, but `Login.svelte` still contains direct auth-side-effect code and still interprets its own auth machine. As a result, the codebase still has two competing centers of auth responsibility: + +- `auth-service`, which is supposed to own auth behavior, +- and `Login.svelte`, which still behaves like a second auth runtime and command executor. + +That split keeps the current relay/store setup harder to reason about, and it makes later decoupling work in `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` more fragile than it needs to be. + +Slice 7 is the smallest reasonable next step because it removes direct command execution from `Login.svelte` without also trying to solve persistence extraction, relay removal, or the final auth-state distribution strategy all at once. + +## In Scope + +- Replace direct auth API command calls in `Login.svelte` with calls to `auth-service` methods: + - `init()` + - `login()` + - `signup()` + - `loginGuest()` + - `logout()` +- Create a widget-scoped `AuthService` instance at the current composition root and thread it explicitly through the current component path into `Login.svelte`. +- Make `Login.svelte` observe service-owned auth state rather than interpret its own auth machine as a second authority. +- Preserve `Login.svelte` ownership of: + - field values, + - field-level validation, + - selected-tab UI, + - selected-tab persistence, + - user-facing status/error rendering. +- Preserve compatibility with the current relay/store consumers by continuing to publish the existing `loginStateStore` shape during this slice. +- Add validation that proves `Login.svelte` delegates auth commands to `auth-service` and does not call auth APIs directly for those flows. + +## Out of Scope + +- Moving `simple_comment_user` persistence out of `Login.svelte`. +- Removing `loginStateStore`, `dispatchableStore`, or `currentUserStore`. +- Removing login relay behavior from `CommentInput.svelte`. +- Removing logout relay behavior from `SelfDisplay.svelte`. +- Choosing the final project-wide answer to direct props versus a thin auth-service-backed store. +- Introducing a singleton auth-service, new event bus, auth controller, runtime wrapper component, or broader frontend state redesign. +- Splitting `Login.svelte` into multiple components. +- Changing backend/API contracts. +- Broad visual or UX redesign of login/signup/guest forms. + +## Constraints + +- `auth-service` remains widget-scoped; do not introduce a singleton service instance. +- Server verification remains the source of truth for session validity. +- The slice must not create two authoritative auth runtimes after wiring is complete. +- The slice must remain reviewable and reversible; do not fold in slices 6, 8, 9, or 10. +- Test and implementation passes remain separate per current team convention. + +## Current State + +At the start of this slice: + +- `auth-service` already owns the extracted auth commands and the live interpreted auth runtime. +- `Login.svelte` still imports and calls auth APIs directly for init/login/signup/guest/logout flows. +- `Login.svelte` still uses `useMachine(loginMachine)` and publishes login state outward through `loginStateStore`. +- `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` still rely on the relay-store contract and are not being cleaned up in this slice. + +## Approach + +1. Add fail-first component tests that treat `Login.svelte` as the boundary under test and assert that it delegates auth actions to an injected `AuthService`. +2. Introduce a widget-scoped service seam at the current composition root and thread it explicitly down to `Login.svelte`. +3. Extend the service boundary only as much as needed for `Login.svelte` to observe service-owned auth runtime state and preserve the existing `loginStateStore` publication contract for unreworked consumers. +4. Replace direct auth API calls and local auth runtime ownership in `Login.svelte` with service delegation plus service-state observation. +5. Stop there. Do not fold relay removal, persistence extraction, or a broader auth-state redesign into this slice. + +## Risks and Mitigations + +- Risk: slice 7 quietly absorbs slice 8 by redesigning auth-state publication. + - Mitigation: preserve the current `loginStateStore` contract for now and limit new service state exposure to the minimum needed by `Login.svelte`. + +- Risk: slice 7 quietly absorbs slice 9 or 10 by changing `CommentInput.svelte` or `SelfDisplay.svelte` behavior. + - Mitigation: keep those components working through the existing relay/store contract and treat their cleanup as later slices only. + +- Risk: the implementation leaves two active auth runtimes, one in `auth-service` and one in `Login.svelte`. + - Mitigation: require the plan to treat service-owned runtime state as the only authority after wiring is complete. + +- Risk: wiring the service through components encourages a future singleton shortcut. + - Mitigation: explicitly scope the service per widget instance and pass it explicitly through the current tree. + +- Risk: UI behavior regresses because form validation and auth delegation are mixed together carelessly. + - Mitigation: keep validation/UI behavior explicitly in scope for preservation, and test the component boundary before implementation. + +## Acceptance Criteria + +1. `Login.svelte` no longer performs direct auth command calls to backend auth APIs for init/login/signup/guest/logout flows. +2. `Login.svelte` delegates auth command execution to a widget-scoped `AuthService`. +3. `Login.svelte` does not continue to run a second authoritative interpreted auth runtime after the slice is complete. +4. `Login.svelte` still owns form-local field state, validation behavior, selected-tab UI, selected-tab persistence, and user-facing status/error presentation. +5. Existing unreworked consumers that depend on the current `loginStateStore` contract continue to function during this slice. +6. The slice does not introduce a singleton auth-service, a new event bus, or a broader auth-state architecture redesign. +7. The resulting changes are narrow enough that later slices can still independently address persistence extraction and relay removal. + +## Validation Strategy + +Required evidence types for Slice 7: + +- **Unit/component evidence** + - `Login.svelte` delegation behavior is tested at the component boundary. + - Pass: tests show valid user actions call the appropriate `auth-service` methods, and local validation failures do not call service commands. + - Fail: `Login.svelte` still calls auth APIs directly for covered command paths, or component validation behavior is lost. + +- **Contract/parity evidence** + - Transitional relay/store behavior remains intact for unreworked consumers. + - Pass: the current `loginStateStore` publication shape required by existing consumers is still produced during this slice. + - Fail: slice 7 breaks current relay/store consumers or silently changes the state contract they rely on. + +- **Type/build evidence** + - The new widget-scoped service seam composes cleanly through the current component tree. + - Pass: frontend typecheck succeeds after the service seam and `Login.svelte` delegation changes. + - Fail: type errors or composition mismatches are introduced in the component tree. + +## Open Questions / Assumptions + +- Assumption: a widget-scoped service instance threaded through the current component path is acceptable as an intermediate step even if the later auth-state distribution choice is still open. +- Assumption: `auth-service` can expose the minimal runtime metadata needed by `Login.svelte` without prematurely deciding the broader state-distribution design. +- Open question: should the later direct-props versus thin-store decision happen before slices 9 and 10, or immediately after them? +- Open question: is the existing `loginStateStore` shape sufficient as a temporary compatibility contract once `Login.svelte` stops owning the runtime? + +## Scope Guard + +The following work is explicitly deferred and must not be folded into Slice 7 without a separate approved plan/checklist update: + +- Slice 6 persistence extraction work +- Slice 8 shared-store publication replacement +- Slice 9 login relay removal from `CommentInput.svelte` +- Slice 10 logout relay removal from `SelfDisplay.svelte` +- Final project-wide auth-state distribution redesign + +If the implementation appears to require one of those to succeed, stop and revise planning rather than silently expanding scope. + +## Conformance QC (Plan) + +- Intent clarity issues: none observed; intent is stated in plain language and distinguishes form responsibilities from auth responsibilities. +- Missing required sections: none (`Goal`, `Intent`, `In Scope`, `Out of Scope`, `Acceptance Criteria`, and `Validation Strategy` are present). +- Ambiguities/assumptions to resolve: whether the current `loginStateStore` shape is sufficient as a temporary compatibility layer should be validated during checklist authoring. +- Validation strategy gaps: none for this slice’s delegated-command and transitional-compatibility scope. +- Traceability readiness: ready; headings and acceptance criteria are stable and quoteable for checklist authoring. +- Pass/Fail: structurally ready for collaborative review and checklist reconciliation — **Pass**. diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md index 3f2ceca7..0f016f49 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md @@ -73,10 +73,12 @@ Findings: - Created `docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md` as the proposed slice-7 checklist draft. + - Backed up and created `docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md` per `docs/norms/plan.md`, with explicit `Intent`, `Motivation`, scope boundaries, acceptance criteria, and validation strategy. - Kept the slice narrow: `Login.svelte` should stop calling auth APIs directly and instead delegate auth commands to `auth-service` while retaining form-local state, field validation, selected-tab UI, selected-tab persistence, and status-message rendering. - Chose the narrowest wiring seam: create a widget-scoped `AuthService` instance and thread it explicitly through the current component path rather than introducing a singleton import, new event bus, or broad store redesign. - Called out a key constraint explicitly: `Login.svelte` should not keep a second authoritative auth runtime once it is delegating to `auth-service`; it should observe service-owned auth state and preserve the existing `loginStateStore` publication shape only as transitional compatibility for unreworked consumers. - Kept item 8 and the relay-removal work out of scope: `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` still rely on `loginStateStore` / `dispatchableStore`, so slice 7 preserves those contracts rather than removing them prematurely. + - The existing slice-7 checklist should now be treated as pre-plan draft input and reconciled to the approved slice-7 plan before it is used for implementation. - 8. [ ] Draft a slice for replacing `Login.svelte` shared-store publication with auth-service state subscriptions. From c22bc50c3aa008a94ae217e584a0f5bba663aea2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:18:39 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 036/105] Expand slice 7 test checklist --- docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md | 15 ++++++++------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md index 4dda1f63..31026d66 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md @@ -41,13 +41,14 @@ Because `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` still depend on `loginSta - [ ] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend component tests for `Login.svelte` auth-service delegation in `src/tests/frontend/Login.auth-service.test.ts`. - Depends on: none. - - Required coverage: - - mount/init delegates the initial auth check through `authService.init()` - - valid login submission calls `authService.login({ userId, password })` - - valid signup submission calls `authService.signup({ userId, password, displayName, email })` - - valid guest submission calls `authService.loginGuest({ displayName, email })` when no explicit stored guest override is provided by the component - - local validation failures surface component-local errors and do not call auth-service command methods - - logout intent delegates through `authService.logout()` when logout is currently allowed + - [ ] T01.01 Add a fail-first test proving mount/init delegates the initial auth check through `authService.init()` rather than running direct `verifySelf()` logic inside `Login.svelte`. + - [ ] T01.02 Add a fail-first test proving a valid login submission calls `authService.login({ userId, password })` with the current form values. + - [ ] T01.03 Add a fail-first test proving a valid signup submission calls `authService.signup({ userId, password, displayName, email })` with the current form values. + - [ ] T01.04 Add a fail-first test proving a valid guest submission calls `authService.loginGuest({ displayName, email })` when no explicit stored guest override is provided by the component. + - [ ] T01.05 Add fail-first tests proving local validation failures still surface component-local errors and do not call `authService.login()`, `authService.signup()`, or `authService.loginGuest()`. + - [ ] T01.06 Add a fail-first test proving logout intent delegates through `authService.logout()` only when logout is currently allowed by the observed auth state. + - [ ] T01.07 Add fail-first tests proving `Login.svelte` no longer performs direct auth command calls to `postAuth`, `createUser`, `getGuestToken`, `createGuestUser`, `updateUser`, or `deleteAuth()` for the delegated flows covered by this slice. + - [ ] T01.08 Add a fail-first test proving `Login.svelte` publishes the existing `loginStateStore` compatibility shape from observed service-owned auth state rather than from a second authoritative local auth runtime. - Trace: - "Draft a slice for wiring `Login.svelte` to call `auth-service` commands while keeping form-local state and field validation in `Login.svelte`." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 7) - "Already service-owned but still duplicated in `Login.svelte`: initial verification uses `verifySelf()` ... user login uses `postAuth(userId, userPassword)`; logout uses `deleteAuth()`." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) From c3f23b06ed38810876cb67956ecd8962bae1ac03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:26:59 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 037/105] Clarify slice 7 service seam --- docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md index 31026d66..e6a06709 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Because `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` still depend on `loginSta ## Atomic Checklist Items -- [ ] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend component tests for `Login.svelte` auth-service delegation in `src/tests/frontend/Login.auth-service.test.ts`. +- T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend component tests for `Login.svelte` auth-service delegation in `src/tests/frontend/Login.auth-service.test.ts`. - Depends on: none. - [ ] T01.01 Add a fail-first test proving mount/init delegates the initial auth check through `authService.init()` rather than running direct `verifySelf()` logic inside `Login.svelte`. - [ ] T01.02 Add a fail-first test proving a valid login submission calls `authService.login({ userId, password })` with the current form values. @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ Because `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` still depend on `loginSta - "Still not owned by `auth-service`: signup uses `createUser(userInfo)` ..." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) - "Still not owned by `auth-service`: guest login flow reads stored guest credentials..." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) -- [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Create a widget-scoped `AuthService` instance with `createAuthService()` at the current composition root and thread it explicitly through `src/components/SimpleComment.svelte`, `src/components/DiscussionDisplay.svelte`, and `src/components/CommentInput.svelte` into `src/components/Login.svelte`. +- [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Create a widget-scoped `AuthService` instance with `createAuthService()` in `src/components/SimpleComment.svelte`, then thread it explicitly through `src/components/DiscussionDisplay.svelte` and `src/components/CommentInput.svelte` into `src/components/Login.svelte`. - Depends on: T01. - Validated by: `yarn typecheck`. - Trace: From 9e148de5b6c9feac10b7edee5ef96fe1256dbc9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:35:46 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 038/105] Clarify slice 7 runtime snapshot item --- docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md index e6a06709..56728b94 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md @@ -62,9 +62,9 @@ Because `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` still depend on `loginSta - "Prefer direct `auth-service` API or a thin service-backed store; avoid introducing another ad-hoc event bus." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 12) - "Resolved the conditional in favor of moving session/guest persistence out of `Login.svelte`: auth/session continuity and guest reuse should not depend on the `Login.svelte` component being mounted." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 6 findings) -- [ ] C02 `[frontend]` Extend `src/lib/auth-service.ts` with the minimal readable auth-runtime metadata needed for `Login.svelte` to mirror the service-owned machine into the existing `loginStateStore` shape without running a second interpreted auth machine inside the component. +- [ ] C02 `[frontend]` Extend `src/lib/auth-service.ts` with one readable auth-runtime snapshot store that exposes the service-owned machine state needed by `Login.svelte` to preserve the existing `loginStateStore` compatibility contract (`state`, `nextEvents`, and any required error context), without running a second interpreted auth machine inside the component. - Depends on: T01. - - Validated by: T01. + - Validated by: T01.08. - Trace: - "Relay coupling remains in `Login.svelte`: it subscribes to `dispatchableStore` and reacts to `loginIntent` / `logoutIntent` by driving its local machine." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) - "Draft a slice for replacing `Login.svelte` shared-store publication with auth-service state subscriptions." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 8) From 5fdca2736962ca586dfcc54af0ec5064dc7c058b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 10:41:54 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 039/105] Refine checklist item C03 to clarify the replacement of direct auth API calls with service-state subscriptions while maintaining compatibility with existing `loginStateStore`. --- docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md index 56728b94..fdde31fb 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ Because `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` still depend on `loginSta - "Relay coupling remains in `Login.svelte`: it subscribes to `dispatchableStore` and reacts to `loginIntent` / `logoutIntent` by driving its local machine." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) - "Draft a slice for replacing `Login.svelte` shared-store publication with auth-service state subscriptions." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 8) -- [ ] C03 `[frontend]` Replace direct auth API calls and local auth-machine ownership in `src/components/Login.svelte` with `auth-service` command delegation and service-state subscriptions, while preserving component-local validation/UI behavior and the current `loginStateStore` publication contract for unreworked consumers. +- [ ] C03 `[frontend]` Replace direct auth API calls and local auth-machine ownership in `src/components/Login.svelte` with `auth-service` command delegation and subscriptions to the auth-runtime snapshot store added in `C02`, then publish the existing `loginStateStore` compatibility shape from that observed service state while preserving component-local validation/UI behavior for unreworked consumers. - Depends on: C01, C02. - Validated by: T01. - Trace: From 85e0fb543950d71acca44b28ab06ef960f5b35d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rendall Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 16:54:28 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 040/105] [codex] Add Svelte component test harness (#180) * Add .codex to .gitignore * Add Priority 5 Svelte Component Testing Plan * Init component testing checklist * Add Vitest component harness * Add component test packages * Add Login smoke component test * Format Vitest component config * Archive component testing docs * Remove .codex ignore * Align Vitest to Vite 6 * Wait for Login smoke startup * Require component tests to exist --------- Co-authored-by: Codex --- ...riority5SvelteComponentTestingChecklist.md | 86 ++++ .../Priority5SvelteComponentTestingPlan.md | 167 ++++++++ jest.frontend.config.ts | 7 +- package.json | 12 +- .../frontend/components/Login.smoke.test.ts | 41 ++ src/tests/frontend/components/vitest.setup.ts | 29 ++ vitest.components.config.ts | 35 ++ yarn.lock | 366 +++++++++++++++++- 8 files changed, 727 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) create mode 100644 docs/archive/Priority5SvelteComponentTestingChecklist.md create mode 100644 docs/archive/Priority5SvelteComponentTestingPlan.md create mode 100644 src/tests/frontend/components/Login.smoke.test.ts create mode 100644 src/tests/frontend/components/vitest.setup.ts create mode 100644 vitest.components.config.ts diff --git a/docs/archive/Priority5SvelteComponentTestingChecklist.md b/docs/archive/Priority5SvelteComponentTestingChecklist.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..afb69f5c --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/archive/Priority5SvelteComponentTestingChecklist.md @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +# Priority 5 Svelte Component Testing Checklist + +Status: archived + +Classification: archived implementation checklist + +Source plan: `docs/archive/Priority5SvelteComponentTestingPlan.md` + +## Scope Lock + +In scope: + +- add a dedicated frontend component-test lane for `.svelte` components using Vitest +- use `@testing-library/svelte` for DOM-oriented component tests +- keep the current Jest frontend suite in place for existing non-component tests +- add the minimal setup needed for component tests to run reliably in this repo: Vite-aligned Svelte compilation, DOM test environment, shared setup/cleanup, and frontend scripts that compose Jest plus component tests into one required validation path +- prove the harness with a narrow smoke-level `Login.svelte` component test that renders the component and checks stable, user-visible basics such as the login/signup/guest tabs +- preserve CI/local parity if the required frontend validation path changes + +Out of scope: + +- rewriting the existing frontend Jest suite to Vitest +- teaching the current Jest frontend config to become the primary Svelte component runner +- introducing `svelte-jester` as the main direction for repo component testing +- adding Vitest Browser Mode, Playwright component testing, Storybook, or Cypress into the required PR gate for this slice +- rewiring `Login.svelte` auth behavior to `auth-service` +- redesigning frontend state architecture, relay stores, or auth runtime ownership +- backfilling component tests across the whole component tree in the same pass + +## Atomic Checklist Items + +- [x] C01 `[frontend]` Add a dedicated Svelte component-test harness in `vitest.components.config.ts` and `src/tests/frontend/components/vitest.setup.ts` with Vite-aligned Svelte compilation, `jsdom`, DOM matchers, and per-test cleanup/reset for `localStorage` and any shared store state touched by `Login.svelte`. + - Depends on: none. + - Validated by: T01. + - Trace: + - "Add a dedicated frontend component-test lane for `.svelte` components using Vitest." (`In Scope`) + - "Add the minimal setup needed for component tests to run reliably in this repo: Svelte compilation through Vite-aligned config, DOM test environment, test setup/cleanup for DOM matchers and browser-local state" (`In Scope`) + - "Add a separate Vitest component-test configuration instead of retrofitting the current Jest frontend config to compile `.svelte`." (`Approach`) + - "Add one shared component-test setup file for DOM matchers and per-test cleanup of browser-local state that can leak across `Login.svelte` tests" (`Approach`) + +- [x] C02 `[frontend]` Update `package.json` and `yarn.lock` to add `vitest`, `@testing-library/svelte`, and `@testing-library/jest-dom`, then wire dedicated frontend component-test scripts and compose them into the required `yarn test:frontend` entry point while keeping the current Jest frontend suite intact. + - Depends on: C01. + - Validated by: `yarn test:frontend`. + - Trace: + - "Add a dedicated frontend component-test lane for `.svelte` components using Vitest." (`In Scope`) + - "Use `@testing-library/svelte` for DOM-oriented component tests." (`In Scope`) + - "Add the minimal setup needed for component tests to run reliably in this repo: Svelte compilation through Vite-aligned config, DOM test environment, test setup/cleanup for DOM matchers and browser-local state" (`In Scope`) + - "Keep the current Jest frontend suite in place for existing non-component tests." (`In Scope`) + - "frontend scripts that compose Jest plus component tests into one required validation path." (`In Scope`) + - "Required frontend validation includes the Svelte component-test lane through the normal repo entry point rather than an optional side command." (`Acceptance Criteria`) + - "Pass: the existing Jest frontend suite still passes after the component-test lane is introduced." (`Validation Strategy`) + +- [x] T01 `[tests]` Add a smoke-level `Login.svelte` component test in `src/tests/frontend/components/Login.smoke.test.ts` that renders the component in the Vitest lane and asserts stable, user-visible basics such as the login/signup/guest tabs, without broader auth-behavior assertions. + - Depends on: C01, C02. + - Validated by: `yarn test:frontend`. + - Trace: + - "Prove the harness with a narrow `Login.svelte` component test so the repo has a real working example rather than infrastructure-only churn." (`In Scope`) + - "Prove the harness with a narrow smoke-level `Login.svelte` test that renders the component and checks stable, user-visible basics such as the login/signup/guest tabs" (`Approach`) + - "At least one smoke-level `Login.svelte` component test runs successfully in the new lane as proof that the harness works in this repo." (`Acceptance Criteria`) + - "Pass: a real `Login.svelte` component test executes through the new Vitest lane using the repo's Svelte 5/Vite-compatible setup." (`Validation Strategy`) + +## Behavior Slices + +### Slice 1A + +Goal: establish a dedicated Svelte component-test lane that fits the current Vite/Svelte toolchain and required frontend test entry point. + +Items: C01, C02 + +Type: mechanical + +### Slice 1B + +Goal: prove the new harness works in this repo with one smoke-level `Login.svelte` component test. + +Items: T01 + +Type: behavior + +## Conformance QC (Checklist) + +- Missing from plan: none. +- Extra beyond plan: none. +- Atomicity fixes needed: none observed; each item is independently checkable and committable. +- Validation mapping gaps: none observed; harness, regression, and smoke-proof evidence are mapped to checklist items. +- Pass/Fail: checklist achieves plan goals — **Pass**. diff --git a/docs/archive/Priority5SvelteComponentTestingPlan.md b/docs/archive/Priority5SvelteComponentTestingPlan.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..847afd71 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/archive/Priority5SvelteComponentTestingPlan.md @@ -0,0 +1,167 @@ +# Priority 5 Svelte Component Testing Plan + +Status: archived + +Related artifacts: + +- `package.json` +- `jest.frontend.config.ts` +- `vite.config.ts` +- `tsconfig.frontend.json` +- `src/components/Login.svelte` +- `.github/workflows/netlify-api-test.yml` +- `scripts/ci-local.sh` + +## Goal + +Introduce a first-class, maintainable Svelte component testing path for this repository so `Login.svelte` component tests can run in required frontend validation without forcing a broad frontend test-runner migration. + +## Intent + +Success means contributors can write focused Svelte 5 component tests against real `.svelte` files in this repo, starting with `Login.svelte`, and run them through the normal frontend validation path. + +In plain language: + +- the existing Jest frontend suite keeps doing what it already does well, +- Svelte component tests get a dedicated runner that actually understands the repo's Vite/Svelte setup, +- required CI and `ci:local` treat those component tests as first-class validation, +- and this side quest stops before it turns into a full Jest-to-Vitest migration or a broader Priority 5 architecture rewrite. + +## Motivation + +Priority 5 work now needs first-class component tests for `Login.svelte`, but the current frontend Jest setup does not compile `.svelte` files. That is the real tooling gap. + +The current repo state makes a Jest-first Svelte component path possible but awkward: + +- frontend Jest currently handles `.ts` and `.js`, not `.svelte`, +- the repo does not have a root `svelte.config.js`; Svelte preprocessing currently lives inside `vite.config.ts`, +- `Login.svelte` depends on browser-facing behavior such as DOM rendering and `localStorage`, +- and a Jest Svelte path would require `svelte-jester`, Jest ESM mode, extra preprocess wiring, and additional `node_modules` transform exceptions. + +By contrast, the repo already builds frontend Svelte through Vite. A narrow Vitest component lane aligns with the existing Svelte 5 toolchain and is the smallest good way to unlock first-class component tests without disturbing the current Jest unit/integration coverage. + +## In Scope + +- Add a dedicated frontend component-test lane for `.svelte` components using Vitest. +- Use `@testing-library/svelte` for DOM-oriented component tests. +- Keep the current Jest frontend suite in place for existing non-component tests. +- Scope the new component lane to a dedicated test location so Jest and Vitest do not compete for the same test files. +- Add the minimal setup needed for component tests to run reliably in this repo: + - Svelte compilation through Vite-aligned config, + - DOM test environment, + - test setup/cleanup for DOM matchers and browser-local state, + - frontend scripts that compose Jest plus component tests into one required validation path. +- Prove the harness with a narrow `Login.svelte` component test so the repo has a real working example rather than infrastructure-only churn. +- Update CI/local parity if the required frontend validation path changes. + +## Out of Scope + +- Rewriting the existing frontend Jest suite to Vitest. +- Teaching the current Jest frontend config to become the primary Svelte component runner. +- Introducing `svelte-jester` as the main direction for repo component testing. +- Adding Vitest Browser Mode, Playwright component testing, Storybook, or Cypress into the required PR gate for this slice. +- Rewiring `Login.svelte` auth behavior to `auth-service`; that remains separate auth implementation work. +- Redesigning frontend state architecture, relay stores, or auth runtime ownership. +- Backfilling component tests across the whole component tree in the same pass. + +## Constraints + +- Keep Priority 5 churn low; this is enabling infrastructure, not a modernization campaign. +- Preserve the current contributor mental model where `yarn test:frontend` is the required frontend validation entry point. +- Preserve CI/local parity under `docs/norms/ci-parity.md` if required validation commands change. +- Keep fail-first testing and production implementation as separate passes. +- Prefer the smallest runner split that is easy to explain and maintain: Jest for current frontend unit/service/state tests, Vitest for Svelte component tests. +- Avoid introducing a second test approach for the same class of tests unless there is a clear boundary. + +## Current State + +At the start of this side quest: + +- `package.json` contains Jest, `ts-jest`, `babel-jest`, `jsdom`, Vite, and Svelte 5. +- `jest.frontend.config.ts` transforms `.ts` and `.js`, but not `.svelte`. +- the current frontend Jest suite passes and already covers stores, XState logic, utilities, and `auth-service`. +- `Login.svelte` has no first-class component tests. +- Cypress indirectly covers login/signup/logout/guest flows, but Cypress is intentionally outside required CI and `ci:local`. +- `vite.config.ts` already holds the repo's active Svelte preprocess/plugin configuration. + +## Approach + +1. Add a separate Vitest component-test configuration instead of retrofitting the current Jest frontend config to compile `.svelte`. +2. Use `@testing-library/svelte` with a DOM environment for component-boundary tests that focus on user-visible behavior and submission/validation outcomes. +3. Keep existing Jest frontend tests on their current path and give Vitest ownership only of Svelte component tests under a dedicated directory such as `src/tests/frontend/components/`. +4. Add one shared component-test setup file for DOM matchers and per-test cleanup of browser-local state that can leak across `Login.svelte` tests, such as `localStorage` and shared stores. +5. Make `yarn test:frontend` the composed entry point for both lanes so required CI and `ci:local` remain simple and first-class component tests are not optional. +6. Prove the harness with a narrow smoke-level `Login.svelte` test that renders the component and checks stable, user-visible basics such as the login/signup/guest tabs, without folding auth-service delegation work into the same change. +7. Stop there. Leave broader component coverage growth and later auth-behavior component tests to explicitly scoped follow-up checklist work. + +## Risks and Mitigations + +- Risk: adding Vitest quietly turns into a repo-wide migration away from Jest. + - Mitigation: keep the boundary explicit and stable: Vitest owns `.svelte` component tests only; existing Jest tests stay where they are. + +- Risk: this side quest quietly absorbs separate auth rewiring work by changing `Login.svelte` production behavior just to make tests possible. + - Mitigation: keep the proof test narrow and treat auth-service delegation assertions as later follow-up work. + +- Risk: using the existing `vite.config.ts` directly for tests introduces unintended build-root assumptions because that file is build-oriented and sets `root` to `src/entry`. + - Mitigation: use a dedicated Vitest config that reuses only the Svelte plugin/preprocess parts needed for tests. + +- Risk: component tests become flaky because shared stores or `localStorage` state leak between tests. + - Mitigation: add explicit per-test cleanup/reset in the shared component-test setup file. + +- Risk: required CI grows confusing if scripts or parity paths split in an ad hoc way. + - Mitigation: keep `yarn test:frontend` as the single required frontend test entry point and update `.github/workflows/netlify-api-test.yml` and `scripts/ci-local.sh` together only if necessary. + +## Acceptance Criteria + +1. The repo has a dedicated, documented test path that can execute Svelte 5 component tests against real `.svelte` files. +2. `@testing-library/svelte` is the standard DOM-level API for this component test lane. +3. The existing frontend Jest suite remains intact and continues to own the current non-component frontend tests. +4. Required frontend validation includes the Svelte component-test lane through the normal repo entry point rather than an optional side command. +5. At least one smoke-level `Login.svelte` component test runs successfully in the new lane as proof that the harness works in this repo. +6. The plan does not require `svelte-jester`, Jest ESM mode, or a broader Jest frontend reconfiguration as the primary solution. +7. The change remains narrow enough that later `Login.svelte` behavior-focused component tests can build on the same runner selection without reopening framework choice. + +## Validation Strategy + +This plan changes required test infrastructure and the frontend validation path, so explicit evidence is required. + +- **Component-harness evidence** + - Pass: a real `Login.svelte` component test executes through the new Vitest lane using the repo's Svelte 5/Vite-compatible setup. + - Fail: `.svelte` tests still cannot compile or run, or the harness only exists on paper. + +- **Frontend-regression evidence** + - Pass: the existing Jest frontend suite still passes after the component-test lane is introduced. + - Fail: enabling component tests breaks the current frontend Jest suite or forces unrelated test rewrites. + +- **Parity evidence** + - Pass: if `yarn test:frontend` or other required frontend validation commands change, the mirrored CI/local parity surfaces remain aligned in `.github/workflows/netlify-api-test.yml` and `scripts/ci-local.sh`. + - Fail: required PR-gate behavior and `ci:local` drift apart. + +- **Scope evidence** + - Pass: the side quest introduces component-test infrastructure and a smoke-level proof test without also implementing `Login.svelte` auth rewiring. + - Fail: the same slice changes `Login.svelte` auth behavior, relay architecture, or broader frontend state design. + +## Open Questions / Assumptions + +- Assumption: `jsdom` is sufficient for the first `Login.svelte` component tests because the immediate need is form rendering, submission, validation, and `localStorage` interaction rather than layout-accurate browser rendering. +- Assumption: a dedicated component-test directory is the cleanest way to keep Jest and Vitest ownership boundaries obvious. +- Assumption: the proof `Login.svelte` test should stay smoke-level only: render the component and assert stable, user-visible basics rather than broader auth behavior. + +## Scope Guard + +The following work is explicitly deferred and must not be folded into this plan without a separate approved plan/checklist update: + +- converting existing frontend Jest tests to Vitest, +- expanding required CI to Browser Mode, Playwright, Cypress, or Storybook, +- rewriting `Login.svelte` to use `auth-service`, +- broad component-test backfill across unrelated components, +- frontend state or auth architecture redesign. + +## Conformance QC (Plan) + +- Intent clarity issues: none observed; the plan distinguishes the test-harness side quest from separate `Login.svelte` auth rewiring work in plain language. +- Missing required sections: none (`Goal`, `Intent`, `In Scope`, `Out of Scope`, `Acceptance Criteria`, and `Validation Strategy` are present). +- Ambiguities/assumptions to resolve: none blocking checklist authoring. +- Validation strategy gaps: none for the runner-selection, parity, and proof-of-harness scope. +- Traceability readiness: ready; stable headings and explicit acceptance criteria are present for checklist citation. +- Pass/Fail: structurally ready for collaborative review and checklist authoring once the plain-language intent is approved — **Pass**. diff --git a/jest.frontend.config.ts b/jest.frontend.config.ts index 8ecbb3e3..051ea81d 100644 --- a/jest.frontend.config.ts +++ b/jest.frontend.config.ts @@ -11,7 +11,12 @@ export default { coverageProvider: "v8", resetMocks: true, roots: ["/src/tests/frontend/"], - testPathIgnorePatterns: ["\\\\node_modules\\\\", "RAW", ".js$"], + testPathIgnorePatterns: [ + "\\\\node_modules\\\\", + "RAW", + ".js$", + "/src/tests/frontend/components/", + ], transform: { "^.