Make Rspack GA and document backports#11213
Conversation
|
|
||
| {{% alert type="info" %}} | ||
| This setting was introduced in [Mendix 11.9.0](/releasenotes/studio-pro/11.9/). It is only available for applications using React client. | ||
| This setting was introduced in [Mendix 11.9.0](/releasenotes/studio-pro/11.9/) and available in Mendix 11.6.7 MTS. It is only available for applications using React client. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This sentence sounds a bit confusing to me. Maybe something for docs team to look at more carefully?
|
|
||
| * **Rspack**: Use Rspack to bundle the React client app as a faster, more memory-efficient bundler | ||
| * **Rollup**: Use Rollup to bundle the React client app (default) | ||
| * **Rspack**: Use Rspack to bundle the React client application for faster build times and lower memory usage. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use Rspack application bundler for faster build times and lower memory usage.
and
Use Rollup application bundler (default).
|
@EnasAbdelrazek @exec-astraea is Rspack in GA or public beta? In the recent 10.24.21 RNs Rspack was described in public beta, but this PR describes it as in GA. |
|
@ConnorLand we made a decision to mark it as GA in all versions of Mendix to avoid confusing customers. |
@EnasAbdelrazek Ok, I'm sure you have good reasons. But I'm a little confused by your use of "we made a decision to mark it as". Objectively, is Rspack in GA, or beta? I have consulted its website and can't find clear answers. What is the objective truth? |
|
@ConnorLand it's GA. |
|
Ok thanks @EnasAbdelrazek and @exec-astraea I'll remove the beta mentions from the 10.24.x RNs. |
|
Rspack itself has been GA since we first started using it, but support for Rspack in SP was initially Beta and later became GA. |
|
I have all my release-related questions answered, so I'll get out of your PR @MarkvanMents . If anyone wants me to change RN language, just ping me on Slack. |
5 participants
It is for 10.24.21 and 11.6.7