Compare existing project board tools against v1's positioning.
Tools to cover: Linear, Notion, GitHub Projects, Plane, Trello,
Asana. Add others if the agent's research surfaces them as
relevant.
Per tool:
- (a) What they do well. Concrete features that v1 should
consider matching or beating.
- (b) What they don't do well. Friction points or absent
features.
- (c) Where v1 is differentiated. v1's positioning is
agent-native + GitHub-substrate-respecting + OSS-deployable.
Identify where each competitor falls short on at least one of
these axes.
Output a "must match or beat" list per competitor — two or
three features each that v1 should benchmark against.
Soft input to: any UI track issue (#30–#35) where competitive
parity matters, plus #44 (agent-native UX patterns) for the
agent-handling subset.
Output: docs/research/0002-competitive-analysis.md
Compare existing project board tools against v1's positioning.
Tools to cover: Linear, Notion, GitHub Projects, Plane, Trello,
Asana. Add others if the agent's research surfaces them as
relevant.
Per tool:
consider matching or beating.
features.
agent-native + GitHub-substrate-respecting + OSS-deployable.
Identify where each competitor falls short on at least one of
these axes.
Output a "must match or beat" list per competitor — two or
three features each that v1 should benchmark against.
Soft input to: any UI track issue (#30–#35) where competitive
parity matters, plus #44 (agent-native UX patterns) for the
agent-handling subset.
Output:
docs/research/0002-competitive-analysis.md