+\\.js$": "babel-jest", "^.+\\.ts$": [ diff --git a/package.json b/package.json index eac4477c..9c2546a1 100644 --- a/package.json +++ b/package.json @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ "@eslint/js": "^10.0.1", "@shelf/jest-mongodb": "^6.0.2", "@sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte": "^4.0.0", + "@testing-library/jest-dom": "^6.9.1", + "@testing-library/svelte": "^5.3.1", "@types/bcryptjs": "^2.4.2", "@types/jest": "^29.5.3", "@types/jsonwebtoken": "^8.5.0", @@ -15,7 +17,8 @@ "cross-env": "^7.0.3", "globals": "^17.4.0", "knip": "^6.0.3", - "vite": "^6.4.2" + "vite": "^6.4.2", + "vitest": "^3.2.4" }, "optionalDependencies": { "cypress": "^12.17.4", @@ -40,7 +43,9 @@ "test": "yarn test:backend && yarn test:frontend", "test:backend": "jest --config jest.backend.config.ts", "test:cypress": "cypress run", - "test:frontend": "cross-env TZ=UTC jest --config jest.frontend.config.ts", + "test:frontend": "yarn test:frontend:unit && yarn test:frontend:components", + "test:frontend:components": "cross-env TZ=UTC vitest --config vitest.components.config.ts run", + "test:frontend:unit": "cross-env TZ=UTC jest --config jest.frontend.config.ts", "typecheck": "tsc --noEmit -p tsconfig.frontend.json && tsc --noEmit -p tsconfig.netlify.functions.json", "watch:backend": "webpack --config ./webpack.netlify.functions.cjs --watch", "watch:frontend": "vite build --config ./vite.config.ts --watch", @@ -95,7 +100,8 @@ "resolutions": { "@cypress/request": "^3.0.0", "async": ">2.6.4 || ^2.6.4", - "glob-parent": ">6.0.2 || ^6.0.2" + "glob-parent": ">6.0.2 || ^6.0.2", + "vite": "6.4.2" }, "documentation": { "resolutions": { diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.smoke.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.smoke.test.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b619aa13 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.smoke.test.ts @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +import { render, screen, waitFor } from "@testing-library/svelte" +import { describe, expect, test, vi } from "vitest" +import { verifySelf } from "../../../apiClient" +import Login from "../../../components/Login.svelte" + +vi.mock("../../../apiClient", () => ({ + createGuestUser: vi.fn(), + createUser: vi.fn(), + deleteAuth: vi.fn(), + getGuestToken: vi.fn(), + getOneUser: vi.fn(), + postAuth: vi.fn(), + updateUser: vi.fn(), + verifySelf: vi.fn(), + verifyUser: vi.fn(), +})) + +const mockVerifySelf = vi.mocked(verifySelf) + +describe("Login smoke", () => { + test("renders the login, signup, and guest tabs", async () => { + mockVerifySelf.mockRejectedValue({ status: 401 }) + + render(Login) + + expect( + await screen.findByRole("button", { + name: "Login", + }) + ).toBeInTheDocument() + expect(screen.getByRole("button", { name: "Signup" })).toBeInTheDocument() + expect(screen.getByRole("button", { name: "Guest" })).toBeInTheDocument() + + await waitFor(() => { + expect(mockVerifySelf).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect( + document.querySelector("section.simple-comment-login") + ).not.toHaveClass("is-loading") + }) + }) +}) diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/components/vitest.setup.ts b/src/tests/frontend/components/vitest.setup.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000..75e9bc80 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/tests/frontend/components/vitest.setup.ts @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +import { cleanup } from "@testing-library/svelte" +import "@testing-library/jest-dom/vitest" +import { afterEach, beforeEach } from "vitest" +import { + currentUserStore, + dispatchableStore, + loginStateStore, +} from "../../../lib/svelte-stores" + +const resetStores = (): void => { + currentUserStore.set(undefined) + loginStateStore.set({ + state: undefined, + nextEvents: undefined, + select: undefined, + }) + dispatchableStore.dispatch("init") +} + +beforeEach(() => { + localStorage.clear() + resetStores() +}) + +afterEach(() => { + cleanup() + localStorage.clear() + resetStores() +}) diff --git a/vitest.components.config.ts b/vitest.components.config.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000..c6e615d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/vitest.components.config.ts @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +import { svelte } from "@sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte" +import sveltePreprocess from "svelte-preprocess" +import { defineConfig } from "vitest/config" + +export default defineConfig({ + plugins: [ + svelte({ + emitCss: false, + preprocess: [ + sveltePreprocess({ + typescript: { tsconfigFile: "tsconfig.frontend.json" }, + }), + ], + compilerOptions: { dev: true }, + }), + ], + resolve: process.env.VITEST + ? { + conditions: ["browser"], + } + : undefined, + test: { + clearMocks: true, + css: true, + environment: "jsdom", + environmentOptions: { + jsdom: { + url: "http://localhost/", + }, + }, + include: ["src/tests/frontend/components/**/*.test.ts"], + restoreMocks: true, + setupFiles: ["src/tests/frontend/components/vitest.setup.ts"], + }, +}) diff --git a/yarn.lock b/yarn.lock index 800ed47e..3e72d70e 100644 --- a/yarn.lock +++ b/yarn.lock @@ -7,6 +7,11 @@ resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@aashutoshrathi/word-wrap/-/word-wrap-1.2.6.tgz#bd9154aec9983f77b3a034ecaa015c2e4201f6cf" integrity sha512-1Yjs2SvM8TflER/OD3cOjhWWOZb58A2t7wpE2S9XfBYTiIl+XFhQG2bjy4Pu1I+EAlCNUzRDYDdFwFYUKvXcIA== +"@adobe/css-tools@^4.4.0": + version "4.4.4" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@adobe/css-tools/-/css-tools-4.4.4.tgz#2856c55443d3d461693f32d2b96fb6ea92e1ffa9" + integrity sha512-Elp+iwUx5rN5+Y8xLt5/GRoG20WGoDCQ/1Fb+1LiGtvwbDavuSk0jhD/eZdckHAuzcDzccnkv+rEjyWfRx18gg== + "@ampproject/remapping@^2.2.0": version "2.2.1" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@ampproject/remapping/-/remapping-2.2.1.tgz#99e8e11851128b8702cd57c33684f1d0f260b630" @@ -23,7 +28,7 @@ "@babel/highlight" "^7.22.10" chalk "^2.4.2" -"@babel/code-frame@^7.26.2", "@babel/code-frame@^7.28.6", "@babel/code-frame@^7.29.0": +"@babel/code-frame@^7.10.4", "@babel/code-frame@^7.26.2", "@babel/code-frame@^7.28.6", "@babel/code-frame@^7.29.0": version "7.29.0" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@babel/code-frame/-/code-frame-7.29.0.tgz#7cd7a59f15b3cc0dcd803038f7792712a7d0b15c" integrity sha512-9NhCeYjq9+3uxgdtp20LSiJXJvN0FeCtNGpJxuMFZ1Kv3cWUNb6DOhJwUvcVCzKGR66cw4njwM6hrJLqgOwbcw== @@ -1036,6 +1041,11 @@ resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@babel/regjsgen/-/regjsgen-0.8.0.tgz#f0ba69b075e1f05fb2825b7fad991e7adbb18310" integrity sha512-x/rqGMdzj+fWZvCOYForTghzbtqPDZ5gPwaoNGHdgDfF2QA/XZbCBp4Moo5scrkAMPhB7z26XM/AaHuIJdgauA== +"@babel/runtime@^7.12.5": + version "7.29.2" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@babel/runtime/-/runtime-7.29.2.tgz#9a6e2d05f4b6692e1801cd4fb176ad823930ed5e" + integrity sha512-JiDShH45zKHWyGe4ZNVRrCjBz8Nh9TMmZG1kh4QTK8hCBTWBi8Da+i7s1fJw7/lYpM4ccepSNfqzZ/QvABBi5g== + "@babel/runtime@^7.21.0": version "7.22.10" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@babel/runtime/-/runtime-7.22.10.tgz#ae3e9631fd947cb7e3610d3e9d8fef5f76696682" @@ -3745,6 +3755,45 @@ dependencies: defer-to-connect "^2.0.1" +"@testing-library/dom@9.x.x || 10.x.x": + version "10.4.1" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@testing-library/dom/-/dom-10.4.1.tgz#d444f8a889e9a46e9a3b4f3b88e0fcb3efb6cf95" + integrity sha512-o4PXJQidqJl82ckFaXUeoAW+XysPLauYI43Abki5hABd853iMhitooc6znOnczgbTYmEP6U6/y1ZyKAIsvMKGg== + dependencies: + "@babel/code-frame" "^7.10.4" + "@babel/runtime" "^7.12.5" + "@types/aria-query" "^5.0.1" + aria-query "5.3.0" + dom-accessibility-api "^0.5.9" + lz-string "^1.5.0" + picocolors "1.1.1" + pretty-format "^27.0.2" + +"@testing-library/jest-dom@^6.9.1": + version "6.9.1" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@testing-library/jest-dom/-/jest-dom-6.9.1.tgz#7613a04e146dd2976d24ddf019730d57a89d56c2" + integrity sha512-zIcONa+hVtVSSep9UT3jZ5rizo2BsxgyDYU7WFD5eICBE7no3881HGeb/QkGfsJs6JTkY1aQhT7rIPC7e+0nnA== + dependencies: + "@adobe/css-tools" "^4.4.0" + aria-query "^5.0.0" + css.escape "^1.5.1" + dom-accessibility-api "^0.6.3" + picocolors "^1.1.1" + redent "^3.0.0" + +"@testing-library/svelte-core@1.0.0": + version "1.0.0" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@testing-library/svelte-core/-/svelte-core-1.0.0.tgz#09ad79f5491600afa1cd064203223c9cdcd5799f" + integrity sha512-VkUePoLV6oOYwSUvX6ShA8KLnJqZiYMIbP2JW2t0GLWLkJxKGvuH5qrrZBV/X7cXFnLGuFQEC7RheYiZOW68KQ== + +"@testing-library/svelte@^5.3.1": + version "5.3.1" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@testing-library/svelte/-/svelte-5.3.1.tgz#8142c1894be5e173f1fea9afcedbb2df537e37e3" + integrity sha512-8Ez7ZOqW5geRf9PF5rkuopODe5RGy3I9XR+kc7zHh26gBiktLaxTfKmhlGaSHYUOTQE7wFsLMN9xCJVCszw47w== + dependencies: + "@testing-library/dom" "9.x.x || 10.x.x" + "@testing-library/svelte-core" "1.0.0" + "@tokenizer/token@^0.3.0": version "0.3.0" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@tokenizer/token/-/token-0.3.0.tgz#fe98a93fe789247e998c75e74e9c7c63217aa276" @@ -3787,6 +3836,11 @@ dependencies: tslib "^2.4.0" +"@types/aria-query@^5.0.1": + version "5.0.4" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@types/aria-query/-/aria-query-5.0.4.tgz#1a31c3d378850d2778dabb6374d036dcba4ba708" + integrity sha512-rfT93uj5s0PRL7EzccGMs3brplhcrghnDoV26NqKhCAS1hVo+WdNsPvE/yb6ilfr5hi2MEk6d5EWJTKdxg8jVw== + "@types/aws-lambda@^8.10.95": version "8.10.119" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@types/aws-lambda/-/aws-lambda-8.10.119.tgz#aaf010a9c892b3e29a290e5c49bfe8bcec82c455" @@ -3830,6 +3884,19 @@ resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@types/bcryptjs/-/bcryptjs-2.4.2.tgz#e3530eac9dd136bfdfb0e43df2c4c5ce1f77dfae" integrity sha512-LiMQ6EOPob/4yUL66SZzu6Yh77cbzJFYll+ZfaPiPPFswtIlA/Fs1MzdKYA7JApHU49zQTbJGX3PDmCpIdDBRQ== +"@types/chai@^5.2.2": + version "5.2.3" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@types/chai/-/chai-5.2.3.tgz#8e9cd9e1c3581fa6b341a5aed5588eb285be0b4a" + integrity sha512-Mw558oeA9fFbv65/y4mHtXDs9bPnFMZAL/jxdPFUpOHHIXX91mcgEHbS5Lahr+pwZFR8A7GQleRWeI6cGFC2UA== + dependencies: + "@types/deep-eql" "*" + assertion-error "^2.0.1" + +"@types/deep-eql@*": + version "4.0.2" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@types/deep-eql/-/deep-eql-4.0.2.tgz#334311971d3a07121e7eb91b684a605e7eea9cbd" + integrity sha512-c9h9dVVMigMPc4bwTvC5dxqtqJZwQPePsWjPlpSOnojbor6pGqdk541lfA7AqFQr5pB1BRdq0juY9db81BwyFw== + "@types/eslint-scope@^3.7.3": version "3.7.4" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@types/eslint-scope/-/eslint-scope-3.7.4.tgz#37fc1223f0786c39627068a12e94d6e6fc61de16" @@ -4209,6 +4276,67 @@ picomatch "^4.0.2" resolve-from "^5.0.0" +"@vitest/expect@3.2.4": + version "3.2.4" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@vitest/expect/-/expect-3.2.4.tgz#8362124cd811a5ee11c5768207b9df53d34f2433" + integrity sha512-Io0yyORnB6sikFlt8QW5K7slY4OjqNX9jmJQ02QDda8lyM6B5oNgVWoSoKPac8/kgnCUzuHQKrSLtu/uOqqrig== + dependencies: + "@types/chai" "^5.2.2" + "@vitest/spy" "3.2.4" + "@vitest/utils" "3.2.4" + chai "^5.2.0" + tinyrainbow "^2.0.0" + +"@vitest/mocker@3.2.4": + version "3.2.4" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@vitest/mocker/-/mocker-3.2.4.tgz#4471c4efbd62db0d4fa203e65cc6b058a85cabd3" + integrity sha512-46ryTE9RZO/rfDd7pEqFl7etuyzekzEhUbTW3BvmeO/BcCMEgq59BKhek3dXDWgAj4oMK6OZi+vRr1wPW6qjEQ== + dependencies: + "@vitest/spy" "3.2.4" + estree-walker "^3.0.3" + magic-string "^0.30.17" + +"@vitest/pretty-format@3.2.4", "@vitest/pretty-format@^3.2.4": + version "3.2.4" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@vitest/pretty-format/-/pretty-format-3.2.4.tgz#3c102f79e82b204a26c7a5921bf47d534919d3b4" + integrity sha512-IVNZik8IVRJRTr9fxlitMKeJeXFFFN0JaB9PHPGQ8NKQbGpfjlTx9zO4RefN8gp7eqjNy8nyK3NZmBzOPeIxtA== + dependencies: + tinyrainbow "^2.0.0" + +"@vitest/runner@3.2.4": + version "3.2.4" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@vitest/runner/-/runner-3.2.4.tgz#5ce0274f24a971f6500f6fc166d53d8382430766" + integrity sha512-oukfKT9Mk41LreEW09vt45f8wx7DordoWUZMYdY/cyAk7w5TWkTRCNZYF7sX7n2wB7jyGAl74OxgwhPgKaqDMQ== + dependencies: + "@vitest/utils" "3.2.4" + pathe "^2.0.3" + strip-literal "^3.0.0" + +"@vitest/snapshot@3.2.4": + version "3.2.4" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@vitest/snapshot/-/snapshot-3.2.4.tgz#40a8bc0346ac0aee923c0eefc2dc005d90bc987c" + integrity sha512-dEYtS7qQP2CjU27QBC5oUOxLE/v5eLkGqPE0ZKEIDGMs4vKWe7IjgLOeauHsR0D5YuuycGRO5oSRXnwnmA78fQ== + dependencies: + "@vitest/pretty-format" "3.2.4" + magic-string "^0.30.17" + pathe "^2.0.3" + +"@vitest/spy@3.2.4": + version "3.2.4" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@vitest/spy/-/spy-3.2.4.tgz#cc18f26f40f3f028da6620046881f4e4518c2599" + integrity sha512-vAfasCOe6AIK70iP5UD11Ac4siNUNJ9i/9PZ3NKx07sG6sUxeag1LWdNrMWeKKYBLlzuK+Gn65Yd5nyL6ds+nw== + dependencies: + tinyspy "^4.0.3" + +"@vitest/utils@3.2.4": + version "3.2.4" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@vitest/utils/-/utils-3.2.4.tgz#c0813bc42d99527fb8c5b138c7a88516bca46fea" + integrity sha512-fB2V0JFrQSMsCo9HiSq3Ezpdv4iYaXRG1Sx8edX3MwxfyNn83mKiGzOcH+Fkxt4MHxr3y42fQi1oeAInqgX2QA== + dependencies: + "@vitest/pretty-format" "3.2.4" + loupe "^3.1.4" + tinyrainbow "^2.0.0" + "@vue/compiler-core@3.5.29": version "3.5.29" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@vue/compiler-core/-/compiler-core-3.5.29.tgz#3fb70630c62a2e715eeddc3c2a48f46aa4507adc" @@ -4809,11 +4937,23 @@ argparse@^1.0.7: dependencies: sprintf-js "~1.0.2" +aria-query@5.3.0: + version "5.3.0" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/aria-query/-/aria-query-5.3.0.tgz#650c569e41ad90b51b3d7df5e5eed1c7549c103e" + integrity sha512-b0P0sZPKtyu8HkeRAfCq0IfURZK+SuwMjY1UXGBU27wpAiTwQAIlq56IbIO+ytk/JjS1fMR14ee5WBBfKi5J6A== + dependencies: + dequal "^2.0.3" + aria-query@5.3.1: version "5.3.1" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/aria-query/-/aria-query-5.3.1.tgz#ebcb2c0d7fc43e68e4cb22f774d1209cb627ab42" integrity sha512-Z/ZeOgVl7bcSYZ/u/rh0fOpvEpq//LZmdbkXyc7syVzjPAhfOa9ebsdTSjEBDU4vs5nC98Kfduj1uFo0qyET3g== +aria-query@^5.0.0: + version "5.3.2" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/aria-query/-/aria-query-5.3.2.tgz#93f81a43480e33a338f19163a3d10a50c01dcd59" + integrity sha512-COROpnaoap1E2F000S62r6A60uHZnmlvomhfyT2DlTcrY1OrBKn2UhH7qn5wTC9zMvD0AY7csdPSNwKP+7WiQw== + array-buffer-byte-length@^1.0.1, array-buffer-byte-length@^1.0.2: version "1.0.2" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/array-buffer-byte-length/-/array-buffer-byte-length-1.0.2.tgz#384d12a37295aec3769ab022ad323a18a51ccf8b" @@ -4867,6 +5007,11 @@ assert-plus@1.0.0, assert-plus@^1.0.0: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/assert-plus/-/assert-plus-1.0.0.tgz#f12e0f3c5d77b0b1cdd9146942e4e96c1e4dd525" integrity sha512-NfJ4UzBCcQGLDlQq7nHxH+tv3kyZ0hHQqF5BO6J7tNJeP5do1llPr8dZ8zHonfhAu0PHAdMkSo+8o0wxg9lZWw== +assertion-error@^2.0.1: + version "2.0.1" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/assertion-error/-/assertion-error-2.0.1.tgz#f641a196b335690b1070bf00b6e7593fec190bf7" + integrity sha512-Izi8RQcffqCeNVgFigKli1ssklIbpHnCYc6AknXGYoB6grJqyeby7jv12JUQgmTAnIDnbck1uxksT4dzN3PWBA== + ast-module-types@^6.0.1: version "6.0.1" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/ast-module-types/-/ast-module-types-6.0.1.tgz#4b4ca0251c57b815bab62604dcb22f8c903e2523" @@ -5361,6 +5506,11 @@ bytes@3.1.2, bytes@^3.1.2, bytes@~3.1.2: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/bytes/-/bytes-3.1.2.tgz#8b0beeb98605adf1b128fa4386403c009e0221a5" integrity sha512-/Nf7TyzTx6S3yRJObOAV7956r8cr2+Oj8AC5dt8wSP3BQAoeX58NoHyCU8P8zGkNXStjTSi6fzO6F0pBdcYbEg== +cac@^6.7.14: + version "6.7.14" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/cac/-/cac-6.7.14.tgz#804e1e6f506ee363cb0e3ccbb09cad5dd9870959" + integrity sha512-b6Ilus+c3RrdDk+JhLKUAQfzzgLEPy6wcXqS7f/xe1EETvsDP6GORG7SFuOs6cID5YkqchW/LXZbX5bc8j7ZcQ== + cacheable-lookup@^7.0.0: version "7.0.0" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/cacheable-lookup/-/cacheable-lookup-7.0.0.tgz#3476a8215d046e5a3202a9209dd13fec1f933a27" @@ -5463,6 +5613,17 @@ caseless@~0.12.0: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/caseless/-/caseless-0.12.0.tgz#1b681c21ff84033c826543090689420d187151dc" integrity sha512-4tYFyifaFfGacoiObjJegolkwSU4xQNGbVgUiNYVUxbQ2x2lUsFvY4hVgVzGiIe6WLOPqycWXA40l+PWsxthUw== +chai@^5.2.0: + version "5.3.3" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/chai/-/chai-5.3.3.tgz#dd3da955e270916a4bd3f625f4b919996ada7e06" + integrity sha512-4zNhdJD/iOjSH0A05ea+Ke6MU5mmpQcbQsSOkgdaUMJ9zTlDTD/GYlwohmIE2u0gaxHYiVHEn1Fw9mZ/ktJWgw== + dependencies: + assertion-error "^2.0.1" + check-error "^2.1.1" + deep-eql "^5.0.1" + loupe "^3.1.0" + pathval "^2.0.0" + chalk@5.6.2, chalk@^5.3.0: version "5.6.2" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/chalk/-/chalk-5.6.2.tgz#b1238b6e23ea337af71c7f8a295db5af0c158aea" @@ -5500,6 +5661,11 @@ chardet@^2.1.1: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/chardet/-/chardet-2.1.1.tgz#5c75593704a642f71ee53717df234031e65373c8" integrity sha512-PsezH1rqdV9VvyNhxxOW32/d75r01NY7TQCmOqomRo15ZSOKbpTFVsfjghxo6JloQUCGnH4k1LGu0R4yCLlWQQ== +check-error@^2.1.1: + version "2.1.3" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/check-error/-/check-error-2.1.3.tgz#2427361117b70cca8dc89680ead32b157019caf5" + integrity sha512-PAJdDJusoxnwm1VwW07VWwUN1sl7smmC3OKggvndJFadxxDRyFJBX/ggnu/KE4kQAB7a3Dp8f/YXC1FlUprWmA== + check-more-types@^2.24.0: version "2.24.0" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/check-more-types/-/check-more-types-2.24.0.tgz#1420ffb10fd444dcfc79b43891bbfffd32a84600" @@ -6046,6 +6212,11 @@ css-what@^6.1.0: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/css-what/-/css-what-6.2.2.tgz#cdcc8f9b6977719fdfbd1de7aec24abf756b9dea" integrity sha512-u/O3vwbptzhMs3L1fQE82ZSLHQQfto5gyZzwteVIEyeaY5Fc7R4dapF/BvRoSYFeqfBk4m0V1Vafq5Pjv25wvA== +css.escape@^1.5.1: + version "1.5.1" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/css.escape/-/css.escape-1.5.1.tgz#42e27d4fa04ae32f931a4b4d4191fa9cddee97cb" + integrity sha512-YUifsXXuknHlUsmlgyY0PKzgPOr7/FjCePfHNt0jxm83wHZi44VDMQ7/fGNkjY3/jV1MC+1CmZbaHzugyeRtpg== + cssesc@^3.0.0: version "3.0.0" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/cssesc/-/cssesc-3.0.0.tgz#37741919903b868565e1c09ea747445cd18983ee" @@ -6208,7 +6379,7 @@ debug@4.4.1: dependencies: ms "^2.1.3" -debug@4.4.3, debug@^4.3.5, debug@^4.3.6, debug@^4.3.7, debug@^4.4.0, debug@^4.4.3: +debug@4.4.3, debug@^4.3.5, debug@^4.3.6, debug@^4.3.7, debug@^4.4.0, debug@^4.4.1, debug@^4.4.3: version "4.4.3" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/debug/-/debug-4.4.3.tgz#c6ae432d9bd9662582fce08709b038c58e9e3d6a" integrity sha512-RGwwWnwQvkVfavKVt22FGLw+xYSdzARwm0ru6DhTVA3umU5hZc28V3kO4stgYryrTlLpuvgI9GiijltAjNbcqA== @@ -6246,6 +6417,11 @@ dedent@^1.0.0: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/dedent/-/dedent-1.5.1.tgz#4f3fc94c8b711e9bb2800d185cd6ad20f2a90aff" integrity sha512-+LxW+KLWxu3HW3M2w2ympwtqPrqYRzU8fqi6Fhd18fBALe15blJPI/I4+UHveMVG6lJqB4JNd4UG0S5cnVHwIg== +deep-eql@^5.0.1: + version "5.0.2" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/deep-eql/-/deep-eql-5.0.2.tgz#4b756d8d770a9257300825d52a2c2cff99c3a341" + integrity sha512-h5k/5U50IJJFpzfL6nO9jaaumfjO/f2NjK/oYB2Djzm4p9L+3T9qWpZqZ2hAbLPuuYq9wrU08WQyBTL5GbPk5Q== + deep-extend@^0.6.0: version "0.6.0" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/deep-extend/-/deep-extend-0.6.0.tgz#c4fa7c95404a17a9c3e8ca7e1537312b736330ac" @@ -6450,6 +6626,16 @@ diff@^4.0.1: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/diff/-/diff-4.0.2.tgz#60f3aecb89d5fae520c11aa19efc2bb982aade7d" integrity sha512-58lmxKSA4BNyLz+HHMUzlOEpg09FV+ev6ZMe3vJihgdxzgcwZ8VoEEPmALCZG9LmqfVoNMMKpttIYTVG6uDY7A== +dom-accessibility-api@^0.5.9: + version "0.5.16" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/dom-accessibility-api/-/dom-accessibility-api-0.5.16.tgz#5a7429e6066eb3664d911e33fb0e45de8eb08453" + integrity sha512-X7BJ2yElsnOJ30pZF4uIIDfBEVgF4XEBxL9Bxhy6dnrm5hkzqmsWHGTiHqRiITNhMyFLyAiWndIJP7Z1NTteDg== + +dom-accessibility-api@^0.6.3: + version "0.6.3" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/dom-accessibility-api/-/dom-accessibility-api-0.6.3.tgz#993e925cc1d73f2c662e7d75dd5a5445259a8fd8" + integrity sha512-7ZgogeTnjuHbo+ct10G9Ffp0mif17idi0IyWNVA/wcwcm7NPOD/WEHVP3n7n3MhXqxoIYm8d6MuZohYWIZ4T3w== + dom-serializer@^2.0.0: version "2.0.0" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/dom-serializer/-/dom-serializer-2.0.0.tgz#e41b802e1eedf9f6cae183ce5e622d789d7d8e53" @@ -6744,7 +6930,7 @@ es-module-lexer@^1.0.0, es-module-lexer@^1.2.1: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/es-module-lexer/-/es-module-lexer-1.3.0.tgz#6be9c9e0b4543a60cd166ff6f8b4e9dae0b0c16f" integrity sha512-vZK7T0N2CBmBOixhmjdqx2gWVbFZ4DXZ/NyRMZVlJXPa7CyFS+/a4QQsDGDQy9ZfEzxFuNEsMLeQJnKP2p5/JA== -es-module-lexer@^1.5.3: +es-module-lexer@^1.5.3, es-module-lexer@^1.7.0: version "1.7.0" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/es-module-lexer/-/es-module-lexer-1.7.0.tgz#9159601561880a85f2734560a9099b2c31e5372a" integrity sha512-jEQoCwk8hyb2AZziIOLhDqpm5+2ww5uIE6lkO/6jcOCusfk6LhMHpXXfBLXTZ7Ydyt0j4VoUQv6uGNYbdW+kBA== @@ -7071,6 +7257,13 @@ estree-walker@2.0.2, estree-walker@^2.0.2: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/estree-walker/-/estree-walker-2.0.2.tgz#52f010178c2a4c117a7757cfe942adb7d2da4cac" integrity sha512-Rfkk/Mp/DL7JVje3u18FxFujQlTNR2q6QfMSMB7AvCBx91NGj/ba3kCfza0f6dVDbw7YlRf/nDrn7pQrCCyQ/w== +estree-walker@^3.0.3: + version "3.0.3" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/estree-walker/-/estree-walker-3.0.3.tgz#67c3e549ec402a487b4fc193d1953a524752340d" + integrity sha512-7RUKfXgSMMkzt6ZuXmqapOurLGPPfgj6l9uRZ7lRGolvk0y2yocc35LdcxKC5PQZdn2DMqioAQ2NoWcrTKmm6g== + dependencies: + "@types/estree" "^1.0.0" + esutils@^2.0.2, esutils@^2.0.3: version "2.0.3" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/esutils/-/esutils-2.0.3.tgz#74d2eb4de0b8da1293711910d50775b9b710ef64" @@ -7165,6 +7358,11 @@ exit@^0.1.2: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/exit/-/exit-0.1.2.tgz#0632638f8d877cc82107d30a0fff1a17cba1cd0c" integrity sha512-Zk/eNKV2zbjpKzrsQ+n1G6poVbErQxJ0LBOJXaKZ1EViLzH+hrLu9cdXI4zw9dBQJslwBEpbQ2P1oS7nDxs6jQ== +expect-type@^1.2.1: + version "1.3.0" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/expect-type/-/expect-type-1.3.0.tgz#0d58ed361877a31bbc4dd6cf71bbfef7faf6bd68" + integrity sha512-knvyeauYhqjOYvQ66MznSMs83wmHrCycNEN6Ao+2AeYEfxUIkuiVxdEa1qlGEPK+We3n0THiDciYSsCcgW/DoA== + expect@^29.0.0, expect@^29.6.2: version "29.6.2" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/expect/-/expect-29.6.2.tgz#7b08e83eba18ddc4a2cf62b5f2d1918f5cd84521" @@ -9494,6 +9692,11 @@ js-tokens@^4.0.0: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/js-tokens/-/js-tokens-4.0.0.tgz#19203fb59991df98e3a287050d4647cdeaf32499" integrity sha512-RdJUflcE3cUzKiMqQgsCu06FPu9UdIJO0beYbPhHN4k6apgJtifcoCtT9bcxOpYBtpD2kCM6Sbzg4CausW/PKQ== +js-tokens@^9.0.1: + version "9.0.1" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/js-tokens/-/js-tokens-9.0.1.tgz#2ec43964658435296f6761b34e10671c2d9527f4" + integrity sha512-mxa9E9ITFOt0ban3j6L5MpjwegGz6lBQmM1IJkWeBZGcMxto50+eWdjC/52xDbS2vy0k7vIMK0Fe2wfL9OQSpQ== + js-yaml@^3.13.1: version "3.14.1" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/js-yaml/-/js-yaml-3.14.1.tgz#dae812fdb3825fa306609a8717383c50c36a0537" @@ -10022,6 +10225,11 @@ logform@^2.3.2, logform@^2.4.0: safe-stable-stringify "^2.3.1" triple-beam "^1.3.0" +loupe@^3.1.0, loupe@^3.1.4: + version "3.2.1" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/loupe/-/loupe-3.2.1.tgz#0095cf56dc5b7a9a7c08ff5b1a8796ec8ad17e76" + integrity sha512-CdzqowRJCeLU72bHvWqwRBBlLcMEtIvGrlvef74kMnV2AolS9Y8xUv1I0U/MNAWMhBlKIoyuEgoJ0t/bbwHbLQ== + lowercase-keys@^3.0.0: version "3.0.0" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/lowercase-keys/-/lowercase-keys-3.0.0.tgz#c5e7d442e37ead247ae9db117a9d0a467c89d4f2" @@ -10056,12 +10264,17 @@ luxon@^3.2.1: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/luxon/-/luxon-3.4.0.tgz#17cb754efecbf76994f05b2a3f1f91fad7ddfde7" integrity sha512-7eDo4Pt7aGhoCheGFIuq4Xa2fJm4ZpmldpGhjTYBNUYNCN6TIEP6v7chwwwt3KRp7YR+rghbfvjyo3V5y9hgBw== +lz-string@^1.5.0: + version "1.5.0" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/lz-string/-/lz-string-1.5.0.tgz#c1ab50f77887b712621201ba9fd4e3a6ed099941" + integrity sha512-h5bgJWpxJNswbU7qCrV0tIKQCaS3blPDrqKWx+QxzuzL1zGUzij9XCWLrSLsJPu5t+eWA/ycetzYAO5IOMcWAQ== + macos-release@^3.3.0: version "3.4.0" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/macos-release/-/macos-release-3.4.0.tgz#1b223706b13106c158e2b40cb81ba35dd74d7856" integrity sha512-wpGPwyg/xrSp4H4Db4xYSeAr6+cFQGHfspHzDUdYxswDnUW0L5Ov63UuJiSr8NMSpyaChO4u1n0MXUvVPtrN6A== -magic-string@^0.30.11, magic-string@^0.30.12, magic-string@^0.30.21: +magic-string@^0.30.11, magic-string@^0.30.12, magic-string@^0.30.17, magic-string@^0.30.21: version "0.30.21" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/magic-string/-/magic-string-0.30.21.tgz#56763ec09a0fa8091df27879fd94d19078c00d91" integrity sha512-vd2F4YUyEXKGcLHoq+TEyCjxueSeHnFxyyjNp80yg0XV4vUhnDer/lvvlqM/arB5bXQN5K2/3oinyCRyx8T2CQ== @@ -10254,6 +10467,11 @@ mimic-response@^4.0.0: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/mimic-response/-/mimic-response-4.0.0.tgz#35468b19e7c75d10f5165ea25e75a5ceea7cf70f" integrity sha512-e5ISH9xMYU0DzrT+jl8q2ze9D6eWBto+I8CNpe+VI+K2J/F/k3PdkdTdz4wvGVH4NTpo+NRYTVIuMQEMMcsLqg== +min-indent@^1.0.0: + version "1.0.1" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/min-indent/-/min-indent-1.0.1.tgz#a63f681673b30571fbe8bc25686ae746eefa9869" + integrity sha512-I9jwMn07Sy/IwOj3zVkVik2JTvgpaykDZEigL6Rx6N9LbMywwUSMtxET+7lVoDLLd3O3IXwJwvuuns8UB/HeAg== + minimatch@^10.2.2, minimatch@^10.2.4: version "10.2.4" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/minimatch/-/minimatch-10.2.4.tgz#465b3accbd0218b8281f5301e27cedc697f96fde" @@ -11253,6 +11471,11 @@ pathe@^2.0.1, pathe@^2.0.3: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/pathe/-/pathe-2.0.3.tgz#3ecbec55421685b70a9da872b2cff3e1cbed1716" integrity sha512-WUjGcAqP1gQacoQe+OBJsFA7Ld4DyXuUIjZ5cc75cLHvJ7dtNsTugphxIADwspS+AraAUePCKrSVtPLFj/F88w== +pathval@^2.0.0: + version "2.0.1" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/pathval/-/pathval-2.0.1.tgz#8855c5a2899af072d6ac05d11e46045ad0dc605d" + integrity sha512-//nshmD55c46FuFw26xV/xFAaB5HF9Xdap7HJBBnrKdAd6/GxDBaNA1870O79+9ueg61cZLSVc+OaFlfmObYVQ== + peek-readable@^5.0.0: version "5.0.0" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/peek-readable/-/peek-readable-5.0.0.tgz#7ead2aff25dc40458c60347ea76cfdfd63efdfec" @@ -11268,16 +11491,16 @@ performance-now@^2.1.0: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/performance-now/-/performance-now-2.1.0.tgz#6309f4e0e5fa913ec1c69307ae364b4b377c9e7b" integrity sha512-7EAHlyLHI56VEIdK57uwHdHKIaAGbnXPiw0yWbarQZOKaKpvUIgW0jWRVLiatnM+XXlSwsanIBH/hzGMJulMow== +picocolors@1.1.1, picocolors@^1.1.1: + version "1.1.1" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/picocolors/-/picocolors-1.1.1.tgz#3d321af3eab939b083c8f929a1d12cda81c26b6b" + integrity sha512-xceH2snhtb5M9liqDsmEw56le376mTZkEX/jEb/RxNFyegNul7eNslCXP9FDj/Lcu0X8KEyMceP2ntpaHrDEVA== + picocolors@^1.0.0: version "1.0.0" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/picocolors/-/picocolors-1.0.0.tgz#cb5bdc74ff3f51892236eaf79d68bc44564ab81c" integrity sha512-1fygroTLlHu66zi26VoTDv8yRgm0Fccecssto+MhsZ0D/DGW2sm8E8AjW7NU5VVTRt5GxbeZ5qBuJr+HyLYkjQ== -picocolors@^1.1.1: - version "1.1.1" - resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/picocolors/-/picocolors-1.1.1.tgz#3d321af3eab939b083c8f929a1d12cda81c26b6b" - integrity sha512-xceH2snhtb5M9liqDsmEw56le376mTZkEX/jEb/RxNFyegNul7eNslCXP9FDj/Lcu0X8KEyMceP2ntpaHrDEVA== - picomatch@^2.0.4, picomatch@^2.2.1, picomatch@^2.2.3, picomatch@^2.3.1, picomatch@^2.3.2: version "2.3.2" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/picomatch/-/picomatch-2.3.2.tgz#5a942915e26b372dc0f0e6753149a16e6b1c5601" @@ -11462,6 +11685,15 @@ pretty-bytes@^5.6.0: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/pretty-bytes/-/pretty-bytes-5.6.0.tgz#356256f643804773c82f64723fe78c92c62beaeb" integrity sha512-FFw039TmrBqFK8ma/7OL3sDz/VytdtJr044/QUJtH0wK9lb9jLq9tJyIxUwtQJHwar2BqtiA4iCWSwo9JLkzFg== +pretty-format@^27.0.2: + version "27.5.1" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/pretty-format/-/pretty-format-27.5.1.tgz#2181879fdea51a7a5851fb39d920faa63f01d88e" + integrity sha512-Qb1gy5OrP5+zDf2Bvnzdl3jsTf1qXVMazbvCoKhtKqVs4/YK4ozX4gKQJJVyNe+cajNPn0KoC0MC3FUmaHWEmQ== + dependencies: + ansi-regex "^5.0.1" + ansi-styles "^5.0.0" + react-is "^17.0.1" + pretty-format@^29.0.0, pretty-format@^29.6.2: version "29.6.2" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/pretty-format/-/pretty-format-29.6.2.tgz#3d5829261a8a4d89d8b9769064b29c50ed486a47" @@ -11697,6 +11929,11 @@ rc@1.2.8: minimist "^1.2.0" strip-json-comments "~2.0.1" +react-is@^17.0.1: + version "17.0.2" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/react-is/-/react-is-17.0.2.tgz#e691d4a8e9c789365655539ab372762b0efb54f0" + integrity sha512-w2GsyukL62IJnlaff/nRegPQR94C/XXamvMWmSHRJ4y7Ts/4ocGRmTHvOs8PSE6pB3dWOrD/nueuU5sduBsQ4w== + react-is@^18.0.0: version "18.2.0" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/react-is/-/react-is-18.2.0.tgz#199431eeaaa2e09f86427efbb4f1473edb47609b" @@ -11818,6 +12055,14 @@ rechoir@^0.7.0: dependencies: resolve "^1.9.0" +redent@^3.0.0: + version "3.0.0" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/redent/-/redent-3.0.0.tgz#e557b7998316bb53c9f1f56fa626352c6963059f" + integrity sha512-6tDA8g98We0zd0GvVeMT9arEOnTw9qM03L9cJXaCjrip1OO764RDBLBfrB4cwzNGDj5OA5ioymC9GkizgWJDUg== + dependencies: + indent-string "^4.0.0" + strip-indent "^3.0.0" + reflect.getprototypeof@^1.0.6, reflect.getprototypeof@^1.0.9: version "1.0.10" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/reflect.getprototypeof/-/reflect.getprototypeof-1.0.10.tgz#c629219e78a3316d8b604c765ef68996964e7bf9" @@ -12488,6 +12733,11 @@ side-channel@^1.1.0: side-channel-map "^1.0.1" side-channel-weakmap "^1.0.2" +siginfo@^2.0.0: + version "2.0.0" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/siginfo/-/siginfo-2.0.0.tgz#32e76c70b79724e3bb567cb9d543eb858ccfaf30" + integrity sha512-ybx0WO1/8bSBLEWXZvEd7gMW3Sn3JFlW3TvX1nREbDLRNQNaeNN8WK0meBwPdAaOI7TtRRRJn/Es1zhrrCHu7g== + signal-exit@^3.0.2, signal-exit@^3.0.3, signal-exit@^3.0.7: version "3.0.7" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/signal-exit/-/signal-exit-3.0.7.tgz#a9a1767f8af84155114eaabd73f99273c8f59ad9" @@ -12710,6 +12960,11 @@ stack-utils@^2.0.3: dependencies: escape-string-regexp "^2.0.0" +stackback@0.0.2: + version "0.0.2" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/stackback/-/stackback-0.0.2.tgz#1ac8a0d9483848d1695e418b6d031a3c3ce68e3b" + integrity sha512-1XMJE5fQo1jGH6Y/7ebnwPOBEkIEnT4QF32d5R1+VXdXveM0IBMJt8zfaxX1P3QhVwrYe+576+jkANtSS2mBbw== + stackframe@^1.3.4: version "1.3.4" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/stackframe/-/stackframe-1.3.4.tgz#b881a004c8c149a5e8efef37d51b16e412943310" @@ -12730,7 +12985,7 @@ statuses@^2.0.1, statuses@^2.0.2, statuses@~2.0.2: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/statuses/-/statuses-2.0.2.tgz#8f75eecef765b5e1cfcdc080da59409ed424e382" integrity sha512-DvEy55V3DB7uknRo+4iOGT5fP1slR8wQohVdknigZPMpMstaKJQWhwiYBACJE3Ul2pTnATihhBYnRhZQHGBiRw== -std-env@^3.7.0: +std-env@^3.7.0, std-env@^3.9.0: version "3.10.0" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/std-env/-/std-env-3.10.0.tgz#d810b27e3a073047b2b5e40034881f5ea6f9c83b" integrity sha512-5GS12FdOZNliM5mAOxFRg7Ir0pWz8MdpYm6AY6VPkGpbA7ZzmbzNcBJQ0GPvvyWgcY7QAhCgf9Uy89I03faLkg== @@ -12901,6 +13156,13 @@ strip-final-newline@^3.0.0: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/strip-final-newline/-/strip-final-newline-3.0.0.tgz#52894c313fbff318835280aed60ff71ebf12b8fd" integrity sha512-dOESqjYr96iWYylGObzd39EuNTa5VJxyvVAEm5Jnh7KGo75V43Hk1odPQkNDyXNmUR6k+gEiDVXnjB8HJ3crXw== +strip-indent@^3.0.0: + version "3.0.0" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/strip-indent/-/strip-indent-3.0.0.tgz#c32e1cee940b6b3432c771bc2c54bcce73cd3001" + integrity sha512-laJTa3Jb+VQpaC6DseHhF7dXVqHTfJPCRDaEbid/drOhgitgYku/letMUqOXFoWV0zIIUbjpdH2t+tYj4bQMRQ== + dependencies: + min-indent "^1.0.0" + strip-json-comments@5.0.3: version "5.0.3" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/strip-json-comments/-/strip-json-comments-5.0.3.tgz#b7304249dd402ee67fd518ada993ab3593458bcf" @@ -12916,6 +13178,13 @@ strip-json-comments@~2.0.1: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/strip-json-comments/-/strip-json-comments-2.0.1.tgz#3c531942e908c2697c0ec344858c286c7ca0a60a" integrity sha512-4gB8na07fecVVkOI6Rs4e7T6NOTki5EmL7TUduTs6bu3EdnSycntVJ4re8kgZA+wx9IueI2Y11bfbgwtzuE0KQ== +strip-literal@^3.0.0: + version "3.1.0" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/strip-literal/-/strip-literal-3.1.0.tgz#222b243dd2d49c0bcd0de8906adbd84177196032" + integrity sha512-8r3mkIM/2+PpjHoOtiAW8Rg3jJLHaV7xPwG+YRGrv6FP0wwk/toTpATxWYOW0BKdWwl82VT2tFYi5DlROa0Mxg== + dependencies: + js-tokens "^9.0.1" + strip-outer@^2.0.0: version "2.0.0" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/strip-outer/-/strip-outer-2.0.0.tgz#c45c724ed9b1ff6be5f660503791404f4714084b" @@ -13181,7 +13450,17 @@ through@^2.3.6, through@^2.3.8: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/through/-/through-2.3.8.tgz#0dd4c9ffaabc357960b1b724115d7e0e86a2e1f5" integrity sha512-w89qg7PI8wAdvX60bMDP+bFoD5Dvhm9oLheFp5O4a2QF0cSBGsBX4qZmadPMvVqlLJBBci+WqGGOAPvcDeNSVg== -tinyglobby@^0.2.13, tinyglobby@^0.2.15: +tinybench@^2.9.0: + version "2.9.0" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/tinybench/-/tinybench-2.9.0.tgz#103c9f8ba6d7237a47ab6dd1dcff77251863426b" + integrity sha512-0+DUvqWMValLmha6lr4kD8iAMK1HzV0/aKnCtWb9v9641TnP/MFb7Pc2bxoxQjTXAErryXVgUOfv2YqNllqGeg== + +tinyexec@^0.3.2: + version "0.3.2" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/tinyexec/-/tinyexec-0.3.2.tgz#941794e657a85e496577995c6eef66f53f42b3d2" + integrity sha512-KQQR9yN7R5+OSwaK0XQoj22pwHoTlgYqmUscPYoknOoWCWfj/5/ABTMRi69FrKU5ffPVh5QcFikpWJI/P1ocHA== + +tinyglobby@^0.2.13, tinyglobby@^0.2.14, tinyglobby@^0.2.15: version "0.2.16" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/tinyglobby/-/tinyglobby-0.2.16.tgz#1c3b7eb953fce42b226bc5a1ee06428281aff3d6" integrity sha512-pn99VhoACYR8nFHhxqix+uvsbXineAasWm5ojXoN8xEwK5Kd3/TrhNn1wByuD52UxWRLy8pu+kRMniEi6Eq9Zg== @@ -13189,6 +13468,21 @@ tinyglobby@^0.2.13, tinyglobby@^0.2.15: fdir "^6.5.0" picomatch "^4.0.4" +tinypool@^1.1.1: + version "1.1.1" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/tinypool/-/tinypool-1.1.1.tgz#059f2d042bd37567fbc017d3d426bdd2a2612591" + integrity sha512-Zba82s87IFq9A9XmjiX5uZA/ARWDrB03OHlq+Vw1fSdt0I+4/Kutwy8BP4Y/y/aORMo61FQ0vIb5j44vSo5Pkg== + +tinyrainbow@^2.0.0: + version "2.0.0" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/tinyrainbow/-/tinyrainbow-2.0.0.tgz#9509b2162436315e80e3eee0fcce4474d2444294" + integrity sha512-op4nsTR47R6p0vMUUoYl/a+ljLFVtlfaXkLQmqfLR1qHma1h/ysYk4hEXZ880bf2CYgTskvTa/e196Vd5dDQXw== + +tinyspy@^4.0.3: + version "4.0.4" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/tinyspy/-/tinyspy-4.0.4.tgz#d77a002fb53a88aa1429b419c1c92492e0c81f78" + integrity sha512-azl+t0z7pw/z958Gy9svOTuzqIk6xq+NSheJzn5MMWtWTFywIacg2wUlzKFGtt3cthx0r2SxMK0yzJOR0IES7Q== + tmp-promise@^3.0.2, tmp-promise@^3.0.3: version "3.0.3" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/tmp-promise/-/tmp-promise-3.0.3.tgz#60a1a1cc98c988674fcbfd23b6e3367bdeac4ce7" @@ -13783,7 +14077,18 @@ verror@1.10.0: core-util-is "1.0.2" extsprintf "^1.2.0" -vite@^6.4.2: +vite-node@3.2.4: + version "3.2.4" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/vite-node/-/vite-node-3.2.4.tgz#f3676d94c4af1e76898c162c92728bca65f7bb07" + integrity sha512-EbKSKh+bh1E1IFxeO0pg1n4dvoOTt0UDiXMd/qn++r98+jPO1xtJilvXldeuQ8giIB5IkpjCgMleHMNEsGH6pg== + dependencies: + cac "^6.7.14" + debug "^4.4.1" + es-module-lexer "^1.7.0" + pathe "^2.0.3" + vite "^5.0.0 || ^6.0.0 || ^7.0.0-0" + +vite@6.4.2, "vite@^5.0.0 || ^6.0.0 || ^7.0.0-0", vite@^6.4.2: version "6.4.2" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/vite/-/vite-6.4.2.tgz#a4e548ca3a90ca9f3724582cab35e1ba15efc6f2" integrity sha512-2N/55r4JDJ4gdrCvGgINMy+HH3iRpNIz8K6SFwVsA+JbQScLiC+clmAxBgwiSPgcG9U15QmvqCGWzMbqda5zGQ== @@ -13802,6 +14107,35 @@ vitefu@^1.0.3: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/vitefu/-/vitefu-1.1.2.tgz#b63fcf3b606170702318b8c432663a3b9030f51d" integrity sha512-zpKATdUbzbsycPFBN71nS2uzBUQiVnFoOrr2rvqv34S1lcAgMKKkjWleLGeiJlZ8lwCXvtWaRn7R3ZC16SYRuw== +vitest@^3.2.4: + version "3.2.4" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/vitest/-/vitest-3.2.4.tgz#0637b903ad79d1539a25bc34c0ed54b5c67702ea" + integrity sha512-LUCP5ev3GURDysTWiP47wRRUpLKMOfPh+yKTx3kVIEiu5KOMeqzpnYNsKyOoVrULivR8tLcks4+lga33Whn90A== + dependencies: + "@types/chai" "^5.2.2" + "@vitest/expect" "3.2.4" + "@vitest/mocker" "3.2.4" + "@vitest/pretty-format" "^3.2.4" + "@vitest/runner" "3.2.4" + "@vitest/snapshot" "3.2.4" + "@vitest/spy" "3.2.4" + "@vitest/utils" "3.2.4" + chai "^5.2.0" + debug "^4.4.1" + expect-type "^1.2.1" + magic-string "^0.30.17" + pathe "^2.0.3" + picomatch "^4.0.2" + std-env "^3.9.0" + tinybench "^2.9.0" + tinyexec "^0.3.2" + tinyglobby "^0.2.14" + tinypool "^1.1.1" + tinyrainbow "^2.0.0" + vite "^5.0.0 || ^6.0.0 || ^7.0.0-0" + vite-node "3.2.4" + why-is-node-running "^2.3.0" + w3c-xmlserializer@^4.0.0: version "4.0.0" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/w3c-xmlserializer/-/w3c-xmlserializer-4.0.0.tgz#aebdc84920d806222936e3cdce408e32488a3073" @@ -14013,6 +14347,14 @@ which@^2.0.1: dependencies: isexe "^2.0.0" +why-is-node-running@^2.3.0: + version "2.3.0" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/why-is-node-running/-/why-is-node-running-2.3.0.tgz#a3f69a97107f494b3cdc3bdddd883a7d65cebf04" + integrity sha512-hUrmaWBdVDcxvYqnyh09zunKzROWjbZTiNy8dBEjkS7ehEDQibXJ7XvlmtbwuTclUiIyN+CyXQD4Vmko8fNm8w== + dependencies: + siginfo "^2.0.0" + stackback "0.0.2" + widest-line@^5.0.0: version "5.0.0" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/widest-line/-/widest-line-5.0.0.tgz#b74826a1e480783345f0cd9061b49753c9da70d0" From 2a93dee696fe2ce4daff5ac1f924adf41666696d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:20:56 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 041/105] Refactor test watch scripts to use concurrently for unit and component tests --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md | 35 +++++++++++-------- package.json | 4 ++- 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md index fdde31fb..508f16f3 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md @@ -4,7 +4,9 @@ Status: planning Classification: proposed implementation checklist draft (not approved) -Source plan: `docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md` (Item 7: Draft a slice for wiring `Login.svelte` to call `auth-service` commands) +Source plan: `docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md` + +Parent plan: `docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md` (Item 7: Draft a slice for wiring `Login.svelte` to call `auth-service` commands) ## Scope Lock @@ -39,43 +41,46 @@ Because `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` still depend on `loginSta ## Atomic Checklist Items -- T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend component tests for `Login.svelte` auth-service delegation in `src/tests/frontend/Login.auth-service.test.ts`. +- T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend component tests for `Login.svelte` auth-service delegation in `src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts`. - Depends on: none. - [ ] T01.01 Add a fail-first test proving mount/init delegates the initial auth check through `authService.init()` rather than running direct `verifySelf()` logic inside `Login.svelte`. - [ ] T01.02 Add a fail-first test proving a valid login submission calls `authService.login({ userId, password })` with the current form values. - [ ] T01.03 Add a fail-first test proving a valid signup submission calls `authService.signup({ userId, password, displayName, email })` with the current form values. - - [ ] T01.04 Add a fail-first test proving a valid guest submission calls `authService.loginGuest({ displayName, email })` when no explicit stored guest override is provided by the component. + - [ ] T01.04 Add fail-first tests proving a valid guest submission calls `authService.loginGuest({ displayName, email })` when no stored guest data exists and passes the stored guest identity through the service payload when stored guest data is present. - [ ] T01.05 Add fail-first tests proving local validation failures still surface component-local errors and do not call `authService.login()`, `authService.signup()`, or `authService.loginGuest()`. - [ ] T01.06 Add a fail-first test proving logout intent delegates through `authService.logout()` only when logout is currently allowed by the observed auth state. - - [ ] T01.07 Add fail-first tests proving `Login.svelte` no longer performs direct auth command calls to `postAuth`, `createUser`, `getGuestToken`, `createGuestUser`, `updateUser`, or `deleteAuth()` for the delegated flows covered by this slice. + - [ ] T01.07 Add fail-first tests proving `Login.svelte` no longer performs direct auth command calls to `verifySelf`, `verifyUser`, `postAuth`, `createUser`, `getGuestToken`, `createGuestUser`, `updateUser`, or `deleteAuth()` for the delegated flows covered by this slice. - [ ] T01.08 Add a fail-first test proving `Login.svelte` publishes the existing `loginStateStore` compatibility shape from observed service-owned auth state rather than from a second authoritative local auth runtime. - Trace: - - "Draft a slice for wiring `Login.svelte` to call `auth-service` commands while keeping form-local state and field validation in `Login.svelte`." