Skip to content

rename lindblad to jump_operator - #44

Merged
ChristophHotter merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
rename_lindblad
Aug 20, 2026
Merged

rename lindblad to jump_operator#44
ChristophHotter merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
rename_lindblad

Conversation

@ChristophHotter

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Benchmark Results

Details
Benchmark suite Current: 6384364 Previous: 7620432 Ratio
Correlations/two-time/single photon cavity 198735793 ns 182943988 ns 1.09
Interaction Picture/coefficient matrix M/analytical (2 equal modes) 13721 ns 14176 ns 0.97
Interaction Picture/coefficient matrix M/numerical (ODE) 66410 ns 66143 ns 1.00
Interaction Picture/coupling matrix evaluation/2 modes 102.44957081545064 ns 96.2601880877743 ns 1.06
Interaction Picture/coupling matrix evaluation/4 modes 218.1074074074074 ns 191.75118858954042 ns 1.14
Interaction Picture/operator substitution/TLS cascade 18698 ns 17964 ns 1.04
Pulse Couplings/multi-pulse/input 2 modes 423629 ns 407237 ns 1.04
Pulse Couplings/multi-pulse/output 2 modes 482968 ns 457893 ns 1.05
Pulse Couplings/single-pulse/input 350829 ns 368086 ns 0.95
Pulse Couplings/single-pulse/input Gaussian 93.51572327044025 ns 91.47803347280335 ns 1.02
Pulse Couplings/single-pulse/output 386472 ns 402400 ns 0.96
Pulse Couplings/single-pulse/output Gaussian 93.58909853249476 ns 90.99686192468619 ns 1.03
SLH Algebra/closure evaluation/2-QD waveguide H(t) 38198 ns 34223 ns 1.12
SLH Algebra/closure evaluation/2-QD waveguide L(t) 3666.75 ns 3236.125 ns 1.13
SLH Algebra/numeric/2-QD waveguide composition 32349 ns 30337 ns 1.07
SLH Algebra/symbolic/3-cavity cascade 7729.25 ns 6953 ns 1.11
SLH Algebra/symbolic/concatenate + cascade 2473.777777777778 ns 2236.3333333333335 ns 1.11
SLH Algebra/symbolic/feedback OPO loop 7453.75 ns 5947 ns 1.25
Translation/closure evaluation/3-cavity H(t) 9254 ns 9388 ns 0.99
Translation/closure evaluation/3-cavity L(t) 9214 ns 9387 ns 0.98
Translation/static/atom-cavity 49575 ns 40095 ns 1.24
Translation/time-dependent/3-cavity H+L 666024 ns 587876 ns 1.13
Translation/time-dependent/atom-cavity 164038 ns 123259 ns 1.33

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark 'Benchmark Results'.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.30.

Benchmark suite Current: 6384364 Previous: 7620432 Ratio
Translation/time-dependent/atom-cavity 164038 ns 123259 ns 1.33

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.33%. Comparing base (7620432) to head (6384364).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #44      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.31%   97.33%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files           4        4              
  Lines         410      413       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits          399      402       +3     
  Misses         11       11              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ChristophHotter
ChristophHotter merged commit 4220857 into main Aug 20, 2026
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant