From 385a7c2aa595d74ef9d06672186af1bfbba1dc62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "copilot-swe-agent[bot]" <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 06:32:41 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Initial plan From ed3084a97d4104bbf10fde4cd18b48c5d7325201 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "copilot-swe-agent[bot]" <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 06:40:07 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] docs: add structured test coverage gap audit issues Co-authored-by: VoDaiLocz <88762074+VoDaiLocz@users.noreply.github.com> Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/VoDaiLocz/Lock-ART./sessions/924ae880-8a6b-4617-b51d-392969905a0e --- docs/PRODUCT_AUDIT.md | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/PRODUCT_AUDIT.md b/docs/PRODUCT_AUDIT.md index 1e66dbd..f20d16a 100644 --- a/docs/PRODUCT_AUDIT.md +++ b/docs/PRODUCT_AUDIT.md @@ -58,6 +58,64 @@ AuraLock started as a clean research/demo repo with working algorithms, but it w - Benchmark against actual LoRA / DreamBooth / style-mimicry pipelines - Add purification robustness tests against external repos such as `robust-style-mimicry` +## Audit: Test Coverage Gap Issues + +### 1) Regression baseline coverage for protection outputs +- **Missing test coverage area:** No stable regression baselines for `protect` output metrics (quality/style/readability) across code changes. +- **Risk if not covered:** Silent behavior drift can change protection strength or image quality without detection. +- **Suggested test strategy:** Add deterministic fixture inputs and snapshot-style assertions for key report values with bounded tolerances per profile. +- **Acceptance criteria:** CI fails when baseline metrics move outside agreed tolerance bands for the same fixture/profile combination. +- **Labels:** `testing`, `regression`, `quality` + +### 2) Cross-module integration flow validation +- **Missing test coverage area:** Incomplete end-to-end flow tests covering `load -> protect -> analyze -> report/save` across service and CLI boundaries. +- **Risk if not covered:** Individually passing unit tests can still hide broken integration contracts and malformed outputs. +- **Suggested test strategy:** Add integration tests that execute full workflows on sample images and assert final artifacts + report structure. +- **Acceptance criteria:** A single integration suite validates expected files, report keys, and non-empty analysis metrics for successful runs. +- **Labels:** `testing`, `integration`, `cli` + +### 3) CLI end-to-end command matrix expansion +- **Missing test coverage area:** Limited end-to-end coverage for `protect`, `analyze`, `demo`, `webui`, and argument/profile combinations. +- **Risk if not covered:** User-facing commands can regress even if internal APIs remain correct. +- **Suggested test strategy:** Use `CliRunner` to cover happy-path and invalid-argument matrices, including profile presets and report options. +- **Acceptance criteria:** Each public CLI command has at least one passing end-to-end test and one explicit failure-path test. +- **Labels:** `testing`, `cli`, `e2e` + +### 4) Docker workflow runtime validation +- **Missing test coverage area:** Docker assets exist, but tests do not validate container build/run workflows for application and benchmark images. +- **Risk if not covered:** Published images may build but fail at runtime due to dependency, entrypoint, or path-mapping issues. +- **Suggested test strategy:** Add CI job(s) to build both Dockerfiles and run smoke commands (`auralock --help`, benchmark preflight) in containers. +- **Acceptance criteria:** CI verifies image build + smoke execution for `Dockerfile` and `Dockerfile.benchmark`. +- **Labels:** `testing`, `docker`, `ci` + +### 5) Release/package verification checks +- **Missing test coverage area:** No automated validation for wheel/sdist creation, installability, script entry points, and version metadata consistency. +- **Risk if not covered:** Broken releases can be published with unusable artifacts or mismatched package metadata. +- **Suggested test strategy:** Add release-gate workflow to build artifacts, install from built wheel in a clean env, and verify `auralock --version`. +- **Acceptance criteria:** Release CI must pass package build, install, and CLI smoke checks before publish steps proceed. +- **Labels:** `testing`, `release`, `packaging` + +### 6) Benchmark reproducibility assertions +- **Missing test coverage area:** Benchmark tests emphasize planning/manifests but do not assert reproducibility under fixed seeds/configuration. +- **Risk if not covered:** Benchmark comparisons may be noisy or non-repeatable, reducing confidence in reported improvements. +- **Suggested test strategy:** Add reproducibility tests that run benchmark routines twice with fixed settings and compare summary metrics/manifests. +- **Acceptance criteria:** Repeated benchmark runs under fixed seed/config produce matching manifest content and stable summary outputs. +- **Labels:** `testing`, `benchmark`, `reproducibility` + +### 7) Failure-path and resiliency coverage +- **Missing test coverage area:** Partial failure-path tests; gaps remain for file I/O permissions, missing/corrupt inputs, and partial batch failures. +- **Risk if not covered:** Real-world errors can produce unclear messages, silent skips, or incomplete outputs. +- **Suggested test strategy:** Add explicit negative tests for invalid files, write failures, and per-file batch error handling with assertive messaging. +- **Acceptance criteria:** Failure-path tests assert non-zero exit behavior (or controlled continuation) and clear user-facing error diagnostics. +- **Labels:** `testing`, `reliability`, `error-handling` + +### 8) Image output validation after save/load roundtrips +- **Missing test coverage area:** Current image tests are lightweight; gaps remain in post-save/load validation for shape, dtype, bounds, and format fidelity. +- **Risk if not covered:** Saved outputs may degrade or become invalid while tests still pass. +- **Suggested test strategy:** Add roundtrip tests per supported extension validating size, channel layout, dtype/range, and expected tolerance envelopes. +- **Acceptance criteria:** Save/load tests cover supported formats and verify output invariants + bounded pixel drift where lossy encoding applies. +- **Labels:** `testing`, `image-io`, `validation` + ## Why This Matters `MiroFish` looks professional because it combines code with deployment, environment setup, workflows, and clearer system boundaries. AuraLock is still smaller in scope, but it now has a cleaner runtime boundary, real batch/CLI behavior, deployment scaffolding, and a default protection mode aligned with the actual artist-protection goal instead of remaining just a classifier-attack demo.