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 7) - - "Already service-owned but still duplicated in `Login.svelte`: initial verification uses `verifySelf()` ... user login uses `postAuth(userId, userPassword)`; logout uses `deleteAuth()`." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) - - "Still not owned by `auth-service`: signup uses `createUser(userInfo)` ..." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) - - "Still not owned by `auth-service`: guest login flow reads stored guest credentials..." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) + - "Add fail-first component tests that treat `Login.svelte` as the boundary under test and assert that it delegates auth actions to an injected `AuthService`." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md`, Approach) + - "Login.svelte delegation behavior is tested at the component boundary." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md`, Validation Strategy) + - "Pass: tests show valid user actions call the appropriate `auth-service` methods, and local validation failures do not call service commands." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md`, Validation Strategy) + - "Fail: `Login.svelte` still calls auth APIs directly for covered command paths, or component validation behavior is lost." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md`, Validation Strategy) - [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Create a widget-scoped `AuthService` instance with `createAuthService()` in `src/components/SimpleComment.svelte`, then thread it explicitly through `src/components/DiscussionDisplay.svelte` and `src/components/CommentInput.svelte` into `src/components/Login.svelte`. - Depends on: T01. - Validated by: `yarn typecheck`. - Trace: - - "Prefer direct `auth-service` API or a thin service-backed store; avoid introducing another ad-hoc event bus." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 12) - - "Resolved the conditional in favor of moving session/guest persistence out of `Login.svelte`: auth/session continuity and guest reuse should not depend on the `Login.svelte` component being mounted." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 6 findings) + - "Create a widget-scoped `AuthService` instance at the current composition root and thread it explicitly through the current component path into `Login.svelte`." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md`, In Scope) + - "`auth-service` remains widget-scoped; do not introduce a singleton service instance." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md`, Constraints) + - "The new widget-scoped service seam composes cleanly through the current component tree." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md`, Validation Strategy) - [ ] C02 `[frontend]` Extend `src/lib/auth-service.ts` with one readable auth-runtime snapshot store that exposes the service-owned machine state needed by `Login.svelte` to preserve the existing `loginStateStore` compatibility contract (`state`, `nextEvents`, and any required error context), without running a second interpreted auth machine inside the component. - Depends on: T01. - Validated by: T01.08. - Trace: - - "Relay coupling remains in `Login.svelte`: it subscribes to `dispatchableStore` and reacts to `loginIntent` / `logoutIntent` by driving its local machine." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 3 findings) - - "Draft a slice for replacing `Login.svelte` shared-store publication with auth-service state subscriptions." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 8) + - "Make `Login.svelte` observe service-owned auth state rather than interpret its own auth machine as a second authority." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md`, In Scope) + - "The slice must not create two authoritative auth runtimes after wiring is complete." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md`, Constraints) + - "Preserve compatibility with the current relay/store consumers by continuing to publish the existing `loginStateStore` shape during this slice." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md`, In Scope) - [ ] C03 `[frontend]` Replace direct auth API calls and local auth-machine ownership in `src/components/Login.svelte` with `auth-service` command delegation and subscriptions to the auth-runtime snapshot store added in `C02`, then publish the existing `loginStateStore` compatibility shape from that observed service state while preserving component-local validation/UI behavior for unreworked consumers. - Depends on: C01, C02. - Validated by: T01. - Trace: - - "Draft a slice for wiring `Login.svelte` to call `auth-service` commands while keeping form-local state and field validation in `Login.svelte`." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 7) - - "Keep explicitly out of scope: ... creating broad auth workflow modules, or redesigning frontend state architecture." (`docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md`, Item 14) - - "login-related state, side effects, and rendering responsibilities are easier to explain as separate concerns" (`docs/RepoHealthImprovementBacklog.md`, Priority 5) + - "Replace direct auth API command calls in `Login.svelte` with calls to `auth-service` methods" (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md`, In Scope) + - "`Login.svelte` delegates auth command execution to a widget-scoped `AuthService`." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md`, Acceptance Criteria) + - "`Login.svelte` does not continue to run a second authoritative interpreted auth runtime after the slice is complete." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md`, Acceptance Criteria) + - "The slice does not introduce a singleton auth-service, a new event bus, or a broader auth-state architecture redesign." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md`, Acceptance Criteria) ## Behavior Slices diff --git a/package.json b/package.json index 9c2546a1..b004adb2 100644 --- a/package.json +++ b/package.json @@ -50,7 +50,9 @@ "watch:backend": "webpack --config ./webpack.netlify.functions.cjs --watch", "watch:frontend": "vite build --config ./vite.config.ts --watch", "watch:lint": "esw -w ./src/**/*.ts --color --clear --changed", - "watch:test": "jest --watch --noStackTrace", + "watch:test": "concurrently \"yarn watch:test:unit\" \"yarn watch:test:components\"", + "watch:test:components": "cross-env TZ=UTC vitest --config vitest.components.config.ts", + "watch:test:unit": "jest --watch --noStackTrace", "knip": "knip" }, "dependencies": { From 97a0cd114d494198ea3146c8fec87328a5e0fb34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:37:26 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 042/105] Approve slice 7 checklist --- docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md index 508f16f3..bda33344 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ # Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 7 Checklist -Status: planning +Status: approved -Classification: proposed implementation checklist draft (not approved) +Classification: approved implementation checklist Source plan: `docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md` From 86a1d1b7d1778fe6d12e0746c0e9585f07f1bbfd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:39:38 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 043/105] Add login init delegation test --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md | 2 +- .../components/Login.auth-service.test.ts | 120 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md index bda33344..75d1979b 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ Because `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` still depend on `loginSta - T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend component tests for `Login.svelte` auth-service delegation in `src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts`. - Depends on: none. - - [ ] T01.01 Add a fail-first test proving mount/init delegates the initial auth check through `authService.init()` rather than running direct `verifySelf()` logic inside `Login.svelte`. + - [x] T01.01 Add a fail-first test proving mount/init delegates the initial auth check through `authService.init()` rather than running direct `verifySelf()` logic inside `Login.svelte`. - [ ] T01.02 Add a fail-first test proving a valid login submission calls `authService.login({ userId, password })` with the current form values. - [ ] T01.03 Add a fail-first test proving a valid signup submission calls `authService.signup({ userId, password, displayName, email })` with the current form values. - [ ] T01.04 Add fail-first tests proving a valid guest submission calls `authService.loginGuest({ displayName, email })` when no stored guest data exists and passes the stored guest identity through the service payload when stored guest data is present. diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b3143e1d --- /dev/null +++ b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@ +import { fireEvent, render, screen, waitFor } from "@testing-library/svelte" +import type { Writable } from "svelte/store" +import { readable, writable } from "svelte/store" +import { beforeEach, describe, expect, test, vi } from "vitest" +import { + createGuestUser, + createUser, + deleteAuth, + getGuestToken, + postAuth, + updateUser, + verifySelf, + verifyUser, +} from "../../../apiClient" +import Login from "../../../components/Login.svelte" +import type { + AuthService, + AuthSessionState, +} from "../../../lib/auth-service" +import type { User } from "../../../lib/simple-comment-types" + +vi.mock("../../../apiClient", () => ({ + createGuestUser: vi.fn(), + createUser: vi.fn(), + deleteAuth: vi.fn(), + getGuestToken: vi.fn(), + getOneUser: vi.fn(), + postAuth: vi.fn(), + updateUser: vi.fn(), + verifySelf: vi.fn(), + verifyUser: vi.fn(), +})) + +type AuthRuntimeSnapshot = { + state: AuthSessionState + nextEvents: string[] + error?: unknown +} + +type AuthServiceUnderTest = AuthService & { + authRuntimeSnapshot: Writable +} + +const mockVerifySelf = vi.mocked(verifySelf) +const mockPostAuth = vi.mocked(postAuth) +const mockCreateUser = vi.mocked(createUser) +const mockDeleteAuth = vi.mocked(deleteAuth) +const mockGetGuestToken = vi.mocked(getGuestToken) +const mockCreateGuestUser = vi.mocked(createGuestUser) +const mockUpdateUser = vi.mocked(updateUser) +const mockVerifyUser = vi.mocked(verifyUser) + +const defaultUser: User = { + id: "alice-user", + name: "Alice Example", + email: "alice@example.com", +} + +const createAuthServiceStub = ({ + currentUser, + snapshot = { state: "loggedOut", nextEvents: ["LOGIN", "SIGNUP", "GUEST"] }, +}: { + currentUser?: User + snapshot?: AuthRuntimeSnapshot +} = {}): AuthServiceUnderTest => ({ + sessionState: readable(snapshot.state), + currentUser: readable(currentUser), + authRequest: readable({ status: "idle" }), + authOutcome: readable({ status: "none" }), + authRuntimeSnapshot: writable(snapshot), + init: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined), + requestAuth: vi.fn(() => ({ requestId: "request-1" })), + clearAuthOutcome: vi.fn(), + cancelAuthRequest: vi.fn(), + reportLocalValidationError: vi.fn(), + login: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined), + signup: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined), + loginGuest: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined), + logout: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined), + destroy: vi.fn(), +}) + +const renderLogin = ({ + authService = createAuthServiceStub(), + currentUser, +}: { + authService?: AuthServiceUnderTest + currentUser?: User +} = {}) => { + render(Login as never, { + props: { + authService, + currentUser, + }, + }) + + return { authService } +} + +describe("Login auth-service delegation", () => { + beforeEach(() => { + mockVerifySelf.mockRejectedValue({ status: 401 }) + mockPostAuth.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true } as never) + mockCreateUser.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true } as never) + mockDeleteAuth.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true } as never) + mockGetGuestToken.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true } as never) + mockCreateGuestUser.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true } as never) + mockUpdateUser.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true } as never) + mockVerifyUser.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true } as never) + }) + + test("delegates mount initialization through authService.init", async () => { + const { authService } = renderLogin() + + await waitFor(() => { + expect(authService.init).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + }) + expect(mockVerifySelf).not.toHaveBeenCalled() + }) +}) From 09cae27d60def48d20f2661a3cec5799e1e6529a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:40:28 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 044/105] Add login submit delegation test --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md | 2 +- .../components/Login.auth-service.test.ts | 44 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md index 75d1979b..5dfb6130 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ Because `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` still depend on `loginSta - T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend component tests for `Login.svelte` auth-service delegation in `src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts`. - Depends on: none. - [x] T01.01 Add a fail-first test proving mount/init delegates the initial auth check through `authService.init()` rather than running direct `verifySelf()` logic inside `Login.svelte`. - - [ ] T01.02 Add a fail-first test proving a valid login submission calls `authService.login({ userId, password })` with the current form values. + - [x] T01.02 Add a fail-first test proving a valid login submission calls `authService.login({ userId, password })` with the current form values. - [ ] T01.03 Add a fail-first test proving a valid signup submission calls `authService.signup({ userId, password, displayName, email })` with the current form values. - [ ] T01.04 Add fail-first tests proving a valid guest submission calls `authService.loginGuest({ displayName, email })` when no stored guest data exists and passes the stored guest identity through the service payload when stored guest data is present. - [ ] T01.05 Add fail-first tests proving local validation failures still surface component-local errors and do not call `authService.login()`, `authService.signup()`, or `authService.loginGuest()`. diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts index b3143e1d..1c8bc9e2 100644 --- a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts +++ b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts @@ -31,6 +31,19 @@ vi.mock("../../../apiClient", () => ({ verifyUser: vi.fn(), })) +vi.mock("../../../frontend-utilities", async importOriginal => { + const actual = + await importOriginal() + + return { + ...actual, + idIconDataUrl: vi.fn( + () => + "" + ), + } +}) + type AuthRuntimeSnapshot = { state: AuthSessionState nextEvents: string[] @@ -97,8 +110,18 @@ const renderLogin = ({ return { authService } } +const submitForm = async (selector: string): Promise => { + const form = document.querySelector(selector) + + expect(form).toBeInTheDocument() + await fireEvent.submit(form as HTMLFormElement) +} + describe("Login auth-service delegation", () => { beforeEach(() => { + Element.prototype.animate = + Element.prototype.animate ?? + vi.fn(() => ({ cancel: vi.fn(), finished: Promise.resolve() }) as never) mockVerifySelf.mockRejectedValue({ status: 401 }) mockPostAuth.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true } as never) mockCreateUser.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true } as never) @@ -117,4 +140,25 @@ describe("Login auth-service delegation", () => { }) expect(mockVerifySelf).not.toHaveBeenCalled() }) + + test("delegates valid login submissions to authService.login", async () => { + const { authService } = renderLogin() + + await fireEvent.click(await screen.findByRole("button", { name: "Login" })) + await fireEvent.input(screen.getByLabelText("User handle"), { + target: { value: "alice-user" }, + }) + await fireEvent.input(screen.getByLabelText("Password"), { + target: { value: "secret" }, + }) + await submitForm("#user-login-form") + + await waitFor(() => { + expect(authService.login).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ + userId: "alice-user", + password: "secret", + }) + }) + expect(mockPostAuth).not.toHaveBeenCalled() + }) }) From df54d2d4d0b8ca09abdf129af9687a323f131668 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:40:53 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 045/105] Add signup delegation test --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md | 2 +- .../components/Login.auth-service.test.ts | 34 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md index 5dfb6130..518a95ee 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ Because `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` still depend on `loginSta - Depends on: none. - [x] T01.01 Add a fail-first test proving mount/init delegates the initial auth check through `authService.init()` rather than running direct `verifySelf()` logic inside `Login.svelte`. - [x] T01.02 Add a fail-first test proving a valid login submission calls `authService.login({ userId, password })` with the current form values. - - [ ] T01.03 Add a fail-first test proving a valid signup submission calls `authService.signup({ userId, password, displayName, email })` with the current form values. + - [x] T01.03 Add a fail-first test proving a valid signup submission calls `authService.signup({ userId, password, displayName, email })` with the current form values. - [ ] T01.04 Add fail-first tests proving a valid guest submission calls `authService.loginGuest({ displayName, email })` when no stored guest data exists and passes the stored guest identity through the service payload when stored guest data is present. - [ ] T01.05 Add fail-first tests proving local validation failures still surface component-local errors and do not call `authService.login()`, `authService.signup()`, or `authService.loginGuest()`. - [ ] T01.06 Add a fail-first test proving logout intent delegates through `authService.logout()` only when logout is currently allowed by the observed auth state. diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts index 1c8bc9e2..a248ea0f 100644 --- a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts +++ b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts @@ -161,4 +161,38 @@ describe("Login auth-service delegation", () => { }) expect(mockPostAuth).not.toHaveBeenCalled() }) + + test("delegates valid signup submissions to authService.signup", async () => { + const { authService } = renderLogin() + + await fireEvent.click( + await screen.findByRole("button", { name: "Signup" }) + ) + await fireEvent.input(screen.getByLabelText("Display name"), { + target: { value: "Alice Example" }, + }) + await fireEvent.input(screen.getByLabelText("User handle"), { + target: { value: "alice-user" }, + }) + await fireEvent.input(screen.getByLabelText("Email"), { + target: { value: "alice@example.com" }, + }) + await fireEvent.input(screen.getByLabelText("Password"), { + target: { value: "secret" }, + }) + await fireEvent.input(screen.getByLabelText("Confirm password"), { + target: { value: "secret" }, + }) + await submitForm("#signup-form") + + await waitFor(() => { + expect(authService.signup).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ + userId: "alice-user", + password: "secret", + displayName: "Alice Example", + email: "alice@example.com", + }) + }) + expect(mockCreateUser).not.toHaveBeenCalled() + }) }) From d5900a2666a9011ef3d9a4409782d99db984fc37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:41:26 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 046/105] Add guest delegation tests --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md | 2 +- .../components/Login.auth-service.test.ts | 50 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md index 518a95ee..1fe51519 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ Because `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` still depend on `loginSta - [x] T01.01 Add a fail-first test proving mount/init delegates the initial auth check through `authService.init()` rather than running direct `verifySelf()` logic inside `Login.svelte`. - [x] T01.02 Add a fail-first test proving a valid login submission calls `authService.login({ userId, password })` with the current form values. - [x] T01.03 Add a fail-first test proving a valid signup submission calls `authService.signup({ userId, password, displayName, email })` with the current form values. - - [ ] T01.04 Add fail-first tests proving a valid guest submission calls `authService.loginGuest({ displayName, email })` when no stored guest data exists and passes the stored guest identity through the service payload when stored guest data is present. + - [x] T01.04 Add fail-first tests proving a valid guest submission calls `authService.loginGuest({ displayName, email })` when no stored guest data exists and passes the stored guest identity through the service payload when stored guest data is present. - [ ] T01.05 Add fail-first tests proving local validation failures still surface component-local errors and do not call `authService.login()`, `authService.signup()`, or `authService.loginGuest()`. - [ ] T01.06 Add a fail-first test proving logout intent delegates through `authService.logout()` only when logout is currently allowed by the observed auth state. - [ ] T01.07 Add fail-first tests proving `Login.svelte` no longer performs direct auth command calls to `verifySelf`, `verifyUser`, `postAuth`, `createUser`, `getGuestToken`, `createGuestUser`, `updateUser`, or `deleteAuth()` for the delegated flows covered by this slice. diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts index a248ea0f..ce0dbe73 100644 --- a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts +++ b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts @@ -195,4 +195,54 @@ describe("Login auth-service delegation", () => { }) expect(mockCreateUser).not.toHaveBeenCalled() }) + + test("delegates new guest submissions to authService.loginGuest", async () => { + const { authService } = renderLogin() + + await fireEvent.input(await screen.findByLabelText("Display Name"), { + target: { value: "Guest Example" }, + }) + await fireEvent.input(screen.getByLabelText("Email"), { + target: { value: "guest@example.com" }, + }) + await submitForm("#guest-login-form") + + await waitFor(() => { + expect(authService.loginGuest).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ + displayName: "Guest Example", + email: "guest@example.com", + }) + }) + expect(mockGetGuestToken).not.toHaveBeenCalled() + expect(mockCreateGuestUser).not.toHaveBeenCalled() + }) + + test("passes stored guest identity through guest submissions", async () => { + const storedGuest = { + id: "guest-ab123-abc12", + challenge: "stored-challenge", + name: "Stored Guest", + email: "stored@example.com", + } + localStorage.setItem("simple_comment_user", JSON.stringify(storedGuest)) + const { authService } = renderLogin() + + await fireEvent.input(await screen.findByLabelText("Display Name"), { + target: { value: "Updated Guest" }, + }) + await fireEvent.input(screen.getByLabelText("Email"), { + target: { value: "updated@example.com" }, + }) + await submitForm("#guest-login-form") + + await waitFor(() => { + expect(authService.loginGuest).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ + displayName: "Updated Guest", + email: "updated@example.com", + storedGuest, + }) + }) + expect(mockGetGuestToken).not.toHaveBeenCalled() + expect(mockCreateGuestUser).not.toHaveBeenCalled() + }) }) From 461228d07cc541faa7f61f40bf890486cd64825e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:41:56 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 047/105] Add login validation guard tests --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md | 2 +- .../components/Login.auth-service.test.ts | 32 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md index 1fe51519..a27d313e 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Because `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` still depend on `loginSta - [x] T01.02 Add a fail-first test proving a valid login submission calls `authService.login({ userId, password })` with the current form values. - [x] T01.03 Add a fail-first test proving a valid signup submission calls `authService.signup({ userId, password, displayName, email })` with the current form values. - [x] T01.04 Add fail-first tests proving a valid guest submission calls `authService.loginGuest({ displayName, email })` when no stored guest data exists and passes the stored guest identity through the service payload when stored guest data is present. - - [ ] T01.05 Add fail-first tests proving local validation failures still surface component-local errors and do not call `authService.login()`, `authService.signup()`, or `authService.loginGuest()`. + - [x] T01.05 Add fail-first tests proving local validation failures still surface component-local errors and do not call `authService.login()`, `authService.signup()`, or `authService.loginGuest()`. - [ ] T01.06 Add a fail-first test proving logout intent delegates through `authService.logout()` only when logout is currently allowed by the observed auth state. - [ ] T01.07 Add fail-first tests proving `Login.svelte` no longer performs direct auth command calls to `verifySelf`, `verifyUser`, `postAuth`, `createUser`, `getGuestToken`, `createGuestUser`, `updateUser`, or `deleteAuth()` for the delegated flows covered by this slice. - [ ] T01.08 Add a fail-first test proving `Login.svelte` publishes the existing `loginStateStore` compatibility shape from observed service-owned auth state rather than from a second authoritative local auth runtime. diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts index ce0dbe73..a5c15e6f 100644 --- a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts +++ b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts @@ -245,4 +245,36 @@ describe("Login auth-service delegation", () => { expect(mockGetGuestToken).not.toHaveBeenCalled() expect(mockCreateGuestUser).not.toHaveBeenCalled() }) + + test("keeps login validation local before authService.login", async () => { + const { authService } = renderLogin() + + await fireEvent.click(await screen.findByRole("button", { name: "Login" })) + await submitForm("#user-login-form") + + expect(await screen.findByText("User handle is required.")).toBeVisible() + expect(screen.getByText("Password is required.")).toBeVisible() + expect(authService.login).not.toHaveBeenCalled() + }) + + test("keeps signup validation local before authService.signup", async () => { + const { authService } = renderLogin() + + await fireEvent.click( + await screen.findByRole("button", { name: "Signup" }) + ) + await submitForm("#signup-form") + + expect(await screen.findByText(/Display name is required/)).toBeVisible() + expect(authService.signup).not.toHaveBeenCalled() + }) + + test("keeps guest validation local before authService.loginGuest", async () => { + const { authService } = renderLogin() + + await submitForm("#guest-login-form") + + expect(await screen.findByText(/Display name is required/)).toBeVisible() + expect(authService.loginGuest).not.toHaveBeenCalled() + }) }) From 87bbc8bfaaf47d0813ccdb090f81f0acacaa10b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:43:07 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 048/105] Add logout delegation test --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md | 2 +- .../components/Login.auth-service.test.ts | 45 ++++++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md index a27d313e..cb1c0748 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ Because `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` still depend on `loginSta - [x] T01.03 Add a fail-first test proving a valid signup submission calls `authService.signup({ userId, password, displayName, email })` with the current form values. - [x] T01.04 Add fail-first tests proving a valid guest submission calls `authService.loginGuest({ displayName, email })` when no stored guest data exists and passes the stored guest identity through the service payload when stored guest data is present. - [x] T01.05 Add fail-first tests proving local validation failures still surface component-local errors and do not call `authService.login()`, `authService.signup()`, or `authService.loginGuest()`. - - [ ] T01.06 Add a fail-first test proving logout intent delegates through `authService.logout()` only when logout is currently allowed by the observed auth state. + - [x] T01.06 Add a fail-first test proving logout intent delegates through `authService.logout()` only when logout is currently allowed by the observed auth state. - [ ] T01.07 Add fail-first tests proving `Login.svelte` no longer performs direct auth command calls to `verifySelf`, `verifyUser`, `postAuth`, `createUser`, `getGuestToken`, `createGuestUser`, `updateUser`, or `deleteAuth()` for the delegated flows covered by this slice. - [ ] T01.08 Add a fail-first test proving `Login.svelte` publishes the existing `loginStateStore` compatibility shape from observed service-owned auth state rather than from a second authoritative local auth runtime. - Trace: diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts index a5c15e6f..ad1fbb33 100644 --- a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts +++ b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ import type { AuthService, AuthSessionState, } from "../../../lib/auth-service" +import { dispatchableStore } from "../../../lib/svelte-stores" import type { User } from "../../../lib/simple-comment-types" vi.mock("../../../apiClient", () => ({ @@ -101,11 +102,9 @@ const renderLogin = ({ currentUser?: User } = {}) => { render(Login as never, { - props: { - authService, - currentUser, - }, - }) + authService, + currentUser, + } as never) return { authService } } @@ -277,4 +276,40 @@ describe("Login auth-service delegation", () => { expect(await screen.findByText(/Display name is required/)).toBeVisible() expect(authService.loginGuest).not.toHaveBeenCalled() }) + + test("delegates allowed logout intents to authService.logout", async () => { + const { authService } = renderLogin({ + currentUser: defaultUser, + authService: createAuthServiceStub({ + currentUser: defaultUser, + snapshot: { state: "loggedIn", nextEvents: ["LOGOUT"] }, + }), + }) + + await waitFor(() => { + expect(document.querySelector("section.simple-comment-login")).not.toHaveClass( + "is-loading" + ) + }) + dispatchableStore.dispatch("logoutIntent") + + await waitFor(() => { + expect(authService.logout).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + }) + expect(mockDeleteAuth).not.toHaveBeenCalled() + }) + + test("ignores logout intents when observed auth state disallows logout", async () => { + const { authService } = renderLogin({ + authService: createAuthServiceStub({ + snapshot: { state: "loggedOut", nextEvents: ["LOGIN", "SIGNUP", "GUEST"] }, + }), + }) + + dispatchableStore.dispatch("logoutIntent") + + await waitFor(() => { + expect(authService.logout).not.toHaveBeenCalled() + }) + }) }) From 0ea17097ae6fd874171b4bb770e812d5b0939f27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:43:47 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 049/105] Add direct auth call guard test --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md | 2 +- .../components/Login.auth-service.test.ts | 23 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md index cb1c0748..1016d09a 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Because `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` still depend on `loginSta - [x] T01.04 Add fail-first tests proving a valid guest submission calls `authService.loginGuest({ displayName, email })` when no stored guest data exists and passes the stored guest identity through the service payload when stored guest data is present. - [x] T01.05 Add fail-first tests proving local validation failures still surface component-local errors and do not call `authService.login()`, `authService.signup()`, or `authService.loginGuest()`. - [x] T01.06 Add a fail-first test proving logout intent delegates through `authService.logout()` only when logout is currently allowed by the observed auth state. - - [ ] T01.07 Add fail-first tests proving `Login.svelte` no longer performs direct auth command calls to `verifySelf`, `verifyUser`, `postAuth`, `createUser`, `getGuestToken`, `createGuestUser`, `updateUser`, or `deleteAuth()` for the delegated flows covered by this slice. + - [x] T01.07 Add fail-first tests proving `Login.svelte` no longer performs direct auth command calls to `verifySelf`, `verifyUser`, `postAuth`, `createUser`, `getGuestToken`, `createGuestUser`, `updateUser`, or `deleteAuth()` for the delegated flows covered by this slice. - [ ] T01.08 Add a fail-first test proving `Login.svelte` publishes the existing `loginStateStore` compatibility shape from observed service-owned auth state rather than from a second authoritative local auth runtime. - Trace: - "Add fail-first component tests that treat `Login.svelte` as the boundary under test and assert that it delegates auth actions to an injected `AuthService`." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md`, Approach) diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts index ad1fbb33..6019f605 100644 --- a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts +++ b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts @@ -1,4 +1,6 @@ import { fireEvent, render, screen, waitFor } from "@testing-library/svelte" +import { readFileSync } from "node:fs" +import { resolve } from "node:path" import type { Writable } from "svelte/store" import { readable, writable } from "svelte/store" import { beforeEach, describe, expect, test, vi } from "vitest" @@ -63,6 +65,16 @@ const mockGetGuestToken = vi.mocked(getGuestToken) const mockCreateGuestUser = vi.mocked(createGuestUser) const mockUpdateUser = vi.mocked(updateUser) const mockVerifyUser = vi.mocked(verifyUser) +const directAuthCommandNames = [ + "verifySelf", + "verifyUser", + "postAuth", + "createUser", + "getGuestToken", + "createGuestUser", + "updateUser", + "deleteAuth", +] as const const defaultUser: User = { id: "alice-user", @@ -312,4 +324,15 @@ describe("Login auth-service delegation", () => { expect(authService.logout).not.toHaveBeenCalled() }) }) + + test("does not call direct auth API commands from Login.svelte", () => { + const loginSource = readFileSync( + resolve(process.cwd(), "src/components/Login.svelte"), + "utf8" + ) + + directAuthCommandNames.forEach(commandName => { + expect(loginSource).not.toMatch(new RegExp(`\\b${commandName}\\s*\\(`)) + }) + }) }) From 3811f069ec4793d41d9f36cc078d6e4453dae769 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:44:10 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 050/105] Add login state bridge test --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md | 2 +- .../components/Login.auth-service.test.ts | 21 +++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md index 1016d09a..4b11ef17 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ Because `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` still depend on `loginSta - [x] T01.05 Add fail-first tests proving local validation failures still surface component-local errors and do not call `authService.login()`, `authService.signup()`, or `authService.loginGuest()`. - [x] T01.06 Add a fail-first test proving logout intent delegates through `authService.logout()` only when logout is currently allowed by the observed auth state. - [x] T01.07 Add fail-first tests proving `Login.svelte` no longer performs direct auth command calls to `verifySelf`, `verifyUser`, `postAuth`, `createUser`, `getGuestToken`, `createGuestUser`, `updateUser`, or `deleteAuth()` for the delegated flows covered by this slice. - - [ ] T01.08 Add a fail-first test proving `Login.svelte` publishes the existing `loginStateStore` compatibility shape from observed service-owned auth state rather than from a second authoritative local auth runtime. + - [x] T01.08 Add a fail-first test proving `Login.svelte` publishes the existing `loginStateStore` compatibility shape from observed service-owned auth state rather than from a second authoritative local auth runtime. - Trace: - "Add fail-first component tests that treat `Login.svelte` as the boundary under test and assert that it delegates auth actions to an injected `AuthService`." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md`, Approach) - "Login.svelte delegation behavior is tested at the component boundary." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md`, Validation Strategy) diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts index 6019f605..dbbf08dc 100644 --- a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts +++ b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ import { fireEvent, render, screen, waitFor } from "@testing-library/svelte" import { readFileSync } from "node:fs" import { resolve } from "node:path" import type { Writable } from "svelte/store" -import { readable, writable } from "svelte/store" +import { get, readable, writable } from "svelte/store" import { beforeEach, describe, expect, test, vi } from "vitest" import { createGuestUser, @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ import type { AuthService, AuthSessionState, } from "../../../lib/auth-service" -import { dispatchableStore } from "../../../lib/svelte-stores" +import { dispatchableStore, loginStateStore } from "../../../lib/svelte-stores" import type { User } from "../../../lib/simple-comment-types" vi.mock("../../../apiClient", () => ({ @@ -335,4 +335,21 @@ describe("Login auth-service delegation", () => { expect(loginSource).not.toMatch(new RegExp(`\\b${commandName}\\s*\\(`)) }) }) + + test("publishes loginStateStore from observed auth-service runtime state", async () => { + renderLogin({ + authService: createAuthServiceStub({ + snapshot: { state: "loggedIn", nextEvents: ["LOGOUT"] }, + }), + }) + + await waitFor(() => { + expect(get(loginStateStore)).toEqual( + expect.objectContaining({ + state: "loggedIn", + nextEvents: ["LOGOUT"], + }) + ) + }) + }) }) From 4c98a9a60ad83bd8499004dff0ad97583d3c2646 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:45:28 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 051/105] Thread auth service through widget --- docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md | 2 +- src/components/CommentDisplay.svelte | 4 ++++ src/components/CommentInput.svelte | 4 +++- src/components/CommentList.svelte | 3 +++ src/components/DiscussionDisplay.svelte | 4 ++++ src/components/Login.svelte | 2 ++ src/components/SimpleComment.svelte | 11 ++++++++++- 7 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md index 4b11ef17..f91f5d9b 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ Because `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` still depend on `loginSta - "Pass: tests show valid user actions call the appropriate `auth-service` methods, and local validation failures do not call service commands." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md`, Validation Strategy) - "Fail: `Login.svelte` still calls auth APIs directly for covered command paths, or component validation behavior is lost." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md`, Validation Strategy) -- [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Create a widget-scoped `AuthService` instance with `createAuthService()` in `src/components/SimpleComment.svelte`, then thread it explicitly through `src/components/DiscussionDisplay.svelte` and `src/components/CommentInput.svelte` into `src/components/Login.svelte`. +- [x] C01 `[frontend]` Create a widget-scoped `AuthService` instance with `createAuthService()` in `src/components/SimpleComment.svelte`, then thread it explicitly through `src/components/DiscussionDisplay.svelte` and `src/components/CommentInput.svelte` into `src/components/Login.svelte`. - Depends on: T01. - Validated by: `yarn typecheck`. - Trace: diff --git a/src/components/CommentDisplay.svelte b/src/components/CommentDisplay.svelte index 25994388..88694583 100644 --- a/src/components/CommentDisplay.svelte +++ b/src/components/CommentDisplay.svelte @@ -18,10 +18,12 @@ import OverflowMenuHorizontal from "carbon-icons-svelte/lib/OverflowMenuHorizontal.svelte" import ChevronLeft from "carbon-icons-svelte/lib/ChevronLeft.svelte" import { linear } from "svelte/easing" + import type { AuthService } from "../lib/auth-service" export let comment: (Comment & { isNew?: true }) | undefined = undefined export let showReply: string export let currentUser: User | undefined + export let authService: AuthService export let onDeleteSuccess export let onDeleteCommentClick export let onOpenCommentInput @@ -189,6 +191,7 @@ {/if} {#if showReply === comment.id && !isEditing} 0} - + {#if !currentUser || (commentText && commentText.length)}
{#if onCancel !== null} diff --git a/src/components/CommentList.svelte b/src/components/CommentList.svelte index 962e31a2..4ef863ac 100644 --- a/src/components/CommentList.svelte +++ b/src/components/CommentList.svelte @@ -10,8 +10,10 @@ import { commentDeleteMachine } from "../lib/commentDelete.xstate" import { deleteComment } from "../apiClient" import CommentDisplay from "./CommentDisplay.svelte" + import type { AuthService } from "../lib/auth-service" export let currentUser: User | undefined + export let authService: AuthService export let replies: (Comment & { isNew?: true; isDelete?: true })[] = [] export let depth: number = 0 export let showReply = "" @@ -105,6 +107,7 @@
    4}> {#each replies as comment} + import { onDestroy } from "svelte" + import { + createAuthService, + type AuthService, + } from "../lib/auth-service" import type { User } from "../lib/simple-comment-types" import { currentUserStore } from "../lib/svelte-stores" import DiscussionDisplay from "./DiscussionDisplay.svelte" @@ -7,10 +12,14 @@ export let title export let currentUser: User | undefined = undefined + const authService: AuthService = createAuthService({ initialUser: currentUser }) + currentUserStore.subscribe(value => (currentUser = value)) + + onDestroy(() => authService.destroy())
    - +
    From 2984d1e3cc7969ec1d00975e24af6d71a0d1d37d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:46:10 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 052/105] Expose auth runtime snapshot --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md | 2 +- src/lib/auth-service.ts | 24 ++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md index f91f5d9b..74a23081 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ Because `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` still depend on `loginSta - "`auth-service` remains widget-scoped; do not introduce a singleton service instance." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md`, Constraints) - "The new widget-scoped service seam composes cleanly through the current component tree." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md`, Validation Strategy) -- [ ] C02 `[frontend]` Extend `src/lib/auth-service.ts` with one readable auth-runtime snapshot store that exposes the service-owned machine state needed by `Login.svelte` to preserve the existing `loginStateStore` compatibility contract (`state`, `nextEvents`, and any required error context), without running a second interpreted auth machine inside the component. +- [x] C02 `[frontend]` Extend `src/lib/auth-service.ts` with one readable auth-runtime snapshot store that exposes the service-owned machine state needed by `Login.svelte` to preserve the existing `loginStateStore` compatibility contract (`state`, `nextEvents`, and any required error context), without running a second interpreted auth machine inside the component. - Depends on: T01. - Validated by: T01.08. - Trace: diff --git a/src/lib/auth-service.ts b/src/lib/auth-service.ts index fdf636c1..b2662740 100644 --- a/src/lib/auth-service.ts +++ b/src/lib/auth-service.ts @@ -42,6 +42,12 @@ type LoginMachineState = StateValueFrom export type AuthSessionState = LoginMachineState +export type AuthRuntimeSnapshot = { + state: AuthSessionState + nextEvents: string[] + error?: ServerResponse | string +} + export type AuthRequestReason = | "comment-submit" | "reply-submit" @@ -119,6 +125,7 @@ export type AuthService = { currentUser: Readable authRequest: Readable authOutcome: Readable + authRuntimeSnapshot: Readable init: () => Promise requestAuth: (reason: AuthRequestReason) => { requestId: string } clearAuthOutcome: (requestId?: string) => void @@ -156,12 +163,24 @@ export const createAuthService = ( const currentUserStore = writable(initialUser) const authRequestStore = writable({ status: "idle" }) const authOutcomeStore = writable({ status: "none" }) + const authRuntimeSnapshotStore = writable({ + state: initialLoginState as AuthSessionState, + nextEvents: loginMachine.initialState.nextEvents ?? [], + error: loginMachine.initialState.context.error, + }) authRuntime.onTransition(state => { if (typeof state.value !== "string") throw new Error("Expected a flat login machine state") - sessionStateStore.set(state.value as AuthSessionState) + const sessionState = state.value as AuthSessionState + + sessionStateStore.set(sessionState) + authRuntimeSnapshotStore.set({ + state: sessionState, + nextEvents: state.nextEvents ?? [], + error: state.context.error, + }) }) authRuntime.start() @@ -243,6 +262,9 @@ export const createAuthService = ( authOutcome: { subscribe: authOutcomeStore.subscribe, }, + authRuntimeSnapshot: { + subscribe: authRuntimeSnapshotStore.subscribe, + }, init: async () => { if (initialUser !== undefined) { currentUserStore.set(initialUser) From ef93f37acd5d35e09c84201afab4984841effaf8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 11:00:01 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 053/105] Delegate login auth commands to service --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md | 2 +- src/components/Login.svelte | 371 +++++++----------- .../components/Login.auth-service.test.ts | 12 +- .../frontend/components/Login.smoke.test.ts | 46 ++- 4 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 250 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md index 74a23081..32b1527f 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Checklist.md @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ Because `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` still depend on `loginSta - "The slice must not create two authoritative auth runtimes after wiring is complete." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md`, Constraints) - "Preserve compatibility with the current relay/store consumers by continuing to publish the existing `loginStateStore` shape during this slice." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice7Plan.md`, In Scope) -- [ ] C03 `[frontend]` Replace direct auth API calls and local auth-machine ownership in `src/components/Login.svelte` with `auth-service` command delegation and subscriptions to the auth-runtime snapshot store added in `C02`, then publish the existing `loginStateStore` compatibility shape from that observed service state while preserving component-local validation/UI behavior for unreworked consumers. +- [x] C03 `[frontend]` Replace direct auth API calls and local auth-machine ownership in `src/components/Login.svelte` with `auth-service` command delegation and subscriptions to the auth-runtime snapshot store added in `C02`, then publish the existing `loginStateStore` compatibility shape from that observed service state while preserving component-local validation/UI behavior for unreworked consumers. - Depends on: C01, C02. - Validated by: T01. - Trace: diff --git a/src/components/Login.svelte b/src/components/Login.svelte index 1363e8b3..c297f1cd 100644 --- a/src/components/Login.svelte +++ b/src/components/Login.svelte @@ -1,32 +1,16 @@
    From 12f6bf4e0dce4ef3e37dcf559a959138354b5700 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 12:44:43 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 070/105] Expect Login to stop auth store publish --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Checklist.md | 2 +- .../components/Login.auth-service.test.ts | 39 ++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Checklist.md index 528f5840..ce3a7e5c 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Checklist.md @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ This slice removes auth/session store publication from `Login.svelte` without re - "call the temporary bridge helper with the widget-scoped `authService`" (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) - "Keep the bridge widget-scoped and lifecycle-cleaned; do not introduce a singleton auth-service or a broad new event bus." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Plan.md`, In Scope) -- [ ] T02 `[tests]` Update `src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts` so `Login.svelte` is expected not to publish auth/session state to legacy stores while still publishing selected-tab UI state. +- [x] T02 `[tests]` Update `src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts` so `Login.svelte` is expected not to publish auth/session state to legacy stores while still publishing selected-tab UI state. - Depends on: C02. - Required coverage: - observed auth runtime state from `Login.svelte` does not update `loginStateStore` with `{ state, nextEvents }`. diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts index 2e9edc9d..2b1b428b 100644 --- a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts +++ b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ import { fireEvent, render, screen, waitFor } from "@testing-library/svelte" import { readFileSync } from "node:fs" import { resolve } from "node:path" import type { Writable } from "svelte/store" -import { get, readable, writable } from "svelte/store" +import { readable, writable } from "svelte/store" import { beforeEach, describe, expect, test, vi } from "vitest" import { createGuestUser, @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ import { import Login from "../../../components/Login.svelte" import type { AuthService, AuthSessionState } from "../../../lib/auth-service" import { dispatchableStore, loginStateStore } from "../../../lib/svelte-stores" -import type { User } from "../../../lib/simple-comment-types" +import { LoginTab, type User } from "../../../lib/simple-comment-types" vi.mock("../../../apiClient", () => ({ createGuestUser: vi.fn(), @@ -342,20 +342,39 @@ describe("Login auth-service delegation", () => { }) }) - test("publishes loginStateStore from observed auth-service runtime state", async () => { - renderLogin({ + test("does not publish auth session state to loginStateStore", async () => { + const setLoginState = vi.spyOn(loginStateStore, "set") + const { authService } = renderLogin({ authService: createAuthServiceStub({ snapshot: { state: "loggedIn", nextEvents: ["LOGOUT"] }, }), }) await waitFor(() => { - expect(get(loginStateStore)).toEqual( - expect.objectContaining({ - state: "loggedIn", - nextEvents: ["LOGOUT"], - }) - ) + expect(authService.init).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + }) + expect(setLoginState).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith({ + state: "loggedIn", + nextEvents: ["LOGOUT"], + }) + }) + + test("continues to publish selected tab state to loginStateStore", async () => { + const setLoginState = vi.spyOn(loginStateStore, "set") + + renderLogin({ + authService: createAuthServiceStub({ + snapshot: { + state: "loggedOut", + nextEvents: ["LOGIN", "SIGNUP", "GUEST"], + }, + }), + }) + + await fireEvent.click(await screen.findByRole("button", { name: "Login" })) + + await waitFor(() => { + expect(setLoginState).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ select: LoginTab.login }) }) }) }) From 6bb66b028365f4024b959948123bd8d8606b4050 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 12:45:10 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 071/105] Stop Login auth store publishing --- docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Checklist.md | 2 +- src/components/Login.svelte | 11 +---------- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Checklist.md index ce3a7e5c..3891d826 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Checklist.md @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ This slice removes auth/session store publication from `Login.svelte` without re - "`Login.svelte` may still publish selected-tab UI state because that is local UI state, not shared auth/session state" (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Plan.md`, Intent) - "`Login.svelte` still publishes selected-tab UI state for current unreworked consumers." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Plan.md`, Acceptance Criteria) -- [ ] C03 `[frontend]` Remove auth/session legacy-store publication from `src/components/Login.svelte` while preserving selected-tab publication and all form-local UI behavior. +- [x] C03 `[frontend]` Remove auth/session legacy-store publication from `src/components/Login.svelte` while preserving selected-tab publication and all form-local UI behavior. - Depends on: T02. - Validated by: T02 and `yarn typecheck`. - Trace: diff --git a/src/components/Login.svelte b/src/components/Login.svelte index c35ccfba..233fd92b 100644 --- a/src/components/Login.svelte +++ b/src/components/Login.svelte @@ -16,11 +16,7 @@ formatUserId, } from "../frontend-utilities" import InputField from "./low-level/InputField.svelte" - import { - currentUserStore, - dispatchableStore, - loginStateStore, - } from "../lib/svelte-stores" + import { dispatchableStore, loginStateStore } from "../lib/svelte-stores" import { isGuestId, isValidResult, @@ -173,8 +169,6 @@ isLoaded || (["loggedIn", "loggedOut", "error"] as string[]).includes(state) - loginStateStore.set({ state, nextEvents }) - switch (state) { case "loggedIn": updateStatusDisplay() @@ -538,14 +532,11 @@ }) onDestroy(() => { - currentUserStore.set(self) unsubscribeDispatchableStore() unsubscribeAuthRuntimeSnapshot() unsubscribeAuthCurrentUser() }) - $: currentUserStore.set(self) - $: loginStateStore.set({ select: selectedIndex }) $: { From 89e42f72dd4a5339eb1730fc3d265ebb26e7d407 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 12:55:02 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 072/105] Mark priority 5 item 8 complete --- docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md index 7b58e2a4..4bca797c 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md @@ -80,7 +80,15 @@ - Kept item 8 and the relay-removal work out of scope: `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` still rely on `loginStateStore` / `dispatchableStore`, so slice 7 preserves those contracts rather than removing them prematurely. - The existing slice-7 checklist should now be treated as pre-plan draft input and reconciled to the approved slice-7 plan before it is used for implementation. -- 8. [ ] Draft a slice for moving `Login.svelte` auth/session shared-store publication to a temporary widget-scoped `auth-service` bridge. +- 8. [x] Draft a slice for moving `Login.svelte` auth/session shared-store publication to a temporary widget-scoped `auth-service` bridge. + + Findings: + + - Created `docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Plan.md` and `docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Checklist.md` for the temporary bridge slice. + - Confirmed the slice keeps the bridge widget-scoped at the current composition root and avoids making `auth-service.ts` import legacy global stores directly. + - Confirmed all slice-8 checklist items are complete: fail-first bridge tests, bridge implementation, composition-root installation, `Login.svelte` tests, and removal of `Login.svelte` auth/session store publication. + - Confirmed `Login.svelte` still owns selected-tab UI publication only, preserving the current unreworked relay consumers for later slices. + - Validation evidence: `yarn run ci:local` passed after slice-8 implementation. - 9. [ ] Draft a slice for removing `dispatchableStore` / `loginStateStore` login relay behavior from `CommentInput.svelte`. From 73fd24a0467bf32ec693d4f8d0ef849cca00f769 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:08:38 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 073/105] Approve slice 9 login relay plan --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md | 132 ++++++++++ docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md | 229 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 361 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md create mode 100644 docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..4390079f --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ +# Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 9 Checklist + +Status: approved + +Classification: approved implementation checklist + +Source plan: `docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md` + +Parent plan: `docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md` (Item 9: Draft a slice for removing `dispatchableStore` / `loginStateStore` login relay behavior from `CommentInput.svelte`) + +## Scope Lock + +In scope: + +- remove `CommentInput.svelte` use of `dispatchableStore` for `loginIntent` +- remove `CommentInput.svelte` subscription to `loginStateStore` +- use the injected widget-scoped `authService` to request authentication before comment posting +- use request-scoped auth outcomes to continue or stop the comment-post flow +- preserve selected-tab-dependent button copy and guest-comment validation without `CommentInput.svelte` reading `loginStateStore` +- teach `Login.svelte` to consume pending auth requests from `authService` +- keep test-writing passes separate from production implementation passes + +Out of scope: + +- removing logout relay behavior from `SelfDisplay.svelte` +- removing `dispatchableStore` from `Login.svelte` for logout handling +- removing `loginStateStore` selected-tab publication from `Login.svelte` +- removing legacy store definitions +- removing the temporary Slice 8 auth bridge +- changing backend/API contracts +- choosing the final direct-props versus thin auth-service-backed store architecture + +## Slice Intent + +This slice removes the login-before-comment relay from `CommentInput.svelte`. After the slice, unauthenticated comment submission should request auth through the injected `authService`, `Login.svelte` should consume that pending request through the same service, and `CommentInput.svelte` should continue posting only after the matching auth request succeeds. The old `dispatchableStore` / `loginStateStore` login relay should no longer be part of `CommentInput.svelte`. + +## Atomic Checklist Items + +- [ ] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend unit tests proving pending auth requests produce request-scoped success and remote-error outcomes from `auth-service` auth commands. + - Depends on: none. + - Required coverage: + - a pending `requestAuth(...)` followed by successful `login(...)` publishes an `authOutcome` success with the matching request id and authenticated user. + - a pending `requestAuth(...)` followed by failed `login(...)` publishes an `authOutcome` remote error with the matching request id and returns `authRequest` to idle. + - pending request success and remote-error outcome behavior is covered for `signup(...)`. + - pending request success and remote-error outcome behavior is covered for `loginGuest(...)`. + - command behavior without a pending auth request preserves existing session/current-user behavior. + - Trace: + - "Ensure successful `login()`, `signup()`, and `loginGuest()` commands publish a matching `authOutcome` success when there is a pending auth request." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + - "Ensure failed remote auth commands publish a matching `authOutcome` remote error when there is a pending auth request." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + - "Pass: `auth-service` tests prove pending auth requests produce success and remote-error outcomes from auth commands." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Validation Strategy) + +- [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Implement request-scoped auth outcome publication in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` while preserving existing auth command behavior. + - Depends on: T01. + - Validated by: T01. + - Trace: + - "Preserve the existing public `AuthService` surface." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + - "Ensure completed or failed pending auth requests return `authRequest` to idle." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + - "Preserve existing session state, current-user publication, and persistence behavior." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + +- [ ] T02 `[tests]` Add fail-first `Login.svelte` component tests for pending `authService.authRequest` consumption and local validation failure reporting. + - Depends on: C01. + - Required coverage: + - a pending auth request triggers the currently selected auth form path without requiring `dispatchableStore.dispatch("loginIntent")`. + - a pending auth request with invalid local form data calls `authService.reportLocalValidationError(...)` with the pending request id. + - existing direct form-submit behavior remains intact. + - Trace: + - "Subscribe to `authService.authRequest`." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + - "When a pending request is observed, submit the currently selected auth form through the existing local submit functions." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + - "Pass: `Login.svelte` component tests prove pending auth requests trigger the selected auth form path and local validation failures are reported through `authService`." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Validation Strategy) + +- [ ] C02 `[frontend]` Implement `Login.svelte` consumption of pending `authService.authRequest` values without removing existing logout relay behavior. + - Depends on: T02. + - Validated by: T02. + - Trace: + - "Keep existing direct form-submit behavior intact for user-triggered form submission." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + - "Keep `dispatchableStore` logout handling intact for Slice 10." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + - "Do not move field state or validation out of `Login.svelte`." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + +- [ ] T03 `[tests]` Add fail-first `CommentInput.svelte` component tests for auth-service request/outcome flow and selected-tab behavior without legacy login stores. + - Depends on: C02. + - Required coverage: + - unauthenticated submit calls `authService.requestAuth(...)` instead of dispatching `loginIntent`. + - a matching success `authOutcome` continues the existing comment-post flow and calls `postComment(...)`. + - a matching failed or cancelled `authOutcome` leaves the comment form out of the processing login state. + - selected-tab-dependent button copy and guest-comment validation continue without `CommentInput.svelte` subscribing to `loginStateStore`. + - source guard proves `CommentInput.svelte` does not import `dispatchableStore` or `loginStateStore`. + - Trace: + - "Remove `dispatchableStore` import and `loginIntent` dispatch." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + - "Remove `loginStateStore` import and subscription." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + - "Pass: `CommentInput.svelte` component tests prove unauthenticated submission calls `authService.requestAuth(...)`, matching success continues posting, selected-tab behavior remains available, and legacy login stores are not used." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Validation Strategy) + +- [ ] C03 `[frontend]` Refactor `src/components/CommentInput.svelte` to use injected `authService` request/outcome flow and direct `Login.svelte` selected-tab binding instead of legacy login relay stores. + - Depends on: T03. + - Validated by: T03 and `yarn typecheck`. + - Trace: + - "Track the pending auth request id returned by `authService.requestAuth(...)`." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + - "Observe `authService.authOutcome`." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + - "Bind selected-tab UI state directly with `Login.svelte` so button copy and guest-comment validation keep working without `loginStateStore`." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + +## Behavior Slices + +### Slice 9A + +Goal: make auth-service request outcomes reliable enough for comment-submit auth flow. + +Items: T01, C01 + +Type: behavior + +### Slice 9B + +Goal: let `Login.svelte` consume widget-scoped pending auth requests without the login relay event. + +Items: T02, C02 + +Type: behavior + +### Slice 9C + +Goal: remove `CommentInput.svelte` dependency on legacy login relay stores while preserving comment-submit UX. + +Items: T03, C03 + +Type: behavior + +## Conformance QC (Checklist) + +- Missing from plan: none. +- Extra beyond plan: none; each item maps to the plan's file impacts, approach, and validation strategy. +- Atomicity fixes needed: none; each test item and implementation item can be checked and committed independently. +- Validation mapping gaps: none; each implementation item is validated by a preceding fail-first test item, plus typecheck where component typing changes. +- Pass/Fail: checklist achieves plan goals — **Pass**. diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e0298377 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md @@ -0,0 +1,229 @@ +# Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 9 Plan + +Status: approved + +Source backlog: `docs/RepoHealthImprovementBacklog.md` (`Priority 5`) + +Parent plan: `docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md` (Item 9) + +Related artifacts: + +- `docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Plan.md` +- `docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Checklist.md` + +## Goal + +Remove the login relay dependency from `CommentInput.svelte` so comment submission requests authentication through the widget-scoped `auth-service` instead of through `dispatchableStore` and `loginStateStore`. + +## Intent + +This slice is about letting `CommentInput.svelte` ask for authentication directly through the shared auth service. + +Today, when an unauthenticated user tries to submit a comment, `CommentInput.svelte` enters a login state, dispatches a `loginIntent` event through `dispatchableStore`, and waits for auth/session updates through `loginStateStore`. That keeps comment submission coupled to legacy global stores and to `Login.svelte` as a relay participant. + +After this slice, `CommentInput.svelte` should no longer import or use those legacy stores for login flow. Instead, it should: + +- request authentication through its injected `authService`, +- observe request-scoped auth outcomes from that same service, +- continue posting the comment after the matching auth request succeeds, +- keep selected-tab UI behavior working through a direct component binding with `Login.svelte`. + +In plain terms: when a comment needs login first, the comment form should talk to the auth service, not shout across the room through old shared stores. + +## In Scope + +- Remove `CommentInput.svelte` use of `dispatchableStore` for `loginIntent`. +- Remove `CommentInput.svelte` subscription to `loginStateStore`. +- Use the existing injected widget-scoped `authService` in `CommentInput.svelte` to create an auth request when comment submission requires login. +- Have `CommentInput.svelte` observe auth request outcomes from `authService` and continue its existing comment-post state machine after the matching request succeeds. +- Preserve the current behavior where the active `Login.svelte` tab determines comment-submit validation and button copy. +- Replace `CommentInput.svelte` selected-tab reads from `loginStateStore` with a narrow direct binding to `Login.svelte` selected-tab UI state. +- Teach `Login.svelte` to respond to pending `authService.authRequest` values by submitting the currently selected auth form, preserving the current outer comment-submit UX without using `dispatchableStore`. +- Use existing `auth-service` request/outcome primitives rather than introducing a new event bus or singleton store. +- Add fail-first tests before production changes. + +## Out of Scope + +- Removing logout relay behavior from `SelfDisplay.svelte`. +- Removing `dispatchableStore` from `Login.svelte` for logout handling. +- Removing `loginStateStore` selected-tab publication from `Login.svelte`. +- Removing `loginStateStore`, `dispatchableStore`, or `currentUserStore` definitions. +- Removing the temporary auth store bridge introduced in Slice 8. +- Redesigning `CommentInput.svelte` or `Login.svelte` layout. +- Splitting `Login.svelte` into smaller form components. +- Changing backend/API contracts. +- Choosing the final direct-props versus thin auth-service-backed store architecture for the whole widget. + +## Constraints + +- Keep `auth-service` widget-scoped; do not introduce a singleton auth-service import. +- Keep the implementation narrow to login-before-comment behavior. +- Keep test-writing passes separate from production implementation passes. +- Do not edit tests during implementation unless the implementation stops and explains why a test is wrong. +- Preserve existing comment-post behavior for already-authenticated users. +- Preserve existing form-local validation ownership in `Login.svelte`. + +## Current State + +At the start of this slice: + +- `CommentInput.svelte` receives `authService` as a prop. +- `CommentInput.svelte` imports `dispatchableStore` and dispatches `loginIntent` from its `loggingIn` state. +- `CommentInput.svelte` imports `loginStateStore` to observe auth state changes and selected-tab changes. +- `Login.svelte` still subscribes to `dispatchableStore` for `loginIntent` and `logoutIntent`. +- `Login.svelte` still publishes selected-tab UI state to `loginStateStore`. +- `auth-service.ts` exposes `authRequest`, `authOutcome`, `requestAuth`, `clearAuthOutcome`, `cancelAuthRequest`, and `reportLocalValidationError`, but request outcomes are not yet sufficient for `CommentInput.svelte` to complete the login-before-comment flow without legacy stores. + +## Detailed File Impact + +### `src/lib/auth-service.ts` + +Expected role: request/outcome coordinator for auth that was requested by another component. + +Expected changes: + +- Preserve the existing public `AuthService` surface. +- Ensure successful `login()`, `signup()`, and `loginGuest()` commands publish a matching `authOutcome` success when there is a pending auth request. +- Ensure failed remote auth commands publish a matching `authOutcome` remote error when there is a pending auth request. +- Ensure completed or failed pending auth requests return `authRequest` to idle. +- Preserve existing session state, current-user publication, and persistence behavior. + +Non-goals: + +- Do not add a new store or event bus. +- Do not make `auth-service.ts` import component stores. + +### `src/components/Login.svelte` + +Expected role: form-local UI and auth command delegate. + +Expected changes: + +- Subscribe to `authService.authRequest`. +- When a pending request is observed, submit the currently selected auth form through the existing local submit functions. +- When form-local validation fails during a pending request, report the validation failure through `authService.reportLocalValidationError(...)`. +- Keep existing direct form-submit behavior intact for user-triggered form submission. +- Keep `dispatchableStore` logout handling intact for Slice 10. +- Keep selected-tab publication to `loginStateStore` intact for now. + +Non-goals: + +- Do not remove logout relay handling. +- Do not move field state or validation out of `Login.svelte`. + +### `src/components/CommentInput.svelte` + +Expected role: comment form that requests auth through `authService` when needed. + +Expected changes: + +- Remove `dispatchableStore` import and `loginIntent` dispatch. +- Remove `loginStateStore` import and subscription. +- Track the pending auth request id returned by `authService.requestAuth(...)`. +- Observe `authService.authOutcome`. +- When the matching auth outcome succeeds, continue the existing state machine with `SUCCESS`. +- When the matching auth outcome fails or is cancelled, return the comment form to a non-processing state with the existing error path. +- Bind selected-tab UI state directly with `Login.svelte` so button copy and guest-comment validation keep working without `loginStateStore`. + +Non-goals: + +- Do not change `postComment(...)` ownership in this slice. +- Do not change the `commentPostMachine` unless implementation proves the current machine cannot represent the required request outcomes cleanly. + +### `src/lib/svelte-stores.ts` + +Expected role: unchanged legacy compatibility surface. + +Expected changes: + +- none. + +### `src/components/SelfDisplay.svelte` + +Expected role: unchanged logout relay consumer during Slice 9. + +Expected changes: + +- none. + +## Approach + +1. Add fail-first tests for `auth-service` request outcomes so request-scoped success and remote-error behavior is explicit before `CommentInput.svelte` depends on it. +2. Implement request-outcome publication in `auth-service.ts` without changing command ownership or persistence behavior. +3. Add fail-first component tests for `Login.svelte` consuming pending `authService.authRequest` values and reporting local validation failures through the service. +4. Implement the narrow `Login.svelte` request-consumption behavior. +5. Add fail-first component tests for `CommentInput.svelte` using `authService.requestAuth` / `authOutcome` instead of legacy stores. +6. Implement the `CommentInput.svelte` relay removal. +7. Stop there. Do not remove logout relay behavior, legacy store definitions, or the temporary auth bridge. + +## Risks and Mitigations + +- Risk: replacing the relay with `authService.authRequest` becomes just another event bus. + - Mitigation: keep the request channel request-scoped, widget-scoped, and tied to existing `authOutcome` semantics rather than adding a new generic dispatcher. + +- Risk: `CommentInput.svelte` loses selected-tab awareness when it stops reading `loginStateStore`. + - Mitigation: bind selected-tab UI state directly from the rendered `Login.svelte` instance. + +- Risk: local login validation failure leaves `CommentInput.svelte` stuck in a processing state. + - Mitigation: require `Login.svelte` to report pending-request validation failures through `authService.reportLocalValidationError(...)`. + +- Risk: this slice accidentally removes logout relay behavior. + - Mitigation: keep `SelfDisplay.svelte` and `Login.svelte` logout relay behavior out of scope. + +## Acceptance Criteria + +1. `CommentInput.svelte` no longer imports or uses `dispatchableStore`. +2. `CommentInput.svelte` no longer imports or subscribes to `loginStateStore`. +3. Unauthenticated comment submission creates an auth request through the injected `authService`. +4. A matching successful auth outcome causes the existing comment-post flow to continue. +5. A matching failed or cancelled auth outcome returns the comment form out of the processing login state through an existing error/reset path. +6. Comment submission for an already-authenticated user still posts without requesting auth. +7. Selected-tab-dependent button copy and guest-comment validation still work without `CommentInput.svelte` reading `loginStateStore`. +8. `Login.svelte` can consume pending auth requests from `authService` without relying on `dispatchableStore` login events. +9. Logout relay behavior remains unchanged for Slice 10. + +## Validation Strategy + +Required evidence types for Slice 9: + +- **Unit evidence** + - Pass: `auth-service` tests prove pending auth requests produce success and remote-error outcomes from auth commands. + - Fail: `CommentInput.svelte` must infer request completion from global legacy stores or non-request-scoped state. + +- **Component evidence** + - Pass: `Login.svelte` component tests prove pending auth requests trigger the selected auth form path and local validation failures are reported through `authService`. + - Fail: `Login.svelte` still requires `dispatchableStore` login events for comment-submit auth requests. + +- **Component evidence** + - Pass: `CommentInput.svelte` component tests prove unauthenticated submission calls `authService.requestAuth(...)`, matching success continues posting, selected-tab behavior remains available, and legacy login stores are not used. + - Fail: `CommentInput.svelte` still imports `dispatchableStore` or `loginStateStore` for login flow. + +- **Type/build evidence** + - Pass: frontend typecheck succeeds after removing legacy-store relay dependencies from `CommentInput.svelte`. + - Fail: component composition or auth-service request typing introduces type errors. + +## Open Questions / Assumptions + +- Assumption: using `authService.authRequest` / `authOutcome` is the intended narrow replacement for the legacy `dispatchableStore` login relay because those primitives already exist on the service. +- Assumption: direct selected-tab binding between `Login.svelte` and `CommentInput.svelte` is acceptable for this slice because selected-tab state is local UI state, not shared auth/session state. +- Assumption: `SelfDisplay.svelte` logout relay removal remains Slice 10 and should not be folded into this slice. +- Assumption: the temporary Slice 8 auth bridge remains until the cleanup slice after relay consumers are removed. + +## Scope Guard + +The following work is explicitly deferred and must not be folded into Slice 9 without a separate approved plan/checklist update: + +- Slice 10 logout relay removal from `SelfDisplay.svelte` +- Slice 11 temporary auth bridge cleanup +- Deleting `loginStateStore`, `currentUserStore`, or `dispatchableStore` +- Removing selected-tab publication from `Login.svelte` +- Redesigning the frontend auth architecture beyond the existing widget-scoped `authService` + +## Conformance QC (Plan) + +- Intent clarity issues: none; the plan states the user-facing goal and the narrow replacement path. +- Missing required sections: none. +- Ambiguities/assumptions to resolve: none blocking; assumptions are explicit and defer broader architecture decisions. +- Validation strategy gaps: none; unit, component, and type/build evidence are defined. +- Traceability readiness: ready; scope, approach, acceptance criteria, and validation statements are quoteable under stable headings. +- Pass/Fail: ready for checklist authoring — **Pass**. From c39c38c7833e807cc01fe3dd838d0956e36ff2be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:09:58 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 074/105] Add auth request outcome tests --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md | 2 +- .../auth-service.auth-request.test.ts | 244 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 245 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 src/tests/frontend/auth-service.auth-request.test.ts diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md index 4390079f..3c3b1605 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ This slice removes the login-before-comment relay from `CommentInput.svelte`. Af ## Atomic Checklist Items -- [ ] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend unit tests proving pending auth requests produce request-scoped success and remote-error outcomes from `auth-service` auth commands. +- [x] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first frontend unit tests proving pending auth requests produce request-scoped success and remote-error outcomes from `auth-service` auth commands. - Depends on: none. - Required coverage: - a pending `requestAuth(...)` followed by successful `login(...)` publishes an `authOutcome` success with the matching request id and authenticated user. diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/auth-service.auth-request.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/auth-service.auth-request.test.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000..fe224f85 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/tests/frontend/auth-service.auth-request.test.ts @@ -0,0 +1,244 @@ +import { beforeEach, describe, expect, jest, test } from "@jest/globals" +import { get } from "svelte/store" +import { + createGuestUser, + createUser, + getGuestToken, + postAuth, + verifySelf, + verifyUser, +} from "../../apiClient" +import { createAuthService } from "../../lib/auth-service" +import type { + AdminSafeUser, + AuthToken, + ServerResponse, + TokenClaim, +} from "../../lib/simple-comment-types" + +jest.mock("../../apiClient", () => ({ + createGuestUser: jest.fn(), + createUser: jest.fn(), + getGuestToken: jest.fn(), + postAuth: jest.fn(), + verifySelf: jest.fn(), + verifyUser: jest.fn(), +})) + +const mockCreateGuestUser = jest.mocked(createGuestUser) +const mockCreateUser = jest.mocked(createUser) +const mockGetGuestToken = jest.mocked(getGuestToken) +const mockPostAuth = jest.mocked(postAuth) +const mockVerifySelf = jest.mocked(verifySelf) +const mockVerifyUser = jest.mocked(verifyUser) + +const verifiedUser: AdminSafeUser = { + id: "alice", + name: "Alice Example", + email: "alice@example.com", + isAdmin: false, + isVerified: true, + challenge: "verified-user-challenge", +} + +const guestUser: AdminSafeUser = { + id: "00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000001", + name: "Guest Example", + email: "guest@example.com", + isAdmin: false, + isVerified: true, + challenge: "guest-challenge", +} + +const validAuthResponse: ServerResponse = { + status: 200, + ok: true, + statusText: "OK", + body: "auth-token", +} + +const validSignupResponse: ServerResponse = { + status: 201, + ok: true, + statusText: "Created", + body: verifiedUser, +} + +const validGuestTokenResponse: ServerResponse = { + status: 200, + ok: true, + statusText: "OK", + body: "guest-token", +} + +const validTokenClaimResponse: ServerResponse = { + status: 200, + ok: true, + statusText: "OK", + body: { user: guestUser.id, exp: 9999999999 }, +} + +const validGuestCreateResponse: ServerResponse = { + status: 201, + ok: true, + statusText: "Created", + body: guestUser, +} + +const remoteErrorResponse: ServerResponse = { + status: 401, + ok: false, + statusText: "Unauthorized", + body: "Bad credentials", +} + +const signupPayload = { + userId: "alice", + password: "password123", + displayName: "Alice Example", + email: "alice@example.com", +} + +const guestLoginPayload = { + displayName: "Guest Example", + email: "guest@example.com", +} + +const bootstrapLoggedOut = async () => { + const authService = createAuthService() + + mockVerifySelf.mockRejectedValue({ status: 401 }) + await authService.init() + + expect(get(authService.sessionState)).toBe("loggedOut") + expect(get(authService.currentUser)).toBeUndefined() + + jest.clearAllMocks() + + return authService +} + +const mockSuccessfulLogin = () => { + mockPostAuth.mockResolvedValue(validAuthResponse) + mockVerifySelf.mockResolvedValue(verifiedUser) +} + +const mockSuccessfulSignup = () => { + mockCreateUser.mockResolvedValue(validSignupResponse) + mockPostAuth.mockResolvedValue(validAuthResponse) + mockVerifySelf.mockResolvedValue(verifiedUser) +} + +const mockSuccessfulGuestLogin = () => { + mockGetGuestToken.mockResolvedValue(validGuestTokenResponse) + mockVerifyUser.mockResolvedValue(validTokenClaimResponse) + mockCreateGuestUser.mockResolvedValue(validGuestCreateResponse) + mockVerifySelf.mockResolvedValue(guestUser) +} + +describe("auth-service auth requests", () => { + beforeEach(() => { + jest.clearAllMocks() + }) + + test("publishes matching success outcome for pending login request", async () => { + const authService = await bootstrapLoggedOut() + const { requestId } = authService.requestAuth("comment-submit") + + mockSuccessfulLogin() + + await authService.login({ userId: "alice", password: "password123" }) + + expect(get(authService.authRequest)).toEqual({ status: "idle" }) + expect(get(authService.authOutcome)).toEqual({ + status: "success", + user: verifiedUser, + requestId, + }) + }) + + test("publishes matching remote error outcome for failed pending login request", async () => { + const authService = await bootstrapLoggedOut() + const { requestId } = authService.requestAuth("comment-submit") + + mockPostAuth.mockRejectedValue(remoteErrorResponse) + + await authService.login({ userId: "alice", password: "wrong-password" }) + + expect(get(authService.authRequest)).toEqual({ status: "idle" }) + expect(get(authService.authOutcome)).toEqual({ + status: "remoteError", + error: remoteErrorResponse, + requestId, + }) + }) + + test("publishes matching request outcome for pending signup request", async () => { + const authService = await bootstrapLoggedOut() + const { requestId } = authService.requestAuth("comment-submit") + + mockSuccessfulSignup() + + await authService.signup(signupPayload) + + expect(get(authService.authRequest)).toEqual({ status: "idle" }) + expect(get(authService.authOutcome)).toEqual({ + status: "success", + user: verifiedUser, + requestId, + }) + + authService.requestAuth("comment-submit") + mockCreateUser.mockRejectedValue(remoteErrorResponse) + + await authService.signup(signupPayload) + + expect(get(authService.authRequest)).toEqual({ status: "idle" }) + expect(get(authService.authOutcome)).toEqual({ + status: "remoteError", + error: remoteErrorResponse, + requestId: "auth-request-2", + }) + }) + + test("publishes matching request outcome for pending guest login request", async () => { + const authService = await bootstrapLoggedOut() + const { requestId } = authService.requestAuth("comment-submit") + + mockSuccessfulGuestLogin() + + await authService.loginGuest(guestLoginPayload) + + expect(get(authService.authRequest)).toEqual({ status: "idle" }) + expect(get(authService.authOutcome)).toEqual({ + status: "success", + user: guestUser, + requestId, + }) + + authService.requestAuth("comment-submit") + mockGetGuestToken.mockRejectedValue(remoteErrorResponse) + + await authService.loginGuest(guestLoginPayload) + + expect(get(authService.authRequest)).toEqual({ status: "idle" }) + expect(get(authService.authOutcome)).toEqual({ + status: "remoteError", + error: remoteErrorResponse, + requestId: "auth-request-2", + }) + }) + + test("preserves command behavior when no auth request is pending", async () => { + const authService = await bootstrapLoggedOut() + + mockSuccessfulLogin() + + await authService.login({ userId: "alice", password: "password123" }) + + expect(get(authService.authRequest)).toEqual({ status: "idle" }) + expect(get(authService.authOutcome)).toEqual({ status: "none" }) + expect(get(authService.sessionState)).toBe("loggedIn") + expect(get(authService.currentUser)).toEqual(verifiedUser) + }) +}) From c8baf79b539226141c2d15ad4fe8fc2ec85db93c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:10:59 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 075/105] Publish auth request outcomes --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md | 2 +- src/lib/auth-service.ts | 36 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md index 3c3b1605..36cc68ee 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ This slice removes the login-before-comment relay from `CommentInput.svelte`. Af - "Ensure failed remote auth commands publish a matching `authOutcome` remote error when there is a pending auth request." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) - "Pass: `auth-service` tests prove pending auth requests produce success and remote-error outcomes from auth commands." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Validation Strategy) -- [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Implement request-scoped auth outcome publication in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` while preserving existing auth command behavior. +- [x] C01 `[frontend]` Implement request-scoped auth outcome publication in `src/lib/auth-service.ts` while preserving existing auth command behavior. - Depends on: T01. - Validated by: T01. - Trace: diff --git a/src/lib/auth-service.ts b/src/lib/auth-service.ts index 75d2d316..c0dfcc2e 100644 --- a/src/lib/auth-service.ts +++ b/src/lib/auth-service.ts @@ -253,6 +253,34 @@ export const createAuthService = ( }) } + const completePendingAuthSuccess = (user: User): void => { + const activeRequest = getPendingRequest() + + if (!activeRequest) return + + authRequestStore.set({ status: "idle" }) + authOutcomeStore.set({ + status: "success", + user, + requestId: activeRequest.requestId, + }) + } + + const completePendingAuthRemoteError = ( + error: ServerResponse | string + ): void => { + const activeRequest = getPendingRequest() + + if (!activeRequest) return + + authRequestStore.set({ status: "idle" }) + authOutcomeStore.set({ + status: "remoteError", + error, + requestId: activeRequest.requestId, + }) + } + return { sessionState: { subscribe: sessionStateStore.subscribe, @@ -313,6 +341,7 @@ export const createAuthService = ( if (!authResponse.ok) { authRuntime.send({ type: "ERROR", error: authResponse }) + completePendingAuthRemoteError(authResponse) return } @@ -323,12 +352,14 @@ export const createAuthService = ( currentUserStore.set(verifiedUser) persistence.saveStoredUser(verifiedUser) authRuntime.send("SUCCESS") + completePendingAuthSuccess(verifiedUser) } catch (error) { currentUserStore.set(undefined) authRuntime.send({ type: "ERROR", error: error as ServerResponse | string, }) + completePendingAuthRemoteError(error as ServerResponse | string) } }, signup: async ({ userId, password, displayName, email }) => { @@ -345,6 +376,7 @@ export const createAuthService = ( if (!signupResponse.ok) { authRuntime.send({ type: "ERROR", error: signupResponse }) + completePendingAuthRemoteError(signupResponse) return } @@ -357,12 +389,14 @@ export const createAuthService = ( currentUserStore.set(verifiedUser) persistence.saveStoredUser(verifiedUser) authRuntime.send("SUCCESS") + completePendingAuthSuccess(verifiedUser) } catch (error) { currentUserStore.set(undefined) authRuntime.send({ type: "ERROR", error: error as ServerResponse | string, }) + completePendingAuthRemoteError(error as ServerResponse | string) } }, loginGuest: async ({ displayName, email, storedGuest }) => { @@ -437,12 +471,14 @@ export const createAuthService = ( currentUserStore.set(verifiedUser) persistence.saveStoredUser(verifiedUser) authRuntime.send("SUCCESS") + completePendingAuthSuccess(verifiedUser) } catch (error) { currentUserStore.set(undefined) authRuntime.send({ type: "ERROR", error: error as ServerResponse | string, }) + completePendingAuthRemoteError(error as ServerResponse | string) } }, logout: async () => { From 765a45899790fc83361fbdd959863e80e3da0b2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:12:11 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 076/105] Add Login auth request tests --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md | 2 +- .../components/Login.auth-service.test.ts | 52 ++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md index 36cc68ee..6309455b 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ This slice removes the login-before-comment relay from `CommentInput.svelte`. Af - "Ensure completed or failed pending auth requests return `authRequest` to idle." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) - "Preserve existing session state, current-user publication, and persistence behavior." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) -- [ ] T02 `[tests]` Add fail-first `Login.svelte` component tests for pending `authService.authRequest` consumption and local validation failure reporting. +- [x] T02 `[tests]` Add fail-first `Login.svelte` component tests for pending `authService.authRequest` consumption and local validation failure reporting. - Depends on: C01. - Required coverage: - a pending auth request triggers the currently selected auth form path without requiring `dispatchableStore.dispatch("loginIntent")`. diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts index 2b1b428b..ed1d58cb 100644 --- a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts +++ b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts @@ -15,7 +15,11 @@ import { verifyUser, } from "../../../apiClient" import Login from "../../../components/Login.svelte" -import type { AuthService, AuthSessionState } from "../../../lib/auth-service" +import type { + AuthRequestState, + AuthService, + AuthSessionState, +} from "../../../lib/auth-service" import { dispatchableStore, loginStateStore } from "../../../lib/svelte-stores" import { LoginTab, type User } from "../../../lib/simple-comment-types" @@ -51,6 +55,7 @@ type AuthRuntimeSnapshot = { } type AuthServiceUnderTest = AuthService & { + authRequest: Writable authRuntimeSnapshot: Writable } @@ -88,7 +93,7 @@ const createAuthServiceStub = ({ } = {}): AuthServiceUnderTest => ({ sessionState: readable(snapshot.state), currentUser: readable(currentUser), - authRequest: readable({ status: "idle" }), + authRequest: writable({ status: "idle" }), authOutcome: readable({ status: "none" }), authRuntimeSnapshot: writable(snapshot), init: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined), @@ -226,6 +231,49 @@ describe("Login auth-service delegation", () => { expect(mockCreateGuestUser).not.toHaveBeenCalled() }) + test("submits selected auth form when authService has a pending auth request", async () => { + const { authService } = renderLogin() + + await fireEvent.input(await screen.findByLabelText("Display Name"), { + target: { value: "Guest Example" }, + }) + await fireEvent.input(screen.getByLabelText("Email"), { + target: { value: "guest@example.com" }, + }) + + authService.authRequest.set({ + status: "pending", + reason: "comment-submit", + requestId: "request-1", + }) + + await waitFor(() => { + expect(authService.loginGuest).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ + displayName: "Guest Example", + email: "guest@example.com", + }) + }) + expect(authService.reportLocalValidationError).not.toHaveBeenCalled() + }) + + test("reports local validation failures for pending auth requests", async () => { + const { authService } = renderLogin() + + authService.authRequest.set({ + status: "pending", + reason: "comment-submit", + requestId: "request-1", + }) + + await waitFor(() => { + expect(authService.reportLocalValidationError).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ + message: "Display name is required.", + requestId: "request-1", + }) + }) + expect(authService.loginGuest).not.toHaveBeenCalled() + }) + test("omits stored guest identity from guest submissions", async () => { const storedGuest = { id: "guest-ab123-abc12", From d110a6f01861ff7d3c9f3c91c9f96e3beb4adc2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:21:38 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 077/105] Loosen Login validation assertion --- .../frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts index ed1d58cb..eca21f70 100644 --- a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts +++ b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts @@ -266,10 +266,12 @@ describe("Login auth-service delegation", () => { }) await waitFor(() => { - expect(authService.reportLocalValidationError).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ - message: "Display name is required.", - requestId: "request-1", - }) + expect(authService.reportLocalValidationError).toHaveBeenCalledWith( + expect.objectContaining({ + message: expect.stringContaining("Display name is required."), + requestId: "request-1", + }) + ) }) expect(authService.loginGuest).not.toHaveBeenCalled() }) From cd27830e03693cca245875cede2aa15df48c2d96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:22:08 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 078/105] Consume pending auth requests in Login --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md | 2 +- src/components/Login.svelte | 68 ++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md index 6309455b..924954e2 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ This slice removes the login-before-comment relay from `CommentInput.svelte`. Af - "When a pending request is observed, submit the currently selected auth form through the existing local submit functions." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) - "Pass: `Login.svelte` component tests prove pending auth requests trigger the selected auth form path and local validation failures are reported through `authService`." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Validation Strategy) -- [ ] C02 `[frontend]` Implement `Login.svelte` consumption of pending `authService.authRequest` values without removing existing logout relay behavior. +- [x] C02 `[frontend]` Implement `Login.svelte` consumption of pending `authService.authRequest` values without removing existing logout relay behavior. - Depends on: T02. - Validated by: T02. - Trace: diff --git a/src/components/Login.svelte b/src/components/Login.svelte index 233fd92b..ab313669 100644 --- a/src/components/Login.svelte +++ b/src/components/Login.svelte @@ -28,7 +28,11 @@ import PasswordInput from "./low-level/PasswordInput.svelte" import PasswordTwinInput from "./low-level/PasswordTwinInput.svelte" import Avatar from "./low-level/Avatar.svelte" - import type { AuthRuntimeSnapshot, AuthService } from "../lib/auth-service" + import type { + AuthRequestState, + AuthRuntimeSnapshot, + AuthService, + } from "../lib/auth-service" import { loadStoredUser } from "../lib/auth-persistence" const DISPLAY_NAME_HELPER_TEXT = "This is the name that others will see" @@ -39,6 +43,8 @@ export let currentUser: User | undefined export let authService: AuthService + type PendingAuthRequest = Extract + let self: User = currentUser let isError = false let isLoaded = false // Hide the component until isLoaded is true @@ -77,6 +83,8 @@ : parseInt(localStorage.getItem("simple_comment_login_tab")) let lastIdChecked + let pendingAuthRequestId: string | undefined = undefined + let handledAuthRequestId: string | undefined = undefined const updateStatusDisplay = (message = "", error = false) => { statusMessage = message @@ -86,6 +94,15 @@ const reportLocalError = (message: string) => updateStatusDisplay(message, true) + const reportPendingAuthValidationError = (message: string) => { + if (!pendingAuthRequestId) return + + authService.reportLocalValidationError({ + message, + requestId: pendingAuthRequestId, + }) + } + /** Note that usually these onClick events will not be used. Rather, "loginIntent" will be sent.*/ const onGuestClick = async (e: Event) => { e.preventDefault() @@ -109,6 +126,7 @@ if (!isValidResult(result)) { reportLocalError(result.reason) + reportPendingAuthValidationError(result.reason) return } @@ -128,6 +146,7 @@ if (!isValidResult(result)) { reportLocalError(result.reason) + reportPendingAuthValidationError(result.reason) return } @@ -149,6 +168,7 @@ if (!isValidResult(guestValidationResult)) { reportLocalError(guestValidationResult.reason) + reportPendingAuthValidationError(guestValidationResult.reason) return } @@ -193,8 +213,52 @@ self = user } + const submitSelectedAuthRequest = async ({ + requestId, + }: PendingAuthRequest) => { + if (handledAuthRequestId === requestId) return + + handledAuthRequestId = requestId + pendingAuthRequestId = requestId + + try { + switch (selectedIndex) { + case LoginTab.guest: + await submitGuestLogin() + break + + case LoginTab.signup: + await submitSignup() + break + + case LoginTab.login: + await submitLogin() + break + + default: + reportLocalError(`Unknown selectedTabIndex ${selectedIndex}`) + reportPendingAuthValidationError( + `Unknown selectedTabIndex ${selectedIndex}` + ) + break + } + } finally { + pendingAuthRequestId = undefined + } + } + + const handleAuthRequest = (authRequest: AuthRequestState) => { + if (authRequest.status === "idle") { + handledAuthRequestId = undefined + return + } + + submitSelectedAuthRequest(authRequest) + } + let unsubscribeAuthRuntimeSnapshot = () => undefined let unsubscribeAuthCurrentUser = () => undefined + let unsubscribeAuthRequest = () => undefined const hydrateStoredUserFields = () => { const storedUser = loadStoredUser() @@ -528,6 +592,7 @@ ) unsubscribeAuthCurrentUser = authService.currentUser.subscribe(handleAuthCurrentUser) + unsubscribeAuthRequest = authService.authRequest.subscribe(handleAuthRequest) authService.init() }) @@ -535,6 +600,7 @@ unsubscribeDispatchableStore() unsubscribeAuthRuntimeSnapshot() unsubscribeAuthCurrentUser() + unsubscribeAuthRequest() }) $: loginStateStore.set({ select: selectedIndex }) From 8b69be20d42a418c54578df19d9f3638cf9f8c4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:24:37 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 079/105] Add CommentInput auth request tests --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md | 2 +- .../CommentInput.auth-service.test.ts | 226 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 227 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 src/tests/frontend/components/CommentInput.auth-service.test.ts diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md index 924954e2..433a917e 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ This slice removes the login-before-comment relay from `CommentInput.svelte`. Af - "Keep `dispatchableStore` logout handling intact for Slice 10." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) - "Do not move field state or validation out of `Login.svelte`." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) -- [ ] T03 `[tests]` Add fail-first `CommentInput.svelte` component tests for auth-service request/outcome flow and selected-tab behavior without legacy login stores. +- [x] T03 `[tests]` Add fail-first `CommentInput.svelte` component tests for auth-service request/outcome flow and selected-tab behavior without legacy login stores. - Depends on: C02. - Required coverage: - unauthenticated submit calls `authService.requestAuth(...)` instead of dispatching `loginIntent`. diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/components/CommentInput.auth-service.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/components/CommentInput.auth-service.test.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000..ee930cb1 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/tests/frontend/components/CommentInput.auth-service.test.ts @@ -0,0 +1,226 @@ +import { fireEvent, render, screen, waitFor } from "@testing-library/svelte" +import { readFileSync } from "node:fs" +import { resolve } from "node:path" +import type { Writable } from "svelte/store" +import { readable, writable } from "svelte/store" +import { beforeEach, describe, expect, test, vi } from "vitest" +import { getOneUser, postComment } from "../../../apiClient" +import CommentInput from "../../../components/CommentInput.svelte" +import type { + AuthOutcomeState, + AuthRequestState, + AuthRuntimeSnapshot, + AuthService, + AuthSessionState, +} from "../../../lib/auth-service" +import { dispatchableStore } from "../../../lib/svelte-stores" +import type { + Comment, + ServerResponse, + User, +} from "../../../lib/simple-comment-types" + +vi.mock("../../../apiClient", () => ({ + getOneUser: vi.fn(), + postComment: vi.fn(), +})) + +vi.mock("../../../frontend-utilities", async importOriginal => { + const actual = + await importOriginal() + + return { + ...actual, + idIconDataUrl: vi.fn( + () => + "" + ), + } +}) + +type AuthServiceStub = AuthService & { + authOutcomeStore: Writable + authRequestStore: Writable +} + +const mockPostComment = vi.mocked(postComment) +const mockGetOneUser = vi.mocked(getOneUser) + +const defaultUser: User = { + id: "alice-user", + name: "Alice Example", + email: "alice@example.com", +} + +const postedComment: Comment = { + id: "comment-1", + parentId: "topic-1", + text: "Hello from the tests", + userId: "alice-user", + user: defaultUser, + dateCreated: new Date("2026-01-01T00:00:00.000Z"), +} + +const validPostCommentResponse: ServerResponse = { + status: 201, + ok: true, + statusText: "Created", + body: postedComment, +} + +const createAuthServiceStub = (): AuthServiceStub => { + const authOutcomeStore = writable({ status: "none" }) + const authRequestStore = writable({ status: "idle" }) + + return { + sessionState: readable("loggedOut"), + currentUser: readable(undefined), + authRequest: { subscribe: authRequestStore.subscribe }, + authOutcome: { subscribe: authOutcomeStore.subscribe }, + authRuntimeSnapshot: readable({ + state: "loggedOut", + nextEvents: ["LOGIN", "SIGNUP", "GUEST"], + }), + init: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined), + requestAuth: vi.fn(() => ({ requestId: "request-1" })), + clearAuthOutcome: vi.fn(), + cancelAuthRequest: vi.fn(), + reportLocalValidationError: vi.fn(), + login: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined), + signup: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined), + loginGuest: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined), + logout: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined), + destroy: vi.fn(), + authOutcomeStore, + authRequestStore, + } +} + +const renderCommentInput = ({ + authService = createAuthServiceStub(), + currentUser, +}: { + authService?: AuthServiceStub + currentUser?: User +} = {}) => { + render( + CommentInput as never, + { + authService, + commentId: "topic-1", + currentUser, + } as never + ) + + return { authService } +} + +const submitComment = async (text = "Hello from the tests") => { + await fireEvent.input(screen.getByPlaceholderText("Your comment"), { + target: { value: text }, + }) + await fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole("button", { name: "Add comment" })) +} + +describe("CommentInput auth-service delegation", () => { + beforeEach(() => { + globalThis.ResizeObserver = class ResizeObserver { + observe = vi.fn() + unobserve = vi.fn() + disconnect = vi.fn() + } as never + + Element.prototype.animate = + Element.prototype.animate ?? + vi.fn(() => ({ cancel: vi.fn(), finished: Promise.resolve() }) as never) + mockGetOneUser.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true, body: defaultUser } as never) + mockPostComment.mockResolvedValue(validPostCommentResponse) + }) + + test("requests auth through authService for unauthenticated comment submit", async () => { + const dispatchLoginIntent = vi.spyOn(dispatchableStore, "dispatch") + const { authService } = renderCommentInput() + + await submitComment() + + await waitFor(() => { + expect(authService.requestAuth).toHaveBeenCalledWith("comment-submit") + }) + expect(dispatchLoginIntent).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith("loginIntent") + }) + + test("continues posting after matching auth success outcome", async () => { + const { authService } = renderCommentInput() + + await submitComment() + await waitFor(() => { + expect(authService.requestAuth).toHaveBeenCalledWith("comment-submit") + }) + + authService.authOutcomeStore.set({ + status: "success", + user: defaultUser, + requestId: "request-1", + }) + + await waitFor(() => { + expect(mockPostComment).toHaveBeenCalledWith( + "topic-1", + "Hello from the tests" + ) + }) + }) + + test("leaves processing state after matching auth failure outcome", async () => { + const { authService } = renderCommentInput() + + await submitComment() + await waitFor(() => { + expect(authService.requestAuth).toHaveBeenCalledWith("comment-submit") + }) + + authService.authOutcomeStore.set({ + status: "remoteError", + error: "Login error", + requestId: "request-1", + }) + + await waitFor(() => { + expect(document.querySelector("form.comment-form")).not.toHaveClass( + "is-hidden" + ) + }) + }) + + test("preserves selected-tab dependent button copy", async () => { + renderCommentInput() + + await fireEvent.click(await screen.findByRole("button", { name: "Login" })) + + expect(screen.getByRole("button", { name: "Log in" })).toBeInTheDocument() + }) + + test("posts immediately for already authenticated users", async () => { + const { authService } = renderCommentInput({ currentUser: defaultUser }) + + await submitComment() + + await waitFor(() => { + expect(mockPostComment).toHaveBeenCalledWith( + "topic-1", + "Hello from the tests" + ) + }) + expect(authService.requestAuth).not.toHaveBeenCalled() + }) + + test("does not import legacy login relay stores", () => { + const commentInputSource = readFileSync( + resolve(process.cwd(), "src/components/CommentInput.svelte"), + "utf8" + ) + + expect(commentInputSource).not.toMatch(/\bdispatchableStore\b/) + expect(commentInputSource).not.toMatch(/\bloginStateStore\b/) + }) +}) From 7a63e7cc73d69a52d4623f1ec29ab9ad91e3338c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:26:36 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 080/105] Remove CommentInput login relay --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md | 2 +- src/components/CommentInput.svelte | 96 +++++++++++-------- src/components/Login.svelte | 7 +- 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md index 433a917e..24a6e7c8 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ This slice removes the login-before-comment relay from `CommentInput.svelte`. Af - "Remove `loginStateStore` import and subscription." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) - "Pass: `CommentInput.svelte` component tests prove unauthenticated submission calls `authService.requestAuth(...)`, matching success continues posting, selected-tab behavior remains available, and legacy login stores are not used." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md`, Validation Strategy) -- [ ] C03 `[frontend]` Refactor `src/components/CommentInput.svelte` to use injected `authService` request/outcome flow and direct `Login.svelte` selected-tab binding instead of legacy login relay stores. +- [x] C03 `[frontend]` Refactor `src/components/CommentInput.svelte` to use injected `authService` request/outcome flow and direct `Login.svelte` selected-tab binding instead of legacy login relay stores. - Depends on: T03. - Validated by: T03 and `yarn typecheck`. - Trace: diff --git a/src/components/CommentInput.svelte b/src/components/CommentInput.svelte index 185e2ffd..bc361124 100644 --- a/src/components/CommentInput.svelte +++ b/src/components/CommentInput.svelte @@ -10,12 +10,11 @@ import type { StateValue } from "xstate" import { commentPostMachine } from "../lib/commentPost.xstate" import { createEventDispatcher, onDestroy, onMount } from "svelte" - import { dispatchableStore, loginStateStore } from "../lib/svelte-stores" import { isResponseOk } from "../frontend-utilities" import { postComment } from "../apiClient" import { useMachine } from "@xstate/svelte" import { LoginTab } from "../lib/simple-comment-types" - import type { AuthService } from "../lib/auth-service" + import type { AuthOutcomeState, AuthService } from "../lib/auth-service" export let currentUser: User | undefined export let commentId: CommentId export let authService: AuthService @@ -25,11 +24,13 @@ let commentText = "" let buttonCopy: string - let loginStateValue let textareaRef let textAreaWidth = "100%" let textAreaHeight = "7rem" let loginTabSelect: LoginTab = LoginTab.guest + let pendingAuthRequestId: string | undefined = undefined + let authOutcomeUser: User | undefined = undefined + let effectiveCurrentUser: User | undefined = currentUser const { state, send } = useMachine(commentPostMachine) const dispatch = createEventDispatcher() @@ -44,7 +45,8 @@ send({ type: "ERROR", error: "Comment is required." }) return } - const hasCurrentUser = currentUser !== undefined + const hasCurrentUser = + currentUser !== undefined || authOutcomeUser !== undefined if (hasCurrentUser) send({ type: "SUCCESS" }) else send("LOG_IN") } @@ -56,45 +58,49 @@ } const loggingInStateHandler = () => { - dispatchableStore.dispatch("loginIntent") + if (pendingAuthRequestId) return + + const { requestId } = authService.requestAuth("comment-submit") + + pendingAuthRequestId = requestId } - const unsubscribeLoginState = loginStateStore.subscribe(loginState => { - const { state: stateValue, select } = loginState - - if (stateValue) { - loginStateValue = stateValue - const commentInputStateValue = $state.value - - //TODO: This state handling should be done via XState, probably by combining these state machines - switch (commentInputStateValue) { - case "loggingIn": - switch (loginStateValue) { - case "loggedIn": - setTimeout(() => send("SUCCESS"), 1) - break - case "error": - setTimeout(() => send({ type: "ERROR", error: "Login error" })) - break - case "loggedOut": - dispatchableStore.dispatch("loginIntent") - break - - default: - console.warn( - `Unhandled loginState '${loginStateValue}' in CommentInput` - ) - break - } - break + const handleAuthOutcome = (authOutcome: AuthOutcomeState) => { + if (!pendingAuthRequestId || authOutcome.status === "none") return + if (authOutcome.requestId !== pendingAuthRequestId) return - default: - break - } - } else if (select !== undefined) { - loginTabSelect = select + pendingAuthRequestId = undefined + + switch (authOutcome.status) { + case "success": + authOutcomeUser = authOutcome.user + authService.clearAuthOutcome(authOutcome.requestId) + send("SUCCESS") + break + + case "localValidationError": + authService.clearAuthOutcome(authOutcome.requestId) + send({ type: "ERROR", error: authOutcome.message }) + break + + case "remoteError": + authService.clearAuthOutcome(authOutcome.requestId) + send({ type: "ERROR", error: authOutcome.error }) + break + + case "cancelled": + authService.clearAuthOutcome(authOutcome.requestId) + send({ type: "ERROR", error: "Authentication cancelled" }) + break + + default: + break } - }) + } + + const unsubscribeAuthOutcome = authService.authOutcome.subscribe( + handleAuthOutcome + ) const postingStateHandler = async () => { try { @@ -172,7 +178,7 @@ }) onDestroy(() => { - unsubscribeLoginState() + unsubscribeAuthOutcome() }) $: { @@ -194,7 +200,13 @@ ["validating", "loggingIn", "posting", "deleting"] as StateValue[] ).includes($state.value) - $: buttonCopy = getButtonCopy(loginTabSelect, commentText, loginStateValue) + $: effectiveCurrentUser = currentUser ?? authOutcomeUser + + $: buttonCopy = getButtonCopy( + loginTabSelect, + commentText, + effectiveCurrentUser ? "loggedIn" : undefined + ) - + {#if !currentUser || (commentText && commentText.length)}
    {#if onCancel !== null} diff --git a/src/components/Login.svelte b/src/components/Login.svelte index ab313669..99a26a40 100644 --- a/src/components/Login.svelte +++ b/src/components/Login.svelte @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ export let currentUser: User | undefined export let authService: AuthService + export let selectedTab: LoginTab = LoginTab.guest type PendingAuthRequest = Extract @@ -76,11 +77,11 @@ let userPasswordMessage = undefined let userPasswordStatus = undefined - let selectedIndex = isNaN( + let selectedIndex: LoginTab = isNaN( parseInt(localStorage.getItem("simple_comment_login_tab")) ) ? LoginTab.guest - : parseInt(localStorage.getItem("simple_comment_login_tab")) + : (parseInt(localStorage.getItem("simple_comment_login_tab")) as LoginTab) let lastIdChecked let pendingAuthRequestId: string | undefined = undefined @@ -605,6 +606,8 @@ $: loginStateStore.set({ select: selectedIndex }) + $: selectedTab = selectedIndex + $: { if (userId.length < 3 && !userIdStatus) userIdHelperText = USER_ID_HELPER_TEXT From 77bb1d81fa1bb41090c5814a1f3e9d8df020f65f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:28:07 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 081/105] Fix CommentInput auth lint --- src/components/CommentInput.svelte | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/components/CommentInput.svelte b/src/components/CommentInput.svelte index bc361124..e9d1efec 100644 --- a/src/components/CommentInput.svelte +++ b/src/components/CommentInput.svelte @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ let loginTabSelect: LoginTab = LoginTab.guest let pendingAuthRequestId: string | undefined = undefined let authOutcomeUser: User | undefined = undefined - let effectiveCurrentUser: User | undefined = currentUser const { state, send } = useMachine(commentPostMachine) const dispatch = createEventDispatcher() @@ -200,12 +199,10 @@ ["validating", "loggingIn", "posting", "deleting"] as StateValue[] ).includes($state.value) - $: effectiveCurrentUser = currentUser ?? authOutcomeUser - $: buttonCopy = getButtonCopy( loginTabSelect, commentText, - effectiveCurrentUser ? "loggedIn" : undefined + currentUser ?? authOutcomeUser ? "loggedIn" : undefined ) From 6b12d5038e6ba4fc426e8ef81f4b5628b1483a79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:28:25 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 082/105] Mark priority 5 item 9 complete --- docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md | 12 +++++++++++- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md index 4bca797c..5b05c970 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md @@ -90,7 +90,17 @@ - Confirmed `Login.svelte` still owns selected-tab UI publication only, preserving the current unreworked relay consumers for later slices. - Validation evidence: `yarn run ci:local` passed after slice-8 implementation. -- 9. [ ] Draft a slice for removing `dispatchableStore` / `loginStateStore` login relay behavior from `CommentInput.svelte`. +- 9. [x] Draft a slice for removing `dispatchableStore` / `loginStateStore` login relay behavior from `CommentInput.svelte`. + + Findings: + + - Created and approved `docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md` and `docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md`. + - Confirmed the slice used the existing widget-scoped `authService.authRequest` / `authOutcome` seam rather than introducing a new event bus or singleton service. + - Implemented request-scoped auth outcomes in `auth-service` so pending comment-submit auth requests can complete with success or remote/local failure. + - Updated `Login.svelte` to consume pending auth requests from `authService` while preserving form-local validation, direct form submissions, selected-tab publication, and the existing logout relay for Slice 10. + - Removed `CommentInput.svelte` imports and use of `dispatchableStore` / `loginStateStore` for login-before-comment behavior. + - Preserved selected-tab-dependent button copy and guest-comment validation through direct `Login.svelte` selected-tab binding. + - Validation evidence: `yarn run ci:local` passed after Slice 9 implementation. - 10. [ ] Draft a slice for removing `dispatchableStore` / `loginStateStore` logout relay behavior from `SelfDisplay.svelte`. From 791f7f69453d233e17acab67cae8c3a19fc23028 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:05:55 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 083/105] Archive auth service slice 9 docs --- docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md | 2 +- docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md (99%) rename docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md (99%) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md similarity index 99% rename from docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md rename to docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md index 24a6e7c8..21f8749f 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md +++ b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 9 Checklist -Status: approved +Status: archived, completed Classification: approved implementation checklist diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md similarity index 99% rename from docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md rename to docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md index e0298377..69901dc7 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md +++ b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 9 Plan -Status: approved +Status: archived, completed Source backlog: `docs/RepoHealthImprovementBacklog.md` (`Priority 5`) From b55e9ca546adee0b02fe8a6ffe996bf1e012ade9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:57:14 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 084/105] Approve slice 10 logout relay plan --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md | 92 +++++++++ docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md | 184 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 276 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md create mode 100644 docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..bd234120 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ +# Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 10 Checklist + +Status: approved + +Classification: approved implementation checklist + +Source plan: `docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md` + +Parent plan: `docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md` (Item 10: Draft a slice for removing `dispatchableStore` / `loginStateStore` logout relay behavior from `SelfDisplay.svelte`) + +## Scope Lock + +In scope: + +- add an explicit `authService` prop to `SelfDisplay.svelte` +- pass the widget-scoped `authService` from `SimpleComment.svelte` to `SelfDisplay.svelte` +- remove `SelfDisplay.svelte` use of `dispatchableStore` +- remove `SelfDisplay.svelte` subscription to `loginStateStore` +- use `authService.authRuntimeSnapshot` for processing state and logout-button visibility +- call `authService.logout()` directly from `SelfDisplay.svelte` +- keep test-writing passes separate from production implementation passes + +Out of scope: + +- removing `dispatchableStore` from `Login.svelte` +- removing `loginStateStore` selected-tab publication from `Login.svelte` +- removing legacy store definitions +- removing the temporary Slice 8 auth bridge +- changing `CommentInput.svelte` +- changing backend/API contracts +- choosing the final direct-props versus thin auth-service-backed store architecture + +## Slice Intent + +This slice removes the logout relay from `SelfDisplay.svelte`. After the slice, the visible user panel should observe logout availability through the injected widget-scoped `authService` and call `authService.logout()` directly. `SelfDisplay.svelte` should no longer depend on `dispatchableStore` or `loginStateStore` for logout behavior. + +## Atomic Checklist Items + +- [ ] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first `SelfDisplay.svelte` component tests for auth-service-driven logout behavior in `src/tests/frontend/components/SelfDisplay.auth-service.test.ts`. + - Depends on: none. + - Required coverage: + - when `authService.authRuntimeSnapshot.nextEvents` includes `LOGOUT`, the logout button is visible for a current user. + - clicking the logout button calls `authService.logout()` directly instead of dispatching `logoutIntent`. + - when auth runtime state is processing, the skeleton display remains visible. + - source guard proves `SelfDisplay.svelte` does not import `dispatchableStore` or `loginStateStore`. + - Trace: + - "Add fail-first component tests proving `SelfDisplay.svelte` reads auth runtime state from `authService`, calls `authService.logout()` directly, and does not import legacy relay stores." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md`, Approach) + - "Pass: `SelfDisplay.svelte` component tests prove logout button visibility comes from `authService.authRuntimeSnapshot`, clicking Log out calls `authService.logout()`, and legacy relay stores are not imported." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md`, Validation Strategy) + - "Clicking the logout button calls `authService.logout()` directly." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md`, Acceptance Criteria) + +- [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Refactor `src/components/SelfDisplay.svelte` to use injected `authService` runtime state and direct `authService.logout()` instead of legacy logout relay stores. + - Depends on: T01. + - Validated by: T01. + - Trace: + - "add `export let authService: AuthService`" (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + - "subscribe to `authService.authRuntimeSnapshot`" (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + - "call `authService.logout()` directly in `onLogoutClick`" (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + - "remove `dispatchableStore` and `loginStateStore` imports." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + +- [ ] C02 `[frontend]` Pass the widget-scoped `authService` from `src/components/SimpleComment.svelte` to `SelfDisplay.svelte`. + - Depends on: C01. + - Validated by: `yarn typecheck`. + - Trace: + - "Pass the existing widget-scoped `authService` from `SimpleComment.svelte` to `SelfDisplay.svelte`." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md`, In Scope) + - "pass `{authService}` to `SelfDisplay.svelte`." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + - "`SimpleComment.svelte` passes the widget-scoped `authService` to `SelfDisplay.svelte`." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md`, Acceptance Criteria) + +## Behavior Slices + +### Slice 10A + +Goal: prove and implement direct logout behavior in `SelfDisplay.svelte`. + +Items: T01, C01 + +Type: behavior + +### Slice 10B + +Goal: wire the composition root to provide the widget-scoped auth service to `SelfDisplay.svelte`. + +Items: C02 + +Type: mechanical + +## Conformance QC (Checklist) + +- Missing from plan: none. +- Extra beyond plan: none; each item maps to the plan's file impacts, approach, and validation strategy. +- Atomicity fixes needed: none; each item can be checked and committed independently. +- Validation mapping gaps: none; implementation items are covered by fail-first component tests or typecheck. +- Pass/Fail: checklist achieves plan goals — **Pass**. diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..cd7a93c9 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md @@ -0,0 +1,184 @@ +# Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 10 Plan + +Status: approved + +Source backlog: `docs/RepoHealthImprovementBacklog.md` (`Priority 5`) + +Parent plan: `docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md` (Item 10) + +Related artifacts: + +- `docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md` +- `docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Checklist.md` + +## Goal + +Remove the logout relay dependency from `SelfDisplay.svelte` so logout is triggered through the widget-scoped `auth-service` instead of through `dispatchableStore` and `loginStateStore`. + +## Intent + +This slice is about letting the visible user panel perform logout directly through the shared auth service. + +Today, `SelfDisplay.svelte` uses `loginStateStore` to decide whether auth is processing and whether logout is allowed. When the user clicks the logout button, it dispatches a `logoutIntent` event through `dispatchableStore`, and `Login.svelte` receives that event and calls `authService.logout()`. That keeps logout behavior coupled to a legacy global relay and to the login form component. + +After this slice, `SelfDisplay.svelte` should no longer import or use those legacy stores. It should receive the widget-scoped `authService`, observe auth runtime state from that service, and call `authService.logout()` directly when the user clicks Log out. + +In plain terms: the user panel should log out through the auth service, not ask the login form to do it by shouting through a shared store. + +## In Scope + +- Add an `authService` prop to `SelfDisplay.svelte`. +- Pass the existing widget-scoped `authService` from `SimpleComment.svelte` to `SelfDisplay.svelte`. +- Remove `SelfDisplay.svelte` imports and use of `dispatchableStore`. +- Remove `SelfDisplay.svelte` imports and subscription to `loginStateStore`. +- Have `SelfDisplay.svelte` observe `authService.authRuntimeSnapshot` for auth processing state and `nextEvents`. +- Have `SelfDisplay.svelte` call `authService.logout()` directly from the logout button. +- Preserve the current visible user display and skeleton/processing behavior. +- Add fail-first component tests before production changes. + +## Out of Scope + +- Removing `dispatchableStore` from `Login.svelte`. +- Removing `loginStateStore` selected-tab publication from `Login.svelte`. +- Removing `loginStateStore`, `dispatchableStore`, or `currentUserStore` definitions. +- Removing the temporary Slice 8 auth store bridge. +- Changing `CommentInput.svelte`. +- Changing backend/API contracts. +- Choosing the final direct-props versus thin auth-service-backed store architecture for the whole widget. + +## Constraints + +- Keep `auth-service` widget-scoped; do not introduce a singleton auth-service import. +- Keep the implementation narrow to `SelfDisplay.svelte` logout behavior and its composition-root prop wiring. +- Keep test-writing passes separate from production implementation passes. +- Do not edit tests during implementation unless the implementation stops and explains why a test is wrong. +- Preserve current behavior where the logout button is visible only when auth runtime state allows `LOGOUT`. + +## Current State + +At the start of this slice: + +- `SelfDisplay.svelte` receives `currentUser` as a prop. +- `SelfDisplay.svelte` imports `dispatchableStore` and dispatches `logoutIntent` from its logout button. +- `SelfDisplay.svelte` imports `loginStateStore` to observe `state` and `nextEvents`. +- `Login.svelte` still subscribes to `dispatchableStore` for `logoutIntent`. +- `SimpleComment.svelte` creates the widget-scoped `authService` but does not pass it to `SelfDisplay.svelte`. +- `auth-service.ts` already owns `logout()` and exposes `authRuntimeSnapshot`. + +## Detailed File Impact + +### `src/components/SelfDisplay.svelte` + +Expected role: user panel that observes auth state and delegates logout directly to `authService`. + +Expected changes: + +- add `export let authService: AuthService`, +- subscribe to `authService.authRuntimeSnapshot`, +- derive processing state from `authRuntimeSnapshot.state`, +- derive logout-button visibility from `authRuntimeSnapshot.nextEvents`, +- call `authService.logout()` directly in `onLogoutClick`, +- clean up the auth-service subscription in `onDestroy`, +- remove `dispatchableStore` and `loginStateStore` imports. + +Non-goals: + +- do not change avatar/user-display markup except as required by auth-service wiring. + +### `src/components/SimpleComment.svelte` + +Expected role: current composition root that owns and passes the widget-scoped auth service. + +Expected changes: + +- pass `{authService}` to `SelfDisplay.svelte`. + +Non-goals: + +- do not remove the temporary auth store bridge in this slice. + +### `src/components/Login.svelte` + +Expected role: unchanged during Slice 10. + +Expected changes: + +- no production changes expected. + +Non-goals: + +- do not remove the now-obsolete `logoutIntent` handler in this slice; leave dead relay cleanup to Slice 11. + +### `src/lib/svelte-stores.ts` + +Expected role: unchanged legacy compatibility surface. + +Expected changes: + +- none. + +## Approach + +1. Add fail-first component tests proving `SelfDisplay.svelte` reads auth runtime state from `authService`, calls `authService.logout()` directly, and does not import legacy relay stores. +2. Wire `SelfDisplay.svelte` to the injected auth service and remove legacy store usage. +3. Pass `authService` from `SimpleComment.svelte` to `SelfDisplay.svelte`. +4. Stop there. Do not remove the legacy store definitions, the Slice 8 bridge, or `Login.svelte` dead relay handling. + +## Risks and Mitigations + +- Risk: this slice quietly becomes the cleanup slice by deleting legacy stores or bridge code. + - Mitigation: keep all legacy-store deletion and bridge cleanup deferred to Slice 11. + +- Risk: logout button visibility changes because `SelfDisplay.svelte` observes auth-service state instead of `loginStateStore`. + - Mitigation: derive visibility from the same `nextEvents` shape already bridged from `authService.authRuntimeSnapshot`. + +- Risk: processing skeleton behavior changes unintentionally. + - Mitigation: preserve the existing processing-state vocabulary and cover it with component tests. + +## Acceptance Criteria + +1. `SelfDisplay.svelte` receives `authService` as an explicit prop. +2. `SimpleComment.svelte` passes the widget-scoped `authService` to `SelfDisplay.svelte`. +3. `SelfDisplay.svelte` no longer imports or uses `dispatchableStore`. +4. `SelfDisplay.svelte` no longer imports or subscribes to `loginStateStore`. +5. Clicking the logout button calls `authService.logout()` directly. +6. Logout button visibility still follows whether auth runtime `nextEvents` includes `LOGOUT`. +7. Processing skeleton behavior remains based on auth runtime state. +8. `Login.svelte` logout relay cleanup is deferred to Slice 11. + +## Validation Strategy + +Required evidence types for Slice 10: + +- **Component evidence** + - Pass: `SelfDisplay.svelte` component tests prove logout button visibility comes from `authService.authRuntimeSnapshot`, clicking Log out calls `authService.logout()`, and legacy relay stores are not imported. + - Fail: `SelfDisplay.svelte` still dispatches `logoutIntent` or reads `loginStateStore` for logout behavior. + +- **Type/build evidence** + - Pass: frontend typecheck succeeds after passing `authService` into `SelfDisplay.svelte`. + - Fail: component composition or auth-service prop typing introduces type errors. + +## Open Questions / Assumptions + +- Assumption: `SelfDisplay.svelte` should use `authService.authRuntimeSnapshot` directly rather than a new auth-state store, because the final direct-props versus thin-store architecture decision remains deferred. +- Assumption: leaving the obsolete `Login.svelte` logout relay listener in place until Slice 11 is acceptable because this slice only removes `SelfDisplay.svelte` as a relay producer/consumer. +- Assumption: the temporary Slice 8 auth bridge remains until Slice 11 cleanup. + +## Scope Guard + +The following work is explicitly deferred and must not be folded into Slice 10 without a separate approved plan/checklist update: + +- removing `dispatchableStore` handling from `Login.svelte`, +- deleting `loginStateStore`, `currentUserStore`, or `dispatchableStore`, +- removing the temporary Slice 8 auth bridge, +- changing `CommentInput.svelte`, +- redesigning the frontend auth architecture beyond explicit widget-scoped `authService` props. + +## Conformance QC (Plan) + +- Intent clarity issues: none; the plan states the user-facing goal and the narrow replacement path. +- Missing required sections: none. +- Ambiguities/assumptions to resolve: none blocking; cleanup work is explicitly deferred. +- Validation strategy gaps: none; component and type/build evidence are defined. +- Traceability readiness: ready; scope, acceptance criteria, and validation statements are quoteable under stable headings. +- Pass/Fail: ready for checklist authoring — **Pass**. From abe7e5b1252a4f651fdac4e49807aa2bb08b1e14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:58:10 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 085/105] Add SelfDisplay auth logout tests --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md | 2 +- .../SelfDisplay.auth-service.test.ts | 114 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 src/tests/frontend/components/SelfDisplay.auth-service.test.ts diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md index bd234120..d3c749a1 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ This slice removes the logout relay from `SelfDisplay.svelte`. After the slice, ## Atomic Checklist Items -- [ ] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first `SelfDisplay.svelte` component tests for auth-service-driven logout behavior in `src/tests/frontend/components/SelfDisplay.auth-service.test.ts`. +- [x] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first `SelfDisplay.svelte` component tests for auth-service-driven logout behavior in `src/tests/frontend/components/SelfDisplay.auth-service.test.ts`. - Depends on: none. - Required coverage: - when `authService.authRuntimeSnapshot.nextEvents` includes `LOGOUT`, the logout button is visible for a current user. diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/components/SelfDisplay.auth-service.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/components/SelfDisplay.auth-service.test.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b5df2808 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/tests/frontend/components/SelfDisplay.auth-service.test.ts @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@ +import { fireEvent, render, screen } from "@testing-library/svelte" +import { readFileSync } from "node:fs" +import { resolve } from "node:path" +import { readable, writable } from "svelte/store" +import { describe, expect, test, vi } from "vitest" +import SelfDisplay from "../../../components/SelfDisplay.svelte" +import type { + AuthRuntimeSnapshot, + AuthService, + AuthSessionState, +} from "../../../lib/auth-service" +import { dispatchableStore } from "../../../lib/svelte-stores" +import type { User } from "../../../lib/simple-comment-types" + +vi.mock("../../../frontend-utilities", async importOriginal => { + const actual = + await importOriginal() + + return { + ...actual, + idIconDataUrl: vi.fn( + () => + "" + ), + } +}) + +const defaultUser: User = { + id: "alice-user", + name: "Alice Example", + email: "alice@example.com", +} + +const createAuthServiceStub = ( + snapshot: AuthRuntimeSnapshot = { + state: "loggedIn", + nextEvents: ["LOGOUT"], + } +): AuthService => ({ + sessionState: readable(snapshot.state), + currentUser: readable(defaultUser), + authRequest: readable({ status: "idle" }), + authOutcome: readable({ status: "none" }), + authRuntimeSnapshot: writable(snapshot), + init: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined), + requestAuth: vi.fn(() => ({ requestId: "request-1" })), + clearAuthOutcome: vi.fn(), + cancelAuthRequest: vi.fn(), + reportLocalValidationError: vi.fn(), + login: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined), + signup: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined), + loginGuest: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined), + logout: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined), + destroy: vi.fn(), +}) + +const renderSelfDisplay = ({ + authService = createAuthServiceStub(), + currentUser = defaultUser, +}: { + authService?: AuthService + currentUser?: User +} = {}) => { + render( + SelfDisplay as never, + { + authService, + currentUser, + } as never + ) + + return { authService } +} + +describe("SelfDisplay auth-service delegation", () => { + test("shows logout when authService runtime allows logout", async () => { + renderSelfDisplay() + + expect( + await screen.findByRole("button", { name: "Log out" }) + ).toBeInTheDocument() + }) + + test("calls authService.logout directly from the logout button", async () => { + const dispatchLogoutIntent = vi.spyOn(dispatchableStore, "dispatch") + const { authService } = renderSelfDisplay() + + await fireEvent.click(await screen.findByRole("button", { name: "Log out" })) + + expect(authService.logout).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) + expect(dispatchLogoutIntent).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith("logoutIntent") + }) + + test("keeps the skeleton visible while auth runtime is processing", () => { + renderSelfDisplay({ + authService: createAuthServiceStub({ + state: "loggingOut", + nextEvents: [], + }), + }) + + expect(document.querySelector("section.skeleton.self-display")).toBeVisible() + }) + + test("does not import legacy logout relay stores", () => { + const selfDisplaySource = readFileSync( + resolve(process.cwd(), "src/components/SelfDisplay.svelte"), + "utf8" + ) + + expect(selfDisplaySource).not.toMatch(/\bdispatchableStore\b/) + expect(selfDisplaySource).not.toMatch(/\bloginStateStore\b/) + }) +}) From bc4cfafdb17b4e2142cd4e3c99c30cb5316a4020 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:59:53 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 086/105] Use auth service logout in SelfDisplay --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md | 2 +- src/components/SelfDisplay.svelte | 39 ++++++++++++------- 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md index d3c749a1..5dd56560 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ This slice removes the logout relay from `SelfDisplay.svelte`. After the slice, - "Pass: `SelfDisplay.svelte` component tests prove logout button visibility comes from `authService.authRuntimeSnapshot`, clicking Log out calls `authService.logout()`, and legacy relay stores are not imported." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md`, Validation Strategy) - "Clicking the logout button calls `authService.logout()` directly." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md`, Acceptance Criteria) -- [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Refactor `src/components/SelfDisplay.svelte` to use injected `authService` runtime state and direct `authService.logout()` instead of legacy logout relay stores. +- [x] C01 `[frontend]` Refactor `src/components/SelfDisplay.svelte` to use injected `authService` runtime state and direct `authService.logout()` instead of legacy logout relay stores. - Depends on: T01. - Validated by: T01. - Trace: diff --git a/src/components/SelfDisplay.svelte b/src/components/SelfDisplay.svelte index 8ec8fd26..24066a5f 100644 --- a/src/components/SelfDisplay.svelte +++ b/src/components/SelfDisplay.svelte @@ -1,33 +1,42 @@ @@ -60,7 +69,7 @@

    {currentUser.email}

    - {#if loginStateNextEvents?.includes("LOGOUT")} + {#if authNextEvents.includes("LOGOUT")} {/if}
    From c25a50cfbb056a3380318b13d271b92ccbe2df5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:00:13 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 087/105] Pass auth service to SelfDisplay --- docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md | 2 +- src/components/SimpleComment.svelte | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md index 5dd56560..41a0cbf4 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ This slice removes the logout relay from `SelfDisplay.svelte`. After the slice, - "call `authService.logout()` directly in `onLogoutClick`" (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) - "remove `dispatchableStore` and `loginStateStore` imports." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) -- [ ] C02 `[frontend]` Pass the widget-scoped `authService` from `src/components/SimpleComment.svelte` to `SelfDisplay.svelte`. +- [x] C02 `[frontend]` Pass the widget-scoped `authService` from `src/components/SimpleComment.svelte` to `SelfDisplay.svelte`. - Depends on: C01. - Validated by: `yarn typecheck`. - Trace: diff --git a/src/components/SimpleComment.svelte b/src/components/SimpleComment.svelte index bcef40b2..3ec20d65 100644 --- a/src/components/SimpleComment.svelte +++ b/src/components/SimpleComment.svelte @@ -28,6 +28,6 @@
    - +
    From 9e4cde0228b8fe4bd1affef02198cc2708c39e09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:00:38 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 088/105] Format SelfDisplay auth tests --- .../frontend/components/SelfDisplay.auth-service.test.ts | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/components/SelfDisplay.auth-service.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/components/SelfDisplay.auth-service.test.ts index b5df2808..9a1b166a 100644 --- a/src/tests/frontend/components/SelfDisplay.auth-service.test.ts +++ b/src/tests/frontend/components/SelfDisplay.auth-service.test.ts @@ -85,7 +85,9 @@ describe("SelfDisplay auth-service delegation", () => { const dispatchLogoutIntent = vi.spyOn(dispatchableStore, "dispatch") const { authService } = renderSelfDisplay() - await fireEvent.click(await screen.findByRole("button", { name: "Log out" })) + await fireEvent.click( + await screen.findByRole("button", { name: "Log out" }) + ) expect(authService.logout).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) expect(dispatchLogoutIntent).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith("logoutIntent") @@ -99,7 +101,9 @@ describe("SelfDisplay auth-service delegation", () => { }), }) - expect(document.querySelector("section.skeleton.self-display")).toBeVisible() + expect( + document.querySelector("section.skeleton.self-display") + ).toBeVisible() }) test("does not import legacy logout relay stores", () => { From d3318c4eecb47387adc4d773e8216d0ab5297ece Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:01:54 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 089/105] Mark priority 5 item 10 complete --- docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md index 5b05c970..aff9953e 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md @@ -102,7 +102,16 @@ - Preserved selected-tab-dependent button copy and guest-comment validation through direct `Login.svelte` selected-tab binding. - Validation evidence: `yarn run ci:local` passed after Slice 9 implementation. -- 10. [ ] Draft a slice for removing `dispatchableStore` / `loginStateStore` logout relay behavior from `SelfDisplay.svelte`. +- 10. [x] Draft a slice for removing `dispatchableStore` / `loginStateStore` logout relay behavior from `SelfDisplay.svelte`. + + Findings: + + - Created and approved `docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md` and `docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md`. + - Confirmed the slice kept the logout-relay removal narrow: `SelfDisplay.svelte` now receives the widget-scoped `authService`, reads logout availability and processing state from `authService.authRuntimeSnapshot`, and calls `authService.logout()` directly. + - Confirmed `src/components/SimpleComment.svelte` passes the existing widget-scoped `authService` to `SelfDisplay.svelte`. + - Added `src/tests/frontend/components/SelfDisplay.auth-service.test.ts` component coverage for logout button visibility, direct `authService.logout()` delegation, processing skeleton visibility, and a source guard against legacy relay store imports. + - Kept out-of-scope cleanup deferred: `Login.svelte` logout relay handling, legacy store definitions, and the temporary auth-service bridge remain for the planned cleanup slice. + - Validation evidence: `yarn run ci:local` passed after Slice 10 implementation. - 11. [ ] Draft a cleanup slice for removing the temporary auth-service bridge and any legacy auth/session store paths made obsolete by slices 8-10. From 7390a9064e838cb1166bfd084bf29860d3717c4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:10:00 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 090/105] Archive completed auth service slices --- docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md | 0 docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md | 0 docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Checklist.md | 0 docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Plan.md | 0 4 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) rename docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md (100%) rename docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md (100%) rename docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Checklist.md (100%) rename docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Plan.md (100%) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md similarity index 100% rename from docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md rename to docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Checklist.md diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md similarity index 100% rename from docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md rename to docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Checklist.md b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Checklist.md similarity index 100% rename from docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Checklist.md rename to docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Checklist.md diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Plan.md b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Plan.md similarity index 100% rename from docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Plan.md rename to docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Plan.md From fc10865dd0a1bc68aa253577fe834071c6a13382 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:21:35 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 091/105] Side-quest: update Cypress and get cypress tests green. --- package.json | 2 +- yarn.lock | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-) diff --git a/package.json b/package.json index b004adb2..e6d23f5a 100644 --- a/package.json +++ b/package.json @@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ "vitest": "^3.2.4" }, "optionalDependencies": { - "cypress": "^12.17.4", "netlify-cli": "^24.0.1" }, "scripts": { @@ -69,6 +68,7 @@ "bcryptjs": "^2.4.3", "carbon-icons-svelte": "^13.10.0", "concurrently": "^7.1.0", + "cypress": "^15.14.1", "dotenv": "^16.0.0", "eslint": "^10.1.0", "eslint-plugin-svelte": "^3.16.0", diff --git a/yarn.lock b/yarn.lock index 3e72d70e..2d214b9c 100644 --- a/yarn.lock +++ b/yarn.lock @@ -1182,7 +1182,7 @@ dependencies: "@jridgewell/trace-mapping" "0.3.9" -"@cypress/request@2.88.12", "@cypress/request@^3.0.0": +"@cypress/request@^3.0.0", "@cypress/request@^3.0.10": version "3.0.0" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@cypress/request/-/request-3.0.0.tgz#7f58dfda087615ed4e6aab1b25fffe7630d6dd85" integrity sha512-GKFCqwZwMYmL3IBoNeR2MM1SnxRIGERsQOTWeQKoYBt2JLqcqiy7JXqO894FLrpjZYqGxW92MNwRH2BN56obdQ== @@ -4017,11 +4017,6 @@ resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@types/node/-/node-20.5.1.tgz#178d58ee7e4834152b0e8b4d30cbfab578b9bb30" integrity sha512-4tT2UrL5LBqDwoed9wZ6N3umC4Yhz3W3FloMmiiG4JwmUJWpie0c7lcnUNd4gtMKuDEO4wRVS8B6Xa0uMRsMKg== -"@types/node@^16.18.39": - version "16.18.41" - resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@types/node/-/node-16.18.41.tgz#61b14360fd3f7444b326ac3207c83005371e3f8a" - integrity sha512-YZJjn+Aaw0xihnpdImxI22jqGbp0DCgTFKRycygjGx/Y27NnWFJa5FJ7P+MRT3u07dogEeMVh70pWpbIQollTA== - "@types/node@^25.5.0": version "25.5.0" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@types/node/-/node-25.5.0.tgz#5c99f37c443d9ccc4985866913f1ed364217da31" @@ -4050,15 +4045,20 @@ integrity sha512-0kSuKjAS0TrGLJ0M/+8MaFkGsQhZpB6pxOmvS3K8FYI72K//YmdfoW9X2qPsAKh1mkwxGD5zib9s1FIFed6E8g== "@types/sizzle@^2.3.2": - version "2.3.3" - resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@types/sizzle/-/sizzle-2.3.3.tgz#ff5e2f1902969d305225a047c8a0fd5c915cebef" - integrity sha512-JYM8x9EGF163bEyhdJBpR2QX1R5naCJHC8ucJylJ3w9/CVBaskdQ8WqBf8MmQrd1kRvp/a4TS8HJ+bxzR7ZJYQ== + version "2.3.10" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@types/sizzle/-/sizzle-2.3.10.tgz#277a542aff6776d8a9b15f2ac682a663e3e94bbd" + integrity sha512-TC0dmN0K8YcWEAEfiPi5gJP14eJe30TTGjkvek3iM/1NdHHsdCA/Td6GvNndMOo/iSnIsZ4HuuhrYPDAmbxzww== "@types/stack-utils@^2.0.0": version "2.0.1" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@types/stack-utils/-/stack-utils-2.0.1.tgz#20f18294f797f2209b5f65c8e3b5c8e8261d127c" integrity sha512-Hl219/BT5fLAaz6NDkSuhzasy49dwQS/DSdu4MdggFB8zcXv7vflBI3xp7FEmkmdDkBUI2bPUNeMttp2knYdxw== +"@types/tmp@^0.2.3": + version "0.2.6" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@types/tmp/-/tmp-0.2.6.tgz#d785ee90c52d7cc020e249c948c36f7b32d1e217" + integrity sha512-chhaNf2oKHlRkDGt+tiKE2Z5aJ6qalm7Z9rlLdBwmOiAAf09YQvvoLXjWK4HWPF1xU/fqvMgfNfpVoBscA/tKA== + "@types/tough-cookie@*": version "4.0.2" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/@types/tough-cookie/-/tough-cookie-4.0.2.tgz#6286b4c7228d58ab7866d19716f3696e03a09397" @@ -5039,7 +5039,7 @@ async-sema@^3.1.1: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/async-sema/-/async-sema-3.1.1.tgz#e527c08758a0f8f6f9f15f799a173ff3c40ea808" integrity sha512-tLRNUXati5MFePdAk8dw7Qt7DpxPB60ofAgn8WRhW6a2rcimZnYBP9oxHiv0OHy+Wz7kPMG+t4LGdt31+4EmGg== -"async@>2.6.4 || ^2.6.4", async@^2.6.4, async@^3.2.0, async@^3.2.3, async@^3.2.4: +"async@>2.6.4 || ^2.6.4", async@^2.6.4, async@^3.2.3, async@^3.2.4: version "3.2.4" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/async/-/async-3.2.4.tgz#2d22e00f8cddeb5fde5dd33522b56d1cf569a81c" integrity sha512-iAB+JbDEGXhyIUavoDl9WP/Jj106Kz9DEn1DPgYw5ruDn0e3Wgi3sKFm55sASdGBNOQB8F59d9qQ7deqrHA8wQ== @@ -5473,7 +5473,7 @@ buffer-from@^1.0.0: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/buffer-from/-/buffer-from-1.1.2.tgz#2b146a6fd72e80b4f55d255f35ed59a3a9a41bd5" integrity sha512-E+XQCRwSbaaiChtv6k6Dwgc+bx+Bs6vuKJHHl5kox/BaKbhiXzqQOwK4cO22yElGp2OCmjwVhT3HmxgyPGnJfQ== -buffer@^5.2.1, buffer@^5.5.0, buffer@^5.6.0: +buffer@^5.2.1, buffer@^5.5.0, buffer@^5.7.1: version "5.7.1" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/buffer/-/buffer-5.7.1.tgz#ba62e7c13133053582197160851a8f648e99eed0" integrity sha512-EHcyIPBQ4BSGlvjB16k5KgAJ27CIsHY/2JBmCRReo48y9rQ3MaUzWX3KVlBa4U7MyX02HdVj0K7C3WaB3ju7FQ== @@ -5666,11 +5666,6 @@ check-error@^2.1.1: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/check-error/-/check-error-2.1.3.tgz#2427361117b70cca8dc89680ead32b157019caf5" integrity sha512-PAJdDJusoxnwm1VwW07VWwUN1sl7smmC3OKggvndJFadxxDRyFJBX/ggnu/KE4kQAB7a3Dp8f/YXC1FlUprWmA== -check-more-types@^2.24.0: - version "2.24.0" - resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/check-more-types/-/check-more-types-2.24.0.tgz#1420ffb10fd444dcfc79b43891bbfffd32a84600" - integrity sha512-Pj779qHxV2tuapviy1bSZNEL1maXr13bPYpsvSDB68HlYcYuhlDrmGd63i0JHMCLKzc7rUSNIrpdJlhVlNwrxA== - chokidar@4.0.3, chokidar@^4.0.1: version "4.0.3" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/chokidar/-/chokidar-4.0.3.tgz#7be37a4c03c9aee1ecfe862a4a23b2c70c205d30" @@ -5710,7 +5705,7 @@ chrome-trace-event@^1.0.2: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/chrome-trace-event/-/chrome-trace-event-1.0.3.tgz#1015eced4741e15d06664a957dbbf50d041e26ac" integrity sha512-p3KULyQg4S7NIHixdwbGX+nFHkoBiA4YQmyWtjb8XngSKV124nJmRysgAeujbUVb15vh+RvFUfCPqU7rXk+hZg== -ci-info@4.4.0: +ci-info@4.4.0, ci-info@^4.1.0: version "4.4.0" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/ci-info/-/ci-info-4.4.0.tgz#7d54eff9f54b45b62401c26032696eb59c8bd18c" integrity sha512-77PSwercCZU2Fc4sX94eF8k8Pxte6JAwL4/ICZLFjJLqegs7kCuAsqqj/70NQF6TvDpgFjkubQB2FW2ZZddvQg== @@ -5782,14 +5777,14 @@ cli-spinners@^2.5.0: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/cli-spinners/-/cli-spinners-2.9.2.tgz#1773a8f4b9c4d6ac31563df53b3fc1d79462fe41" integrity sha512-ywqV+5MmyL4E7ybXgKys4DugZbX0FC6LnwrhjuykIjnK9k8OQacQ7axGKnjDXWNhns0xot3bZI5h55H8yo9cJg== -cli-table3@~0.6.1: - version "0.6.3" - resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/cli-table3/-/cli-table3-0.6.3.tgz#61ab765aac156b52f222954ffc607a6f01dbeeb2" - integrity sha512-w5Jac5SykAeZJKntOxJCrm63Eg5/4dhMWIcuTbo9rpE+brgaSZo0RuNJZeOyMgsUdhDeojvgyQLmjI+K50ZGyg== +cli-table3@0.6.1: + version "0.6.1" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/cli-table3/-/cli-table3-0.6.1.tgz#36ce9b7af4847f288d3cdd081fbd09bf7bd237b8" + integrity sha512-w0q/enDHhPLq44ovMGdQeeDLvwxwavsJX7oQGYt/LrBlYsyaxyDnp6z3QzFut/6kLLKnlcUVJLrpB7KBfgG/RA== dependencies: string-width "^4.2.0" optionalDependencies: - "@colors/colors" "1.5.0" + colors "1.4.0" cli-truncate@^2.1.0: version "2.1.0" @@ -6155,19 +6150,19 @@ cross-env@^7.0.3: dependencies: cross-spawn "^7.0.1" -cross-spawn@^7.0.0, cross-spawn@^7.0.3: - version "7.0.3" - resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/cross-spawn/-/cross-spawn-7.0.3.tgz#f73a85b9d5d41d045551c177e2882d4ac85728a6" - integrity sha512-iRDPJKUPVEND7dHPO8rkbOnPpyDygcDFtWjpeWNCgy8WP2rXcxXL8TskReQl6OrB2G7+UJrags1q15Fudc7G6w== +cross-spawn@^7.0.0, cross-spawn@^7.0.1, cross-spawn@^7.0.6: + version "7.0.6" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/cross-spawn/-/cross-spawn-7.0.6.tgz#8a58fe78f00dcd70c370451759dfbfaf03e8ee9f" + integrity sha512-uV2QOWP2nWzsy2aMp8aRibhi9dlzF5Hgh5SHaB9OiTGEyDTiJJyx0uy51QXdyWbtAHNua4XJzUKca3OzKUd3vA== dependencies: path-key "^3.1.0" shebang-command "^2.0.0" which "^2.0.1" -cross-spawn@^7.0.1, cross-spawn@^7.0.6: - version "7.0.6" - resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/cross-spawn/-/cross-spawn-7.0.6.tgz#8a58fe78f00dcd70c370451759dfbfaf03e8ee9f" - integrity sha512-uV2QOWP2nWzsy2aMp8aRibhi9dlzF5Hgh5SHaB9OiTGEyDTiJJyx0uy51QXdyWbtAHNua4XJzUKca3OzKUd3vA== +cross-spawn@^7.0.3: + version "7.0.3" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/cross-spawn/-/cross-spawn-7.0.3.tgz#f73a85b9d5d41d045551c177e2882d4ac85728a6" + integrity sha512-iRDPJKUPVEND7dHPO8rkbOnPpyDygcDFtWjpeWNCgy8WP2rXcxXL8TskReQl6OrB2G7+UJrags1q15Fudc7G6w== dependencies: path-key "^3.1.0" shebang-command "^2.0.0" @@ -6256,25 +6251,25 @@ cyclist@^1.0.1: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/cyclist/-/cyclist-1.0.2.tgz#673b5f233bf34d8e602b949429f8171d9121bea3" integrity sha512-0sVXIohTfLqVIW3kb/0n6IiWF3Ifj5nm2XaSrLq2DI6fKIGa2fYAZdk917rUneaeLVpYfFcyXE2ft0fe3remsA== -cypress@^12.17.4: - version "12.17.4" - resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/cypress/-/cypress-12.17.4.tgz#b4dadf41673058493fa0d2362faa3da1f6ae2e6c" - integrity sha512-gAN8Pmns9MA5eCDFSDJXWKUpaL3IDd89N9TtIupjYnzLSmlpVr+ZR+vb4U/qaMp+lB6tBvAmt7504c3Z4RU5KQ== +cypress@^15.14.1: + version "15.14.1" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/cypress/-/cypress-15.14.1.tgz#396a6f0aa4f0e7fa98e714c1d435e9affd60cde0" + integrity sha512-AkuiHNSnmm0a+h/horcvbjmY6dWpCe1Ebp1R0LjMP5I6pjMaNA50Mw1YP/d07pLHJ/sV8FZoGecUWFCJ/Nifpw== dependencies: - "@cypress/request" "2.88.12" + "@cypress/request" "^3.0.10" "@cypress/xvfb" "^1.2.4" - "@types/node" "^16.18.39" "@types/sinonjs__fake-timers" "8.1.1" "@types/sizzle" "^2.3.2" + "@types/tmp" "^0.2.3" arch "^2.2.0" blob-util "^2.0.2" bluebird "^3.7.2" - buffer "^5.6.0" + buffer "^5.7.1" cachedir "^2.3.0" chalk "^4.1.0" - check-more-types "^2.24.0" + ci-info "^4.1.0" cli-cursor "^3.1.0" - cli-table3 "~0.6.1" + cli-table3 "0.6.1" commander "^6.2.1" common-tags "^1.8.0" dayjs "^1.10.4" @@ -6286,12 +6281,10 @@ cypress@^12.17.4: extract-zip "2.0.1" figures "^3.2.0" fs-extra "^9.1.0" - getos "^3.2.1" - is-ci "^3.0.0" + hasha "5.2.2" is-installed-globally "~0.4.0" - lazy-ass "^1.6.0" listr2 "^3.8.3" - lodash "^4.17.21" + lodash "^4.17.23" log-symbols "^4.0.0" minimist "^1.2.8" ospath "^1.2.2" @@ -6299,9 +6292,11 @@ cypress@^12.17.4: process "^0.11.10" proxy-from-env "1.0.0" request-progress "^3.0.0" - semver "^7.5.3" supports-color "^8.1.1" - tmp "~0.2.1" + systeminformation "^5.31.1" + tmp "~0.2.4" + tree-kill "1.2.2" + tslib "1.14.1" untildify "^4.0.0" yauzl "^2.10.0" @@ -6361,9 +6356,9 @@ date-fns@^2.29.1: "@babel/runtime" "^7.21.0" dayjs@^1.10.4: - version "1.11.9" - resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/dayjs/-/dayjs-1.11.9.tgz#9ca491933fadd0a60a2c19f6c237c03517d71d1a" - integrity sha512-QvzAURSbQ0pKdIye2txOzNaHmxtUBXerpY0FJsFXUMKbIZeFm5ht1LS/jFsrncjnmtv8HsG0W2g6c0zUjZWmpA== + version "1.11.20" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/dayjs/-/dayjs-1.11.20.tgz#88d919fd639dc991415da5f4cb6f1b6650811938" + integrity sha512-YbwwqR/uYpeoP4pu043q+LTDLFBLApUP6VxRihdfNTqu4ubqMlGDLd6ErXhEgsyvY0K6nCs7nggYumAN+9uEuQ== debug@4, debug@^4.1.0, debug@^4.1.1, debug@^4.3.1, debug@^4.3.2, debug@^4.3.4: version "4.3.4" @@ -8065,13 +8060,6 @@ get-tsconfig@4.13.7: dependencies: resolve-pkg-maps "^1.0.0" -getos@^3.2.1: - version "3.2.1" - resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/getos/-/getos-3.2.1.tgz#0134d1f4e00eb46144c5a9c0ac4dc087cbb27dc5" - integrity sha512-U56CfOK17OKgTVqozZjUKNdkfEv6jk5WISBJ8SHoagjE6L69zOwl3Z+O8myjY9MEW3i2HPWQBt/LTbCgcC973Q== - dependencies: - async "^3.2.0" - getpass@^0.1.1: version "0.1.7" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/getpass/-/getpass-0.1.7.tgz#5eff8e3e684d569ae4cb2b1282604e8ba62149fa" @@ -8337,6 +8325,14 @@ has@^1.0.3: dependencies: function-bind "^1.1.1" +hasha@5.2.2: + version "5.2.2" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/hasha/-/hasha-5.2.2.tgz#a48477989b3b327aea3c04f53096d816d97522a1" + integrity sha512-Hrp5vIK/xr5SkeN2onO32H0MgNZ0f17HRNH39WfL0SYUNOTZ5Lz1TJ8Pajo/87dYGEFlLMm7mIc/k/s6Bvz9HQ== + dependencies: + is-stream "^2.0.0" + type-fest "^0.8.0" + hasown@^2.0.2: version "2.0.2" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/hasown/-/hasown-2.0.2.tgz#003eaf91be7adc372e84ec59dc37252cedb80003" @@ -8798,13 +8794,6 @@ is-callable@^1.1.3, is-callable@^1.2.7: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/is-callable/-/is-callable-1.2.7.tgz#3bc2a85ea742d9e36205dcacdd72ca1fdc51b055" integrity sha512-1BC0BVFhS/p0qtw6enp8e+8OD0UrK0oFLztSjNzhcKA3WDuJxxAPXzPuPtKkjEY9UUoEWlX/8fgKeu2S8i9JTA== -is-ci@^3.0.0: - version "3.0.1" - resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/is-ci/-/is-ci-3.0.1.tgz#db6ecbed1bd659c43dac0f45661e7674103d1867" - integrity sha512-ZYvCgrefwqoQ6yTyYUbQu64HsITZ3NfKX1lzaEYdkTDcfKzzCI/wthRRYKkdjHKFVgNiXKAKm65Zo1pk2as/QQ== - dependencies: - ci-info "^3.2.0" - is-core-module@^2.13.0, is-core-module@^2.9.0: version "2.13.0" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/is-core-module/-/is-core-module-2.13.0.tgz#bb52aa6e2cbd49a30c2ba68c42bf3435ba6072db" @@ -9815,9 +9804,9 @@ jsonc-parser@^3.2.0: integrity sha512-HUgH65KyejrUFPvHFPbqOY0rsFip3Bo5wb4ngvdi1EpCYWUQDC5V+Y7mZws+DLkr4M//zQJoanu1SP+87Dv1oQ== jsonfile@^6.0.1: - version "6.1.0" - resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/jsonfile/-/jsonfile-6.1.0.tgz#bc55b2634793c679ec6403094eb13698a6ec0aae" - integrity sha512-5dgndWOriYSm5cnYaJNhalLNDKOqFwyDB/rr1E9ZsGciGvKPs8R2xYGCacuf3z6K1YKDz182fd+fY3cn3pMqXQ== + version "6.2.1" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/jsonfile/-/jsonfile-6.2.1.tgz#b6e31717f22cc37330b081ce0051ed5de53af2f6" + integrity sha512-zwOTdL3rFQ/lRdBnntKVOX6k5cKJwEc1HdilT71BWEu7J41gXIB2MRp+vxduPSwZJPWBxEzv4yH1wYLJGUHX4Q== dependencies: universalify "^2.0.0" optionalDependencies: @@ -9974,11 +9963,6 @@ latest-version@^9.0.0: dependencies: package-json "^10.0.0" -lazy-ass@^1.6.0: - version "1.6.0" - resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/lazy-ass/-/lazy-ass-1.6.0.tgz#7999655e8646c17f089fdd187d150d3324d54513" - integrity sha512-cc8oEVoctTvsFZ/Oje/kGnHbpWHYBe8IAJe4C0QNc3t8uM/0Y8+erSz/7Y1ALuXTEZTMvxXwO6YbX1ey3ujiZw== - lazystream@^1.0.0: version "1.0.1" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/lazystream/-/lazystream-1.0.1.tgz#494c831062f1f9408251ec44db1cba29242a2638" @@ -10174,6 +10158,11 @@ lodash@^4.17.15, lodash@^4.17.21: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/lodash/-/lodash-4.17.21.tgz#679591c564c3bffaae8454cf0b3df370c3d6911c" integrity sha512-v2kDEe57lecTulaDIuNTPy3Ry4gLGJ6Z1O3vE1krgXZNrsQ+LFTGHVxVjcXPs17LhbZVGedAJv8XZ1tvj5FvSg== +lodash@^4.17.23: + version "4.18.1" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/lodash/-/lodash-4.18.1.tgz#ff2b66c1f6326d59513de2407bf881439812771c" + integrity sha512-dMInicTPVE8d1e5otfwmmjlxkZoUpiVLwyeTdUsi/Caj/gfzzblBcCE5sRHV/AsjuCmxWrte2TNGSYuCeCq+0Q== + log-process-errors@^11.0.0: version "11.0.1" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/log-process-errors/-/log-process-errors-11.0.1.tgz#7f660758e0d1a717a81e1f005b0648edc78286ed" @@ -12401,14 +12390,14 @@ rxjs@^6.6.2: dependencies: tslib "^1.9.0" -rxjs@^7.0.0, rxjs@^7.5.1: +rxjs@^7.0.0: version "7.8.1" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/rxjs/-/rxjs-7.8.1.tgz#6f6f3d99ea8044291efd92e7c7fcf562c4057543" integrity sha512-AA3TVj+0A2iuIoQkWEK/tqFjBq2j+6PO6Y0zJcvzLAFhEFIO3HL0vls9hWLncZbAAbK0mar7oZ4V079I/qPMxg== dependencies: tslib "^2.1.0" -rxjs@^7.5.5: +rxjs@^7.5.1, rxjs@^7.5.5: version "7.8.2" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/rxjs/-/rxjs-7.8.2.tgz#955bc473ed8af11a002a2be52071bf475638607b" integrity sha512-dhKf903U/PQZY6boNNtAGdWbG85WAbjT/1xYoZIC7FAY0yWapOBQVsVrDl58W86//e1VpMNBtRV4MaXfdMySFA== @@ -13320,6 +13309,11 @@ system-architecture@^0.1.0: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/system-architecture/-/system-architecture-0.1.0.tgz#71012b3ac141427d97c67c56bc7921af6bff122d" integrity sha512-ulAk51I9UVUyJgxlv9M6lFot2WP3e7t8Kz9+IS6D4rVba1tR9kON+Ey69f+1R4Q8cd45Lod6a4IcJIxnzGc/zA== +systeminformation@^5.31.1: + version "5.31.5" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/systeminformation/-/systeminformation-5.31.5.tgz#e839fa6b40620a8bee010eb9d9d55c2d5f7042c8" + integrity sha512-5SyLdip4/3alxD4Kh+63bUQTJmu7YMfYQTC+koZy7X73HgNqZSD2P4wOZQWtUncvPvcEmnfIjCoygN4MRoEejQ== + tagged-tag@^1.0.0: version "1.0.0" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/tagged-tag/-/tagged-tag-1.0.0.tgz#a0b5917c2864cba54841495abfa3f6b13edcf4d6" @@ -13433,9 +13427,9 @@ thread-stream@^4.0.0: real-require "^0.2.0" throttleit@^1.0.0: - version "1.0.0" - resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/throttleit/-/throttleit-1.0.0.tgz#9e785836daf46743145a5984b6268d828528ac6c" - integrity sha512-rkTVqu6IjfQ/6+uNuuc3sZek4CEYxTJom3IktzgdSxcZqdARuebbA/f4QmAxMQIxqq9ZLEUkSYqvuk1I6VKq4g== + version "1.0.1" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/throttleit/-/throttleit-1.0.1.tgz#304ec51631c3b770c65c6c6f76938b384000f4d5" + integrity sha512-vDZpf9Chs9mAdfY046mcPt8fg5QSZr37hEH4TXYBnDF+izxgrbRGUAAaBvIk/fJm9aOFCGFd1EsNg5AZCbnQCQ== through2@^2.0.0, through2@~2.0.0: version "2.0.5" @@ -13490,13 +13484,18 @@ tmp-promise@^3.0.2, tmp-promise@^3.0.3: dependencies: tmp "^0.2.0" -tmp@^0.2.0, tmp@~0.2.1: +tmp@^0.2.0: version "0.2.1" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/tmp/-/tmp-0.2.1.tgz#8457fc3037dcf4719c251367a1af6500ee1ccf14" integrity sha512-76SUhtfqR2Ijn+xllcI5P1oyannHNHByD80W1q447gU3mp9G9PSpGdWmjUOHRDPiHYacIk66W7ubDTuPF3BEtQ== dependencies: rimraf "^3.0.0" +tmp@~0.2.4: + version "0.2.5" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/tmp/-/tmp-0.2.5.tgz#b06bcd23f0f3c8357b426891726d16015abfd8f8" + integrity sha512-voyz6MApa1rQGUxT3E+BK7/ROe8itEx7vD8/HEvt4xwXucvQ5G5oeEiHkmHZJuBO21RpOf+YYm9MOivj709jow== + tmpl@1.0.5: version "1.0.5" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/tmpl/-/tmpl-1.0.5.tgz#8683e0b902bb9c20c4f726e3c0b69f36518c07cc" @@ -13571,7 +13570,7 @@ tr46@~0.0.3: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/tr46/-/tr46-0.0.3.tgz#8184fd347dac9cdc185992f3a6622e14b9d9ab6a" integrity sha512-N3WMsuqV66lT30CrXNbEjx4GEwlow3v6rr4mCcv6prnfwhS01rkgyFdjPNBYd9br7LpXV1+Emh01fHnq2Gdgrw== -tree-kill@^1.2.2: +tree-kill@1.2.2, tree-kill@^1.2.2: version "1.2.2" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/tree-kill/-/tree-kill-1.2.2.tgz#4ca09a9092c88b73a7cdc5e8a01b507b0790a0cc" integrity sha512-L0Orpi8qGpRG//Nd+H90vFB+3iHnue1zSSGmNOOCh1GLJ7rUKVwV2HvijphGQS2UmhUZewS9VgvxYIdgr+fG1A== @@ -13656,7 +13655,7 @@ ts-node@^10.9.2: v8-compile-cache-lib "^3.0.1" yn "3.1.1" -tslib@^1.9.0: +tslib@1.14.1, tslib@^1.9.0: version "1.14.1" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/tslib/-/tslib-1.14.1.tgz#cf2d38bdc34a134bcaf1091c41f6619e2f672d00" integrity sha512-Xni35NKzjgMrwevysHTCArtLDpPvye8zV/0E4EyYn43P7/7qvQwPh9BGkHewbMulVntbigmcT7rdX3BNo9wRJg== @@ -13700,6 +13699,11 @@ type-fest@^0.21.3: resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/type-fest/-/type-fest-0.21.3.tgz#d260a24b0198436e133fa26a524a6d65fa3b2e37" integrity sha512-t0rzBq87m3fVcduHDUFhKmyyX+9eo6WQjZvf51Ea/M0Q7+T374Jp1aUiyUl0GKxp8M/OETVHSDvmkyPgvX+X2w== +type-fest@^0.8.0: + version "0.8.1" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/type-fest/-/type-fest-0.8.1.tgz#09e249ebde851d3b1e48d27c105444667f17b83d" + integrity sha512-4dbzIzqvjtgiM5rw1k5rEHtBANKmdudhGyBEajN01fEyhaAIhsoKNy6y7+IN93IfpFtwY9iqi7kD+xwKhQsNJA== + type-fest@^4.18.2, type-fest@^4.21.0, type-fest@^4.39.1, type-fest@^4.41.0, type-fest@^4.6.0: version "4.41.0" resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/type-fest/-/type-fest-4.41.0.tgz#6ae1c8e5731273c2bf1f58ad39cbae2c91a46c58" @@ -13897,9 +13901,9 @@ universalify@^0.2.0: integrity sha512-CJ1QgKmNg3CwvAv/kOFmtnEN05f0D/cn9QntgNOQlQF9dgvVTHj3t+8JPdjqawCHk7V/KA+fbUqzZ9XWhcqPUg== universalify@^2.0.0: - version "2.0.0" - resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/universalify/-/universalify-2.0.0.tgz#75a4984efedc4b08975c5aeb73f530d02df25717" - integrity sha512-hAZsKq7Yy11Zu1DE0OzWjw7nnLZmJZYTDZZyEFHZdUhV8FkH5MCfoU1XMaxXovpyW5nq5scPqq0ZDP9Zyl04oQ== + version "2.0.1" + resolved "https://registry.yarnpkg.com/universalify/-/universalify-2.0.1.tgz#168efc2180964e6386d061e094df61afe239b18d" + integrity sha512-gptHNQghINnc/vTGIk0SOFGFNXw7JVrlRUtConJRlvaw6DuX0wO5Jeko9sWrMBhh+PsYAZ7oXAiOnf/UKogyiw== unix-dgram@2.x: version "2.0.6" From 53a1ec9b860a4c73094a6024344dfc5becd3bcdc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:27:50 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 092/105] Fix Cypress frontend bootstrap --- package.json | 2 +- vite.config.ts | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/package.json b/package.json index e6d23f5a..113e719c 100644 --- a/package.json +++ b/package.json @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ "dev": "concurrently \"yarn run watch:backend\" \"NODE_ENV=development NODE_OPTIONS=\\\"--max-old-space-size=4096\\\" netlify dev\" --kill-others", "test": "yarn test:backend && yarn test:frontend", "test:backend": "jest --config jest.backend.config.ts", - "test:cypress": "cypress run", + "test:cypress": "cross-env ELECTRON_RUN_AS_NODE= cypress run", "test:frontend": "yarn test:frontend:unit && yarn test:frontend:components", "test:frontend:components": "cross-env TZ=UTC vitest --config vitest.components.config.ts run", "test:frontend:unit": "cross-env TZ=UTC jest --config jest.frontend.config.ts", diff --git a/vite.config.ts b/vite.config.ts index f7fbd77e..f5d1895f 100644 --- a/vite.config.ts +++ b/vite.config.ts @@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ export default defineConfig(async ({ mode }) => { }, }, ], + resolve: { + conditions: ["svelte", "browser", "module", "development|production"], + }, build: { outDir: distDir, emptyOutDir: true, From 296e22d5044b93eec29b5c350c956bb61127fab3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:33:17 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 093/105] Approve slice 11 cleanup plan --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md | 138 +++++++++ docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md | 267 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 405 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md create mode 100644 docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..9b6c14d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ +# Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 11 Checklist + +Status: approved + +Classification: approved implementation checklist + +Source plan: `docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md` + +Parent plan: `docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md` (Item 11: Draft a cleanup slice for removing the temporary auth-service bridge and any legacy auth/session store paths made obsolete by slices 8-10) + +## Scope Lock + +In scope: + +- remove `Login.svelte` use of `dispatchableStore` +- remove `Login.svelte` use of `loginStateStore` +- remove `Login.svelte` handling for `loginIntent` and `logoutIntent` +- keep `Login.svelte` selected-tab UI, selected-tab binding, and `simple_comment_login_tab` persistence +- remove `SimpleComment.svelte` use of `createAuthStoreBridge` +- remove `SimpleComment.svelte` use of `currentUserStore` +- subscribe `SimpleComment.svelte` directly to `authService.currentUser` +- remove migrated component-test imports of `dispatchableStore` that exist only for negative relay spies +- remove obsolete bridge/store unit tests +- delete `src/lib/auth-store-bridge.ts` +- delete `src/lib/svelte-stores.ts` after imports are removed +- keep test-writing passes separate from production implementation passes + +Out of scope: + +- changing `auth-service.ts` command behavior or public service API +- changing `CommentInput.svelte` auth request behavior +- changing `SelfDisplay.svelte` logout behavior +- removing `Login.svelte` selected-tab binding to `CommentInput.svelte` +- removing `simple_comment_login_tab` localStorage persistence +- deciding the broader direct-props versus thin auth-service-backed store architecture +- adding a new event bus, auth controller, `AuthRuntime.svelte`, or broad auth workflow module +- splitting `Login.svelte` into smaller form components + +## Slice Intent + +This slice removes the temporary migration scaffolding left after slices 8-10. After the slice, runtime auth UI should continue to work through the widget-scoped `authService`, but `dispatchableStore`, `loginStateStore`, `currentUserStore`, and `createAuthStoreBridge` should no longer be part of runtime or test code. + +## Atomic Checklist Items + +- [ ] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first cleanup/source-guard component tests and remove migrated component-test negative relay spies. + - Depends on: none. + - Required coverage: + - `Login.svelte` source must not import `dispatchableStore` or `loginStateStore`. + - `Login.svelte` source must not handle `loginIntent` or `logoutIntent`. + - `SimpleComment.svelte` source must not import or install `createAuthStoreBridge`. + - `SimpleComment.svelte` source must not import or subscribe to `currentUserStore`. + - `CommentInput.svelte` tests must keep positive `authService.requestAuth()` coverage without importing `dispatchableStore` for a negative spy. + - `SelfDisplay.svelte` tests must keep positive `authService.logout()` coverage without importing `dispatchableStore` for a negative spy. + - Existing direct auth-service delegation coverage must remain in place. + - Trace: + - "Add or revise fail-first component/source tests for the desired cleanup state." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, Approach) + - "Replace migrated component-test negative relay spies with source guards or direct auth-service assertions that do not import `dispatchableStore`." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, In Scope) + - "Do not keep `dispatchableStore` solely so tests can spy on events that no runtime component should dispatch." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, Constraints) + - "Keep positive behavior assertions against `authService` (`requestAuth()` for comments, `logout()` for self display)." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, DispatchableStore Test Caveat) + +- [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Remove dead legacy relay handling and selected-tab store publication from `src/components/Login.svelte`. + - Depends on: T01. + - Validated by: T01 and existing `Login.svelte` auth-service component tests. + - Trace: + - "Remove `Login.svelte` imports and use of `dispatchableStore`." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, In Scope) + - "Remove `Login.svelte` imports and use of `loginStateStore`." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, In Scope) + - "Remove `Login.svelte` handling for `loginIntent` and `logoutIntent`." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, In Scope) + - "keep `bind:selectedTab` support through the existing `selectedTab` export and `$: selectedTab = selectedIndex`" (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + - "keep `simple_comment_login_tab` localStorage persistence." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + +- [ ] C02 `[frontend]` Replace `src/components/SimpleComment.svelte` bridge/global-store plumbing with a direct `authService.currentUser` subscription. + - Depends on: T01. + - Validated by: T01 and `yarn typecheck`. + - Trace: + - "Remove `SimpleComment.svelte` installation of `createAuthStoreBridge`." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, In Scope) + - "Remove `SimpleComment.svelte` subscription to `currentUserStore`." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, In Scope) + - "Have `SimpleComment.svelte` subscribe directly to `authService.currentUser` to keep its local `currentUser` prop flow updated." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, In Scope) + - "`SimpleComment.svelte` subscribes directly to `authService.currentUser`, preserving the existing local `currentUser` prop flow without the temporary bridge." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, Risks and Mitigations) + +- [ ] T02 `[tests]` Remove obsolete bridge/store test dependencies before deleting their modules. + - Depends on: C01, C02. + - Required cleanup: + - remove `src/tests/frontend/auth-store-bridge.test.ts`, + - remove `src/tests/frontend/svelte-stores.test.ts`, + - remove `currentUserStore`, `loginStateStore`, and `dispatchableStore` imports/resets from `src/tests/frontend/components/vitest.setup.ts`, + - verify component tests still cover auth-service behavior without legacy store imports. + - Trace: + - "Remove or revise tests that exist only to exercise the deleted bridge/store modules." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, In Scope) + - "remove `src/tests/frontend/auth-store-bridge.test.ts`" (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + - "remove `src/tests/frontend/svelte-stores.test.ts`" (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + - "remove legacy store resets from component test setup once no component tests import those stores." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) + +- [ ] C03 `[cleanup]` Delete obsolete bridge/store modules and prove no runtime or test imports remain. + - Depends on: T02. + - Validated by: repository import search, `yarn typecheck`, and `yarn run ci:local`. + - Required cleanup: + - delete `src/lib/auth-store-bridge.ts`, + - delete `src/lib/svelte-stores.ts`, + - verify no runtime or test imports remain for `auth-store-bridge` or `svelte-stores`. + - Trace: + - "Delete the obsolete `src/lib/auth-store-bridge.ts` module." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, In Scope) + - "Delete obsolete `src/lib/svelte-stores.ts` relay/store definitions if no runtime or test imports remain." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, In Scope) + - "Pass: repository search finds no runtime or test imports of `src/lib/auth-store-bridge.ts` or `src/lib/svelte-stores.ts` after deletion." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, Validation Strategy) + - "Fail: deleted modules still have importers or must be kept alive for tests." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, Validation Strategy) + +## Behavior Slices + +### Slice 11A + +Goal: prove and remove the dead Login relay path. + +Items: T01, C01 + +Type: behavior + +### Slice 11B + +Goal: replace the temporary composition-root bridge with direct auth-service current-user observation. + +Items: C02 + +Type: behavior + +### Slice 11C + +Goal: delete obsolete bridge/store test scaffolding and modules after all imports are gone. + +Items: T02, C03 + +Type: mechanical + +## Conformance QC (Checklist) + +- Missing from plan: none. +- Extra beyond plan: none; each item maps to the plan's scope, file impacts, approach, acceptance criteria, or validation strategy. +- Atomicity fixes needed: none; each item can be checked and committed independently. +- Validation mapping gaps: none; implementation items are covered by source/component tests, import search, typecheck, and local CI. +- Pass/Fail: checklist achieves plan goals — **Pass**. diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..489b7009 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md @@ -0,0 +1,267 @@ +# Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 11 Plan + +Status: approved + +Source backlog: `docs/RepoHealthImprovementBacklog.md` (`Priority 5`) + +Parent plan: `docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md` (Item 11) + +Related artifacts: + +- `docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice8Plan.md` +- `docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice9Plan.md` +- `docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice10Plan.md` + +## Goal + +Remove the temporary auth-service bridge and the legacy auth/session relay stores made obsolete by slices 8-10. + +## Intent + +This slice is about finishing the cleanup after the careful auth-service extraction work. + +`CommentInput.svelte` no longer asks `Login.svelte` to log in through `dispatchableStore`, and `SelfDisplay.svelte` no longer asks `Login.svelte` to log out through `dispatchableStore`. Both now work through the widget-scoped `authService`. + +That leaves a few old support pieces behind: `Login.svelte` still listens for relay events that no runtime component sends anymore, `SimpleComment.svelte` still installs the temporary bridge from `authService` into legacy global stores, and tests still import `dispatchableStore` only to prove the old path is not called. + +After this slice, the widget should keep the same visible auth behavior, but the old relay path should be gone. `SimpleComment.svelte` should observe `authService.currentUser` directly, `Login.svelte` should no longer import or publish through legacy stores, and the obsolete bridge/store modules should be deleted. + +In plain terms: now that the components talk to the auth service directly, remove the scaffolding that helped us migrate there. + +## Motivation + +Slice 8 intentionally introduced `src/lib/auth-store-bridge.ts` as temporary migration scaffolding so existing consumers could keep working while ownership moved to `auth-service`. + +Slices 9 and 10 removed the two runtime consumers that needed that scaffolding: + +- `CommentInput.svelte` now requests auth through `authService`. +- `SelfDisplay.svelte` now reads logout state and performs logout through `authService`. + +Keeping the bridge and relay stores after that point creates avoidable confusion: future work could accidentally revive `dispatchableStore` / `loginStateStore`, and tests could keep the dead relay alive by importing `dispatchableStore` only for negative assertions. + +## In Scope + +- Remove `Login.svelte` imports and use of `dispatchableStore`. +- Remove `Login.svelte` imports and use of `loginStateStore`. +- Remove `Login.svelte` handling for `loginIntent` and `logoutIntent`. +- Preserve `Login.svelte` form-local state, validation, selected-tab UI, selected-tab binding, and `simple_comment_login_tab` localStorage behavior. +- Remove `SimpleComment.svelte` installation of `createAuthStoreBridge`. +- Remove `SimpleComment.svelte` subscription to `currentUserStore`. +- Have `SimpleComment.svelte` subscribe directly to `authService.currentUser` to keep its local `currentUser` prop flow updated. +- Delete the obsolete `src/lib/auth-store-bridge.ts` module. +- Delete obsolete `src/lib/svelte-stores.ts` relay/store definitions if no runtime or test imports remain. +- Remove or revise tests that exist only to exercise the deleted bridge/store modules. +- Replace migrated component-test negative relay spies with source guards or direct auth-service assertions that do not import `dispatchableStore`. + +## Out of Scope + +- Changing `auth-service.ts` command behavior or public service API. +- Changing backend/API contracts. +- Changing `CommentInput.svelte` auth request behavior. +- Changing `SelfDisplay.svelte` logout behavior. +- Removing `Login.svelte` selected-tab binding to `CommentInput.svelte`. +- Removing `simple_comment_login_tab` localStorage persistence. +- Deciding the broader direct-props versus thin auth-service-backed store architecture for future auth state. +- Adding a new event bus, auth controller, `AuthRuntime.svelte`, or broad auth workflow module. +- Splitting `Login.svelte` into smaller form components. + +## Constraints + +- Keep test-writing and production implementation passes separate. +- Tests must move from failing to passing through production code changes only. +- If implementation discovers an actual runtime consumer of `dispatchableStore`, `loginStateStore`, `currentUserStore`, or `createAuthStoreBridge` outside the expected cleanup surfaces, stop and revise the plan. +- Do not keep `dispatchableStore` solely so tests can spy on events that no runtime component should dispatch. +- Do not replace the old relay with another ad-hoc event bus. + +## Current State + +At the start of this slice: + +- `Login.svelte` imports `dispatchableStore` and `loginStateStore`. +- `Login.svelte` subscribes to `dispatchableStore` and handles `loginIntent` / `logoutIntent`. +- `Login.svelte` publishes selected-tab state through `loginStateStore`. +- `SimpleComment.svelte` imports and installs `createAuthStoreBridge(authService)`. +- `SimpleComment.svelte` subscribes to `currentUserStore` to keep local `currentUser` updated. +- `src/lib/auth-store-bridge.ts` publishes `authService.currentUser` and `authService.authRuntimeSnapshot` to legacy stores. +- `src/lib/svelte-stores.ts` defines `dispatchableStore`, `loginStateStore`, and `currentUserStore`. +- `CommentInput.svelte` and `SelfDisplay.svelte` no longer import or use those legacy stores. +- Some component tests still import `dispatchableStore` only to prove migrated components no longer dispatch legacy relay events. + +## Detailed File Impact + +### `src/components/Login.svelte` + +Expected role: form-local auth UI that delegates auth commands to `authService`. + +Expected changes: + +- remove the `dispatchableStore` / `loginStateStore` import, +- remove the `dispatchableStore.subscribe(...)` relay listener, +- remove `unsubscribeDispatchableStore()` from `onDestroy`, +- remove `$: loginStateStore.set({ select: selectedIndex })`, +- keep `bind:selectedTab` support through the existing `selectedTab` export and `$: selectedTab = selectedIndex`, +- keep `simple_comment_login_tab` localStorage persistence. + +### `src/components/SimpleComment.svelte` + +Expected role: widget composition root that owns the widget-scoped `authService`. + +Expected changes: + +- remove `createAuthStoreBridge` import and setup, +- remove `currentUserStore` import and subscription, +- subscribe directly to `authService.currentUser`, +- clean up that subscription in `onDestroy`, +- keep passing the same widget-scoped `authService` to child components. + +### `src/lib/auth-store-bridge.ts` + +Expected role: obsolete temporary migration helper. + +Expected changes: + +- delete the file after `SimpleComment.svelte` no longer imports it. + +### `src/lib/svelte-stores.ts` + +Expected role: obsolete relay/global-store module after bridge and relay consumers are removed. + +Expected changes: + +- delete the file after runtime and test imports are removed. + +### `src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts` + +Expected role: component coverage for `Login.svelte` auth-service delegation. + +Expected changes: + +- remove tests that assert legacy `dispatchableStore` relay behavior, +- remove tests that assert selected-tab publication to `loginStateStore`, +- add or keep source guards proving `Login.svelte` no longer imports legacy relay stores, +- preserve tests for direct auth-service delegation, form-local validation, selected-tab UI behavior, and selected-tab binding. + +### `src/tests/frontend/components/CommentInput.auth-service.test.ts` + +Expected role: component coverage for `CommentInput.svelte` auth-service auth requests. + +Expected changes: + +- remove the `dispatchableStore` import used only for negative spying, +- keep direct assertions that `authService.requestAuth()` is called, +- keep source guards proving `CommentInput.svelte` does not import legacy relay stores. + +### `src/tests/frontend/components/SelfDisplay.auth-service.test.ts` + +Expected role: component coverage for `SelfDisplay.svelte` auth-service logout. + +Expected changes: + +- remove the `dispatchableStore` import used only for negative spying, +- keep direct assertions that `authService.logout()` is called, +- keep source guards proving `SelfDisplay.svelte` does not import legacy relay stores. + +### Obsolete Bridge/Store Tests + +Expected role: removed along with deleted modules. + +Expected changes: + +- remove `src/tests/frontend/auth-store-bridge.test.ts`, +- remove `src/tests/frontend/svelte-stores.test.ts`, +- remove legacy store resets from component test setup once no component tests import those stores. + +## DispatchableStore Test Caveat + +Slice 10 left a test caveat: some migrated component tests still import `dispatchableStore` only to assert that `loginIntent` or `logoutIntent` is not dispatched. + +The minimal solution is not to keep `dispatchableStore` alive for those tests. Instead: + +1. Keep positive behavior assertions against `authService` (`requestAuth()` for comments, `logout()` for self display). +2. Keep source guards proving migrated runtime components do not import `dispatchableStore` or `loginStateStore`. +3. Remove the negative relay spies and then delete `dispatchableStore` with the rest of `src/lib/svelte-stores.ts`. + +This preserves regression coverage without retaining a dead event bus as test scaffolding. + +## Approach + +1. Add or revise fail-first component/source tests for the desired cleanup state. +2. Remove dead relay handling and legacy selected-tab publication from `Login.svelte`. +3. Replace `SimpleComment.svelte` bridge/global-store subscription with a direct `authService.currentUser` subscription. +4. Remove obsolete test dependencies on the soon-to-be-deleted bridge/store modules. +5. Delete the obsolete bridge/store modules. +6. Validate no runtime or test imports remain for `auth-store-bridge` or `svelte-stores`. + +## Risks and Mitigations + +- Risk: removing `currentUserStore` breaks current-user propagation from auth commands to discussion/comment/self-display components. + - Mitigation: `SimpleComment.svelte` subscribes directly to `authService.currentUser`, preserving the existing local `currentUser` prop flow without the temporary bridge. + +- Risk: deleting `loginStateStore` removes selected-tab coordination needed by `CommentInput.svelte`. + - Mitigation: `CommentInput.svelte` already uses `bind:selectedTab` on `Login.svelte`; keep that direct binding and preserve selected-tab UI/localStorage behavior. + +- Risk: deleting `dispatchableStore` hides a regression where components silently stop requesting auth/logout. + - Mitigation: rely on positive auth-service component assertions and source guards rather than negative relay spies. + +- Risk: cleanup grows into a frontend state architecture decision. + - Mitigation: use existing `authService` stores and explicit props only; do not introduce a new store or event bus. + +## Acceptance Criteria + +1. `Login.svelte` no longer imports `dispatchableStore` or `loginStateStore`. +2. `Login.svelte` no longer subscribes to or handles `loginIntent` / `logoutIntent`. +3. `Login.svelte` still preserves form-local validation, selected-tab UI, selected-tab binding, and `simple_comment_login_tab` localStorage behavior. +4. `SimpleComment.svelte` no longer imports or installs `createAuthStoreBridge`. +5. `SimpleComment.svelte` no longer imports or subscribes to `currentUserStore`. +6. `SimpleComment.svelte` directly subscribes to `authService.currentUser` and cleans up that subscription on destroy. +7. `src/lib/auth-store-bridge.ts` is removed. +8. `src/lib/svelte-stores.ts` is removed if no imports remain. +9. Migrated component tests do not import `dispatchableStore` solely for negative relay assertions. +10. Obsolete bridge/store unit tests are removed with the modules they covered. +11. No runtime or test imports remain for `auth-store-bridge` or `svelte-stores`. + +## Validation Strategy + +Required evidence types for Slice 11: + +- **Component/source evidence** + - Pass: component/source tests prove `Login.svelte`, `CommentInput.svelte`, `SelfDisplay.svelte`, and `SimpleComment.svelte` no longer import or use legacy auth relay stores or bridge plumbing. + - Fail: any migrated runtime component still imports `dispatchableStore`, `loginStateStore`, `currentUserStore`, or `createAuthStoreBridge`. + +- **Behavior evidence** + - Pass: existing component tests still prove `Login.svelte` delegates auth commands to `authService`, `CommentInput.svelte` requests auth through `authService`, and `SelfDisplay.svelte` logs out through `authService`. + - Fail: cleanup removes or weakens direct auth-service behavior coverage. + +- **Import cleanup evidence** + - Pass: repository search finds no runtime or test imports of `src/lib/auth-store-bridge.ts` or `src/lib/svelte-stores.ts` after deletion. + - Fail: deleted modules still have importers or must be kept alive for tests. + +- **Type/build evidence** + - Pass: `yarn typecheck` and `yarn run ci:local` pass. + - Fail: deleting the bridge/store modules causes unresolved imports, type errors, or test regressions. + +## Open Questions / Assumptions + +- Assumption: `bind:selectedTab` is now the only needed selected-tab coordination path between `Login.svelte` and `CommentInput.svelte`. +- Assumption: no runtime component outside the expected surfaces still depends on `dispatchableStore`, `loginStateStore`, `currentUserStore`, or `createAuthStoreBridge`. +- Assumption: deleting `src/lib/svelte-stores.ts` is acceptable once runtime and test imports are gone; if an unexpected non-auth consumer appears, stop and revise the plan. + +## Scope Guard + +The following work is explicitly deferred and must not be folded into Slice 11 without a separate approved plan/checklist update: + +- broader auth state architecture decisions, +- replacing explicit auth-service props with a new store, +- deleting selected-tab localStorage persistence, +- changing auth-service command semantics, +- changing comment submission behavior, +- splitting or redesigning `Login.svelte`. + +## Conformance QC (Plan) + +- Intent clarity issues: none; the plan states the cleanup goal and why the temporary bridge/stores are now obsolete. +- Missing required sections: none. +- Ambiguities/assumptions to resolve: none blocking; expected cleanup surfaces and stop conditions are explicit. +- Validation strategy gaps: none; source/component, behavior, import-cleanup, and type/build evidence are defined. +- Traceability readiness: ready; scope, acceptance criteria, and validation statements are quoteable under stable headings. +- Pass/Fail: ready for checklist authoring — **Pass**. From 3b3a4a23aee30def7ac4e68e7cf779c7037f59cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:34:49 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 094/105] Add auth relay cleanup tests --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md | 2 +- .../CommentInput.auth-service.test.ts | 3 - .../components/Login.auth-service.test.ts | 94 ++----------------- .../SelfDisplay.auth-service.test.ts | 3 - .../SimpleComment.auth-cleanup.test.ts | 17 ++++ 5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-) create mode 100644 src/tests/frontend/components/SimpleComment.auth-cleanup.test.ts diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md index 9b6c14d7..7b409ad7 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ This slice removes the temporary migration scaffolding left after slices 8-10. A ## Atomic Checklist Items -- [ ] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first cleanup/source-guard component tests and remove migrated component-test negative relay spies. +- [x] T01 `[tests]` Add fail-first cleanup/source-guard component tests and remove migrated component-test negative relay spies. - Depends on: none. - Required coverage: - `Login.svelte` source must not import `dispatchableStore` or `loginStateStore`. diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/components/CommentInput.auth-service.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/components/CommentInput.auth-service.test.ts index ee930cb1..21a1efc3 100644 --- a/src/tests/frontend/components/CommentInput.auth-service.test.ts +++ b/src/tests/frontend/components/CommentInput.auth-service.test.ts @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ import type { AuthService, AuthSessionState, } from "../../../lib/auth-service" -import { dispatchableStore } from "../../../lib/svelte-stores" import type { Comment, ServerResponse, @@ -138,7 +137,6 @@ describe("CommentInput auth-service delegation", () => { }) test("requests auth through authService for unauthenticated comment submit", async () => { - const dispatchLoginIntent = vi.spyOn(dispatchableStore, "dispatch") const { authService } = renderCommentInput() await submitComment() @@ -146,7 +144,6 @@ describe("CommentInput auth-service delegation", () => { await waitFor(() => { expect(authService.requestAuth).toHaveBeenCalledWith("comment-submit") }) - expect(dispatchLoginIntent).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith("loginIntent") }) test("continues posting after matching auth success outcome", async () => { diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts index eca21f70..d5f3661d 100644 --- a/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts +++ b/src/tests/frontend/components/Login.auth-service.test.ts @@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ import { beforeEach, describe, expect, test, vi } from "vitest" import { createGuestUser, createUser, - deleteAuth, getGuestToken, postAuth, updateUser, @@ -20,13 +19,11 @@ import type { AuthService, AuthSessionState, } from "../../../lib/auth-service" -import { dispatchableStore, loginStateStore } from "../../../lib/svelte-stores" -import { LoginTab, type User } from "../../../lib/simple-comment-types" +import type { User } from "../../../lib/simple-comment-types" vi.mock("../../../apiClient", () => ({ createGuestUser: vi.fn(), createUser: vi.fn(), - deleteAuth: vi.fn(), getGuestToken: vi.fn(), getOneUser: vi.fn(), postAuth: vi.fn(), @@ -62,7 +59,6 @@ type AuthServiceUnderTest = AuthService & { const mockVerifySelf = vi.mocked(verifySelf) const mockPostAuth = vi.mocked(postAuth) const mockCreateUser = vi.mocked(createUser) -const mockDeleteAuth = vi.mocked(deleteAuth) const mockGetGuestToken = vi.mocked(getGuestToken) const mockCreateGuestUser = vi.mocked(createGuestUser) const mockUpdateUser = vi.mocked(updateUser) @@ -78,12 +74,6 @@ const directAuthCommandNames = [ "deleteAuth", ] as const -const defaultUser: User = { - id: "alice-user", - name: "Alice Example", - email: "alice@example.com", -} - const createAuthServiceStub = ({ currentUser, snapshot = { state: "loggedOut", nextEvents: ["LOGIN", "SIGNUP", "GUEST"] }, @@ -141,7 +131,6 @@ describe("Login auth-service delegation", () => { mockVerifySelf.mockRejectedValue({ status: 401 }) mockPostAuth.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true } as never) mockCreateUser.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true } as never) - mockDeleteAuth.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true } as never) mockGetGuestToken.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true } as never) mockCreateGuestUser.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true } as never) mockUpdateUser.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true } as never) @@ -342,45 +331,6 @@ describe("Login auth-service delegation", () => { expect(authService.loginGuest).not.toHaveBeenCalled() }) - test("delegates allowed logout intents to authService.logout", async () => { - const { authService } = renderLogin({ - currentUser: defaultUser, - authService: createAuthServiceStub({ - currentUser: defaultUser, - snapshot: { state: "loggedIn", nextEvents: ["LOGOUT"] }, - }), - }) - - await waitFor(() => { - expect( - document.querySelector("section.simple-comment-login") - ).not.toHaveClass("is-loading") - }) - dispatchableStore.dispatch("logoutIntent") - - await waitFor(() => { - expect(authService.logout).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) - }) - expect(mockDeleteAuth).not.toHaveBeenCalled() - }) - - test("ignores logout intents when observed auth state disallows logout", async () => { - const { authService } = renderLogin({ - authService: createAuthServiceStub({ - snapshot: { - state: "loggedOut", - nextEvents: ["LOGIN", "SIGNUP", "GUEST"], - }, - }), - }) - - dispatchableStore.dispatch("logoutIntent") - - await waitFor(() => { - expect(authService.logout).not.toHaveBeenCalled() - }) - }) - test("does not call direct auth API commands from Login.svelte", () => { const loginSource = readFileSync( resolve(process.cwd(), "src/components/Login.svelte"), @@ -392,39 +342,15 @@ describe("Login auth-service delegation", () => { }) }) - test("does not publish auth session state to loginStateStore", async () => { - const setLoginState = vi.spyOn(loginStateStore, "set") - const { authService } = renderLogin({ - authService: createAuthServiceStub({ - snapshot: { state: "loggedIn", nextEvents: ["LOGOUT"] }, - }), - }) - - await waitFor(() => { - expect(authService.init).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) - }) - expect(setLoginState).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith({ - state: "loggedIn", - nextEvents: ["LOGOUT"], - }) - }) - - test("continues to publish selected tab state to loginStateStore", async () => { - const setLoginState = vi.spyOn(loginStateStore, "set") - - renderLogin({ - authService: createAuthServiceStub({ - snapshot: { - state: "loggedOut", - nextEvents: ["LOGIN", "SIGNUP", "GUEST"], - }, - }), - }) - - await fireEvent.click(await screen.findByRole("button", { name: "Login" })) + test("does not import or handle legacy auth relay stores", () => { + const loginSource = readFileSync( + resolve(process.cwd(), "src/components/Login.svelte"), + "utf8" + ) - await waitFor(() => { - expect(setLoginState).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ select: LoginTab.login }) - }) + expect(loginSource).not.toMatch(/\bdispatchableStore\b/) + expect(loginSource).not.toMatch(/\bloginStateStore\b/) + expect(loginSource).not.toMatch(/\bloginIntent\b/) + expect(loginSource).not.toMatch(/\blogoutIntent\b/) }) }) diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/components/SelfDisplay.auth-service.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/components/SelfDisplay.auth-service.test.ts index 9a1b166a..44c33d34 100644 --- a/src/tests/frontend/components/SelfDisplay.auth-service.test.ts +++ b/src/tests/frontend/components/SelfDisplay.auth-service.test.ts @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ import type { AuthService, AuthSessionState, } from "../../../lib/auth-service" -import { dispatchableStore } from "../../../lib/svelte-stores" import type { User } from "../../../lib/simple-comment-types" vi.mock("../../../frontend-utilities", async importOriginal => { @@ -82,7 +81,6 @@ describe("SelfDisplay auth-service delegation", () => { }) test("calls authService.logout directly from the logout button", async () => { - const dispatchLogoutIntent = vi.spyOn(dispatchableStore, "dispatch") const { authService } = renderSelfDisplay() await fireEvent.click( @@ -90,7 +88,6 @@ describe("SelfDisplay auth-service delegation", () => { ) expect(authService.logout).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) - expect(dispatchLogoutIntent).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith("logoutIntent") }) test("keeps the skeleton visible while auth runtime is processing", () => { diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/components/SimpleComment.auth-cleanup.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/components/SimpleComment.auth-cleanup.test.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e1f8071d --- /dev/null +++ b/src/tests/frontend/components/SimpleComment.auth-cleanup.test.ts @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +import { readFileSync } from "node:fs" +import { resolve } from "node:path" +import { describe, expect, test } from "vitest" + +const readComponentSource = (componentPath: string) => + readFileSync(resolve(process.cwd(), componentPath), "utf8") + +describe("SimpleComment auth cleanup source guards", () => { + test("SimpleComment no longer installs the temporary auth store bridge", () => { + const simpleCommentSource = readComponentSource( + "src/components/SimpleComment.svelte" + ) + + expect(simpleCommentSource).not.toMatch(/\bcreateAuthStoreBridge\b/) + expect(simpleCommentSource).not.toMatch(/\bcurrentUserStore\b/) + }) +}) From ef5b75b5c4aec8c731df9a0e7629e2154bf3ff8b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:35:52 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 095/105] Remove Login auth relay handling --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md | 2 +- src/components/Login.svelte | 48 ------------------- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 49 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md index 7b409ad7..7d11f3bd 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ This slice removes the temporary migration scaffolding left after slices 8-10. A - "Do not keep `dispatchableStore` solely so tests can spy on events that no runtime component should dispatch." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, Constraints) - "Keep positive behavior assertions against `authService` (`requestAuth()` for comments, `logout()` for self display)." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, DispatchableStore Test Caveat) -- [ ] C01 `[frontend]` Remove dead legacy relay handling and selected-tab store publication from `src/components/Login.svelte`. +- [x] C01 `[frontend]` Remove dead legacy relay handling and selected-tab store publication from `src/components/Login.svelte`. - Depends on: T01. - Validated by: T01 and existing `Login.svelte` auth-service component tests. - Trace: diff --git a/src/components/Login.svelte b/src/components/Login.svelte index 99a26a40..4b74ed3a 100644 --- a/src/components/Login.svelte +++ b/src/components/Login.svelte @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ formatUserId, } from "../frontend-utilities" import InputField from "./low-level/InputField.svelte" - import { dispatchableStore, loginStateStore } from "../lib/svelte-stores" import { isGuestId, isValidResult, @@ -50,9 +49,7 @@ let isError = false let isLoaded = false // Hide the component until isLoaded is true - let nextEvents = [] let statusMessage = "" - let authState: AuthRuntimeSnapshot["state"] | undefined = undefined let displayName = "" let displayNameHelperText = DISPLAY_NAME_HELPER_TEXT @@ -104,7 +101,6 @@ }) } - /** Note that usually these onClick events will not be used. Rather, "loginIntent" will be sent.*/ const onGuestClick = async (e: Event) => { e.preventDefault() await submitGuestLogin() @@ -181,11 +177,8 @@ const handleAuthRuntimeSnapshot = ({ state, - nextEvents: snapshotNextEvents, error, }: AuthRuntimeSnapshot) => { - authState = state - nextEvents = snapshotNextEvents ?? [] isLoaded = isLoaded || (["loggedIn", "loggedOut", "error"] as string[]).includes(state) @@ -495,44 +488,6 @@ checkUserIdExists_debounced(userId) } - const unsubscribeDispatchableStore = dispatchableStore.subscribe(event => { - switch (event.name) { - case "logoutIntent": { - const canLogout = nextEvents?.includes("LOGOUT") - if (canLogout) authService.logout() - else console.warn("Received logoutIntent at state", authState) - break - } - - case "loginIntent": { - const canLogin = nextEvents?.some(event => - ["LOGIN", "GUEST", "SIGNUP"].includes(event) - ) - if (canLogin) { - switch (selectedIndex) { - case LoginTab.guest: - submitGuestLogin() - break - case LoginTab.signup: - submitSignup() - break - case LoginTab.login: - submitLogin() - break - default: - reportLocalError(`Unknown selectedTabIndex ${selectedIndex}`) - break - } - } else console.warn("Received loginIntent at state", authState) - break - } - - default: - // Intentionally left blank. Do not respond to other events. - break - } - }) - const checkPasswordValid = () => { const result = validatePassword(userPassword) @@ -598,14 +553,11 @@ }) onDestroy(() => { - unsubscribeDispatchableStore() unsubscribeAuthRuntimeSnapshot() unsubscribeAuthCurrentUser() unsubscribeAuthRequest() }) - $: loginStateStore.set({ select: selectedIndex }) - $: selectedTab = selectedIndex $: { From c30b7081222ce855bc09c7127cc62ef894ab32fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:36:41 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 096/105] Subscribe SimpleComment to auth service --- docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md | 2 +- src/components/SimpleComment.svelte | 9 ++------- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md index 7d11f3bd..21b131e6 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ This slice removes the temporary migration scaffolding left after slices 8-10. A - "keep `bind:selectedTab` support through the existing `selectedTab` export and `$: selectedTab = selectedIndex`" (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) - "keep `simple_comment_login_tab` localStorage persistence." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) -- [ ] C02 `[frontend]` Replace `src/components/SimpleComment.svelte` bridge/global-store plumbing with a direct `authService.currentUser` subscription. +- [x] C02 `[frontend]` Replace `src/components/SimpleComment.svelte` bridge/global-store plumbing with a direct `authService.currentUser` subscription. - Depends on: T01. - Validated by: T01 and `yarn typecheck`. - Trace: diff --git a/src/components/SimpleComment.svelte b/src/components/SimpleComment.svelte index 3ec20d65..ae9ab5e2 100644 --- a/src/components/SimpleComment.svelte +++ b/src/components/SimpleComment.svelte @@ -4,9 +4,7 @@ createAuthService, type AuthService, } from "../lib/auth-service" - import { createAuthStoreBridge } from "../lib/auth-store-bridge" import type { User } from "../lib/simple-comment-types" - import { currentUserStore } from "../lib/svelte-stores" import DiscussionDisplay from "./DiscussionDisplay.svelte" import SelfDisplay from "./SelfDisplay.svelte" export let discussionId @@ -14,15 +12,12 @@ export let currentUser: User | undefined = undefined const authService: AuthService = createAuthService({ initialUser: currentUser }) - const destroyAuthStoreBridge = createAuthStoreBridge(authService) - - const unsubscribeCurrentUserStore = currentUserStore.subscribe( + const unsubscribeAuthCurrentUser = authService.currentUser.subscribe( value => (currentUser = value) ) onDestroy(() => { - destroyAuthStoreBridge() - unsubscribeCurrentUserStore() + unsubscribeAuthCurrentUser() authService.destroy() }) From 5cfe7abbde8cf434be725c5366c5b3dd950b6654 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:38:35 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 097/105] Remove obsolete auth store tests --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md | 2 +- src/tests/frontend/auth-store-bridge.test.ts | 126 ------------------ src/tests/frontend/components/vitest.setup.ts | 17 --- src/tests/frontend/svelte-stores.test.ts | 11 -- 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 155 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 src/tests/frontend/auth-store-bridge.test.ts delete mode 100644 src/tests/frontend/svelte-stores.test.ts diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md index 21b131e6..60580042 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ This slice removes the temporary migration scaffolding left after slices 8-10. A - "Have `SimpleComment.svelte` subscribe directly to `authService.currentUser` to keep its local `currentUser` prop flow updated." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, In Scope) - "`SimpleComment.svelte` subscribes directly to `authService.currentUser`, preserving the existing local `currentUser` prop flow without the temporary bridge." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, Risks and Mitigations) -- [ ] T02 `[tests]` Remove obsolete bridge/store test dependencies before deleting their modules. +- [x] T02 `[tests]` Remove obsolete bridge/store test dependencies before deleting their modules. - Depends on: C01, C02. - Required cleanup: - remove `src/tests/frontend/auth-store-bridge.test.ts`, diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/auth-store-bridge.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/auth-store-bridge.test.ts deleted file mode 100644 index ca7ea451..00000000 --- a/src/tests/frontend/auth-store-bridge.test.ts +++ /dev/null @@ -1,126 +0,0 @@ -import { beforeEach, describe, expect, jest, test } from "@jest/globals" -import type { Writable } from "svelte/store" -import { get, writable } from "svelte/store" -import type { StateValue } from "xstate" -import { createAuthStoreBridge } from "../../lib/auth-store-bridge" -import type { - AuthRuntimeSnapshot, - AuthService, - AuthSessionState, -} from "../../lib/auth-service" -import type { User } from "../../lib/simple-comment-types" - -type AuthServiceStub = AuthService & { - currentUserStore: Writable - authRuntimeSnapshotStore: Writable -} - -type LegacyLoginState = { - state?: StateValue - nextEvents?: string[] -} - -const defaultUser: User = { - id: "alice-user", - name: "Alice Example", - email: "alice@example.com", -} - -const defaultSnapshot: AuthRuntimeSnapshot = { - state: "loggedOut", - nextEvents: ["LOGIN", "SIGNUP", "GUEST"], -} - -const createAuthServiceStub = ({ - currentUser, - snapshot = defaultSnapshot, -}: { - currentUser?: User - snapshot?: AuthRuntimeSnapshot -} = {}): AuthServiceStub => { - const currentUserStore = writable(currentUser) - const authRuntimeSnapshotStore = writable(snapshot) - - return { - sessionState: writable(snapshot.state), - currentUser: { subscribe: currentUserStore.subscribe }, - authRequest: writable({ status: "idle" }), - authOutcome: writable({ status: "none" }), - authRuntimeSnapshot: { subscribe: authRuntimeSnapshotStore.subscribe }, - init: jest.fn(async () => undefined), - requestAuth: jest.fn(() => ({ requestId: "request-1" })), - clearAuthOutcome: jest.fn(), - cancelAuthRequest: jest.fn(), - reportLocalValidationError: jest.fn(), - login: jest.fn(async () => undefined), - signup: jest.fn(async () => undefined), - loginGuest: jest.fn(async () => undefined), - logout: jest.fn(async () => undefined), - destroy: jest.fn(), - currentUserStore, - authRuntimeSnapshotStore, - } -} - -const createLegacyStores = () => ({ - currentUserStore: writable(undefined), - loginStateStore: writable({ - state: undefined, - nextEvents: undefined, - }), -}) - -describe("auth store bridge", () => { - beforeEach(() => { - jest.clearAllMocks() - }) - - test("publishes authService.currentUser to currentUserStore", () => { - const authService = createAuthServiceStub() - const legacyStores = createLegacyStores() - const cleanup = createAuthStoreBridge(authService, legacyStores) - - authService.currentUserStore.set(defaultUser) - - expect(get(legacyStores.currentUserStore)).toEqual(defaultUser) - - cleanup() - }) - - test("publishes auth runtime snapshots to loginStateStore", () => { - const authService = createAuthServiceStub() - const legacyStores = createLegacyStores() - const cleanup = createAuthStoreBridge(authService, legacyStores) - - authService.authRuntimeSnapshotStore.set({ - state: "loggedIn", - nextEvents: ["LOGOUT"], - }) - - expect(get(legacyStores.loginStateStore)).toEqual({ - state: "loggedIn", - nextEvents: ["LOGOUT"], - }) - - cleanup() - }) - - test("stops publishing service updates after cleanup", () => { - const authService = createAuthServiceStub() - const legacyStores = createLegacyStores() - const cleanup = createAuthStoreBridge(authService, legacyStores) - - cleanup() - authService.currentUserStore.set(defaultUser) - authService.authRuntimeSnapshotStore.set({ - state: "loggedIn", - nextEvents: ["LOGOUT"], - }) - - expect(get(legacyStores.currentUserStore)).toBeUndefined() - expect(get(legacyStores.loginStateStore)).toEqual({ - state: "loggedOut", - nextEvents: ["LOGIN", "SIGNUP", "GUEST"], - }) - }) -}) diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/components/vitest.setup.ts b/src/tests/frontend/components/vitest.setup.ts index 75e9bc80..3174a3bb 100644 --- a/src/tests/frontend/components/vitest.setup.ts +++ b/src/tests/frontend/components/vitest.setup.ts @@ -1,29 +1,12 @@ import { cleanup } from "@testing-library/svelte" import "@testing-library/jest-dom/vitest" import { afterEach, beforeEach } from "vitest" -import { - currentUserStore, - dispatchableStore, - loginStateStore, -} from "../../../lib/svelte-stores" - -const resetStores = (): void => { - currentUserStore.set(undefined) - loginStateStore.set({ - state: undefined, - nextEvents: undefined, - select: undefined, - }) - dispatchableStore.dispatch("init") -} beforeEach(() => { localStorage.clear() - resetStores() }) afterEach(() => { cleanup() localStorage.clear() - resetStores() }) diff --git a/src/tests/frontend/svelte-stores.test.ts b/src/tests/frontend/svelte-stores.test.ts deleted file mode 100644 index 7ac692d9..00000000 --- a/src/tests/frontend/svelte-stores.test.ts +++ /dev/null @@ -1,11 +0,0 @@ -import { get } from "svelte/store" -import { dispatchableStore } from "../../lib/svelte-stores" - -describe("dispatchableStore", () => { - it("should dispatch and update the state correctly", () => { - const testEventName = "testEvent" - dispatchableStore.dispatch(testEventName) - - expect(get(dispatchableStore)).toEqual({ name: testEventName }) - }) -}) From e70a4cf39800a5e4febf5929900ee8ea79b43702 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:40:04 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 098/105] Delete obsolete auth relay stores --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md | 2 +- src/lib/auth-store-bridge.ts | 40 ------------------- src/lib/svelte-stores.ts | 31 -------------- 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 72 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 src/lib/auth-store-bridge.ts delete mode 100644 src/lib/svelte-stores.ts diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md index 60580042..0ed7b1d9 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ This slice removes the temporary migration scaffolding left after slices 8-10. A - "remove `src/tests/frontend/svelte-stores.test.ts`" (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) - "remove legacy store resets from component test setup once no component tests import those stores." (`docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md`, Detailed File Impact) -- [ ] C03 `[cleanup]` Delete obsolete bridge/store modules and prove no runtime or test imports remain. +- [x] C03 `[cleanup]` Delete obsolete bridge/store modules and prove no runtime or test imports remain. - Depends on: T02. - Validated by: repository import search, `yarn typecheck`, and `yarn run ci:local`. - Required cleanup: diff --git a/src/lib/auth-store-bridge.ts b/src/lib/auth-store-bridge.ts deleted file mode 100644 index dd6d54c8..00000000 --- a/src/lib/auth-store-bridge.ts +++ /dev/null @@ -1,40 +0,0 @@ -import type { Unsubscriber, Writable } from "svelte/store" -import type { StateValue } from "xstate" -import type { AuthService } from "./auth-service" -import { - currentUserStore as defaultCurrentUserStore, - loginStateStore as defaultLoginStateStore, -} from "./svelte-stores" -import type { LoginTab, User } from "./simple-comment-types" - -type LegacyLoginState = { - state?: StateValue - nextEvents?: string[] - select?: LoginTab -} - -type AuthStoreBridgeStores = { - currentUserStore?: Writable - loginStateStore?: Writable -} - -export const createAuthStoreBridge = ( - authService: AuthService, - stores: AuthStoreBridgeStores = {} -): Unsubscriber => { - const currentUserStore = stores.currentUserStore ?? defaultCurrentUserStore - const loginStateStore = stores.loginStateStore ?? defaultLoginStateStore - - const unsubscribeCurrentUser = authService.currentUser.subscribe(user => { - currentUserStore.set(user) - }) - const unsubscribeAuthRuntimeSnapshot = - authService.authRuntimeSnapshot.subscribe(({ state, nextEvents }) => { - loginStateStore.set({ state, nextEvents }) - }) - - return () => { - unsubscribeCurrentUser() - unsubscribeAuthRuntimeSnapshot() - } -} diff --git a/src/lib/svelte-stores.ts b/src/lib/svelte-stores.ts deleted file mode 100644 index bcdf8848..00000000 --- a/src/lib/svelte-stores.ts +++ /dev/null @@ -1,31 +0,0 @@ -import type { StateValue } from "xstate" -import type { User } from "../lib/simple-comment-types" -import { writable } from "svelte/store" -import { LoginTab } from "../lib/simple-comment-types" - -type EventDispatch = { name: string } - -const createDispatchableStore = () => { - const { subscribe, set, update } = writable({ name: "init" }) - - return { - subscribe, - set, - update, - dispatch: (eventName: string) => set({ name: eventName }), - } -} - -export const dispatchableStore = createDispatchableStore() - -export const loginStateStore = writable<{ - state?: StateValue - nextEvents?: string[] - select?: LoginTab -}>({ - state: undefined, - nextEvents: undefined, - select: undefined, -}) - -export const currentUserStore = writable(undefined) From 3a30bace84532a7eb318d1ce02041804e438f4fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:40:22 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 099/105] Record priority 5 slice 11 completion --- docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md | 12 +++++++++++- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md index aff9953e..e90949cb 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md @@ -113,7 +113,17 @@ - Kept out-of-scope cleanup deferred: `Login.svelte` logout relay handling, legacy store definitions, and the temporary auth-service bridge remain for the planned cleanup slice. - Validation evidence: `yarn run ci:local` passed after Slice 10 implementation. -- 11. [ ] Draft a cleanup slice for removing the temporary auth-service bridge and any legacy auth/session store paths made obsolete by slices 8-10. +- 11. [x] Draft a cleanup slice for removing the temporary auth-service bridge and any legacy auth/session store paths made obsolete by slices 8-10. + + Findings: + + - Created and approved `docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md` and `docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md`. + - Removed `Login.svelte` legacy `dispatchableStore` / `loginStateStore` relay handling, including `loginIntent`, `logoutIntent`, and selected-tab store publication, while preserving selected-tab binding and `simple_comment_login_tab` persistence. + - Replaced `SimpleComment.svelte` temporary bridge/global-store plumbing with a direct widget-scoped `authService.currentUser` subscription. + - Removed obsolete bridge/store unit tests and legacy store resets from component test setup after migrated component tests covered the auth-service path directly. + - Deleted `src/lib/auth-store-bridge.ts` and `src/lib/svelte-stores.ts` after repository import search confirmed no runtime or test imports remained. + - Validation evidence: repository import search found no `auth-store-bridge` or `svelte-stores` references under `src`, focused auth-service component tests passed, and `yarn run ci:local` passed. + - Cypress note: Cypress bootstrap was fixed separately in commit `53a1ec9`, but known behavioral Cypress failures remain intentionally out of scope for this cleanup slice. - 12. [ ] Decide whether auth state should be passed directly through component props or exposed through a thin auth-service-backed store. From 3b786748dd37c21fc9f77802b49aea425471f4e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:55:05 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 100/105] Archive priority 5 slice 11 docs --- .../Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md | 4 ++-- docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) rename docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md (98%) rename docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md (99%) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md similarity index 98% rename from docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md rename to docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md index 0ed7b1d9..38540d3c 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md +++ b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Checklist.md @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ # Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 11 Checklist -Status: approved +Status: archived, completed Classification: approved implementation checklist -Source plan: `docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md` +Source plan: `docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md` Parent plan: `docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md` (Item 11: Draft a cleanup slice for removing the temporary auth-service bridge and any legacy auth/session store paths made obsolete by slices 8-10) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md similarity index 99% rename from docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md rename to docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md index 489b7009..31d7071a 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md +++ b/docs/archive/Priority5AuthServiceSlice11Plan.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Priority 5 Auth Service Slice 11 Plan -Status: approved +Status: archived, completed Source backlog: `docs/RepoHealthImprovementBacklog.md` (`Priority 5`) From ea651cc0ddcfd7ccae3f314b4b06627ab25827a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:59:01 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 101/105] Record priority 5 auth state architecture decision --- docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md index e90949cb..fbf3b928 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md @@ -125,7 +125,16 @@ - Validation evidence: repository import search found no `auth-store-bridge` or `svelte-stores` references under `src`, focused auth-service component tests passed, and `yarn run ci:local` passed. - Cypress note: Cypress bootstrap was fixed separately in commit `53a1ec9`, but known behavioral Cypress failures remain intentionally out of scope for this cleanup slice. -- 12. [ ] Decide whether auth state should be passed directly through component props or exposed through a thin auth-service-backed store. +- 12. [x] Decide whether auth state should be passed directly through component props or exposed through a thin auth-service-backed store. + + Findings: + + - Decision: prefer the current direct widget-scoped `authService` plus explicit props architecture. + - `SimpleComment.svelte` remains the composition root: it creates one widget-scoped `authService`, subscribes to `authService.currentUser`, and passes `authService` / `currentUser` to children that need auth behavior or identity display. + - Components that need auth behavior should receive `authService`; components that only need identity display should receive `currentUser`. + - Do not add a new global auth store, singleton auth service, replacement event bus, or speculative `AuthRuntime.svelte` as part of Priority 5. + - A thin auth-service-backed store remains a possible later slice only if repeated prop threading or shared derived auth views become a concrete maintenance problem. + - Architectural impact: this keeps auth ownership in `auth-service.ts`, composition ownership in `SimpleComment.svelte`, and component dependencies explicit and testable. - 13. [ ] Prefer direct `auth-service` API or a thin service-backed store; avoid introducing another ad-hoc event bus. From 458fea333c193ea49a2854918bf3b5b2d15c528e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 17:00:28 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 102/105] Record priority 5 auth eventing decision --- docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md index fbf3b928..d597650e 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md @@ -136,7 +136,15 @@ - A thin auth-service-backed store remains a possible later slice only if repeated prop threading or shared derived auth views become a concrete maintenance problem. - Architectural impact: this keeps auth ownership in `auth-service.ts`, composition ownership in `SimpleComment.svelte`, and component dependencies explicit and testable. -- 13. [ ] Prefer direct `auth-service` API or a thin service-backed store; avoid introducing another ad-hoc event bus. +- 13. [x] Prefer direct `auth-service` API or a thin service-backed store; avoid introducing another ad-hoc event bus. + + Findings: + + - Resolved by item 12's architecture decision: prefer direct widget-scoped `authService` plus explicit props for current Priority 5 work. + - Do not introduce another ad-hoc event bus. The former `dispatchableStore` / `loginStateStore` relay path has been removed, and future auth interactions should not recreate that pattern under a new name. + - Use `authService` directly for auth commands and auth runtime observation at component boundaries that need behavior. + - Use `currentUser` props for identity display where no auth command/runtime behavior is needed. + - Keep a thin service-backed store as a deferred option only if a future slice demonstrates concrete prop-threading or shared-derived-state pressure. - 14. [ ] Add validation expectations per slice: fail-first tests in one pass, production implementation in a later pass, no test edits during implementation unless the implementation session stops and explains why the test is wrong. From f1e85c1b5d0ee67cbbd0d65478960f4d6573d454 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:07:47 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 103/105] Record priority 5 validation expectations --- docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md index d597650e..53224bd6 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md @@ -146,6 +146,14 @@ - Use `currentUser` props for identity display where no auth command/runtime behavior is needed. - Keep a thin service-backed store as a deferred option only if a future slice demonstrates concrete prop-threading or shared-derived-state pressure. -- 14. [ ] Add validation expectations per slice: fail-first tests in one pass, production implementation in a later pass, no test edits during implementation unless the implementation session stops and explains why the test is wrong. +- 14. [x] Add validation expectations per slice: fail-first tests in one pass, production implementation in a later pass, no test edits during implementation unless the implementation session stops and explains why the test is wrong. + + Findings: + + - Resolved as a Priority 5 governance expectation rather than a new behavior slice. + - `docs/norms/implementation.md` already requires atomic checklist-item commits, item checkoff in the same commit, baseline validation, production-code-first fixes, broad regression checks, and stop conditions when scope or tests are wrong. + - Priority 5 additionally adopts the explicit test/code separation guard used during the auth-service slices: fail-first tests are written in their own pass, production implementation happens in a later pass, and tests must move from failing to passing through production code changes only. + - If a test cannot be made green without editing the test during an implementation pass, implementation must stop and explain why the test is bad before any test change is made. + - Documentation-only slices may satisfy validation by checking references, commands, and cited evidence consistency; they must not be used as approval for downstream behavior changes. - 15. [ ] Keep explicitly out of scope: splitting `Login.svelte` into form components, adding `auth-controller.ts`, adding `AuthRuntime.svelte`, creating broad auth workflow modules, or redesigning frontend state architecture. From 2aece141a59446f8910ca0ddbde1277af9ea02b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:09:57 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 104/105] Record priority 5 scope boundaries --- docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md index 53224bd6..ce5f3e42 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md +++ b/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md @@ -156,4 +156,12 @@ - If a test cannot be made green without editing the test during an implementation pass, implementation must stop and explain why the test is bad before any test change is made. - Documentation-only slices may satisfy validation by checking references, commands, and cited evidence consistency; they must not be used as approval for downstream behavior changes. -- 15. [ ] Keep explicitly out of scope: splitting `Login.svelte` into form components, adding `auth-controller.ts`, adding `AuthRuntime.svelte`, creating broad auth workflow modules, or redesigning frontend state architecture. +- 15. [x] Keep explicitly out of scope: splitting `Login.svelte` into form components, adding `auth-controller.ts`, adding `AuthRuntime.svelte`, creating broad auth workflow modules, or redesigning frontend state architecture. + + Findings: + + - Resolved as a Priority 5 scope boundary rather than an implementation slice. + - Priority 5 intentionally ends with the narrow auth-service ownership model, widget-scoped `authService`, and explicit component props recorded in items 12 and 13. + - Splitting `Login.svelte` into form components remains out of scope; it may be worthwhile later, but it is not required to complete the auth-service extraction. + - Adding `auth-controller.ts`, `AuthRuntime.svelte`, broad auth workflow modules, a singleton auth service, or a replacement auth event bus remains out of scope because those options would reintroduce the architecture churn Priority 5 was trying to escape. + - Any future frontend state architecture redesign should be opened as a separate priority with its own plan, checklist, validation strategy, and explicit approval. From d12eb2c55d7cb2d05f2c263295b02ef358469026 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Codex Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:11:51 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 105/105] Archive priority 5 completion docs --- docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5Completion.md | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) rename docs/{plans => archive}/Priority5Completion.md (99%) diff --git a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md b/docs/archive/Priority5Completion.md similarity index 99% rename from docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md rename to docs/archive/Priority5Completion.md index ce5f3e42..c6b214c4 100644 --- a/docs/plans/Priority5Completion.md +++ b/docs/archive/Priority5Completion.md @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ # Priority 5 Completion Items +Status: archived, completed + - 1. [x] Confirm completed baseline: `auth-service` owns login-machine runtime, initial verification, `login()`, and `logout()` behavior. Findings: